Contextual confusability leads to targeted hyperarticulation

Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2014

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 1970-1975

  Buz, Esteban ^a   Jaeger, T Florian ^a   Tanenhaus, Michael K ^a  

^a Information Systems   (United States)

Author keywords

Communication; Human experimentation; Language understanding; Linguistics; Psychology; Speech recognition

Indexed keywords

PRODUCTION CONTROL; SPEECH COMMUNICATION;

CO-PRESENT; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATIONS; HYPERARTICULATION; LANGUAGE PRODUCTION; LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDING; PRODUCTION PLANNING; PRODUCTION SYSTEM; PSYCHOLOGY; ROBUST COMMUNICATION; SPEECH PRODUCTION;

SPEECH RECOGNITION;

EID: 85039416891     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Arnold, J. E. (2008). Reference production: Production-internal and addressee-oriented processes. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(4), 495-527.
2. Baese-Berk, M. & Goldrick, M. (2009). Mechanisms of interaction in speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(4), 527-554.
3. Bard, E. G., Anderson, A. H., Sotillo, C., Aylett, M. P., Doherty-Sneddon, G., & Newlands, A. (2000). Controlling the intelligibility of referring expressions in dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 42(1), 1-22.
4. Bell, A., Brenier, J. M., Gregory, M., Girand, C., & Jurafsky, D. (2009). Predictability effects on durations of content and function words in conversational English. Journal of Memory and Language, 60(1), 92-111.
5. Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2014). Praat: doing phonetics by computer.
6. Gahl, S., Yao, Y., & Johnson, K. (2012). Why reduce? Phonological neighborhood density and phonetic reduction in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(4), 789-806.
7. Gruenstein, A., McGraw, I., & Badr, I. (2008). The WAMI toolkit for developing, deploying and evaluating web-accessible multimodal interfaces. In 10th international conference on multimodal interfaces.
8. Houde, J. F. & Jordan, M. I. (1998). Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production. Science, 279(1213), 1213-1216.
9. Jaeger, T. F. (2013). Production preferences cannot be understood without reference to communication. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 230.
10. Jaeger, T. F. & Ferreira, V. S. (2013). Seeking predictions from a predictive framework. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 359-360.
11. Kessinger, R. H. & Blumstein, S. E. (1998). Effects of speaking rate on voice-onset time and vowel production: Some implications for perception studies. Journal of Phonetics, 26(2), 117-128.
12. Kirov, C. & Wilson, C. (2012). The specificity of online variation in speech production. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 587-592). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
13. Kirov, C. & Wilson, C. (2013). Bayesian speech production: Evidence from latency and hyperarticulation. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 788-793). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
14. Lindblom, B. (1990). Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In W. J. Hardcastle & A. Marchal (Eds.), Speech production and speech modeling (pp. 403-439). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
15. Lockridge, C. B. & Brennan, S. E. (2002). Addressees' needs influence speakers' early syntactic choices. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), 550-7.
16. Oldfield, R. C. & Wingfield, A. (1965). Response latencies in naming objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17(4), 273-281.
17. Sadat, J., Martin, C. D., Costa, A., & Alario, F.-X. (2013). Reconciling phonological neighborhood effects in speech production through single trial analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 68C, 33-58.
18. Scarborough, R. (2010). Lexical and contextual predictability: Confluent effects on the production of vowels. In C. Fougeron, B. Kuehnert, M. Imperio, & N. Vallee (Eds.), Laboratory phonology 10 (Vol. 10, pp. 557-586). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
19. Schertz, J. (2013). Exaggeration of featural contrasts in clarifications of misheard speech in English. Journal of Phonetics, 41(3-4), 249-263.
20. Wei, K. & Körding, K. P. (2009). Relevance of error: what drives motor adaptation? Journal of Neurophysiology, 101, 655-664.