The Specificity of Online Variation in Speech Production

Building Bridges Across Cognitive Sciences Around the World - Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 587-592

  Kirov, Christo ^a   Wilson, Colin ^a  

^a Department of Cognitive Science ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian modeling; communication; lexical competition; Speech production

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; SPEECH COMMUNICATION;

BAYESIAN MODELLING; COGNITIVE PROCESS; CONTEXTUAL PROPERTIES; DENSITY PROPERTY; LEXICAL COMPETITION; NEIGHBOURHOOD; PROPERTY; SPEECH PRODUCTION; TARGET WORDS;

LINGUISTICS;

EID: 85114776826     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Aylett, M., & Turk, A. (2004). The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: A functional explanation for relashionships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech, 47(1), 31-56.
2. Cohen-Priva, U., & Jurafsky, D. (2008, April). Phone information content influences phone duration. In Conference on prosody and language processing.
3. Dell, G. S., & Gordon, J. K. (2003). Neighbors in the lexicon: Friends or foes? In N. O. Schiller & A. S. Meyer (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities (p. 9-39). Mouton, New York.
4. Feldman, N. H., Morgan, J. L., & Griffiths, T. L. (2009). The influence of categories on perception: Explainng the perceptual magnet effect as optimal statistical inference. Psychological Review, 116(4), 752-782.
5. Frank, A. F., & Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Speaking rationally: Uniform information density as an optimal strategy for language production. In CogSci (Vol. 30, p. 939-944).
6. Genzel, D., & Charniak, E. (2002). Entropy rate constancy in text. In Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (ACL) (p. 199-206). Philadelphia.
7. Goldinger, S., & Summers, W. V. (1989). Lexical neighborhoods in speech production: A first report. In Research on Speech Percetion Progress Report (p. 331-342). Blooming-ton.
8. Jaeger, T. F. (2010). Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information density. Cognitive Psychology, 61, 23-62.
9. Lau, P. (2008). The Lombard Effect as a communicative phenomenon (Tech. Rep.). UC Berkeley.
10. Levy, R., & Jaeger, T. F. (2006). Speakers optimize information density through syntactic reduction. In NIPS (Vol. 19, p. 849-856).
11. Lindblom, B. (1990). Explaining phonetic variation: a sketch of the H&H theory. In W. Hardcastle & A. Maschal (Eds.), Speech Production and Speech Modeling (p. 403-439). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
12. Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activativation model. Ear and Hearing, 19, 1-36.
13. Marslen-Wilson, W., & Zwitserlood, P. (1989). Accessing spoken words: The importance of word onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 576-585.
14. Munson, B., & Solomon, N. P. (2004). The effect of phonological neighborhood density on vowel articulation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1048-1058.
15. Norris, D., & McQueen, J. M. (2008). Shortlist B: A Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition. Psychological Review, 115(2), 357-395.
16. Scarborough, R. A. (2004). Coarticulation structure and the lexicon. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, UCLA.
17. Scharenborg, O. (2009). Using durational cues in a computational model of spoken-word recognition. In INTER-SPEECH (p. 1675-1678).
18. Son, R. van, & Pols, L. C. (2003). How efficient is speech? In ICPhS (Vol. 25, p. 171-184).
19. Suchato, A., & Punyabukkana, P. (2005). Factors in classification of stop consonant place of articulation. In INTER-SPEECH (p. 2969-2972).
20. Wright, R. (2003). Factors of lexical competition in vowel articulation. In J. Local, R. Ogden, & R. Temple (Eds.), Phonetic Interpretation: Papers in Laboratory Phonology VI (p. 75-87). Cambridge University Press.
21. Zhao, Y., & Jurafsky, D. (2009). The effect of lexical frequency and Lombard Reflex on tone hyperarticulation. Journal of Phonetics, 37(2), 231-247.