Bayesian Speech Production: Evidence from Latency and Hyperarticulation

Cooperative Minds: Social Interaction and Group Dynamics - Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2013

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 788-793

  Kirov, Christo ^a   Wilson, Colin ^a  

^a Department of Cognitive Science ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian modeling; competition; Speech production

Indexed keywords

LINGUISTICS; SPEECH COMMUNICATION;

BAYESIAN; BAYESIAN MODELLING; CHANNEL COMMUNICATION; HYPERARTICULATION; NOISY CHANNEL; PRODUCTION PROCESS; PRODUCTION TIME; SPEECH PRODUCTION;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS;

EID: 85026614706     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Baese-Berk, M., & Goldrick, M. (2009). Mechanisms of interaction in speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 527-554.
2. Bell, A., Brenier, J. M., Gregory, M., Girand, C., & Jurafsky, D. (2009). Predictability effects on durations of content and function words in conversational english. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 92-111.
3. Buz, E., & Jaeger, T. F. (2012). Effects of phonological confusability on speech duration (poster). In The 23th CUNY sentence processing conference.
4. Dell, G. S., & Gordon, J. K. (2003). Neighbors in the lexicon: Friends or foes? In N. O. Schiller & A. S. Meyer (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities (p. 9-39). Mouton, New York.
5. Feldman, N. H., Morgan, J. L., & Griffiths, T. L. (2009). The influence of categories on perception: Explainng the perceptual magnet effect as optimal statistical inference. Psychological Review, 116(4), 752-782.
6. Ferrand, L., Segui, J., & Grainger, J. (1996). Masked priming of word and picture naming: The role of syllabic units. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(708-723).
7. Galantucci, B., Fowler, C. A., & Goldstein, L. M. (2009). Perceptuomotor compatibility effects in speech. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71(1), 1138-1149.
8. Girshick, A. R., Landy, M. S., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2011). Cardinal rules: Visual orientation perception reflects knowledge of environmental statistics. Nature Neuroscience, 14(7), 926-934.
9. Goldinger, S., & Summers, W. V. (1989). Lexical neighborhoods in speech production: A first report. In Research on Speech Percetion Progress Report (p. 331-342). Blooming-ton.
10. Gordon, P. C., & Meyer, D. E. (1984). Perceptual-motor processing of phonetic features in speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(2), 153-178.
11. Kirov, C., & Wilson, C. (2012). The specificity of online variation in speech production. In Proceedings of the 34th annual meeting of the cognitive science society. Sapporo, Japan.
12. Knill, D., & Richards, W. (1996). Perception as bayesian inference. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activativation model. Ear and Hearing, 19, 1-36.
14. Marslen-Wilson, W., & Zwitserlood, P. (1989). Accessing spoken words: The importance of word onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 576-585.
15. Meyer, D. E., & Gordon, P. C. (1985). Speech production: Motor programming of phonetic features. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 3-26.
16. Munson, B., & Solomon, N. P. (2004). The effect of phonological neighborhood density on vowel articulation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1048-1058.
17. Norris, D., & McQueen, J. M. (2008). Shortlist B: A Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition. Psychological Review, 115(2), 357-395.
18. Roelofs, A. (1997). The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition, 64, 249-284.
19. Roelofs, A. (1999). Phonological segments and features as planning units in speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 173-200.
20. Roon, K. (2012). The dynamics of phonological planning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University.
21. Sanborn, A. N., Griffiths, T. L., & Navarro, D. J. (2010). Rational approximations to rational models: Alternative algorithms for category learning. Psychological Review, 117(4), 1144-1167.
22. Wright, R. (2003). Factors of lexical competition in vowel articulation. In J. Local, R. Ogden, & R. Temple (Eds.), Phonetic Interpretation: Papers in Laboratory Phonology VI (p. 75-87). Cambridge University Press.
23. Yaniv, I., Meyer, D. E., Gordon, P. C., Huff, C. A., & Sevald, C. A. (1990). Vowel similarity, connectionist models, and syllable structure in motor programming of speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(1), 1-26.