Sociodigital Revolution: Digital Natives vs Digital Immigrants

International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 918-923

  Hakkarainen, Kai ^a   Hietajärvi, Lauri ^b   Alho, Kimmo ^b   Lonka, Kirsti ^b   Salmela Aro, Katariina ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Creative participation gap; Digital native; Sociodigital technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 85034390617     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.26094-7     Document Type: Chapter

References (39)

1. Barron B. Learning ecologies for technological fluency: gender and experience differences. Journal of Educational Computing Research 2004, 31:1-36.
2. Barron B. Interest and self-sustained learning as catalyst of development: a learning ecology perspective. Human Development 2006, 49:193-224.
3. Bennett S., Maton K., Kervin L. The 'digital natives' debate: a critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology 2008, 39:775-786.
4. Clark A. Natural-Born Cyborgs: Minds, Technologies, and the Future of Human Intelligence 2003, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
5. Csikszentmihalyi M. Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention 1996, HarperCollins, New York.
6. Csikszentmihalyi M., Rathunde K., Whalen S. Talented Teenagers: The Roots of Success and Failure 1996, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
7. Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. Handbook of Self-determination Research 2004, The University of Rochester Press, Rochester, NY.
8. Donald M. Origins of the Modern Mind 1991, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
9. Eynon R., Malmberg L. A typology of young people's internet use: implications for education. Computers and Education 2011, 56:585-595.
10. Gee J.P., Hayes E.R. Language and Learning in the Digital Age 2011, Routledge, London.
11. Hakkarainen K., Ilomäki L., Lipponen L., Muukkonen H., Rahikainen M., Tuominen T., Lakkala M., Lehtinen E. Students' skills and practices of using ICT: results of a national assessment in Finland. Computers & Education 2000, 34:103-117.
12. Heikkilä A., Lonka K. Studying in higher education: students' approaches to learning, self-regulation, and cognitive strategies. Studies in Higher Education 2006, 31:99-117.
13. Helsper E., Enyon R. Digital natives: where is the evidence?. British Educational Research Journal 2011, 36:503-520.
14. Inkinen, M., Lonka, K., Hakkarainen K., Muukkonen, H., Litmanen, T., Salmela-Aro, K., 2014. The interface between core affects and the challenge-skill relationship. Journal of Happiness Studies. doi:, 15, 891-913. doi:10.1007/s10902-013-9455-6.
15. Ito M., Baumer S., Bittandi M., Boud D., Cody R., et al. Hanging Out, Messing Around, and Geeking Out 2010, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
16. Jenkins H., Clinton K., Purushotma R., Robison A., Wiegel M. Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for 21st Century 2009, MacArthur Foundation, Retrieved 28.08.12 from www.newmedialiteracies.org/files/working/NMLWhitePaper.pdf.
17. Kennedy G., Judd T., Dalgarno B., Waycott J. Beyond natives and immigrants: exploring types of net generation students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 2010, 26:332-343.
18. Kindermann T.A. Effects of naturally-existing peer groups on changes in academic engagement in a cohort of sixth graders. Child Development 2007, 78:1186-1203.
19. Kiuru N., Nurmi J.-E., Aunola K., Salmela-Aro K. Peer group homogeneity in adolescents' school adjustment varies according to peer group type and gender. International Journal of Behavioral Development 2009, 33:65-76. 10.1177/0165025408098014.
20. Larson R., Eccles J., Gootman J.A. Features of positive developmental setting. The Prevention Researchers 2004, 11:8-13.
21. Laursen B.P., Hoff E. Person-oriented and variable-oriented approaches to longitudinal data. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 2006, 52:377-389.
22. Laursen B., Bukowski W.M., Nurmi J.-E., Marion D., Salmela-Aro K., Kiuru N. Opposites detract: middle school peer group antipathies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2010, 106:240-256.
23. Lenhart A., Madden M. Teen Content Creators and Consumers November 2, 2005, Pew Internet & American Life Project, Washington DC, Available online at:. http://www.pewInternet.org/PPF/r/166/report_display.asp.
24. Lenhart A., Purcell K., Smith A., Zickuhr K. Social Media and Mobile Internet Use among Teens and Young Adults 2010, Pew Internet & American Life Project, Available at:. http://web.pewinternet.org/%7E/media/Files/Reports/2010/PIP_Social_Media_and_Young_Adults_Report_Final_with_toplines.pdf.
25. Madden M., Lenhart A., Cortesi S., Gasser U., Duggan M., Smith A., Beaton M. Teens, Social Media, and Privacy 2013, Pew Internet and American Life Project Report, Available at:. http://www.pewinternet.org/%7E/media/Files/Reports/2013/PIP_TeensSocialMediaandPrivacy_%20FINAL.pdf.
26. Nadkarni A., Hofmann S.G. Why do people use Facebook?. Personality and Individual Differences 2012, 52:243-249.
27. Palfrey J., Gasser U. Reclaiming an awkward term: what we might learn from "digital natives". Deconstructing Digital Natives 2011, 186-204. Routledge, London, UK. M. Thomas (Ed.).
28. Patel R., Spreng R.N., Turner G.R. Functional brain changes following cognitive and motor skills training: a quantitative meta-analysis. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2013, 27:187-199.
29. Prensky M. Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the New Horizon 2001, 9(5):1-6.
30. Prensky M. From Digital Natives to Digital Wisdom: Hopeful Essays from 21st Century Learning 2012, Sage (Corwin), Thousand Oaks, CA.
31. Rainie L., Wellman B. Networked: The New Social Operating System 2012, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
32. Reich S.M., Subrahmayan K., Espinosa G. Friending, iming, and hanging out face-to-face: Overlap in adolescents' online and offline social networks. Developmental Psychology 2012, 48:356-368.
33. Rheingold H. Net Smart 2012, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
34. Ritella G., Hakkarainen K. Instrument genesis in technology mediated learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2012, 7:239-258.
35. Shirky C. Cognitive Surplus 2010, Penguin, New York, NY.
36. Smahel D., Brown B.B., Blinka L. Associations between online friendship and Internet addiction among adolescents and emerging adults. Developmental Psychology 2012, 48:381-388.
37. Thomas M. Technology, education, and the discourse of digital natives. Deconstructing Digital Natives 2011, 1-11. Routledge, London, UK. M. Thomas (Ed.).
38. Vallerand R.J., Salvy S.-J., Mageau G.A., Elliot A.J., Denis P.L., Grouzet F.M., Blanchard C. On the role of passion in performance. Journal of Personality 2007, 75:505-533.
39. Wexler B. Brain and Culture 2006, The MIT Press, Cambridge: MA.