Instrumental genesis in technology-mediated learning: From double stimulation to expansive knowledge practices

International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 239-258

  Ritella, Giuseppe ^a   Hakkarainen, Kai ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Chronotope; CSCL; Double stimulation; Epistemic mediation; Expansive learning; Instrumental genesis; Knowledge building; Knowledge practices

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861673018     PISSN: 15561607     EISSN: 15561615     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11412-012-9144-1     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin. University of Texas Press.
2. Barowy, W., & Jouper, C. (2004). The complex of school change: Personal and systemic co-development. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 11, 9-24.
3. Barron, B. (2004). Learning ecologies for technological fluency: Gender and experience differences. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31, 1-36.
4. Barron, B. (2006). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalyst of development: A learning ecology perspective. Human Development, 49, 193-224.
5. Batane, T., Engeström, R., Hakkarainen, K., Newnham, D., & Virkkunen, J. (submitted). Dilemmas of promoting expansive educational transformation through Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) in Botswana. A manuscript submitted for publication.
6. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. Chicago: The Chicago University Press.
7. Béguin, P., & Rabardel, P. (2000). Designing for instrument-mediated activity. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 12, 173-190.
8. Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
9. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
10. Blunden, A. (2010). An interdisciplinary theory of activity. Leiden: Brill.
11. Bolger, N., Davis, A., & Rafaeli, E. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579-616.
12. Brown, R., & Renshaw, P. (2006). Positioning students as actors and authors: A chronotopic analysis of collaborative learning activities. Mind, Culture and Activity, 13(3), 244-256.
13. Carr, N. (2010). The shallows: How the internet is changing the way we think, read, and remember. London: Atlantic.
14. Clark, A. (2003). Natural-born cyborgs: Minds, technologies, and the future of human intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural Psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
16. Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and the schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
17. Dennett, D. (1991). Consciousness explained. Boston: Little, Brown & Company.
18. Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the modern mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
19. Donald, M. (2000). The central role of culture in cognitive evolution: A reflection on the myth of the isolated mind. In L. P. Nucci, G. B. Saxe, & E. Turiel (Eds.), Culture, though, and development (pp. 19-37). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
20. Donald, M. (2001). A mind so rare: The evolution of human consciousness. New York: Norton.
21. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
22. Engeström, Y. (2007). Putting Vygotsky to work: The change laboratory as an application of double stimulation. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 363-382). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211-245.
24. Ericsson, K. A., & Lehmann, A. C. (1996). Experts and exceptional performance. Evidence on maximal adaptation on task constraints. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 273-305.
25. Fleck, L. (1979). Genesis and development of a scientific fact. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
26. Foucault, M. (1967). Of other spaces, heterotopias. http://foucault. info/documents/heteroTopia/foucault. heteroTopia. en. html.
27. Galperin, P. Y. (1957). An experimental study in the formation of mental actions. In S. Brign (Ed.), Psychology in the Soviet Union (pp. 213-225). London: Routledge & Kegan.
28. Gleick, J. (1992). Genius: The life and science of Richard Feynman. New York: Vintage Books.
29. Goody, J. (1977). The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Gruber, H. (1981). Darwin on man (2nd ed.). Chicago: The Chicago University Press.
31. Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Progressive inquiry in computer-supported biology classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(10), 1072-1088.
32. Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Pursuit of explanation within a computer-supported classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 979-996.
33. Hakkarainen, K. (2009). A knowledge-practice perspective on technology-mediated learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4, 213-231.
34. Hakkarainen, K., Bollström-Huttunen, M., & Hoffman, R. (2008). Teacher-researcher dialogue and expansive transformation of pedagogical practices. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 3, 157-178.
35. Hakkarainen, K., Engeström, R., Paavola, S., Pohjola, P., & Honkela, T. (2009). Knowledge practices, epistemic technologies, and pragmatic web. In A. Paschke et al. (Eds.) Proceedings of I-KNOW '09 and I-SEMANTICS '09 2009. Verlag der Technischen Universität Graz.
36. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
37. Knorr-Cetina, K. (2001). Objectual practices. In T. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, & E. Von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 175-188). London: Routledge.
38. Lemke, J. (2001). The long and the short of it: Comments on multiple timescale studies of human activity. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 17-26.
39. Ligorio M. B., Ritella G., (2010). The collaborative construction of chronotopes during computer supported collaborative tasks. ijCSCL, 5(4).
40. Ligorio, M. B., & Sansone, N. (2009). Structure of a blended university course. In C. R. Payne (Ed.), Information technology and constructivism in higher education (pp. 216-230). IGI Global: London.
41. Lonchamp, J. (this issue). An instrumental perspective on CSCL systems. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning.
42. Lund, A., & Rasmussen, I. (2008). The right tool for the wrong task? Match and mismatch between first and second stimulus in double stimulation. ijCSCL, 3(4).
43. Luria, A. R. (1974). The working brain: An introduction to neuropsychology. New York: Basic Books.
44. McLuhan, M., & Lapham, L. H. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. Cambridge: MIT.
45. Muukkonen, H., Inkinen, M., Kosonen, K., Hakkarainen, K., Karlgren, K., Lachmann, H., & Vesikivi, P. (2009). Research on knowledge practices with the Contextual Activity Sampling System. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (Rhodes, Greece). Volume 1, 385-394. ISLS.
46. Nardi, B., & O'Day, V. (2000). Information ecologies: Using technology with heart. Cambridge: MIT.
47. Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of BA. California Management Review, 40, 40-54.
48. Norman, D. (1994). Things that make us smart. Reading: AddisonWesley.
49. Olson, D. (1994). The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50. Overdijk, M., & van Diggelen, W. (2008). Appropriation of a shared workspace: Organizing principles and their application. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 3, 165-192.
51. Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Modeling innovative knowledge communities: A knowledge-creation approach to learning. Review of Educational Research, 74, 557-576.
52. Papert, S. (1994). The children's machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York: Basic Books.
53. Perez, C. (2002). Technological revolution and financial capital. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
54. Piaget, J. (1985). The equilibrium of cognitive structures: The central problem of intellectual development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
55. Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
56. Popper, K. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the New Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
58. Pretsky, M. (2010). Teaching digital natives: Partnering for real learning. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
59. Prior, P. A. (1998). Writing/disciplinarity. Mahwah: LEA.
60. Rabardel, P., & Bourmaud, G. (2003). From computer to instrument system: A developmental perspective. Interacting with Computers, 15, 665-691.
61. Reis, H. T., & Gable, S. L. (2000). Event sampling and other methods for studying daily experience. In H. T. Reis & C. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 190-222). New York: Cambridge University Press.
62. Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
63. Rückriem, G., Ang-Stein, C., & Erdmann, W. (2011). Understanding media revolution: How digitalization is to be considered. International Cultural Historical Human Sciences.
64. Russell, D. A. (1997). Writing and genre in higher education and workplaces: A review of studies that use cultural-historical activity theory. Mind, Activity and Culture, 4, 224-237.
65. Sawyer, R. K. (2005). Emergence: Societies as complex systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66. Sawyer, R. K. (2009). The science of social emergence. In G. Trajkovski & S. G. Collins (Eds.), Agent-based societies: Social and cultural interactions (pp. 1-16). Hershey: Idea Group Inc.
67. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97-115). Cambridge: Cambridge University.
68. Schank, R., & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale: LEA.
69. Skagestad, P. (1993). Thinking with machines. The Journal of Social and Evolutionary System, 16, 157-180.
70. Sterelny, K. (2004). Externalism, epistemic artifacts, and the extended mind. In R. Schantz (Ed.), The externalist challenge (pp. 239-254). New York: Walter de Gruyter.
71. Stetsenko, A. (2005). Activity as object-related: Resolving the dichotomy of individual and collective planes of activity. Mind, Culture and Activity, 12, 70-88.
72. Tomasello, M. (2009). Why we cooperate. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
73. Tuomi, I. (2002). Networks of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
74. Venkatraman, N. (1994). It-enabled business transformation. Sloan Management Review, 35, 73-87.
75. Vérillon, P., & Rabardel, P. (1995). Artefact and cognition: A contribution to the study of thought in relation to instrumented activity. European Journal of Psychology in Education, IX, (3).
76. Viilo, M., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., & Hakkarainen, K. (2011). Supporting thetechnology-enhanced collaborative inquiry and design project - A teacher's reflections on practices. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 17, 51-72.
77. Virkkunen, J. (2006). Dilemmas of building shared transformative agency. @ctivites, 3, 43-66.
78. Virkkunen, J., & Schaupp, M. (2011). From change to development: Expansing the concept of intervention. Theory and Psychology, 21, 629-655.
79. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Language and thought. Cambridge: MIT Press.
80. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
81. Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Vol. 4: The history of the development of higher mental functions. New York: Plenum.
82. Wertsch, J. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
83. Williams, R., Stewart, J., & Slack, R. (2005). Social learning in technological innovation: Experimenting with information and communication technologies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.