Learning ecologies for technological fluency: Gender and experience differences

Journal of Educational Computing Research

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 1-36

  Barron, Brigid ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 7544234526     PISSN: 07356331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/1N20-VV12-4RB5-33VA     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. AAUW (2000). Tech-savvy: Educating girls in the new computer age. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women Educational Foundation.
2. Attewell, P. (2001). Children of the digital divide. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
3. Attewell, P., & Battle, J. (1999). Home computers and school performance. The Information Society, 15, 1-10.
4. Badagliacco, J. (1990). Gender and race differences in computing attitudes and experience. Social Science Computer Review, 8, 42-63.
5. Barron, B. (2000). Problem solving in video-based microworlds: Collaborative and individual outcomes of high achieving sixth grade students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2): 391-398.
6. Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 307-359.
7. Barron, B., Martin, C. K., & Roberts, E. (2002, October). A design experiment to build technological fluency and bridge divides. In P. Bell & R. Stevens (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of the Learning Sciences: Keeping learning complex - Fostering multidisciplinary research efforts. Mahwah,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Barron, B., Martin, C. K., Roberts, E., Mercier, E., & McPhee, S. (in press). Imaging possible futures: Course taking and knowledge use within trajectories of technological fluency. Social and equity issues with technology. San Diego, CA: American Educational Research Association.
9. Barron, B., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, T., Zech, L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem and project-based-learning. Journal of Learning Sciences, 7, 271-311.
10. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine Books.
11. Boaler, J. (2002). Paying the price for 'sugar and spice'-Shifting the analytical lens in equity research. Mathematical Thinking & Learning, 4(2&3), 127-144.
12. Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (2001). Rethinking transfer A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research in Education, 24, 61-100.
13. Brofenbrenner, U., & Evans, G. W. (2000). Developmental science in the 21st century. Emerging questions, theoretical models, research designs, and empirical findings. Social Development, 9, 115-125.
14. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141-178.
15. Brown, J. S. (2002, March/April). Growing up digital: How the Web changes work, education, and the way people learn. Change, pp. 10-20.
16. Busch, T. (1995). Gender differences in self-efficacy and attitudes towards computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 147-158.
17. Camp, T. (1997). The incredible shrinking pipeline. Communications of the ACM, 40(10), 103-110.
18. Cassel, J. & Jenkins, H. (1998). From Barbie to Mortal Kombat. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Malden, MA: Blackell.
20. CCST (2002). Critical path analysis of California's science and technology education system. Sacramento, CA: Author.
21. Chen, M. (1986). Gender and computers: The beneficial effects of experience on attitudes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2, 265-282.
22. Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2002). The second educational revolution: From apprenticeship to schooling to lifelong learning. Manuscript in preparation.
23. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Collier Books.
24. Greeno, J., Collins, A., & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15-46). New York: Macmillan.
25. Hartup, W. W., & Laursen, B. (1999). Relationships as developmental contexts: Retrospective themes and contemporary issues. In W. A. Collins & B. Laursen (Eds.), Relationships as developmental contexts (pp. 13-35). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. John-Steiner, V. (2000). Creative collaboration. New York Oxford University Press.
27. Kafai, Y. (1995). Minds in play: Computer game design as a context for children's learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Kafai, Y. (1996). Learning design by making games: Children's development of design strategies in the creation of a complex computational artifact. In Y. Kafai & M. Resnick (Eds.), Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking and learning in a digital world (pp. 71-96). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Kelly, A., & Lesh, R. A. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. Kersteen, Z., Linn, M., Clancy, M., & Hardyck, C. (1998). Previous experience and the learning of computer programming: The computer helps those who help themselves. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4, 321-333.
31. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate, peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
32. Levin, T., & Gordon, C. (1989). Effect of gender and computer experience on attitudes toward computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 69-88.
33. Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319-340.
34. Looi-Chi. (1999). A learning ecology perspective for the Internet. Educational Technology, 40, 56-60.
35. Margolis, J., & Fisher, A. (2002). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Nardi, B., & O'Day, V. (1999). Information ecologies: Using technology with heart. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. National Research Council (NRC). (1999). Being fluent with information technology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
38. New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60-92.
39. Pew reports. (2002). The digital disconnect: The widening gap between Internet-savvy students and their schools. [On-line] Available: www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=67.
40. Reich, R. (2002). The future of success. New York: Vintage Books.
41. Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.
42. Schofield, J. (1995). Computers and classroom culture. New York: Cambridge University Press.
43. Super, C. M., & Harkness, S. (1986). The developmental niche: A conceptualization at the interface of child and culture. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 9, 545-569.
44. Sutton, R. E. (1991). Equity and computers in the schools: A decade of research. Review of Education Research, 61, 475-503.
45. Taylor, H. G., & Mounfield, L. C. (1994). Exploration of the relationship between prior computing experience and gender on success in college computer science. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 11, 291-306.
46. United States Department of Commerce. (2002). A nation on line. How Americans are expanding their use of the Internet. [On-line] Available: http://www.digitaldivide.gov/reports.html
47. Volman, M., & van Eck. E. (2001). Gender equity and information technology in education: The second decade. Review of Educational Research, 71, 613-634.
48. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49. Warschauer, M. (2000). Technology and school reform: A view from both sides of the track. Educational Policy Archives, 8, 4.