Demonstration tasks for assessment

Learning from Dynamic Visualization: Innovations in Research and Application

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 177-201

  Lowe, Richard ^a,b   Boucheix, Jean Michel ^b   Fillisch, Benjamin ^c  

^a CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85033574649     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-56204-9_8     Document Type: Chapter

References (46)

1. Adams, D. M., Stull, A. T., & Hegarty, M. (2014). Effects of mental and manual rotation training on mental and manual rotation performance. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 14, 169-198.
2. Bazerman, C. (Ed.). (2008). Handbook of writing research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Berney, S., & Bétrancourt, M. (2009, August). When and why does animation enhance learning? A meta-analysis. Paper presented at the 13th European Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
5. Boucheix, J.-M., & Lowe, R. K. (2010). An eye tracking comparison of external pointing cues and internal continuous cues in learning with complex animations. Learning and Instruction, 20, 123-135.
6. Boucheix, J.-M., Lowe, R. K., Breyer, B., & Ploetzner, R. (2015, August). How self-generated drawing may impact learning from animation. Paper presented at the 16th European Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction, Limassol, Cyprus.
7. Boucheix, J.-M., Lowe, R. K., Putri, D. K., & Groff, J. (2013). Cueing animations: Dynamic signaling aids information extraction and comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 25, 71-84.
8. Boucheix, J.-M., Lowe, R. K., & Soirat, A. (2006, August). Online processing of a complex technical animation: Eye tracking investigation during verbal description. Paper presented at the Comprehension of Text and Graphics Conference, Nottingham, UK.
9. Davenport, J. L., & Quellmalz, E. S. (2017). Assessing science inquiry and reasoning using dynamic visualizations and interactive simulations. In R. Lowe & R. Ploetzner (Eds.), Learning from dynamic visualization-Innovations in research and application. Berlin: Springer (this volume).
10. De Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Paas, F. (2007). Attention cueing as a means to enhance learning from an animation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 731-746.
11. De Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Paas, F. (2010). Learning by generating vs. receiving instructional explanations: Two approaches to enhance attention cueing in animations. Computers & Education, 55, 681-691.
12. De Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Paas, F. (2010). Attention guidance in learning from a complex animation: Seeing is understanding. Learning and Instruction, 20, 111-122.
13. Fillisch, B., & Ploetzner, R. (2015, August). The role of support in drawing for learning from complex animation. Paper presented at the 16th European Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction, Limassol, Cyprus.
14. Flower, L. S. (1979). Writer-based prose: A cognitive basis for problems in writing. College English, 41, 19-37.
15. Hegarty, M., Mayer, S., Kriz, S., & Keehner, M. (2005). The role of gestures in mental animation. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 5, 333-356.
16. Höffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2007). Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17, 722-738.
17. Houghton, H. A., & Willows, D. M. (1987). The Psychology of illustrations: Vol 2: Instructional issues. New York: Springer.
18. Jamalian, A., Giardino, V., & Tversky, B. (2013). Gestures for thinking. Paper presented at the 35th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Berlin, Germany.
19. Kang, S., Tversky, B., & Black, J. B. (2015). Coordinating gesture, word, and diagram: Explanations for experts and novices. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 15, 1-26.
20. Khacharem, A., Zoudji, B., & Kalyuga, S. (2015). Perceiving versus inferring movements to understand dynamic events: The influence of content complexity. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 19, 70-75.
21. Lowe, R.K. (2017). Designing static and animated diagrams for modern learning materials. In A. Black, S. Lund, & S. Walker (Eds.), Handbook of information design (pp. 361-376). London: Gower.
22. Lowe, R. K., & Boucheix, J.-M. (2008). Learning from animated diagrams: How are mental models built? In G. Stapleton, J. Howse, & J. Lee (Eds.), Diagrammatic representation and inference (pp. 266-281). Berlin: Springer.
23. Lowe, R. K., & Boucheix, J.-M. (2010). Manipulatable models for investigating processing of dynamic diagrams. In A. K. Goel, M. Jamnik, & N. H. Narayanan (Eds.), Diagrammatic representation and inference (pp. 319-321). Berlin: Springer.
24. Lowe, R. K., & Boucheix, J.-M. (2011). Cueing complex animation: Does direction of attention foster learning processes? Learning and Instruction, 21, 650-663.
25. Lowe, R. K., & Boucheix, J.-M. (2016). Principled animation design improves comprehension of complex dynamics. Learning and Instruction, 45, 72-84.
26. Lowe, R. K., & Boucheix, J.-M. (2017). A composition approach to design of educational animations. In R. Lowe & R. Ploetzner (Eds.), Learning from dynamic visualization-Innovations in research and application. Berlin: Springer (this volume).
27. Lowe, R. K., Jenkinson, J., & McGill, G. (2014, August). Learning functional relations in complex animations. Paper presented at the EARLI SIG 2 (Comprehension of Text and Graphics) Meeting, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
28. Lowe, R. K., & Schnotz, W. (2007, August). Animations and temporal manipulations: Supporting comprehension of complex dynamic information. Paper presented at the 12th European Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction, Budapest, Hungary.
29. Lowe, R. K., & Schnotz, W. (2014). Animation principles in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 513-546). New York: Cambridge University Press.
30. Mandel, L. P., Lentz, G. M., & Goff, B. A. (2000). Teaching and evaluating surgical skills. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 95, 783-785.
31. Marcus, N., Cleary, B., Wong, A., & Ayres, P. (2013). Should hand actions be observed when learning hand motor skills from instructional animations? Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2172-2178.
32. Mayer, R. E. (Ed.). (2014). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. B. (1992). The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 444-452.
34. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2002). Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 87-99.
35. McGill, G. (2017). Designing instructional science visualizations in the trenches: where research meets production reality. In R. Lowe & R. Ploetzner (Eds.), Learning from dynamic visualization - Innovations in research and application. Berlin: Springer (this volume).
36. Ploetzner, R., & Lowe, R. (2012). A systematic characterization of expository animations. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 781-794.
37. Ramsey, L. L., Walczyk, J., Deese, W. C., & Eddy, D. (2000). Using demonstration assessments to improve learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 77, 1511-1516.
38. Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., Huk, T., Imhof, B., & Kammerer, Y. (2009). The effects of realism in learning with dynamic visualizations. Learning and Instruction, 19, 481-494.
39. Schnotz, W. (2001). Sign systems, technologies, and the acquisition of knowledge. In J.-F. Rouet, J. J. Levonen, & A. Biardeau (Eds.), Multimedia learning: Cognitive and instructional issues (pp. 9-29). London: Pergamon.
40. Schnotz, W. (2002). Towards an integrated view of learning from text and visual displays. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 101-120.
41. Schwan, S., & Riempp, R. (2004). The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: learning to tie nautical knots. Learning and Instruction, 14, 293-305.
42. Tversky, B. (2011). Visualizing thought. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 499-535.
43. Tversky, B., Heiser, J., Lee, P., & Daniel, M.-P. (2009). Explanations in gesture, diagram, and word. In K. R. Coventry, T. Tenbrink, & J. A. Bateman (Eds.), Spatial language and dialogue (pp. 119-131). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44. Tversky, B., Morrison, J. B., & Bétrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 57, 247-262.
45. Van Hove, P. D., Tuijthof, G. J. M., Verdaasdonk, E. G. G., Stassen, L. P. S., & Dankelman, J. (2010). Objective assessment of technical surgical skills. British Journal of Surgery, 97, 972-987.
46. Wong, A., Leahy, W., Marcus, N., & Sweller, J. (2012). Cognitive load theory, the transient information effect and e-learning. Learning and Instruction, 22, 449-457.