Assessment of tobacco heating product THP1.0. Part 8: Study to determine puffing topography, mouth level exposure and consumption among Japanese users

Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

Volumn 93, Issue , 2018, Pages 84-91

  Gee, Jodie ^a   Prasad, Krishna ^a   Slayford, Sandra ^a   Gray, Adam ^a   Nother, Kathryn ^a   Cunningham, Anthony ^a   Mavropoulou, Eleni ^a   Proctor, Christopher ^a  

^a BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Actual use; Consumer use; Mouth insertion depth; Mouth level exposure; Next generation products; Preclinical assessment; Puffing topography; Tobacco heating product

Indexed keywords

MENTHOL; NICOTINE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CIGARETTE SMOKING; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE; FEMALE; HUMAN; JAPAN; JAPANESE (PEOPLE); MALE; MOUTH LEVEL EXPOSURE; NICOTINE FREE DRY PARTICULATE MATTER; PARTICULATE MATTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUFFING TOPOGRAPHY; SMOKING AND SMOKING RELATED PHENOMENA; SMOKING HABIT; TOBACCO HEATING PRODUCT; ADMINISTRATION AND DOSAGE; ANALYSIS; DEVICES; DRUG EFFECT; EPIDEMIOLOGY; EXPOSURE; HEATING; METABOLISM; MIDDLE AGED; MOUTH MUCOSA; PROCEDURES; TOBACCO; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ELECTRONIC NICOTINE DELIVERY SYSTEMS; FEMALE; HEATING; HUMANS; INHALATION EXPOSURE; JAPAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOUTH MUCOSA; NICOTINE; PARTICULATE MATTER; TOBACCO PRODUCTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85033464475     PISSN: 02732300     EISSN: 10960295     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.08.005     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Baker, R., Dixon, M., The incidence and consequence of filter vent blocking amongst british smokers. Beitr. Tab. Int. 18 (1998), 71–83.
2. Baker, R., Lewis, L., Filter Ventilation - has there been a “cover up”?. Recent ad. Tob. Sci. 23 (1997), 152–196.
3. Baker, R., Lewis, L., A review of the incidence and consequences of cigarette filter vent blocking amongst smokers. Beitr. Tab. Int. 19 (2001), 209–228.
4. Baker, R.R., Smoke generation inside a burning cigarette: modifying combustion to develop cigarettes that may be less hazardous to health. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 32 (2006), 373–385.
5. Cunningham, A., Slayford, S., Vas, C., Gee, J., Costigan, S., Prasad, K., Development and validation of a device to measure e-cigarette users’ topography. Sci. Rep., 6, 2016, 35071.
6. Djordjevic, M., Stellman, S., Zang, E., Doses of nicotine and lung carcinogens delivered to cigarette smokers. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 92 (2000), 106–111.
7. Eaton, D., Jakaj, B., Forster, M., Nicol, J., Scott, J.K., Liu, C., McAdam, K.G., Murphy, J., Proctor, C.J., Assessment of a novel tobacco heating product THP1.0(T). Part 2: product design, operation and thermophysical characterisation. Reg. Tox Pharm., 2017 this issue.
8. Farsalinos, K.E., Le Houezec, J., Regulation in the face of uncertainty: the evidence on electronic nicotine delivery systems (e-cigarettes). Risk Manag. Healthc. Policy 8 (2015), 157–167.
9. FDA (Food and Drug Administration), Guidance for Industry - Modified Risk Tobacco Product Applications - Draft Guidance. 2012 https://www.fda.gov/TobaccoProducts/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/default. (Accessed 29 March 2017)
10. Forster, M., Liu, C., Duke, M.G., McAdam, K.G., Proctor, C.J., An experimental method to study emissions from heated tobacco between 100 to 200°C. Chem. Cent. J., 9, 2015, 20.
11. Forster, M., Mariner, D., Wright, C., Fiebelkorn, S., Yurteri, C., Liu, C., McAdam, K.G., Proctor, C.J., Assessment of tobacco heating product THP1.0. Part 3: comprehensive chemical characterisation - harmful and potentially harmful aerosol emissions. Reg. Tox Pharm., 2017.
12. Fowles, J., Dybing, E., Application of toxicological risk assessment principles to the chemical constituents of cigarette smoke. Tob. Control 12:4 (2003), 424–430.
13. Gonzalez-Suarez, I., Martin, F., Marescotti, D., Guedj, E., Acali, S., Johne, S., Dulize, R., Baumer, K., Peric, D., Goedertier, D., Frentzel, S., Ivanov, N.V., Mathis, C., Hoeng, J., Peitsch, M.C., In vitro systems toxicology assessment of a candidate modified risk tobacco product shows reduced toxicity compared to that of conventional cigarette. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 29 (2016), 3–18.
14. Haziza, C., de La Bourdonnaye, G., Skiada, D., Ancerewicz, J., Baker, G., Picavet, P., Lüdicke, F., Evaluation of the Tobacco Heating System 2.2. Part 8: 5–Day randomized reduced exposure clinical study in Poland. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 81:Suppl. 2 (2016), S139–S150.
15. Health Canada, Health Canada method T-115, determination of “tar” nicotine and carbon monoxide in mainstream tobacco smoke. http://edge.rit.edu/edge/P10056/public/Health%20Canada%20Nicotine, 1999. (Accessed 24 October 2016)
16. Hu, Q., Liu, Z., Ma, J., Peng, L., Bai, H., Cigarette mouth insertion depths among Chinese smokers. Beitr. Tab. Int. 20 (2003), 476–480.
17. International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)/ESOMAR, International Code on Market, Opinion and Social Research and Data Analytics. 2016 https://www.esomar.org/uploads/public/knowledge-and-standards/codes-and-guidelines/ICCESOMAR-International-Code_English.pdf. (Accessed 27 March 2017)
18. International Organization for Standardization, Cigarettes Determination of Total and Nicotine-free Dry Particulate Matter Using a Routine Analytical Smoking Machine ISO 4387:2000. 2000, ISO, Geneva.
19. International Organization for Standardization, Cigarettes – Sampling ISO/8243:2013. 2013, ISO, Geneva.
20. Jaunky, T., Adamson, J., Santopietro, S., Terry, A., Thorne, D., Breheny, D., Proctor, C.J., Gaca, M., Assessment of tobacco heating product THP1.0. Part 5: In vitro dosimetric and cytotoxic assessment. Reg. Tox Pharm., 2017 this issue.
21. Kozlowski, L., Frecker, R., Khouw, V., Pope, M., The misuse of ‘less hazardous’ cigarettes and its detection: hole blocking of ventilated filters. Am. J. Od. Pub. Health 70 (1980), 1203–1204.
22. Kozlowski, L., Rickert, W., Pope, M., Robinson, J., Frecker, R., Estimating the yield to smokers of tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide from the lowest yield ventilated filter cigarettes. Br. J. Addict. 77 (1982), 159–165.
23. Kozlowski, L., Pope, M., Lux, J., Prevalence of the misuse of ultra low tar cigarettes by blocking filter vents. Am. J. Pub. Health 6 (1988), 694–695.
24. Kozlowski, L., Sweeney, C., Pillitteri, J., Blocking cigarette filter vents with lips more than doubles carbon monoxide intake from ultra-low tar cigarettes. Exp. And Clin. Psychopharmacol. 4 (1996), 404–408.
25. Lee, E.M., Malson, J.L., Moolchan, E.T., Pickworth, W.B., Quantitative comparisons between a nicotine delivery device (Eclipse) and conventional cigarette smoking. Nicotine Tob. Res. 6 (2004), 95–102.
26. Lüdicke, F., Baker, G., Magnette, J., Picavet, P., Weitkunat, R., Reduced exposure to harmful and potentially harmful smoke constituents with the tobacco heating system 2.1. Nicotine Tob. Res. 19 (2017), 168–175.
27. Moennikes, O., Vanscheeuwijck, P.M., Friedrichs, B., Anskeit, E., Patskan, G.J., Reduced toxicological activity of cigarette smoke by the addition of ammonia magnesium phosphate to the paper of an electrically heated cigarette: subchronic inhalation toxicology. Inhal. Toxicol. 20 (2008), 647–663.
28. Murphy, J., Assessing the risk of e-cigarettes. Pan Eur. Netw. Gov. 21 (2017), 52–55.
29. Murphy, J., Lowe, F., Fearon, I., Camacho, O., Minet, E., A Framework for the Assessment of Reduced-risk Tobacco and Nicotine Products. 2015, Tobacco Science Research Conference (TRSC).
30. Pauly, J., O'Connor, R., Paszkiewicz, K., Cuymmings, M., Djordjevic, M., Shields, P., Cigarette filter-based assays as proxies for toxicant exposure and smoking behavior – a literature review. Cancer. Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 18 (2009), 3321–3333.
31. Poget, L., Campelos, P., Jeannet, C., Maeder, S., Development of models for the estimation of mouth level exposure to aerosol constituetns from a heat-not-burn tobacco product using mouthpiece analysis. Beitr. Tab. Int. 27 (2017), 42–64.
32. Porter, A., Dunn, P.J., Mouth insertion depths in Canadian smokers. Beitr. Tab. Int. 18 (1998), 85–91.
33. Rodgman, A., Perfetti, T., The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke. second ed., 2013, CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA.
34. Schorp, M., Tricker, A., Dempsey, R., Reduced exposure evaluation of an electrically heated cigarette smoking system. Part 1: non-clinical and clinical insights. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 64 (2012), S1–S10.
35. Shepperd, C.J., St. Charles, F.K., Lien, M., Dixon, M., Validation of methods for determining consumer smoked cigarette yields from cigarette filter analysis. Beitr. Tab. Int. 22 (2006), 176–184.
36. Smith, M., Clark, B., Lüdicke, F., Schaller, J., Vanscheeuwijck, P., Hoeng, J., Peitsch, M., Evaluation of the tobacco heating system 2.2. Part 1: description of the system and the scientific assessment program. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 81:Suppl. l2 (2016), S17–S26.
37. Slayford, S., Frost, B., A device to measure a smokers’ puffing topography and real-time puff by puff “tar” delivery. Beitr. Tab. Int. 26:18 (2014), 74–84.
38. Stabbert, R., Voncken, P., Rustemeier, K., Haussmann, H., Roemer, E., Schaffernicht, H., Patskan, G., Toxicological evaluation of an electrically heated cigarette. Part 2: chemical composition of mainstream smoke. J. Appl. Toxicol. 23 (2003), 329–339.
39. St Charles, F.K., Ashley, M., Shepperd, C.J., Clayton, P., Errington, G., A robust method for estimating human smoked cigarette yields from filter analysis data. Beitr. Tab. Int. 23 (2009), 232–243.
40. Taylor, M., Thorne, D., Carr, T., Breheny, D., Walker, P., Proctor, C.J., Gaca, M., Assessment of tobacco heating product THP1.0. Part 6: a comparative in vitro study using contemporary screening approaches. Reg. Tox Pharm., 2017 this issue.
41. Thorne, D., Breheny, D., Proctor, C.J., Gaca, M., Assessment of tobacco heating product THP1.0. Part 7: comparative in vitro toxicological evaluation. Reg. Tox Pharm., 2017 this issue.
42. US Department of Health and Human Services, The Health Consequences of Smoking 50 Years of Progress: a Report of the Surgeon General, 2014., 2014, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US), Atlanta, USA http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/reports/50-years-of-progress/index.html. (Accessed 26 August 2016)
43. Watson, C., McCraw, J., Polzin, J., Ashley, D., Development of a method to assess cigarette smoke intake. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38 (2004), 248–253.
44. Zenzen, V., Diekmann, J., Gerstenberg, B., Weber, S., Wittke, S., Schorp, M.K., Reduced exposure evaluation of an electrically heated cigarette smoking system. Part 2: smoke chemistry and in vitro toxicological evaluation using smoking regimes reflecting human puffing behaviour. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 64 (2012), S11–S14.