The complete structure of the small-subunit processome

Nature Structural and Molecular Biology

Volumn 24, Issue 11, 2017, Pages 944-953

  Barandun, Jonas ^a   Chaker Margot, Malik ^a   Hunziker, Mirjam ^a   Molloy, Kelly R ^a   Chait, Brian T ^a   Klinge, Sebastian ^a  

^a ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RIBOSOME PROTEIN; RNA 18S; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CROSS LINKING; ETS DOMAIN; MOLECULAR MIMICRY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; REGULATORY MECHANISM; RNA CLEAVAGE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SMALL RIBOSOMAL SUBUNIT; STEREOSPECIFICITY; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; RIBOSOME SUBUNITS, SMALL, EUKARYOTIC; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 18S; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 85032962047     PISSN: 15459993     EISSN: 15459985     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.3472     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Woolford, J. L. Jr. & Baserga, S. J. Ribosome biogenesis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 195, 643-681 (2013).
2. Mougey, E. B. et al. The terminal balls characteristic of eukaryotic rRNA transcription units in chromatin spreads are rRNA processing complexes. Genes Dev. 7, 1609-1619 (1993).
3. Osheim, Y. N. et al. Pre-18S ribosomal RNA is structurally compacted into the SSU processome prior to being cleaved from nascent transcripts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell 16, 943-954 (2004).
4. Dragon, F. et al. A large nucleolar U3 ribonucleoprotein required for 18S ribosomal RNA biogenesis. Nature 417, 967-970 (2002).
5. Fatica, A., Tollervey, D. & Dlakic, M. PIN domain of Nob1p is required for D-site cleavage in 20S pre-rRNA. RNA 10, 1698-1701 (2004).
6. Pérez-Fernández, J., Román, A., De Las Rivas, J., Bustelo, X. R. & Dosil, M. The 90S preribosome is a multimodular structure that is assembled through a hierarchical mechanism. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 5414-5429 (2007).
7. Chaker-Margot, M., Hunziker, M., Barandun, J., Dill, B. D. & Klinge, S. Stage-specific assembly events of the 6-MDa small-subunit processome initiate eukaryotic ribosome biogenesis. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 22, 920-923 (2015).
8. Zhang, L., Wu, C., Cai, G., Chen, S. & Ye, K. Stepwise and dynamic assembly of the earliest precursors of small ribosomal subunits in yeast. Genes Dev. 30, 718-732 (2016).
9. Hunziker, M. et al. UtpA and UtpB chaperone nascent pre-ribosomal RNA and U3 snoRNA to initiate eukaryotic ribosome assembly. Nat. Commun. 7, 12090 (2016).
10. Marmier-Gourrier, N., Cléry, A., Schlotter, F., Senty-Ségault, V. & Branlant, C. A second base pair interaction between U3 small nucleolar RNA and the 5-ETS region is required for early cleavage of the yeast pre-ribosomal RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 9731-9745 (2011).
11. Dutca, L. M., Gallagher, J. E. G. & Baserga, S. J. The initial U3 snoRNA: pre-rRNA base pairing interaction required for pre-18S rRNA folding revealed by in vivo chemical probing. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 5164-5180 (2011).
12. Kornprobst, M. et al. Architecture of the 90S pre-ribosome: a structural view on the birth of the eukaryotic ribosome. Cell 166, 380-393 (2016).
13. Chaker-Margot, M., Barandun, J., Hunziker, M. & Klinge, S. Architecture of the yeast small subunit processome. Science 355, eaal1880 (2017).
14. Sun, Q. et al. Molecular architecture of the 90S small subunit pre-ribosome. eLife 6, e22086 (2017).
15. Talkish, J. et al. Disruption of ribosome assembly in yeast blocks cotranscriptional pre-rRNA processing and affects the global hierarchy of ribosome biogenesis. RNA 22, 852-866 (2016).
16. Kos-Braun, I. C., Jung, I. & Koš, M. Tor1 and CK2 kinases control a switch between alternative ribosome biogenesis pathways in a growth-dependent manner. PLoS Biol. 15, e2000245 (2017).
17. Makarova, K. S., Wolf, Y. I., Mekhedov, S. L., Mirkin, B. G. & Koonin, E. V. Ancestral paralogs and pseudoparalogs and their role in the emergence of the eukaryotic cell. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 4626-4638 (2005).
18. Khoshnevis, S. et al. The DEAD-box protein Rok1 orchestrates 40S and 60S ribosome assembly by promoting the release of Rrp5 from pre-40S ribosomes to allow for 60S maturation. PLoS Biol. 14, e1002480 (2016).
19. Torchet, C. & Jacq, C. Hermann-Le Denmat, S. Two mutant forms of the S1/TPRcontaining protein Rrp5p affect the 18S rRNA synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. RNA 4, 1636-1652 (1998).
20. Eppens, N. A., Rensen, S., Granneman, S., Raué, H. A. & Venema, J. The roles of Rrp5p in the synthesis of yeast 18S and 5. 8S rRNA can be functionally and physically separated. RNA 5, 779-793 (1999).
21. Lin, J., Lu, J., Feng, Y., Sun, M. & Ye, K. An RNA-binding complex involved in ribosome biogenesis contains a protein with homology to tRNA CCA-adding enzyme. PLoS Biol. 11, e1001669 (2013).
22. Zheng, S., Lan, P., Liu, X. & Ye, K. Interaction between ribosome assembly factors Krr1 and Faf1 is essential for formation of small ribosomal subunit in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 22692-22703 (2014).
23. Zhang, L., Lin, J. & Ye, K. Structural and functional analysis of the U3 snoRNA binding protein Rrp9. RNA 19, 701-711 (2013).
24. Kühn, H. et al. The Noc-domain containing C-terminus of Noc4p mediates both formation of the Noc4p-Nop14p submodule and its incorporation into the SSU processome. PLoS One 4, e8370 (2009).
25. Lee, S. J. & Baserga, S. J. Imp3p and Imp4p, two specific components of the U3 small nucleolar ribonucleoprotein that are essential for pre-18S rRNA processing. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 5441-5452 (1999).
26. Zheng, S. & Ye, K. Purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction analysis of Imp3 in complex with an Mpp10 peptide involved in yeast ribosome biogenesis. Acta Crystallogr. F Struct. Biol. Commun. 70, 918-921 (2014).
27. Thoms, M. et al. The exosome is recruited to RNA substrates through specific adaptor proteins. Cell 162, 1029-1038 (2015).
28. Zhu, J., Liu, X., Anjos, M., Correll, C. C. & Johnson, A. W. Utp14 recruits and activates the RNA helicase Dhr1 to undock U3 snoRNA from the pre-ribosome. Mol. Cell Biol. 36, 965-978 (2016).
29. Sardana, R. et al. The DEAH-box helicase Dhr1 dissociates U3 from the pre-rRNA to promote formation of the central pseudoknot. PLoS Biol. 13, e1002083 (2015).
30. Gelperin, D., Horton, L., Beckman, J., Hensold, J. & Lemmon, S. K. Bms1p, a novel GTP-binding protein, and the related Tsr1p are required for distinct steps of 40S ribosome biogenesis in yeast. RNA 7, 1268-1283 (2001).
31. Delprato, A. et al. Crucial role of the Rcl1p-Bms1p interaction for yeast preribosomal RNA processing. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 10161-10172 (2014).
32. Mitchell, P. Rrp47 and the function of the Sas10/C1D domain. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 38, 1088-1092 (2010).
33. Ben-Shem, A. et al. The structure of the eukaryotic ribosome at 3. 0 Å resolution. Science 334, 1524-1529 (2011).
34. Sondalle, S. B. & Baserga, S. J. Human diseases of the SSU processome. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1842, 758-764 (2014).
35. Robson, A., Owens, N. D. L., Baserga, S. J., Khokha, M. K. & Griffin, J. N. Expression of ribosomopathy genes during Xenopus tropicalis embryogenesis. BMC Dev. Biol. 16, 38 (2016).
36. Paolini, N. A. et al. A ribosomopathy reveals decoding defective ribosomes driving human dysmorphism. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 100, 506-522 (2017).
37. Marneros, A. G. BMS1 is mutated in aplasia cutis congenita. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003573 (2013).
38. Lebaron, S. et al. Proofreading of pre-40S ribosome maturation by a translation initiation factor and 60S subunits. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 744-753 (2012).
39. Mastronarde, D. N. Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements. J. Struct. Biol. 152, 36-51 (2005).
40. Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331-332 (2017).
41. Rohou, A. & Grigorieff, N. CTFFIND4: Fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 192, 216-221 (2015).
42. Kimanius, D., Forsberg, B. O., Scheres, S. H. & Lindahl, E. Accelerated cryo-EM structure determination with parallelisation using GPUs in RELION-2. eLife 5, e. 18722 (2016).
43. Kucukelbir, A., Sigworth, F. J. & Tagare, H. D. Quantifying the local resolution of cryo-EM density maps. Nat. Methods 11, 63-65 (2014).
44. Kelley, L. A., Mezulis, S., Yates, C. M., Wass, M. N. & Sternberg, M. J. E. The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 10, 845-858 (2015).
45. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126-2132 (2004).
46. Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 213-221 (2010).
47. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera-a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605-1612 (2004).
48. Tang, G. et al. EMAN2: an extensible image processing suite for electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 157, 38-46 (2007).
49. Shi, Y. et al. Structural characterization by cross-linking reveals the detailed architecture of a coatomer-related heptameric module from the nuclear pore complex. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 13, 2927-2943 (2014).
50. Shi, Y. et al. A strategy for dissecting the architectures of native macromolecular assemblies. Nat. Methods 12, 1135-1138 (2015).
51. Yang, B. et al. Identification of cross-linked peptides from complex samples. Nat. Methods 9, 904-906 (2012).
52. Combe, C. W., Fischer, L. & Rappsilber, J. xiNET: cross-link network maps with residue resolution. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 14, 1137-1147 (2015).