Architecture of the yeast small subunit processome

Science

Volumn 355, Issue 6321, 2017, Pages

  Chaker Margot, Malik ^a   Barandun, Jonas ^a   Hunziker, Mirjam ^a   Klinge, Sebastian ^a  

^a ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FUNGAL RNA; GUANOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; MOLECULAR MOTOR; MOLECULAR SCAFFOLD; RIBOSOME RNA; SMALL NUCLEOLAR RNA; RNA 18S; RNA, U3 SMALL NUCLEOLAR; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

BIOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; CELL ORGANELLE; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; EUKARYOTE; PROTEIN; RNA; YEAST;

ARTICLE; BASE PAIRING; BIOGENESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; FUNGAL GENETICS; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESSOME; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN CROSS LINKING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; RIBOSOME; RIBOSOME SUBUNIT; RNA CONFORMATION; RNA DEGRADATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SMALL RIBOSOMAL SUBUNIT; BETA SHEET; CHEMISTRY; CONFORMATION; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

EUKARYOTA; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; NUCLEIC ACID CONFORMATION; PROTEIN CONFORMATION, BETA-STRAND; RIBOSOME SUBUNITS, SMALL, EUKARYOTIC; RNA, FUNGAL; RNA, RIBOSOMAL; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 18S; RNA, SMALL NUCLEOLAR; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 85006341574     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.aal1880     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. J. L. Woolford Jr., S. J. Baserga, Ribosome biogenesis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 195, 643-681 (2013). doi: 10.1534/genetics.113.153197; pmid: 24190922
2. E. B. Mougey et al., The terminal balls characteristic of eukaryotic rRNA transcription units in chromatin spreads are rRNA processing complexes. Genes Dev. 7, 1609-1619 (1993). doi: 10.1101/gad.7.8.1609; pmid: 8339936
3. F. Dragon et al., A large nucleolar U3 ribonucleoprotein required for 18S ribosomal RNA biogenesis. Nature 417, 967-970 (2002). doi: 10.1038/nature00769; pmid: 12068309
4. J. Pérez-Fernández, A. Román, J. De Las Rivas, X. R. Bustelo, M. Dosil, The 90S preribosome is a multimodular structure that is assembled through a hierarchical mechanism. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 5414-5429 (2007). doi: 10.1128/MCB.00380-07; pmid: 17515605
5. M. Chaker-Margot, M. Hunziker, J. Barandun, B. D. Dill, S. Klinge, Stage-specific assembly events of the 6-MDa small-subunit processome initiate eukaryotic ribosome biogenesis. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 22, 920-923 (2015). pmid: 26479197
6. L. Zhang, C. Wu, G. Cai, S. Chen, K. Ye, Stepwise and dynamic assembly of the earliest precursors of small ribosomal subunits in yeast. Genes Dev. 30, 718-732 (2016). doi: 10.1101/gad.274688.115; pmid: 26980190
7. M. Hunziker et al., UtpA and UtpB chaperone nascent pre-ribosomal RNA and U3 snoRNA to initiate eukaryotic ribosome assembly. Nat. Commun. 7, 12090 (2016). doi: 10.1038/ncomms12090; pmid: 27354316
8. G. R. Wells et al., The PIN domain endonuclease Utp24 cleaves pre-ribosomal RNA at two coupled sites in yeast and humans. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 5399-5409 (2016). doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw213; pmid: 27034467
9. M. Kornprobst et al., Architecture of the 90S pre-ribosome: A structural view on the birth of the eukaryotic ribosome. Cell 166, 380-393 (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.014; pmid: 27419870
10. J. Talkish et al., Disruption of ribosome assembly in yeast blocks cotranscriptional pre-rRNA processing and affects the global hierarchy of ribosome biogenesis. RNA 22, 852-866 (2016). doi: 10.1261/rna.055780.115; pmid: 27036125
11. D. Kimanius, B. O. Forsberg, S. H. Scheres, E. Lindahl, Accelerated cryo-EM structure determination with parallelisation using GPUs in RELION-2. bioRxiv 5, e18722 (2016).doi: 10.1101/059717; pmid: 27845625
12. A. Ben-Shem et al., The structure of the eukaryotic ribosome at 3.0 A resolution. Science 334, 1524-1529 (2011). doi: 10.1126/science.1212642; pmid: 22096102
13. B. Meyer et al., The Bowen-Conradi syndrome protein Nep1 (Emg1) has a dual role in eukaryotic ribosome biogenesis, as an essential assembly factor and in the methylation of Y1191 in yeast 18S rRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 1526-1537 (2011). doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq931; pmid: 20972225
14. S. Sharma et al., Yeast Kre33 and human NAT10 are conserved 18S rRNA cytosine acetyltransferases that modify tRNAs assisted by the adaptor Tan1/THUMPD1. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, 2242-2258 (2015). doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv075; pmid: 25653167
15. P. C. Liu, D. J. Thiele, Novel stress-responsive genes EMG1 and NOP14 encode conserved, interacting proteins required for 40S ribosome biogenesis. Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 3644-3657 (2001). doi: 10.1091/mbc.12.11.3644; pmid: 11694595
16. C. Zhang et al., Integrative structural analysis of the UTPB complex, an early assembly factor for eukaryotic small ribosomal subunits. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 7475-7486 (2016). pmid: 27330138
17. K. Sharma, D. Tollervey, Base pairing between U3 small nucleolar RNA and the 5' end of 18S rRNA is required for pre-rRNA processing. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 6012-6019 (1999). doi: 10.1128/MCB.19.9.6012; pmid: 10454548
18. N. Marmier-Gourrier, A. Cléry, F. Schlotter, V. Senty-Ségault, C. Branlant, A second base pair interaction between U3 small nucleolar RNA and the 5'-ETS region is required for early cleavage of the yeast pre-ribosomal RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 9731-9745 (2011). doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr675; pmid: 21890904
19. L. M. Dutca, J. E. G. Gallagher, S. J. Baserga, The initial U3 snoRNA:pre-rRNA base pairing interaction required for pre-18S rRNA folding revealed by in vivo chemical probing. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 5164-5180 (2011). doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr044; pmid: 21349877
20. L. C. Yeh, J. C. Lee, Structure analysis of the 5' external transcribed spacer of the precursor ribosomal RNA from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Mol. Biol. 228, 827-839 (1992). doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90867-J; pmid: 1469716
21. R. V. Intine, L. Good, R. N. Nazar, Essential structural features in the Schizosaccharomyces pombe pre-rRNA 5' external transcribed spacer. J. Mol. Biol. 286, 695-708 (1999). doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2502; pmid: 10024444
22. S. Will, T. Joshi, I. L. Hofacker, P. F. Stadler, R. Backofen, LocARNA-P: Accurate boundary prediction and improved detection of structural RNAs. RNA 18, 900-914 (2012). doi: 10.1261/rna.029041.111; pmid: 22450757
23. M. Beltrame, Y. Henry, D. Tollervey, Mutational analysis of an essential binding site for the U3 snoRNA in the 5' external transcribed spacer of yeast pre-rRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 5139-5147 (1994). doi: 10.1093/nar/22.23.5139; pmid: 7800512
24. C. Zhang et al., Structure of Utp21 tandem WD domain provides insight into the organization of the UTPB complex involved in ribosome synthesis. PLOS ONE 9, e86540 (2014). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086540; pmid: 24466140
25. E. A. Champion, B. H. Lane, M. E. Jackrel, L. Regan, S. J. Baserga, A direct interaction between the Utp6 half-a-tetratricopeptide repeat domain and a specific peptide in Utp21 is essential for efficient pre-rRNA processing. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 6547-6556 (2008). doi: 10.1128/MCB.00906-08; pmid: 18725399
26. G. Pöll et al., In vitro reconstitution of yeast tUTP/UTP A and UTP B subcomplexes provides new insights into their modular architecture. PLOS ONE 9, e114898 (2014). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114898; pmid: 25501974
27. A. Delprato et al., Crucial role of the Rcl1p-Bms1p interaction for yeast pre-ribosomal RNA processing. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 10161-10172 (2014). doi: 10.1093/nar/gku682; pmid: 25064857
28. U. M. McCaughan et al., Pre-40S ribosome biogenesis factor Tsr1 is an inactive structural mimic of translational GTPases. Nat. Commun. 7, 11789 (2016). doi: 10.1038/ncomms11789; pmid: 27250689
29. D. Gelperin, L. Horton, J. Beckman, J. Hensold, S. K. Lemmon, Bms1p, a novel GTP-binding protein, and the related Tsr1p are required for distinct steps of 40S ribosome biogenesis in yeast. RNA 7, 1268-1283 (2001). doi: 10.1017/S1355838201013073; pmid: 11565749
30. T. Wegierski, E. Billy, F. Nasr, W. Filipowicz, Bms1p, a G-domaincontaining protein, associates with Rcl1p and is required for 18S rRNA biogenesis in yeast. RNA 7, 1254-1267 (2001). doi: 10.1017/S1355838201012079; pmid: 11565748
31. K. Karbstein, S. Jonas, J. A. Doudna, An essential GTPase promotes assembly of preribosomal RNA processing complexes. Mol. Cell 20, 633-643 (2005). doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.09.017; pmid: 16307926
32. C. Madru et al., Chaperoning 5S RNA assembly. Genes Dev. 29, 1432-1446 (2015). doi: 10.1101/gad.260349.115; pmid: 26159998
33. S. Zheng, K. Ye, Purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction analysis of Imp3 in complex with an Mpp10 peptide involved in yeast ribosome biogenesis. Acta Crystallogr. F Struct. Biol. Commun. 70, 918-921 (2014). doi: 10.1107/S2053230X14010905; pmid: 25005089
34. J. E. G. Gallagher, S. J. Baserga, Two-hybrid Mpp10p interaction-defective Imp4 proteins are not interaction defective in vivo but do confer specific pre-rRNA processing defects in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1404-1413 (2004). doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh318; pmid: 14990745
35. J. Lin, J. Lu, Y. Feng, M. Sun, K. Ye, An RNA-binding complex involved in ribosome biogenesis contains a protein with homology to tRNA CCA-adding enzyme. PLOS Biol. 11, e1001669 (2013). doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001669; pmid: 24130456
36. J. Rappsilber, Y. Ishihama, M. Mann, Stop and go extraction tips for matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization, nanoelectrospray, and LC/MS sample pretreatment in proteomics. Anal. Chem. 75, 663-670 (2003). doi: 10.1021/ac026117i; pmid: 12585499
37. L. Käll, J. D. Canterbury, J. Weston, W. S. Noble, M. J. MacCoss, Semi-supervised learning for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics datasets. Nat. Methods 4, 923-925 (2007). doi: 10.1038/nmeth1113; pmid: 17952086
38. G. Tang et al., EMAN2: An extensible image processing suite for electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 157, 38-46 (2007). doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2006.05.009; pmid: 16859925
39. T. Grant, N. Grigorieff, Measuring the optimal exposure for single particle cryo-EMusing a 2.6 A reconstruction of rotavirus VP6. eLife 4, e06980 (2015). doi: 10.7554/eLife.06980; pmid: 26023829
40. L. A. Kelley, S. Mezulis, C. M. Yates, M. N. Wass, M. J. E. Sternberg, The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 10, 845-858 (2015). doi: 10.1038/nprot.2015.053; pmid: 25950237
41. J. Söding, A. Biegert, A. N. Lupas, The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 33 (Web Server), W244-8 (2005). doi: 10.1093/nar/gki408; pmid: 15980461
42. E. F. Pettersen et al., UCSF Chimera-A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605-1612 (2004). doi: 10.1002/jcc.20084; pmid: 15264254
43. P. Emsley, K. Cowtan, Coot: Model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126-2132 (2004). doi: 10.1107/S0907444904019158; pmid: 15572765
44. A. Brown et al., Tools for macromolecular model building and refinement into electron cryo-microscopy reconstructions. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 71, 136-153 (2015). doi: 10.1107/S1399004714021683; pmid: 25615868
45. P. D. Adams et al., PHENIX: A comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 213-221 (2010). doi: 10.1107/S0907444909052925; pmid: 20124702
46. G. D. Pintilie, J. Zhang, T. D. Goddard, W. Chiu, D. C. Gossard, Quantitative analysis of cryo-EM density map segmentation by watershed and scale-space filtering, and fitting of structures by alignment to regions. J. Struct. Biol. 170, 427-438 (2010). doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2010.03.007; pmid: 20338243