Cone-beam computed tomography and interdisciplinary dentofacial therapy: An American Academy of Periodontology Best Evidence review focusing on risk assessment of the dentoalveolar bone changes influenced by tooth movement

Journal of Periodontology

Volumn 88, Issue 10, 2017, Pages 960-977

  Mandelaris, George A ^a,b   Neiva, Rodrigo ^c   Chambrone, Leandro ^d,e,f  

^a University of Illinois College of Dentistry ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSIDAD EL BOSQUE   (Colombia)

^e IBIRAPUERA UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

^f UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Alveolar bone; Cone beam computed tomography; Evidence based dentistry; Imaging, Three dimensional; Periodontics; Surgical procedures, Operative; Tooth movement techniques

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALVEOLAR BONE; ANATOMY; BONE REMODELING; CHEEK; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; EMBASE; ENGLISH (LANGUAGE); FEMALE; HEIGHT; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; MALE; MAXILLA; MEDLINE; ORTHODONTIC TOOTH MOVEMENT; PERIODONTICS; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOFT TISSUE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; THICKNESS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EVIDENCE BASED DENTISTRY; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; PROCEDURES; UNITED STATES;

ALVEOLAR PROCESS; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; EVIDENCE-BASED DENTISTRY; HUMANS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIETIES, DENTAL; TOOTH MOVEMENT TECHNIQUES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85030865478     PISSN: 00223492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2017.160781     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Chen LC, Lundgren T, Hallström H, Cherel F. Comparison of different methods of assessing alveolar ridge dimensions prior to dental implant placement. J Periodontol 2008;79:401-405.
2. Luk LC, Pow EH, Li TK, Chow TW. Comparison of ridge mapping and cone beam computed tomography for planning dental implant therapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:70-74.
3. Raes F, Renckens L, Aps J, Cosyn J, De Bruyn H. Reliability of circumferential bone level assessment around single implants in healed ridges and extraction sockets using cone beam CT. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013;15:661-672.
4. Fuentes R, Flores T, Navarro P, Salamanca C, Beltrán V, Borie E. Assessment of buccal bone thickness of aesthetic maxillary region: A cone-beam computed tomography study. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2015; 45:162-168.
5. Jung BA, Wehrbein H, Heuser L, Kunkel M. Vertical palatal bone dimensions on lateral cephalometry and cone-beam computed tomography: Implications for palatal implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:664-668.
6. Parsa A, Ibrahim N, Hassan B, van der Stelt P, Wismeijer D. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:e1-e7.
7. Fuhrmann RA. Three-dimensional evaluation of periodontal remodeling during orthodontic treatment. Semin Orthod 2002;8:23-28.
8. Lund H. Cone beam computed tomography in evaluations of some side effects of orthodontic treatment. Swed Dent J Suppl 2011;219:4-78.
9. Nowzari H, Molayem S, Chiu CH, Rich SK. Cone beam computed tomographic measurement of maxillary central incisors to determine prevalence of facial alveolar bone width ≥2 mm. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14:595-602.
10. Evangelista K, Vasconcelos Kde F, Bumann A, Hirsch E, Nitka M, Silva MA. Dehiscence and fenestration in patients with Class I and Class II division 1 malocclusion assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;138:133.e1-133.e7, discussion 133-135.
11. Yagci A, Veli I, Uysal T, Ucar FI, Ozer T, Enhos S. Dehiscence and fenestration in skeletal Class I, II, and III malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 2012;82:67-74.
12. Castro IO, Alencar AH, Valladares-Neto J, Estrela C. Apical root resorption due to orthodontic treatment detected by cone beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 2013;83:196-203.
13. Chan HL, Garaicoa-Pazmino C, Suarez F, et al. Incidence of implant buccal plate fenestration in the esthetic zone: A cone beam computed tomography study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:171-177.
14. de Freitas JC, Lyra OC, de Alencar AH, Estrela C. Long-term evaluation of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment using periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography. Dental Press J Orthod 2013;18:104-112.
15. Nikolic-Jakoba N, Spin-Neto R, Wenzel A. Cone beam computed tomography for detection of intrabony and furcation defects: A systematic review based on hierarchical model for diagnostic efficacy. J Periodontol 2016;87:630-644.
16. McGuire MK, Scheyer ET, Schupbach P. Growth factormediated treatment of recession defects: A randomized controlled trial and histologic and microcomputed tomography examination. J Periodontol 2009;80:550-564.
17. Handelman CS. The anterior alveolus: Its importance in limiting orthodontic treatment and its influence on the occurrence of iatrogenic sequelae. Angle Orthod 1996; 66:95-109, discussion 109-110.
18. Kim DM, Neiva R. Periodontal soft tissue non-root coverage procedures: A systematic review from the AAP Regeneration Workshop. J Periodontol 2015;86 (Suppl. 2):S56-S72.
19. Chambrone L, Tatakis DN. Periodontal soft tissue root coverage procedures: A systematic review from the AAP Regeneration Workshop. J Periodontol 2015; 86(Suppl. 2):S8-S51.
20. Roblee RD, Bolding SL, Landers JM. Surgically facilitated orthodontic therapy: A new tool for optimal interdisciplinary results. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2009;30:264-275, quiz 276, 278.
21. Mandelaris GA, Vence BS, Rosenfeld AL, Forbes DS. A classification system for crestal and radicular dentoalveolar bone phenotypes. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2013;33:289-296.
22. Richman C. Is gingival recession a consequence of an orthodontic tooth size and/or tooth position discrepancy? "A paradigm shift." Compend Contin Educ Dent 2011;32:62-69.
23. Molina-Berlanga N, Llopis-Perez J, Flores-Mir C, Puigdollers A. Lower incisor dentoalveolar compensation and symphysis dimensions among Class I and III malocclusion patients with different facial vertical skeletal patterns. Angle Orthod 2013;83:948-955.
24. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:1006-1012.
25. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1 [updated September 2011] The Cochrane Collaboration 2011. Available at: www.cochrane-handbook.org. Accessed February 15, 2015.
26. Chambrone L, Faggion CM Jr., Pannuti CM, Chambrone LA. Evidence-based periodontal plastic surgery: An assessment of quality of systematic reviews in the treatment of recession-type defects. J Clin Periodontol 2010;37:1110-1118.
27. Chambrone L, Chambrone LA, Lima LA. Effects of occlusal overload on peri-implant tissue health: A systematic review of animal-model studies. J Periodontol 2010;81:1367-1378.
28. Chambrone L, Mandia J Jr., Shibli JA, Romito GA, Abrahao M. Dental implants installed in irradiated jaws: A systematic review. J Dent Res 2013;92(Suppl. 12): 119S-130S.
29. Chambrone L, Shibli JA, Mercúrio CE, Cardoso B, Preshaw PM. Efficacy of standard (SLA) and modified sandblasted and acid-etched (SLActive) dental implants in promoting immediate and/or early occlusal loading protocols: A systematic review of prospective studies. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:359-370.
30. Chambrone L, Preshaw PM, Ferreira JD, Rodrigues JA, Cassoni A, Shibli JA. Effects of tobacco smoking on the survival rate of dental implants placed in areas of maxillary sinus floor augmentation: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:408-416.
31. Chambrone L, Tatakis DN. Long-term outcomes of untreated buccal gingival recessions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol 2016;87: 796-808.
32. Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses. University of Ottawa, 2001. Available at http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical-epidemiology/oxford.htm. Accessed January 7, 2016.
33. ADA Clinical Practice Guidelines Handbook [updated November 2013]. American Dental Association. Available at: http://ebd.ada.org/contentdocs/ADA-Clinical-Practice-Guidelines-Handbook- 2013-Update.pdf. Accessed January 29, 2014.
34. Chambrone L, Ramos UD, Reynolds MA. Infrared laser wavelengths for the treatment of moderate to severe periodontitis: An American Academy of Periodontology best evidence review. J Periodontol 2018; in press.
35. Garib DG, Henriques JFC, Janson G, de Freitas MR, Fernandes AY. Periodontal effects of rapid maxillary expansion with tooth-tissue-borne and tooth-borne expanders: A computed tomography evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:749-758.
36. Gauthier C, Voyer R, Paquette M, Rompré P, Papadakis A. Periodontal effects of surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion evaluated clinically and with conebeam computerized tomography: 6-month preliminary results. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139 (Suppl. 4):S117-S128.
37. Rungcharassaeng K, Caruso JM, Kan JY, Kim J, Taylor G. Factors affecting buccal bone changes of maxillary posterior teeth after rapid maxillary expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:428.e1-e8.
38. Coscia G, Coscia V, Peluso V, Addabbo F. Augmented corticotomy combined with accelerated orthodontic forces in Class III orthognathic patients: Morphologic aspects of the mandibular anterior ridge with conebeam computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;71:1760.e1-e9.
39. Wang B, Shen G, Fang B, Yu H, Wu Y, Sun L. Augmented corticotomy-assisted surgical orthodontics decompensates lower incisors in Class III malocclusion patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;72:596-602.
40. Ahn H-W, Moon SC, Baek S-H. Morphometric evaluation of changes in the alveolar bone and roots of the maxillary anterior teeth before and after en masse retraction using cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 2013;83:212-221.
41. Cao T, Xu L, Shi J, Zhou Y. Combined orthodonticperiodontal treatment in periodontal patients with anteriorly displaced incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015;148:805-813.
42. Lombardo L, Bragazzi R, Perissinotto C, Mirabella D, Siciliani G. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of periodontal and bone support loss in extraction cases. Prog Orthod 2013;14:29.
43. Lund H, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl H-G. Cone beam computed tomography evaluations of marginal alveolar bone before and after orthodontic treatment combined with premolar extractions. Eur J Oral Sci 2012;120:201-211.
44. Nayak Krishna US, Shetty A, Girija MP, Nayak R. Changes in alveolar bone thickness due to retraction of anterior teeth during orthodontic treatment: A cephalometric and computed tomography comparative study. Indian J Dent Res 2013;24:736-741.
45. Picancxo PR, Valarelli FP, Cancxado RH, de Freitas KM, Picancxo GV. Comparison of the changes of alveolar bone thickness in maxillary incisor area in extraction and non-extraction cases: Computerized tomography evaluation. Dental Press J Orthod 2013;18:91-98.
46. Garlock DT, Buschang PH, Araujo EA, Behrents RG, Kim KB. Evaluation of marginal alveolar bone in the anterior mandible with pretreatment and posttreatment computed tomography in nonextraction patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016;149:192-201.
47. Lee K-M, Kim Y-I, Park S-B, Son W-S. Alveolar bone loss around lower incisors during surgical orthodontic treatment in mandibular prognathism. Angle Orthod 2012;82:637-644.
48. Zemann W, Schanbacher M, Feichtinger M, Linecker A, Kärcher H. Dentoalveolar changes after surgically assisted maxillary expansion: A three-dimensional evaluation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107:36-42.
49. Sarikaya S, Haydar B, Ciǧer S, Ariyürek M. Changes in alveolar bone thickness due to retraction of anterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122:15-26.
50. Fuhrmann R. Three-dimensional interpretation of periodontal lesions and remodeling during orthodontic treatment. Part III. J Orofac Orthop 1996;57:224-237.
51. Solem RC, Marasco R, Guiterrez-Pulido L, Nielsen I, Kim SH, Nelson G. Three-dimensional soft-tissue and hard-tissue changes in the treatment of bimaxillary protrusion. AmJ Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;144: 218-228.
52. Proffit WR, Fields HW Jr., Moray LJ. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: Estimates from the NHANES III survey. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1998;13:97-106.
53. Cho M-I, Garant PR. Development and general structure of the periodontium. Periodontol 2000 2000;24: 9-27.
54. Nanci A, Moffatt P. Embryology of craniofacial bones. In: McCauley LK, Somerman MJ, eds. Mineralized Tissues in Oral and Craniofacial Science. Biological Principles and Clinical Correlates. Ames, IA: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012:3-11.
55. Weijs WA, de Jongh HJ. Strain in mandibular alveolar bone during mastication in the rabbit. Arch Oral Biol 1977;22:667-675.
56. Yeh K, Popowics T, Rafferty K, Herring S, Egbert M. The effects of tooth extraction on alveolar bone biomechanics in the miniature pig, Sus scrofa. Arch Oral Biol 2010;55:663-669.
57. Herring SW. Biomechanics of teeth in bone; function, movement and prosthetic rehabilitation. In: McCauley LK, Somerman MJ, eds. Mineralized Tissues in Oral and Craniofacial Science. Biological Principles and Clinical Correlates. Ames, IA: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012: 255-269.
58. Lorenzoni DC, Fracalossi AC, Carlin V, Ribeiro DA, Sant'anna EF. Mutagenicity and cytotoxicity in patients submitted to ionizing radiation. Angle Orthod 2013;83:104-109.
59. Wilcko WM, Wilcko T, Bouquot JE, Ferguson DJ. Rapid orthodontics with alveolar reshaping: Two case reports of decrowding. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2001;21:9-19.
60. Vardimon AD, Oren E, Ben-Bassat Y. Cortical bone remodeling/tooth movement ratio during maxillary incisor retraction with tip versus torque movements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:520-529.
61. Wainwright WM. Faciolingual tooth movement: Its influence on the root and cortical plate. Am J Orthod 1973;64:278-302.
62. Kapila SD, Nervina JM. Alveolar boundary conditions in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. In: Kapila SD. Cone Beam Tomography in Orthodontics. Indications, Insights, and Innovations. Ames, IA: Wiley-Blackwell; 2014:293-316.
63. Mandelaris GA, Relle R, DeGroot B, Huang I. Surgically facilitated orthodontic therapy (SFOT): Optimizing dentoalveolar bone and space appropriation for facially prioritized interdisciplinary dentofacial therapy. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2018;39(3): in press.
64. Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc 2006;72:75-80.
65. Mah JK, Danforth RA, Bumann A, Hatcher D. Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;96:508-513.
66. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, Howerton WB. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, New Tom 3G and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35:219-226.