Incidence of Implant Buccal Plate Fenestration in the Esthetic Zone: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 171-177

  Chan, Hsun Liang ^a   Garaicoa Pazmino, Carlos ^a   Suarez, Fernando ^a   Monje, Alberto ^a   Benavides, Erika ^a   Oh, Tae Ju ^a   Wang, Hom Lay ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

computed tomography; computer guided surgery; cone beam virtual implant placement; dental implants, fenestration; maxilla

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HARD PALATE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INCISOR; JAW; JAW DISEASE; MALE; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OROANTRAL FISTULA; RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALVEOLAR PROCESS; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL FISTULA; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS, SINGLE-TOOTH; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; INCISOR; MALE; MAXILLA; MAXILLARY DISEASES; MIDDLE AGED; PALATE, HARD; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84900007611     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: 19424434     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11607/jomi.3397     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. 1. Buser D, von Arx T. Surgical procedures in partially edentulous patients with ITI implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11(suppl 1): 83–100.
2. 2. Misch CE, Goodacre CJ, Finley JM, et al. Consensus conference panel report: Crown-height space guidelines for implant dentistry—Part 1. Implant Dent 2005;14:312–318.
3. 3. Tarnow DP, Cho SC, Wallace SS. The effect of inter-implant distance on the height of inter-implant bone crest. J Periodontol 2000;71: 546–549.
4. 4. Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: Anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19(suppl):43–61.
5. 5. Lau SL, Chow J, Li W, Chow LK. Classification of maxillary central incisors—Implications for immediate implant in the esthetic zone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69:142–153.
6. 6. Daftary F. Dentoalveolar morphology: Evaluation of natural root form versus cylindrical implant fixtures. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1997;9:469–477.
7. 7. Chan HL, Benavides E, Yeh CY, Fu JH, Rudek IE, Wang HL. Risk assessment of lingual plate perforation in posterior mandibular region: A virtual implant placement study using cone-beam computed tomography. J Periodontol 2011;82:129–135.
8. 8. Su H, Gonzalez-Martin O, Weisgold A, Lee E. Considerations of implant abutment and crown contour: Critical contour and subcritical contour. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010;30:335–343.
9. 9. Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:212–218.
10. 10. Farmer M, Darby I. Ridge dimensional changes following single-tooth extraction in the aesthetic zone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013 Jan 25. [Epub ahead of print]
11. 11. Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: A clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003;23:313–323.
12. 12. Becker W, Dahlin C, Lekholm U, et al. Five-year evaluation of implants placed at extraction and with dehiscences and fenestration defects augmented with ePTFE membranes: Results from a prospective multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 1999;1:27-32.
13. 13. Blanco J, Alonso A, Sanz M. Long-term results and survival rate of implants treated with guided bone regeneration: A 5-year case series prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:294–301.
14. 14. Fortin T, Bosson JL, Coudert JL, Isidori M. Reliability of preoperative planning of an image-guided system for oral implant placement based on 3-dimensional images: An in vivo study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:886–893.
15. 15. Katsoulis J, Pazera P, Mericske-Stern R. Prosthetically driven, computer-guided implant planning for the edentulous maxilla: A model study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009;11:238–245.
16. 16. Braut V, Bornstein MM, Belser U, Buser D. Thickness of the anterior maxillary facial bone wall—A retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2011;31:125–131.
17. 17. Huynh-Ba G, Pjetursson BE, Sanz M, et al. Analysis of the socket bone wall dimensions in the upper maxilla in relation to immediate implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:37–42.
18. 18. Vera C, De Kok IJ, Reinhold D, et al. Evaluation of buccal alveolar bone dimension of maxillary anterior and premolar teeth: A cone beam computed tomography investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27:1514–1519.
19. 19. Roe P, Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Caruso JM, Zimmerman G, Mesquida J. Horizontal and vertical dimensional changes of peri-implant facial bone following immediate placement and provision-alization of maxillary anterior single implants: A 1-year cone beam computed tomography study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012; 27:393–400.
20. 20. Kan JY, Roe P, Rungcharassaeng K, et al. Classification of sagittal root position in relation to the anterior maxillary osseous housing for immediate implant placement: A cone beam computed tomography study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:873–876.
21. 21. Steigmann M, Wang HL. Esthetic buccal flap for correction of buccal fenestration defects during flapless immediate implant surgery. J Periodontol 2006;77:517–522.
22. 22. Chan HL, Misch K, Wang HL. Dental imaging in implant treatment planning. Implant Dent 2010;19:288–298.
23. 23. D’Haese J, Van De Velde T, Komiyama A, Hultin M, De Bruyn H. Accuracy and complications using computer-designed stereolithographic surgical guides for oral rehabilitation by means of dental implants: A review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14:321–335.
24. 24. Ganz SD. Defining new paradigms for assessment of implant receptor sites. The use of CT/CBCT and interactive virtual treatment planning for congenitally missing lateral incisors. Compend Contin Educ Denti 2008;29:256–258, 260–262, 264–267.
25. 25. Ganz SD. Using interactive technology: In the zone with the Triangle of Bone. Dent Implantol Update 2008;19:33–38.
26. 26. Ganz SD. The triangle of bone—A formula for successful implant placement and restoration. Implant Soc 1995;5:2–6.
27. 27. Ganz SD. Techniques for the use of CT imaging for the fabrication of surgical guides. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2006;14: 75–97.