Comparison of ridge mapping and cone beam computed tomography for planning dental implant therapy

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 70-74

  Luk, Luki C K ^a   Pow, Edmond H N ^b   Li, Thomas K L ^b   Chow, T W ^b  

^a The University of Hong Kong ^*  (Hong Kong)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Dental implant; Measurement; Ridge mapping

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL CARE; EDENTULOUSNESS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; JAW; MALE; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PERIODONTIUM; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

ADULT; ALVEOLAR PROCESS; CEPHALOMETRY; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST MEDIA; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL MODELS; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS, PARTIALLY; MALE; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PERIODONTIUM; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79955004375     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Engelman MJ, Sorensen JA, Moy P. Optimum placement of osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 59:467-473.
2. Vercruyssen M, Jacobs R, Van Assche N, van Steenberghe D. The use of CT scan based planning for oral rehabilitation by means of implants and its transfer to the surgical field: A critical review on accuracy. J Oral Rehabil 2008; 35:454-474.
3. Wilson DJ. Ridge mapping for determination of alveolar ridge width. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989; 4:41-43.
4. ten Bruggenkate CM, de Rijcke TB, Kraaijenhagen HA, Oosterbeek HS. Ridge mapping. Implant Dent 1994; 3:179-182.
5. Allen F, Smith DG. An assessment of the accuracy of ridgemapping in planning implant therapy for the anterior maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11:34-38.
6. Chen LC, Lundgren T, Hallstrom H, Cherel F. Comparison of different methods of assessing alveolar ridge dimensions prior to dental implant placement. J Periodontol 2008; 79:401-405.
7. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1:307-310.
8. Schulze D, Heiland M, Thurmann H, Adam G. Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4-and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33:83-86.
9. Kobayashi K, Shimoda S, Nakagawa Y, Yamamoto A. Accuracy in measurement of distance using limited cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19:228-231.
10. Pinsky HM, Dyda S, Pinsky RW, Misch KA, Sarment DP. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements using cone-beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35:410-416.
11. Loubele M, Guerrero ME, Jacobs R, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D. A comparison of jaw dimensional and quality assessments of bone characteristics with cone-beam CT, spiral tomography, and multi-slice spiral CT. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22:446-454.