The anterior alveolus: Its importance in limiting orthodontic treatment and its influence on the occurrence of iatrogenic sequelae

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 66, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 95-110

  Handelman, Chester S ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Alveolar width; Borderline surgical case; Facial type; Iatrogenic loss

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IATROGENIC DISEASE; INCISOR; JAW; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PERIODONTAL DISEASE; TOOTH OCCLUSION;

ADULT; ALVEOLAR PROCESS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEPHALOMETRY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IATROGENIC DISEASE; INCISOR; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS I; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS III; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; TOOTH MOVEMENT; VERTICAL DIMENSION;

EID: 0029691187     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Proffit WR, White RP Jr. Who needs surgical-orthodontic treatment? Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1990;5:81-89.
2. Proffit WR, Phillips C, Douvartzidis A. Comparison of orthodontic and surgical-orthodontic treatment of Class II malocclusion in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992;101:556-565.
3. Cassidy DW Jr., Herbosa EG, Rotskoff KS, Johnston LE, Jr. A comparison of surgery and orthodontics in "borderline" adults with Class II, Division 1 malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1993;104:455-470.
4. Lupi JE, Handelman CS, Sadowsky C. Prevalence and severity of apical root resorption and alveolar bone loss in orthodontically treated adults. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop: In press.
5. Handelman, C.S. Limitations of orthodontic treatment in adults: Part I, The impact of iatrogenic phenomena. In: McNamara JA Jr., Trotman CA, eds. Orthodontic treatment: The management of unfavorable sequalae. Monograph 32, Craniofacial Growth Series, Center for Human Growth and Development. Ann Arbor:The University of Michigan, 1996;177-203.
6. Proffitt WR , Ackerman JL. Diagnosis and treatment planning. In: Graber TM, Swain BF, eds. Current orthodontic concepts and techniques. St. Louis: Mosby, 1982, chapter 1.
7. Edwards JG. A study of the anterior portion of the palate as it relates to orthodontic therapy. Am J Orthod 1976; 69:249-273.
8. Ten Hoeve A, Mulie RM. The effect of anterioposterior incisor repositioning on the palatal cortex as studied with laminography. J Clin Orthod 1976; 10:804-22.
9. Mulie RM, Ten Hoeve A. The limitations of tooth movement within the symphysis studied with laminography and standardized occlusal films. J Clin Orthod 1976; 10:882-93.
10. Sassouni V. A classification of skeletal facial types. Am J Orthod 1969; 55:109-123.
11. Isaacson JR, Issacson RJ, Speidel TM, Worms FW. Extreme variation in vertical facial growth and associated variation in skeletal and dental relations. Angle Orthod 1971;41:219-229.
12. Sperry TP, Speidel TM, Isaacson RJ, Worms FW. The role of dental compensations in orthodontic treatment of mandibular prognathism. Angle Orthod 1977; 47:293-299.
13. Årtun J, Krogstad O. Periodontal status of mandibular incisors following excessive proclinations. A study in adults with surgically treated mandibular prognathism. Angle Orthod 1987; 47:293-299.
14. Broadbent BH. A new x-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthod 1931; 1:45-66.
15. Kaley J, Phillips C. Factors related to root resorption in edgewise practice. Angle Orthod 1991; 61:125-132.