Developing policy scenarios for sustainable urban growth management: A Delphi approach

Sustainability (Switzerland)

Volumn 9, Issue 10, 2017, Pages

  Perveen, Sajida ^a   Kamruzzaman, Md ^a   Yigitcanlar, Tan ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Australia; Delphi method; Policy scenarios; Regional plan; Scenario based planning; South East Queensland; Sustainability indicators; Sustainable urban development; Urban growth management

Indexed keywords

DELPHI ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUE; REGIONAL PLANNING; SCENARIO ANALYSIS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN GROWTH; URBAN POLICY; URBANIZATION;

AUSTRALIA; QUEENSLAND;

EID: 85030451794     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20711050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su9101787     Document Type: Article

References (148)

1. Warner, S.B. The Private City: Philadelphia in Three Periods of Its Growth; University of Pennsylvania Press: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1987.
2. Clark, W.C., Dickson, N.M. Sustainability science: The emerging research program. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 8059-8061.
3. Shkaruba, A., Kireyeu, V., Likhacheva, O. Rural-urban peripheries under socioeconomic transitions: Changing planning contexts, lasting legacies, and growing pressure. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2017, 165, 244- 255.
4. Shearer, A.W., Mouat, D.A., Bassett, S.D., Binford, M.W., Johnson, C.W., Saarinen, J.A., Gertler, A.W., Koracin, J. Land Use Scenarios: Environmental Consequences of Development; CRC Press: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009.
5. Jabareen, Y.R. Sustainable urban forms. J. Plan. Ed. Res. 2006, 26, 38-52.
6. Haghshenas, H., Vaziri, M. Urban sustainable transportation indicators for global comparison. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 15, 115-121.
7. Beder, S. Costing the earth: Equity, sustainable development and environmental economics. N. Z. J. Envtl. L. 2000, 4, 227.
8. Mavrakis, A., Papavasileiou, C., Salvati, L. Towards (un)sustainable urban growth? Industrial development, land-use, soil depletion and climate aridity in a Greek agro-forest area. J. Arid Environ. 2015, 121, 1-6.
9. Zhao, P. Sustainable urban expansion and transportation in a growing megacity: Consequences of urban sprawl for mobility on the urban fringe of Beijing. Habitat Int. 2010, 34, 236-243.
10. Roy, M. Planning for sustainable urbanisation in fast growing cities: Mitigation and adaptation issues addressed in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Habitat Int. 2009, 33, 276-286.
11. Yigitcanlar, T., Teriman, S. Rethinking sustainable urban development: Towards an integrated planning and development process. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 12, 341-352.
12. Abdel-Galil, R.E.S. Desert reclamation, a management system for sustainable urban expansion. Prog. Plan. 2012, 78, 151-206.
13. Geneletti, D., La Rosa, D., Spyra, M., Cortinovis, C. A review of approaches and challenges for sustainable planning in urban peripheries. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2017, 165, 231-243.
14. Wu, X., Hu, Y., He, H., Xi, F., Bu, R. Study on forecast scenarios for simulation of future urban growth in Shenyang city based on sleuth model. Geo-spat. Inf. Sci. 2010, 13, 32-39.
15. Bartholomew, K., Ewing, R. Land use transportation scenarios and future vehicle travel and land consumption: A meta-analysis. Am. Plan. Assoc. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 2009, 75, 13-27.
16. Hua, L., Tang, L., Cui, S., Yin, K. Simulating urban growth using the Sleuth Model in a coastal peri-urban district in China. Sustainability 2014, 6, 3899-3914.
17. Plata-Rocha, W., Gomez-Delgado, M., Bosque-Sendra, J. Simulating urban growth scenarios using GIS and multicriteria analysis techniques: A case study of the Madrid region, Spain. Environ. Plan. B Plan. Des. 2011, 38, 1012-1031.
18. Perveen, S., Yigitcanlar, T., Kamruzzaman, M., Hayes, J. Evaluating transport externalities of urban growth: A critical review of scenario-based planning methods. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 1-16, doi:10.1007/s13762-016-1144-7.
19. Ratcliffe, J., Krawczyk, E. Imagineering city futures: The use of prospective through scenarios in urban planning. Futures 2011, 43, 642-653.
20. Lindgren, M., Bandhold, H. Scenario Planning-Revised and Updated; Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke, UK, 2009; p. 216.
21. Khakee, A. Scenario construction for urban planning. Omega 1991, 19, 459-469.
22. Perveen, S., Kamruzzaman, M., Yigitcanlar, T. What Constitutes a Sustainable Urban Growth Management Policy? A Delphi Approach to Develop Alternative Policy Scenarios. In Proceedings of the State of Australian Cities National Conference, Adelaide, South Australia, 28-30 November 2017.
23. Perveen, S., Kamruzzaman, M., Yigitcanlar, T. What to assess to model the transport impacts of urban growth? A Delphi approach to examine the space-time suitability of transport indicators. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 2017, under review.
24. Aysan, M., Demir, O., Altan, Z., Dokmeci, V. Industrial decentralization in Istanbul and its impact on transport. J. Urban Plan. Dev. 1997, 123, 40-58.
25. Litman, T. Developing indicators for comprehensive and sustainable transport planning. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2007, 2017, 10-15.
26. Jepson, E.J., Edwards, M.M. How possible is sustainable urban development? An analysis of planners' perceptions about new urbanism, smart growth and the ecological city. Plan. Pract. Res. 2010, 25, 417-437.
27. Mitchell, G. Problems and fundamentals of sustainable development indicators. Sustain. Dev. 1996, 4, 1-
28. Santos, A.S., Ribeiro, S.K. The role of transport indicators to the improvement of local governance in Rio de Janeiro city: A contribution for the debate on sustainable future. Case Stud. Transp. Policy 2015, 3, 415- 420.
29. Shiftan, Y., Kaplan, S., Hakkert, S. Scenario building as a tool for planning a sustainable transportation system. Transp. Res. Part D 2003, 8, 323-342.
30. Haughton, G., Hunter, C. Sustainable Cities; Routledge: Abingdon-on-Thames, UK, 2004.
31. Yigitcanlar, T., Dizdaroglu, D. Ecological approaches in planning for sustainable cities: A review of the literature. Glob. J. Environ. Sci. Manag. 2015, 1, 159-188.
32. Kamruzzaman, M., Hine, J., Yigitcanlar, T. Investigating the link between carbon dioxide emissions and transport-related social exclusion in rural Northern Ireland. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 12, 3463-
33. Forber, D.R. Managing Growth in America's Communities; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1997.
34. Frenkel, A. The potential effect of national growth-management policy on urban sprawl and the depletion of open spaces and farmland. Land Use Policy 2004, 21, 357-369.
35. Bengston, D.N., Fletcher, J.O., Nelson, K.C. Public policies for managing urban growth and protecting open space: Policy instruments and lessons learned in the United States. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2004, 69, 271- 286.
36. Nelson, A.C. Urban planning: Growth management. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences; Baltes, N.J.S.B., Ed., Pergamon: Oxford, UK, 2001; pp. 16051-16055.
37. Anthony, J. Do state growth management regulations reduce sprawl? Urban Aff. Rev. 2004, 39, 376-397.
38. Yigitcanlar, T., Kamruzzaman, M. Investigating the interplay between transport, land use and the environment: A review of the literature. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 11, 2121-2132.
39. Gkartzios, M., Scott, M. Countering counter-urbanisation: Spatial planning challenges in a dispersed city-region, the greater Dublin area. Town Plan. Rev. 2010, 81, 23-52.
40. Deilami, K., Kamruzzaman, M. Modelling the urban heat island effect of smart growth policy scenarios in Brisbane. Land Use Policy 2017, 64, 38-55.
41. Neuman, M. The compact city fallacy. J. Plan. Ed. Res. 2005, 25, 11-26.
42. Morison, I. The corridor city: Planning for growth in the 1960s. In The Australian Metropolis: A Planning History; Allen & Unwin: Crows Nest, Australia, 2000; pp. 113-130.
43. Li, P., Wang, C., Zhang, X. Did city cluster development help improve labor productivity in China? J. Asia Pac. Econ. 2017, 22, 122-135.
44. Kamruzzaman, M., Baker, D., Washington, S., Turrell, G. Advance transit oriented development typology: Case study in Brisbane, Australia. J. Transp. Geogr. 2014, 34, 54-70.
45. Wheeler, S.M., Tomuta, M., Haden, V.R., Jackson, L.E. The impacts of alternative patterns of urbanization on greenhouse gas emissions in an agricultural county. J. Urban. Int. Res. Placemak. Urban Sustain. 2013, 6, 213-235.
46. Shen, L.-Y., Jorge Ochoa, J., Shah, M.N., Zhang, X. The application of urban sustainability indicators-A comparison between various practices. Habitat Int. 2011, 35, 17-29.
47. Dobranskyte-Niskota, A., Perujo, A., Pregl, M. Indicators to Assess Sustainability of Transport Activities; European Commission, Joint Research Centre: Brussels, Belgium; Luxembourg, 2007.
48. Herva, M., Franco, A., Carrasco, E.F., Roca, E. Review of corporate environmental indicators. J. Clean. Prod. 2011, 19, 1687-1699.
49. Hiremath, R.B., Balachandra, P., Kumar, B., Bansode, S.S., Murali, J. Indicator-based urban sustainability-A review. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2013, 17, 555-563.
50. Dur, F., Yigitcanlar, T., Bunker, J. A spatial-indexing model for measuring neighbourhood-level land-use and transport integration. Environ. Plan. B 2014, 41, 792-812.
51. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD Core Set of Indicators for Environmental Performance Reviews; OECD Environment Monographs: Paris, France, 1993.
52. Kasanko, M., Lavalle, C., Demicheli, L., McCormick, N.L., Turchini, M. Land-use and transport-network indicators in the assessment of the sustainability of urban areas. Remote Sens. Environ. Monit. GIS Appl. Geol. 2002, 4545, 118-129.
53. Gilbert, R., Tanguay, H. Sustainable Transportation Performance Indicators Project: Brief Review of Some Worldwide Activity and Development of an Initial Long List of Indicators; Mississauga, Centre for Sustainable Transportation: Toronto, ON, Canada, 2000.
54. Niemeijer, D., de Groot, R.S. A conceptual framework for selecting environmental indicator sets. Ecol. Indic. 2008, 8, 14-25.
55. AtKisson, A. Developing indicators of sustainable community: Lessons from sustainable Seattle. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 1996, 16, 337-350.
56. Josza, A., Brown, D. Neighborhood Sustainability Indicators Report on a Best Practice Workshop-Report, School of Urban Planning; McGill University and the Urban Ecology Center/SodemC: Montreal, QC, Canada
57. Yigitcanlar, T., Kamruzzaman, M., Teriman, S. Neighborhood sustainability assessment: Evaluating residential development sustainability in a developing country context. Sustainability 2015, 7, 2570-2602.
58. Yigitcanlar, T., Dur, F. Developing a sustainability assessment model: The sustainable infrastructure, land-use, environment and transport model. Sustainability 2010, 2, 321.
59. Dur, F., Yigitcanlar, T. Assessing land-use and transport integration via a spatial composite indexing model. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 12, 803-816.
60. Dizdaroglu, D., Yigitcanlar, T. A parcel-scale assessment tool to measure sustainability through urban ecosystem components: The MUSIX model. Ecol. Indic. 2014, 41, 115-130.
61. Rahman, G., Alam, D., Islam, S. City Growth with Urban Sprawl and Problems of Management for Sustainable Urbanisation; International Society of City and Regional Planners (ISOCARP) Congress: Hague, The Netherlands, 2008.
62. Allen, A., You, N. Sustainable Urbanisation: Building the Green and Brown Agenda; UN-HABITAT: Yangon, Myanmar, 2002.
63. Riddell, R. Sustainable Urban Planning: Tipping the Balance; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008.
64. Hens, L., De Wit, J. The development of indicators and core indicators for sustainable development: A state of the art review. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. 2003, 6, 436-459.
65. Musakwa, W., Van Niekerk, A. Monitoring sustainable urban development using built-up area indicators: A case study of Stellenbosch, South Africa. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2015, 17, 547-566.
66. Chiesura, A. The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2004, 68, 129-138.
67. Camagni, R. Sustainable urban development: Definition and reasons for a research programme. Int. J. Environ. Pollut. 1998, 10, 6-27.
68. Dizdaroglu, D., Yigitcanlar, T. Integrating urban ecosystem sustainability assessment into policy-making: Insights from the gold coast city. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 2016, 59, 1982-2006.
69. Yigitcanlar, T., Dur, F., Dizdaroglu, D. Towards prosperous sustainable cities: A multiscalar urban sustainability assessment approach. Habitat Int. 2015, 45, 36-46.
70. Button, K.J., Pearce, D.W. Improving the urban environment: How to adjust national and local government policy for sustainable urban growth. Prog. Plan. 1989, 32, 135137-135184.
71. Liu, Y. Modelling sustainable urban growth in a rapidly urbanising region using a fuzzy-constrained cellular automata approach. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2012, 26, 151-167.
72. Ness, B., Urbel-Piirsalu, E., Anderberg, S., Olsson, L. Categorising tools for sustainability assessment. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 60, 498-508.
73. Pearman, A.D. Scenario construction for transport planning. Transp. Plan. Technol. 1988, 12, 73-85.
74. Oana, P.L., Harutyun, S., Brendan, W., Sheila, C. Scenarios and indicators supporting urban regional planning. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2011, 21, 243-252.
75. Harries, C. Correspondence to what? Coherence to what? What is good scenario-based decision making? Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2003, 70, 797-817.
76. Gibson, J.E. The eight scenarios for urban revitalization. Proc. IEEE 1975, 63, 444-451.
77. Fertner, C., Jørgensen, G., Nielsen, T.S. Land use scenarios for greater Copenhagen: Modelling the impact of the Fingerplan. J. Settl. Spat. Plan. 2012, 3, 1-10.
78. Dischinger, M., Jackson, J.M. Which future urban scenarios can we construct? Manag. Environ. Qual. Int. J. 2006, 17, 409-420.
79. Pillkahn, U. Using Trends and Scenarios as Tools for Strategy Development: Shaping the Future of Your Enterprise; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008.
80. Tolley, R., Lumsdon, L., Bickerstaff, K. The future of walking in Europe: A Delphi project to identify expert opinion on future walking scenarios. Transp. Policy 2001, 8, 307-315.
81. Vermeiren, K., Van Rompaey, A., Loopmans, M., Serwajja, E., Mukwaya, P. Urban growth of Kampala, Uganda: Pattern analysis and scenario development. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2012, 106, 199-206.
82. Sakieh, Y., Amiri, B.J., Danekar, A., Feghhi, J., Dezhkam, S. Scenario-based evaluation of urban development sustainability: An integrative modeling approach to compromise between urbanization suitability index and landscape pattern. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2015, 17, 1343-1365.
83. Schwarz, P. The art of the long view-Planning for the future in an uncertain world. In Currency Doubleday, New York; Wiley: Chichester, UK, 1991.
84. Feng, X., Zhang, J., Fujiwara, A. Adding a new step with spatial autocorrelation to improve the four-step travel demand model with feedback for a developing city. IATSS Res. 2009, 33, 44-54.
85. Tian, G., Qiao, Z. Modeling urban expansion policy scenarios using an agent-based approach for Guangzhou metropolitan region of China. Ecol. Soc. 2014, 19, doi:0.5751/ES-06909-190352.
86. Villarreal, M.L., Norman, L.M., Boykin, K.G., Wallace, C.S.A. Biodiversity losses and conservation trade-offs: Assessing future urban growth scenarios for a North American trade corridor. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Ecosyst. Serv. Manag. 2013, 9, 90-103.
87. Pullin, A., Frampton, G., Jongman, R., Kohl, C., Livoreil, B., Lux, A., Pataki, G., Petrokofsky, G., Podhora, A., Saarikoski, H., et al. Selecting appropriate methods of knowledge synthesis to inform biodiversity policy. Biodivers. Conserv. 2016, 25, 1285-1300.
88. Susskind, L., McKearnan, S., Thomas-Larmer, J. The Consensus Building Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide to Reaching Agreement; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1999.
89. Heiko, A. Consensus measurement in Delphi studies: Review and implications for future quality assurance. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2012, 79, 1525-1536.
90. MacCarthy, B.L., Atthirawong, W. Factors affecting location decisions in international operations-A Delphi study. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2003, 23, 794-818.
91. Chakraborty, A., Mishra, S. Land use and transit ridership connections: Implications for state-level planning agencies. Land Use Policy 2013, 30, 458-469.
92. Hemphill, L., McGreal, S., Berry, J. An aggregated weighting system for evaluating sustainable urban regeneration. J. Prop. Res. 2002, 19, 353-373.
93. Rikkonen, P., Tapio, P. Future prospects of alternative agro-based bioenergy use in Finland-Constructing scenarios with quantitative and qualitative Delphi data. Technol. Forecast. Soc.
94. Fhado., F.L. ,an alternative to sprawl and auto-centric development model through a TOD scenario for the North-Pas-de-Calais region? Lessons from an integrated transportation-land use modelling. Transp. Res. Procedia 2014, 4, 154-177.
95. Mittal, S., Dai, H., Shukla, P.R. Low carbon urban transport scenarios for China and India: A comparative assessment. Transp. Res. Part D 2016, 44, 266-276.
96. Jantz, C.A., Goetz, S.J., Shelley, M.K. Using the sleuth urban growth model to simulate the impacts of future policy scenarios on urban land use in the Baltimore-Washington metropolitan area. Environ. Plan. B Plan. Des. 2004, 31, 251-271.
97. Cavalli-Sforza, V., Ortolano, L. Delphi forecasts of land use: Transportation interactions. J. Transp. Eng. 1984, 110, 324-339.
98. Kaufmann, R.P., Integrating factor analysis and the Delphi method in scenario development: a case study of Dalmatia, Croatia. Appl. Geogr. 2016, 71, 56-68.
99. Thapa, R.B., Murayama, Y. Scenario based urban growth allocation in Kathmandu valley, Nepal. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2012, 105, 140-148.
100. Van Notten, P. Writing on the Wall: Scenario Development in Times of Discontinuity; Universal-Publishers: Sydney, Australia; Irvine, CA, USA, 2005.
101. Ducot, G., Lubben, G. A typology for scenarios. Futures 1980, 12, 51-57.
102. Bishop, P., Hines, A., Collins, T. The current state of scenario development: An overview of techniques. Foresight 2007, 9, 5-25.
103. Jun, M.-J., Hur, J.-W. Commuting costs of "leap-frog" newtown development in Seoul. Cities 2001, 18, 151-158.
104. Jun, M.-J. The effects of Seoul's new-town development on suburbanization and mobility: A counterfactual approach. Environ. Plan. A 2012, 44, 2171-2190.
105. Burke, M., Li, T., Dodson, J. What happens when government workers move to the suburbs? Impact on transport of planned decentralization of employment in Brisbane, Australia. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2011, 2255, 110-116.
106. Musa, H.D., Yacob, M.R., Abdullah, A.M., Ishak, M.Y. Delphi method of developing environmental well-being indicators for the evaluation of urban sustainability in Malaysia. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2015, 30, 244-249.
107. Spickermann, A., Grienitz, V., von der Gracht, H.A. Heading towards a multimodal city of the future? Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2014, 89, 201-221.
108. Hayati, E., Majnounian, B., Abdi, E., Sessions, J., Makhdoum, M. An expert-based approach to forest road network planning by combining Delphi and spatial multi-criteria evaluation. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2013, 185, 1767-1776.
109. Manoliadis, O., Tsolas, I., Nakou, A. Sustainable construction and drivers of change in Greece: A Delphi study. Constr. Manag. Econ. 2006, 24, 113-120.
110. Hasson, F., Keeney, S., McKenna, H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J. Adv. Nurs. 2000, 32, 1008-1015.
111. Schuckmann, S.W., Gnatzy, T., Darkow, I.-L., von der Gracht, H.A. Analysis of factors influencing the development of transport infrastructure until the year 2030-A Delphi based scenario study. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2012, 79, 1373-1387.
112. Wicklein, R.C. Identifying critical issues and problems in technology education using a modified-Delphi technique. J. Technol. Educ. 1993, 5, 54-71.
113. Williams, P.L., Webb, C. The Delphi technique: A methodological discussion. J. Adv. Nurs. 1994, 19, 180- 186.
114. Rayens, M.K., Hahn, E.J. Building consensus using the policy Delphi method. Policy Politics Nurs. Pract. 2000, 1, 308-315.
115. Corbin, J.M., Strauss, A. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual. Soc. 1990, 13, 3-21.
116. Linacre, J.M. Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. J. Appl. Meas. 2002, 3, 85-106.
117. Andrich, D. A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika 1978, 43, 561-573.
118. Riahi, K., Grübler, A., Nakicenovic, N. Scenarios of long-term socio-economic and environmental development under climate stabilization. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2007, 74, 887-935.
119. Liu, Y., Feng, Y. Simulating the impact of economic and environmental strategies on future urban growth scenarios in Ningbo, China. Sustainability 2016, 8, 1045.
120. Matsuura, M., Schenk, T. Joint Fact-Finding in Urban Planning and Environmental Disputes; Routledge: Abingdon-on-Thames, UK, 2016.
121. Harrison, C., Davies, G. Conserving biodiversity that matters: Practitioners' perspectives on brownfield development and urban nature conservation in London. J. Environ. Manag. 2002, 65, 95-108.
122. Steiner, F., Blair, J., McSherry, L., Guhathakurta, S., Marruffo, J., Holm, M. A watershed at a watershed: The potential for environmentally sensitive area protection in the upper San Pedro drainage basin (Mexico and USA). Landsc. Urban Plan. 2000, 49, 129-148.
123. Riddell, R., Wiley, I. Sustainable Urban Planning: Tipping the Balance, 1st ed., Blackwell: Malden, MA, USA, 2004.
124. Yigitcanlar, T., Edvardsson, I., Johannesson, H., Kamruzzaman, M., Ioppolo, G., Pancholi, S. Knowledge-based development dynamics in less favoured regions: insights from Australian and Icelandic university towns. Europ. Plann.Stud. 2017, 25, 2272-2292.
125. Martinez, J.M. American Environmentalism: Philosophy, History, and Public Policy, 1 ed., CRC Press: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013.
126. Arrow, K., Bolin, B., Costanza, R., Dasgupta, P., Folke, C., Holling, C.S., Jansson, B.-O., Levin, S., Mäler, K.-G., Perrings, C. Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment. Ecol. Econ. 1995, 15, 91-95.
127. Huggins, L.E. Environmental Entrepreneurship: Markets Meet the Environment in Unexpected Places; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2013.
128. Li, T., Corcoran, J., Burke, M. Disaggregate GIS modelling to track spatial change: Exploring a decade of commuting in South East Queensland, Australia. J. Transp. Geogr. 2012, 24, 306-314.
129. Queensland Government. Shaping SEQ, South East Queensland Regional Plan 2017; Department of Infrastructure and Planning, Queensland Government, Brisbane: Brisbane City, Australia, 2017.
130. Chakrabarty, B.K. Urban management: Concepts, principles, techniques and education. Cities 2001, 18, 331-345.
131. Courtney, K.E. Sustainable urban transportation and Ontario's new planning regime: The provincial policy statement, 2005 and the growth plan for the greater golden horseshoe. J. Environ. Law Pract. 2009, 19, 71-104.
132. Linstone, H.A., Turoff, M. The Delphi Method Techniques and Applications; Addision Wesley Publishing Co.: Boston, UK, 1975.
133. O'Hara, L., De Souza, L.H., Ide, L. A Delphi study of self-care in a community population of people with multiple sclerosis. Clin. Rehabil. 2000, 14, 62-71.
134. Goodman, C.M. The Delphi technique: A critique. J. Adv. Nurs. 1987, 12, 729-734.
135. Geist, M.R. Using the Delphi method to engage stakeholders: A comparison of two studies. Eval. Program Plan. 2010, 33, 147-154.
136. De Loe, R.C. Exploring complex policy questions using the policy Delphi: A multi-round, interactive survey method. Appl. Geogr. 1995, 15, 53-68.
137. Kishita, Y., Hara, K., Uwasu, M., Umeda, Y. Research needs and challenges faced in supporting scenario design in sustainability science: A literature review. Sustain. Sci. 2016, 11, 331-347.
138. Yigitcanlar, T., Sarimin, M. Multimedia Super Corridor, Malaysia: knowledge-based urban development lessons from an emerging economy. VINE 2015, 45, 126-147.
139. Watkins, J.R. Shaping the Future of Northeast Michigan: Utilizing the Delphi Method to Inform Planning Scenario Construction; Michigan State University: East Lansing, MI, USA, 2010.
140. Bailey, R., Longhurst, J.W.S., Hayes, E.T., Hudson, L., Ragnarsdottir, K.V., Thumim, J. Exploring a city's potential low carbon futures using Delphi methods: Some preliminary findings. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 2012, 55, 1022-1046.
141. Lewis, S.L., Cooper, C.L., Cooper, K.G., Bonner, P.N. Research priorities for nephrology nursing: American nephrology nurses' association's Delphi study. Nephrol. Nurs. J. 1999, 26, 215.
142. Dator, J.A. Introduction: The future lies behind-thirty years of teaching futures studies. In Advancing Futures: Futures Studies in Higher Education; Praeger: Westport, Ireland, 2002; pp. 1-30.
143. Newton, P. Urban form and environmental performance. Achiev. Sustain. Urban Form 2000, 2, 46-53.
144. Minnery, J.R. Urban Form and Development Strategies: Equity, Environmental and Economic Implications; Australian Govt. Pub. Service: Canberra, Australia, 1992.
145. Li, K., Zhang, P., Crittenden, J.C., Guhathakurta, S., Chen, Y., Fernando, H., Sawhney, A., McCartney, P., Grimm, N., Kahhat, R., et al. Development of a framework for quantifying the environmental impacts of urban development and construction practices. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 5130-5136.
146. Duque, J.A.G., Panagopoulos, T. Urban planning throughout environmental quality and human well-being. 2010. Available online: http://www.cieo.pt/discussionpapers/4/article1.pdf (accessed on 30 September 2017).
147. Wang, L. Urban Planning throughout Human Well-Being; Trans. Tech. Publications Ltd.: Zurich, Switzerland, 2012; pp. 2498-2504.
148. Gudes, O., Kendall, E., Yigitcanlar, T., Pathak, V., Baum, S. Rethinking health planning: a framework for organising information to underpin collaborative health planning. Health Inform. Manag. J. 2010, 39, 18-29.