Quality Assessment of Domesticated Animal Genome Assemblies

Bioinformatics and Biology Insights

Volumn 9S4, Issue , 2015, Pages 49-58

  Seemann, Stefan E ^a   Anthon, Christian ^a   Palasca, Oana ^a   Gorodkin, Jan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

assembly quality; domesticated animals; genome assembly

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; DOMESTIC ANIMAL; GENOME; GENOTYPE; NONHUMAN; QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 85029674935     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11779322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4137/BBI.S29333     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Spurlock M.E., Gabler N.K., The development of porcine models of obesity and the metabolic syndrome. J Nutr. 2008; 138: 397–402.
2. Mentzel C.M., Anthon C., Jacobsen M.J.. Gender and obesity specific microRNA expression in adipose tissue from lean and obese pigs. PLoS One. 2015; 10: e0131650.
3. Vilahur G., Padro T., Badimon L., Atherosclerosis and thrombosis: insights from large animal models. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2011; 2011: 907575.
4. Getz G.S., Reardon C.A., Animal models of atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2012; 32: 1104–15.
5. Swindle M.M., Makin A., Herron A.J., Clubb FJ, Jr, Frazier K.S., Swine as models in biomedical research and toxicology testing. Vet Pathol. 2012; 49: 344–56.
6. Gutierrez K., Dicks N., Glanzner W.G., Agellon L.B., Bordignon V., Efficacy of the porcine species in biomedical research. Front Genet. 2015; 6: 293.
7. Lee H., Gurtowski J., Yoo S.. Third-generation sequencing and the future of genomics. bioRxiv. 2016.
8. Schatz M.C., Delcher A.L., Salzberg S.L., Assembly of large genomes using second-generation sequencing. Genome Res. 2010; 20: 1165–73.
9. Lindblad-Toh K., Wade C.M., Mikkelsen T.S.. Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog. Nature. 2005; 438: 803–19.
10. Wade C.M., Giulotto E., Sigurdsson S.. Genome sequence, comparative analysis, and population genetics of the domestic horse. Science. 2009; 326: 865–7.
11. Zimin A.V., Delcher A.L., Florea L.. A whole-genome assembly of the domestic cow, Bos taurus. Genome Biol. 2009; 10: R42.
12. Groenen M.A., Archibald A.L., Uenishi H.. Analyses of pig genomes provide insight into porcine demography and evolution. Nature. 2012; 491: 393–8.
13. Jiang Y., Xie M., Chen W.. The sheep genome illuminates biology of the rumen and lipid metabolism. Science. 2014; 344: 1168–73.
14. Dong Y., Xie M., Jiang Y.. Sequencing and automated whole-genome optical mapping of the genome of a domestic goat (Capra hircus). Nat Biotechnol. 2013; 31: 135–41.
15. International Chicken Genome Sequencing Consortium. Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature. 2004; 432: 695–716.
16. Dalloul R.A., Long J.A., Zimin A.V.. Multi-platform next-generation sequencing of the domestic turkey (Meleagris gallopavo): genome assembly and analysis. PLoS Biol. 2010; 8.
17. Gurevich A., Saveliev V., Vyahhi N., Tesler G., QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2013; 29: 1072–5.
18. Clark S.C., Egan R., Frazier P.I., Wang Z., ALE: a generic assembly likelihood evaluation framework for assessing the accuracy of genome and metagenome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2013; 29: 435–43.
19. Parra G., Bradnam K., Ning Z., Keane T., Korf I., Assessing the gene space in draft genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009; 37: 289–97.
20. Simão F.A., Waterhouse R.M., Ioannidis P., Kriventseva E.V., Zdobnov E.M., BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics. 2015; 31: 3210–2.
21. Harris R.S., Improved Pairwise Alignment of Genomic DNA [Ph.D. thesis]. The Pennsylvania State University; 2007. Available at: http://www.bx.psu.edu/~rsharris/rsharris_phd_thesis_2007.pdf
22. Kent J., UCSC Tools; 2015. Available at: http://genome.ucsc.edu/index.html.
23. Ciccarelli F.D., Doerks T., von M.C., Creevey C.J., Snel B., Bork P., Toward automatic reconstruction of a highly resolved tree of life. Science. 2006; 311: 1283–7.
24. Bejerano G., Pheasant M., Makunin I.. Ultraconserved elements in the human genome. Science. 2004; 304: 1321–5.
25. Keller O., Kollmar M., Stanke M., Waack S., A novel hybrid gene prediction method employing protein multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics. 2011; 27: 757–63.
26. Schmitz K.M., Mayer C., Postepska A., Grummt I., Interaction of noncoding RNA with the rDNA promoter mediates recruitment of DNMT3b and silencing of rRNA genes. Genes Dev. 2010; 24: 2264–9.
27. Lagesen K., Hallin P., Rodland E.A., Staerfeldt H.H., Rognes T., Ussery D.W., RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007; 35: 3100–8.
28. Nawrocki E.P., Eddy S.R., Infernal 1.1: 100-fold faster RNA homology searches. Bioinformatics. 2013; 29: 2933–5.
29. Lowe T.M., Eddy S.R., tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997; 25: 955–64.
30. Land M.L., Hyatt D., Jun S.R.. Quality scores for 32,000 genomes. Stand Genomic Sci. 2014; 9: 20.
31. Kodama Y., Shumway M., Leinonen R, International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration. The sequence read archive: explosive growth of sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012; 40: D54–6.
32. Martin M., Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 2011; 17: 10–2.
33. Dobin A., Davis C.A., Schlesinger F.. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013; 29: 15–21.
34. Yue H., Biao L., JiYing W., Ying W., ShuDong W., YunLiang J., Analysis on the developmental expression of Acyl-coA: diacylglycerol acyltransferase genes (DGAT1 and DGAT2) in porcine backfat tissues. Nong Ye Sheng Wu Ji Shu Xue Bao. 2010; 18: 905–10.
35. Yin Q., Yang H., Han X., Fan B., Liu B., Isolation, mapping, SNP detection and association with backfat traits of the porcine CTNNBL1 and DGAT2 genes. Mol Biol Rep. 2012; 39: 4485–90.
36. Renaville B., Bacciu N., Lanzoni M., Corazzin M., Piasentier E., Polymorphism of fat metabolism genes as candidate markers for meat quality and production traits in heavy pigs. Meat Sci. 2015; 110: 220–3.
37. Jacobsen M.J., Mentzel C.M., Olesen A.S.. Altered methylation profile of lymphocytes is concordant with perturbation of lipids metabolism and inflammatory response in obesity. J Diabetes Res. 2016; 2016: 8539057.
38. Weber C., Noels H., Atherosclerosis: current pathogenesis and therapeutic options. Nat Med. 2011; 17: 1410–22.
39. Badimon L., Vilahur G., LDL-cholesterol versus HDL-cholesterol in the atherosclerotic plaque: inflammatory resolution versus thrombotic chaos. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012; 1254: 18–32.
40. Barkowski R.S., Frishman W.H., HDL metabolism and CETP inhibition. Cardiol Rev. 2008; 16: 154–62.
41. Fang X., Mou Y., Huang Z.. The sequence and analysis of a Chinese pig genome. Gigascience. 2012; 1: 16.
42. Shi X.W., Zhang Y.D., Rothschild M.F., Tuggle C.K., Rapid communication: genetic linkage and physical mapping of the porcine cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) gene. J Anim Sci. 2002; 80: 1390–1.
43. Speijer H., Groener J.E., van R.E., van T.A., Different locations of cholesteryl ester transfer protein and phospholipid transfer protein activities in plasma. Atherosclerosis. 1991; 90: 159–68.
44. Cho K.H., Lee J.Y., Choi M.S., Bok S.H., Park Y.B., Interaction of CETP inhibitory peptide and lipoprotein substrates in cholesteryl ester transfer assay: relationship between association properties and inhibitory activities. Lipids. 2002; 37: 641–6.
45. Koren S., Schatz M.C., Walenz B.P.. Hybrid error correction and de novo assembly of single-molecule sequencing reads. Nat Biotechnol. 2012; 30: 693–700.
46. Putnam N.H., O'Connell B.L., Stites J.C.. Chromosome-scale shotgun assembly using an in vitro method for long-range linkage. Genome Res. 2016; 26: 342–50.