Considering life cycle during design: A longitudinal study of engineering undergraduates

ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Yasuhara, Ken ^a   Morozov, Andrew ^a   Kilgore, Deborah ^a   Atman, Cynthia ^a   Loucks Jaret, Christine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Context; Design; Gender; Life cycle; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

EID: 85029063729     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21535965     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Environmental Protection Agency (2006). Life cycle assessment: Principles and practice. Available online: http://www.epa.gov/NRMRL/lcaccess/lca101.html
2. Jeswiet, J. (2006). "Reasons and Objectives for Life Cycle Engineering at an Undergraduate Level", CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, Leuven, Belgium, pp. 173-176.
3. Allen, D.T., Murphy, C.F., Allenby, B., & Davidson, C. (2006). Sustainable engineering: A model for engineering education in the twenty-first century? Clean Technology and Environmental Policy 8:70-71.
4. Nair, I. (1998). LCA and Green Design: A Context for Teaching Design, Environment and Ethics, Journal of Engineering Education.
5. Allen, D., Allenby, B., Bridges, M. et al. (2008). Benchmarking Sustainable Engineering Education: Final Report. Available online: http://www.csengin.org/BSEE-Final-Report-31Dec08-No-Appen-D.pdf
6. Kilgore, D., Atman, C.J., Yasuhara, K., Barker, T.J., & Morozov, A. (2007). Considering Context: A Study of First-Year Engineering Students. Journal of Engineering Education 96(4): 321-334.
7. Kilgore, D., Yasuhara, K., Saleem, J.J., & Atman, C.J. (2006). What Brings Women to the Table? Female and Male Students' Perceptions of Ways of Thinking in Engineering Study and Practice. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, San Diego, California.
8. Goodman, I.F. et al. (2002). Final report of the Women's Experiences in College Engineering (WECE) Project. Goodman Research Group, Inc.
9. Kilgore, D., Chachra, D., Loshbaugh, H., McCain, J., Jones, M., & Yasuhara, K. (2007). Creative, Contextual, and Engaged: Are Women the Engineers of 2020? In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii.
10. Sheppard, S., Atman, C.J., Stevens, R., Fleming, L., Streveler, R., Adams, R.S., & Barker, T. (2004). Studying the Engineering Experience: Design of a Longitudinal Study. In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah.
11. Eris, Ö., Chachra, D., Chen, H., Rosca, C., Ludlow, L., Sheppard, S., & Donaldson, K. (2007). A Preliminary Analysis of Correlates of Engineering Persistence: Results from a Longitudinal Study. In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii.
12. Atman, C.J., & Bursic, K.M. (1996). Teaching engineering design: can reading a textbook make a difference? Research in Engineering Design, 7(7):240-250.
13. Mullins, C.A., Atman, C.J., & Shuman, L.J. (1999). Freshman engineers' performance when solving design problems. IEEE Transactions on Education, 42(4):281-287.
14. Cardella, M.E., Atman, C.J., Adams, R., & Turns, J. (2002). Engineering student design processes: Looking at evaluation practices across problems. American Society of Engineering Education Conference Proceedings.
15. Atman, C.J., Cardella, M.J., Turns, J., & Adams, R. (2005). Comparing freshman and senior engineering design processes: an in-depth follow-up study. Design Studies, 26:325-357.