Engineering student design processes: Looking at evaluation practices across problems

ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 6015-6023

  Cardella, Monica E ^a   Atman, Cynthia J ^a   Adams, Robin S ^a   Turns, Jennifer ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DESIGN PROCESSES; ENGINEERING DESIGN; ENGINEERING PROGRAMS;

CONSTRAINT THEORY; DATA REDUCTION; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; ENGINEERS; PROBLEM SOLVING; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 8744300854     PISSN: 01901052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) (1998). Engineering Criteria 2000: Criteria for accrediting programs in engineering in the United States (2nd edition ed.). Baltimore, Engineering Accreditation Commission, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology.
2. Adams, Robin S. (2001). Cognitive processes in iterative design behavior. Dissertation: University of Washington.
3. Adams, Robin S. and Cynthia J. Atman (1999). Characterizing Engineering Student Design Processes: An Illustration of Iteration. Proceedings of the Annual Conference for the American Society of Engineering Education, Charlotte, NC.
4. Adams, Robin, Jennifer Turns and Cynthia J. Atman, (2001). Educating Effective Engineering Designers: The Role of Reflective Practice. Proceedings of the 2001 Design Thinking Research Symposium 5, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands, December.
5. Atman, Cynthia J. and Jennifer Turns (2001). Studying Engineering Design Learning: Four Verbal Protocol Analysis Studies. Design Learning and Knowing. M. McCracken, Newsletter, W., and Eastman, C. New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Atman, Cynthia J., Justin R. Chimka, Karen M. Bursic, and Heather L. Nachtmann (1999), "A comparison of freshman and senior engineering design processes, "Design Studies 20 (2), 131-152.
7. Mullins, Carie A., Cynthia J. Atman, and Larry J. Shuman (1999), "Freshmen Engineers' Performance When Solving Design Problems," IEEE Transactions on Education, 42 (4), 281-287.
8. Ericsson, K.A. and H. A. Simon (1984). Protocol Analysis: verbal reports as data. Cambridge, The MIT Press.
9. Atman, Cynthia J. and Karen M. Bursic (1998), " Verbal Protocol Analysis as a Method to Document engineering Student Design Processes," Journal of Engineering Education 87 (2), 121-132.
10. Gero, John S. and Thomas Mc Neill (1998), "An approach to the analysis of design protocols," Design Studies 19 (1), 21-61.
11. Atman, Cynthia J. and Karen M. Bursic (1996). Teaching Engineering Design: Can Reading a Textbook Make a Difference? Research in Engineering Design 7(7): 240-250.
12. Sanderson, P.M., J.J.P. Scott, T. Johnston, J. Mainzer, L.M.Watanabe, and J.M. James (1994), "MacSHAPA and the enterprise of Exploratory Sequential Data Analysis (ESDA)", International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 41 (5), 633-681.
13. Ullman, David G., Thomas G. Dietterich and Larry A. Staufer (1988), "A Model of Mechanical Design Process Based on Empirical Data," AI in Engineering Design and Manufacturing, 2(1), 33-52.
14. Woods, D.R. (1995), "Problem-based Learning: Helping your students gain the most from PBL" D.R. Woods Publishing, Waterdown, ON.