Small and large deformation analysis with the p- and B-spline versions of the Finite Cell Method

Computational Mechanics

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 445-478

  Schillinger, Dominik ^a   Ruess, Martin ^a   Zander, Nils ^a   Bazilevs, Yuri ^b   Düster, Alexander ^c   Rank, Ernst ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^c HAMBURG UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

B spline version of the finite cell method; Embedded domain methods; Fictitious domain methods; Immersed boundary methods; Large deformation solid mechanics; P Version of the finite cell method; Weak boundary conditions

Indexed keywords

BONE; BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; CELLS; CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION; CYTOLOGY; DEFORMATION; FOAMS; INTERPOLATION; ITERATIVE METHODS; MESH GENERATION; METALS; SHIP PROPELLERS; TURBULENT FLOW;

B-SPLINE VERSION OF THE FINITE CELL METHODS; EMBEDDED DOMAIN METHODS; FICTITIOUS DOMAIN METHOD; IMMERSED BOUNDARY METHODS; LARGE DEFORMATION SOLID MECHANICS; P-VERSION OF THE FINITE CELL METHODS; WEAK BOUNDARY CONDITIONS;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

EID: 85028127077     PISSN: 01787675     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/S00466-012-0684-Z     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Bathe K-J (1996) Finite element procedures. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
2. Hughes TJR (2000) The finite element method: linear static and dynamic finite element analysis. Dover, New York
3. Hughes TJR, Cottrell. JA, Bazilevs Y (2005) Isogeometric analysis: CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194:4135-4195 (Pubitemid 40875970)
4. Cottrell JA, Hughes TJR, Bazilevs Y (2009) Isogeometric analysis: toward integration of CAD and FEA. Wiley, New York.
5. Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Cottrell JA, Evans JA, Hughes TJR, Lipton S, Scott MA, Sederberg TW (2010) Isogeometric analysis using T-splines. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199:229-263
6. Neittaanmäki P, Tiba D (1995) An embedding domains approach in free boundary problems and optimal design. SIAM Control Optim 33(5): 1587-1602
7. Peskin C (2002) The immersed boundary method. Acta Numer 11:1-39
8. Mittal R, Iaccarino G (2005) Immersed boundary methods. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 37:239-261 (Pubitemid 40301258)
9. Löhner R, Cebral RJ, Camelli FE, Appanaboyina S, Baum JD, Mestreau EL, Soto OA (2008) Adaptive embedded and immersed unstructured grid techniques. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197:2173-2197 (Pubitemid 351509249)
10. Del Pino S, Pironneau O (2003) A fictitious domain based general PDE solver. In: Kuznetsov Y, Neittanmäki P, Pironneau O (eds) Numerical, methods for scientific computing: variational, problems and applications. CIMNE, Barcelona
11. Glowinski R, Kuznetsov Y (2007) Distributed Lagrange multipliers based on fictitious domain method for second order elliptic problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196:1498-1506 (Pubitemid 44762805)
12. Ramière I, Angot P, Belliard M (2007) A fictitious domain approach with spread interface for elliptic problems with general boundary conditions. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196:766-
13. Bishop J (2003) Rapid stress analysis of geometrically complex domains using implicit meshing. Comput Mech 30:460-478
14. Baaijens FPT (2001) A fictitious domain/mortar element method for fluid-structure interaction. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 35:743761
15. Farhat C, Hetmaniuk U (2002) A fictitious domain decomposition method for the solution of partially axisymmetric acoustic scattering problems. Part I: Dirichlet boundary conditions. Int J Numer Methods Eng 54:1309-1332 (Pubitemid 34718604)
16. Haslinger J, Kozubek T, Kunisch K, Peichl G (2003) Shape optimization and fictitious domain approach for solving free boundary problems of bernoulli type. Comput Optim Appl 26:231-251
17. Burman E, Hansbo P (2010) Fictitious domain finite element methods using cut elements: I. A stabilized Lagrange multiplier method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199:2680-2686
18. Gerstenberger A, Wall WA (2010) An embedded Dirichlet formulation for 3D continua. Int J Numer Methods Eng 82:537-563
19. Burman E, Hansbo P (2011) Fictitious domain finite element methods using cut elements: II. A stabilized Nitsche method. Appl Numer Math, doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2011.01.008
20. Sukumar N, Chopp DL, Moës N, Belytschko T (2001) Modeling holes and inclusions by level sets in the extended finite-element method. Comput Methods Appl. Mech Eng 190:6183-6200 (Pubitemid 32961904)
21. Gerstenberger A, Wall WA (2008) An extended Finite Element Method/Lagrange multiplier based approach for fluid-structure interaction. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197:1699-1714 (Pubitemid 351309132)
22. Haslinger J, Renard Y (2009) A new fictitious domain approach inspired by the extended finite element method. SIAM J Numer Anal 47:1474-1499
23. Becker R, Burman E, Hansbo P (2011) A hierarchical NXFEM for fictitious domain simulations. Int J Numer Methods Eng 86(45):54-559
24. Bastian P, Engwer C (2009) An unfitted finite element method using discontinuous Galerkin. Int J Numer Methods Eng 79:15571576
25. Legay A, Wang HW, Belytschko T (2005) Strong and weak arbitrary discontinuities in spectral finite elements. Int J Numer Methods Eng 64:991-1008 (Pubitemid 41539064)
26. Lui S (2009) Spectral domain embedding for elliptic PDEs in complex domains. J Comput Appl Math 225:541-557
27. Parussini L, Pediroda V (2009) Fictitious domain approach with ftp-finite element approximation for incompressible fluid flow. J Comput Phys 228:3891-3910
28. Parvizian J, Düster A, Rank E (2007) Finite Cell Method: h- and p-extension for embedded domain methods in solid mechanics. Comput Mech 41:122-133
29. Düster A, Parvizian J, Yang Z, Rank E (2008) The Finite Cell Method for three-dimensional problems of solid mechanics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197:3768-3782
30. Szabó B, Babuška I (1991) Finite element analysis. Wiley, New York
31. Szabó B, Düster A, Rank E (2004) The p- version of the finite element method. In: Stein E, de Borst R, Hughes TJR (eds) Encyclopedia of computational mechanics, vol 1. Wiley, Chichester, pp 119-139
32. Rank E, Düster A, Schillinger D, Yang Z (2009) The Finite Cell Method: high order simulation of complex structures without meshing. In: Yuan Y, Cui J, Mang H (eds) Computational structural, engineering. Springer, Heidelberg pp 87-92
33. Ruess M, Tal D, Trabelsi N, Yosibash Z, Rank E (2011) The Finite Cell Method for bone simulations: verification and validation. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. doi:10.1007/s10237-011-0322-2
34. Schillinger D, Düster A, Rank E (2011) The hp-d adaptive Finite Cell Method for geometrically nonlinear problems of solid mechanics. Int J Numer Methods Eng. doi:10.1002/nme.3289
35. Vos PEJ, van Loon R, Sherwin SJ (2008) A comparison of fictitious domain methods appropriate for spectral/hp element discretisations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197:2275-2289
36. Parvizian J, Düster A, Rank E (2011) Topology optimization using the Finite Cell Method. Opt Eng. doi: 10.1007/s11081-011-9159-x
37. Rank E, Rollmannsberger S, Sorger C, Düster A (2011) Shell Finite Cell Method: a high order fictitious domain approach for thin-walled structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200:3200-3209
38. Vinci C (2009) Application of Dirichlet boundary conditions in the Finite Cell Method. Master thesis, Lehrstuhl für Computation in Engineering, Technische Universität München
39. Zander N (2011) The Finite Cell Method for linear thermoelasticity. Master thesis, Lehrstuhl für Computation in Engineering, Technische Universität München
40. Abedian A, Parvizian J, Düster A, Rhademyzadeh H, Rank E (2010) The Finite Cell Method for elasto-plastic problems. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on computational structures technology, Valencia, 2010
41. Cai Q, Rollmannsberger S, Mundani RP, Rank E (2011) The Finite Cell Method for solute transport problems in porous media. In: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on finite elements in flow problems, Munich, 2011
42. s00466-012-0681-2
43. Yang Z, Ruess M, Rollmannsberger S, Düster A, Rank E (2012) An efficient integration technique for the voxel-based Finite Cell Method. Int J Numer Methods Eng (accepted)
44. Allaire G, Jouve F, Toader A (2004) Structural optimization using sensitivity analysis and a level-set method. J Comput Phys 194:363-393 (Pubitemid 38184245)
45. Bonet J, Wood R (2008) Nonlinear continuum mechanics for finite element analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
46. Sueli E, Mayers DF (2003) An introduction to numerical analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
47. Samet H (2006) Foundations of multidimensional and metric data structures. Morgan Raufmann Publishers, San Francisco
48. Zohdi T, Wriggers P (2001) Aspects of the computational testing of the mechanical properties of microheterogeneous material, samples. Int J Numer Methods Eng 50:2573-2599 (Pubitemid 32248103)
49. Düster A (2001) High order finite elements for three-dimensional, thin-walled nonlinear continua. PhD thesis, Lehrstuhl für Bauinformatik, Technische Universität München, Shaker, Aachen
50. Düster A, Broker H, Rank E (2001) The p-version of the finite element method for three-dimensional curved thin walled structures. Int J Numer Methods Eng 52:673-703 (Pubitemid 32978646)
51. Schillinger D, Kollmannsberger S, Mundani R-P, Rank E (2010) The Finite Cell Method for geometrically nonlinear problems of solid mechanics. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 10:012170
52. Schillinger D, Rank E (2011) An unfitted hp-adaptiv finite element method based on hierarchical B-splines for interface problems of complex geometry. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200(4748):3358-3380
53. Piegl LA, Tiller W (1997) The NURBS book (monographs in visual communication). Springer, New York
54. Rogers DF (2001) An introduction to NURBS with historical perspective. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco
55. Höllig R (2003) Finite element methods with B-splines. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Phliadelphia
56. Babuška I (1972) The finite element method with penalty. Math Comput: 27(122):221-228
57. Zhu T, Atluri SN (1998) A modified collocation method and a penalty formulation for enforcing the essential boundary conditions in the element free Galerkin method. Comput Mech 21:211-
58. Babuška I, Banerjee U, Osborn JE (2002) Meshless and generalized finite element methods: a survey of some major results. In: Griebel M, Schweitzer MA (eds) Meshfree methods for partial differential equations. Lecture notes in computational science and engineering, vol 26. Springer, Berlin
59. Fernandez-Mendez S, Huerta A (2004) Imposing essential boundary conditions in mesh-free methods. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193:1257-1275 (Pubitemid 38439214)
60. Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL (2005) The finite element method vol 1: the basis. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford
61. Hansbo A, Hansbo P (2002) An. unfitted finite element method, based on Nitsche's method, for elliptic interface problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 191:537-552
62. Bazilevs Y, Hughes TJR (2007) Weak imposition of Dirichlet boundary conditions in fluid mechanics. Comput Fluids 36: 12-26 (Pubitemid 44641502)
63. Embar A, Dolbow J, Harari I (2010) Imposing Dirichlet boundary conditions with Nitsche's method and spline-based finite elements. Int J Numer Methods Eng 83:877-898
64. Harari I, Dolbow J (2010) Analysis of an efficient finite element method for embedded interface problems. Comput Mech 46:205211
65. Sadd MH (2009) Elasticity: theory, applications, and numerics. Academic Press, Oxford
66. Reyak J, Falkinstein Y (2003) Comparison of in situ and in vitro CT-scan-based finite element model predictions of proximal femoral, fracture load. J Med Eng Phys 25:781-787
67. Schileo E, Dali'Ara E, Taddei F, Malandrino A, Schotkamp T, Viceconti M (2008) An accurate estimation of bone density improves the accuracy of subject-specific finite element models. J Biomech 41:2483-2491
68. Bungartz HJ, Griebel M, Zenger C (2004) Introduction to computer graphics. Charles River Media, Hingham
69. Novelline R (1997) Squire's fundamentals of radiology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
70. Yosibash Z, Padan R, Joskowicz L, Milgrom C (2007) A CT-based high-order finite element analysis of the human proximal femur compared to in-vitro experiments. J Biomech Eng 129:297-309 (Pubitemid 47066843)
71. Trabelsi N, Yosibash Z, Milgrom C (2009) Validation of subjectspecific automated p-FE analysis of the proximal femur. J Biomech. 42:234-241
72. Belytschko T, Liu WK, Moran B (2006) Nonlinear finite elements for continua and structures. Wiley, New York
73. de Souza Neto EA, Perić D, Owen DRJ (2008) Computational methods for plasticity: theory and applications. Wiley, New York
74. Wriggers P (2008) Nonlinear finite element methods. Springer, Berlin
75. Holzapfel. G (2000) Nonlinear solid mechanics. A continuum approach for engineering. Wiley, New York
76. Noë AT, Szabó B (1997) Formulation of geometrically non-linear problems in the spatial reference frame. Int J Numer Methods Eng 40:1263-1280
77. Düster A, Hartmann S, Rank E (2003) p-FEM applied to finite isotropic hyperelastic bodies. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 192:5147-5166 (Pubitemid 37379605)
78. Sehlhorst HG, Jänicke R, Düster A, Rank E, Steeb H, Diebels S (2009) Numerical investigations of foam-like materials by nested high-order finite element methods. Comput Mech 45:45-59
79. Rrause R, Mücke R, Rank E (1.995) Ap-version finite elements for geometrically non-linear problems. Commun Numer Methods Eng 11:887-897
80. Bertsekas DP (1996) Constrained optimization and lagrange multiplier methods. Athina Scientific, Nashua
81. Trilinos Version. 10.4, Sandia National Laboratories, Los Alamos, NM. http://trilinos.sandia.gov/
82. MKL PARDISO. www.intel.com/software/products/mkl. 16 January 2012
83. FlagShyp 08 Version 2.30, Nonlinear FE solver developed by J. Bonet and R. Wood, http://www.flagshyp.com
84. Visual DoMesh 2008 Version 1.1, Mesh generator developed by C. Sorger, Chair for Computation in Engineering, Technische Universität München.
85. Netgen Version 4.9.13, Tetrahdral. mesh generator developed by J. Schöberl. http://sourceforge.net/projects/netgen-mesher
86. Para View Version 3.8.1, Open-source scientific visualization package. Kitware Inc., Clifton Park, NY. http://www.paraview.org
87. Dong S, Yosibash Z (2009) A parallel spectral element method for dynamic three-dimensional nonlinear elasticity problems. Comput Struct 87(1-2):59-72
88. Elguedj T, Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Hughes TJR (2008) B-bar and F-bar projection methods for nearly incompressible linear and nonlinear elasticity and plasticity using higher-order NURBS elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197:2732-2762
89. Lipton S, Evans JA, Bazilevs Y, Elguedj T, Hughes TJR (2010) Robustness of isogeometric structural discretizations under severe mesh distortion. Comput Methods Appl. Mech Eng 199:357373
90. Banhart J (2001) Manufacture, characterization and application of cellular metals and metal foams. Prog Mater Sci 46:559-632
91. Zohdi T, Wriggers P (2005) Introduction to computational micromechanics. Springer, Berlin
92. Lapack Version 3.2.2. (2010) Linear algebra package. http://www. netlib.org/lapack/
93. Chapman B, Jost G, van der Pas R (2008) Using Open MP. Portable shared memory parallel programming. MIT Press, Cambridge