Shell Finite Cell Method: A high order fictitious domain approach for thin-walled structures

Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering

Volumn 200, Issue 45-46, 2011, Pages 3200-3209

  Rank, E ^a   Kollmannsberger, S ^a   Sorger, Ch ^a   Duster A ^b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b HAMBURG UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Fictitious Domain Method; Finite Cell Method; High order methods; Isogeometric analysis; P FEM; Thin walled structures

Indexed keywords

FICTITIOUS DOMAIN METHOD; FINITE CELL METHOD; HIGH-ORDER METHODS; ISOGEOMETRIC ANALYSIS; P-FEM;

CELLS; COMPUTATIONAL EFFICIENCY; THIN WALLED STRUCTURES; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

EID: 80051786856     PISSN: 00457825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2011.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Hyman M.A. Non-iterative numerical solution of boundary value problems. Appl. Sci. Res. Sec. 1952, B2:325-351.
2. Saul'ev V.K. A method for automatization of the solution of boundary value problems on high performance computers. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 1962, 144:497-500. (in Russian). English translation in Soviet Math. Dokl. 3 (1963) 763-766.
3. Saul'ev V.K. On solution of some boundary value problems on high performance computers by fictitious domain method. Sib. Math. J. 1963, 4:912-925.
4. Vos P., Loon R., Sherwin S. A comparison of fictitious domain methods appropriate for spectral/hp element discretizations. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 2008, 197:2275-2289.
5. Löhner R., Cebral J., Camelli F., Baum J., Mestreau E., Soto O. Adaptive embedded/immersed unstructured grid techniques. Arch. Comput. Methods Engrg. 2007, 14:279-301.
6. Lui S. Spectral domain embedding for elliptic PDEs in complex domains. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 2009, 225:541-557.
7. Gerstenberger A., Wall W. An embedded Dirichlet formulation for 3D continua. Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 2010, 82:537-563.
8. Peskin C. The immersed boundary method. Acta Numer. 2002, 11:1-39.
9. Mittal R., Iaccarino G. Immersed boundary method. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 2005, 37:239-260.
10. Belytschko T., Black T., Lu Y.Y., Gu L. Element-free Galerkin methods. Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 1994, 37:229-256.
11. Melenk J., Babuška I. The partition of unity finite element method: basic theory and applications. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 1996, 39:289-314.
12. Oden J., Duarte C.A.M., Zienkiewicz O.C. A new cloud-based hp finite element method. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 1998, 153:117-126.
13. Nguyen N.-Q., Ladd A. Meshless methods: a review and computer implementation aspects. Math. Comput. Simul. 2008, 79:763-813.
14. Belytschko T., Black T. Elastic crack growth in finite elements with minimal remeshing. Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 1999, 45:601-620.
15. Belytschko T., Parimi C., Moës N., Sukumar N., Usui S. Structured extended finite element methods for solids defined by implicit surfaces. Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 2003, 56:609-635.
16. Osher S., Sethian J. Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations. J. Comput. Phys. 1988, 79:12-49.
17. Moumnassi M., Belouettar J., Béchet E., Bordas S., Quoirin D., Potier-Ferry M. Finite element analysis on implicitly defined domains: an accurate representation based on arbitrary parametric surfaces. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 2011, 200(5-8):774-796.
18. S. Del Pino, O. Pironneau, A fictitious domain based general pde solver, in: P.N.Y. Kuznetsov, O. Pironneau (Eds.), Numerical Methods for Sscientific Computing Variational Problems and Applications, CIMNE, Barcelona, Spain, 2003.
19. Rami'ere I., Angot P., Belliard M. A fictitious domain approach with spread interface for elliptic problems with general boundary conditions. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 2007, 196:766-781.
20. Glowinski R., Kuznetsov Y. Distributed Lagrange multipliers based on fictitious domain method for second order elliptic problems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 2007, 196:1498-1506.
21. Parvizian J., Düster A., Rank E. Finite cell method - h- and p-extension for embedded domain problems in solid mechanics. Comput. Mech. 2007, 41:121-133.
22. Düster A., Parvizian J., Yang Z., Rank E. The finite cell method for three-dimensional problems of solid mechanics. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 2008, 197:3768-3782.
23. Düster A., Parvizian J., Rank E. Topology optimization based on the finite cell method. Proc. Appl. Math. Mech. 2010, 10:151-152.
24. J. Parvizian, A. Düster, E. Rank, Topology optimization using the finite cell method, Optimiz. Engrg. doi:10.1007/s11081-011-9159-x.
25. D. Schillinger, S. Kollmannsberger, R. Mundani, E. Rank, The hierarchical B-spline version of the finite cell method for geometrically nonlinear problems of solid mechanics, in: The European Conference on Computational Mechanics, Paris, France, 2010. http://www.eccm2010.org/complet/fullpaper_1204.pdf.
26. D. Schillinger, S. Kollmannsberger, R. Mundani, E. Rank, The finite cell method for geometrically nonlinear problems of solid mechanics, in: The World Congress on Computational Mechanics, Sidney, Australia, 2010.
27. A. Abedian, J. Parvizian, A. Düster, H. Khademyzadeh, E. Rank, The finite cell method for elasto-plastic problems, in: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Computational Structures Technology, Civil-Comp Press, 2010.
28. D. Schillinger, E. Rank, An unfitted hp adaptive finite element method based on hierarchical B-splines for interface problems of complex geometry, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., doi:10.1016/j.cma.2011.08.002.
29. A. Düster, J. Parvizian, Z. Yang, E. Rank, A high order fictitious domain method for patient specific surgery planning, in: Proceedings of APCOM'07 in Conjunction with EPMESC XI, Kyoto, Japan, 2007.
30. Yang Z., Düster A., Ruess M., Rank E. The finite cell method for interactive orthopaedic simulation. Interdiscip. J. Funct. Mater. Biomech. Tissue Engrg. 2009, 10(1/2):66.
31. Cottrell J.A., Hughes T.J.R., Bazilevs Y. Isogeometric Analysis 2009, John Wiley & Sons.
32. Neittaanmäki P., Tiba D. An embedding of domains approach in free boundary problems and optimal design. SIAM J. Control Optimiz. 1995, 33(5):1587-1602.
33. A. Düster, H. Bröker, H. Heidkamp, U. Heißerer, S. Kollmannsberger, Z. Wassouf, R. Krause, A. Muthler, A. Niggl, V. Nübel, M. Rücker, D. Scholz, AdhoC4 - User's Guide, Lehrstuhl für Bauinformatik, Technische Universität München, 2004.
34. Szabó B., Babuška I. Finite Element Analysis 1991, John Wiley & Sons.
35. Düster A., Bröker H., Rank E. The p-version of the finite element method for three-dimensional curved thin walled structures. Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 2001, 52:673-703.
36. Szabó B., Düster A., Rank E. The p-version of the finite element method. Encyclopedia of Computational Mechanics 2004, vol. 1:119-139. John Wiley & Sons, (Chapter 5).
37. Dauge M., Faou E., Yosibash Z. Plates and shells: asymptotic expansions and hierarchic models. Encyclopedia of Computational Mechanics 2004, vol. 1:199-236. John Wiley & Sons, (Chapter 8).
38. Z. Yang, C. Dick, S. Kollmannsberger, A. Düster, M. Ruess, R. Burgkart, E. Rank, Computational steering for orthopeadics, Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol., submitted for publication.
39. Ruess M., Tal D., Trabelsi N., Yosibash Z., Rank E. Non-standard bone simulations: verification and validation. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 2011, 10.1007/s10237-011-0322-2.
40. Királyfalvi G., Szabó B. Quasi-regional mapping for the p-version of the finite element method. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 1997, 27:85-97.
41. A. Düster, High order finite elements for three-dimensional, thin-walled nonlinear continua, Ph.D. Thesis, Lehrstuhl für Bauinformatik, Fakultät für Bauingenieur- und Vermessungswesen, Technische Universität München, 2001.
42. Suri M. Analytical and computational assessment of locking in the hp finite element method. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 1996, 133:347-371.
43. Leino Y., Pitkäranta J. On the membrane locking of h-p finite elements in a cylindrical shell problem. Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 1994, 37:1053-1070.
44. Gordon W., Hall C. Construction of curvilinear co-ordinate systems and applications to mesh generation. Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 1973, 7:461-477.
45. Gordon W., Hall C. Transfinite element methods: blending function interpolation over arbitrary curved element domains. Numer. Math. 1973, 21:109-129.
46. Chen Q., Babuška I. Approximate optimal points for polynomial interpolation of real functions in an interval and in a triangle. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 1995, 128:405-417.
47. Chen Q., Babuška I. The optimal symmetrical points for polynomial interpolation of real functions in the tetrahedron. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 1996, 137:89-94.
48. Actis R., Szabó B., Schwab C. Hierarchic models for laminated plates and shells. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 1999, 172:79-107.
49. H. Bröker, Integration von geometrischer Modellierung und Berechnung nach der p-version der FEM, Ph.D. Thesis, Lehrstuhl für Bauinformatik, Fakultät für Bauingenieur- und Vermessungswesen, Technische Universität München, 2001.
50. Bröker H., Düster A., Nübel V. Geometrische Modellierung als Kern strukturmechanischer Berechnungen. Forum Bauinformatik, Fortschrittberichte VDI, Reihe 4: Bauingenieurwesen 2001, 201-211. VDI-Verlag. R. Romberg, M. Schulz (Eds.).
51. S. Dey, Geometry based three-dimensional hp-finite element modelling and computation, Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 1997.
52. Dey S., Shephard M., Flaherty J. Geometry representation issues associated with p-version finite element computations. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 1997, 150:39-55.
53. Holzer S., Haußer C. Ergebnisverbesserung von Finite-Element-Berechnungen durch exakte Geometriemodellierung. Forschung im Ingenieurwesen 1990, 56(3):65-70.
54. Királyfalvi G., Szabó B. Quasi-regional mapping for the p-version of the finite element method. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 1997, 27:85-97.
55. Rank E., Bröker H., Düster A., Rücker M. A client-server concept for integration of the p-version finite element analysis with geometric modelling. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering (VIII-ICCCBE) 2000, Stanford University, CA, USA.
56. E. Rank, H. Bröker, A. Düster, M. Rücker, A geometrical model as a kernel for simulation of spatial structures, in: Proceedings of IASS-IACM 2000, Fourth International Colloquium on Computation of Shell & Spatial Structures, Chania-Crete, Greece, 2000.
57. M. Ruess, D. Schillinger, Y. Bazilevs, E. Rank, The B-spline version of the finite cell method for linear and nonlinear analysis of complex geometry, in: IGA Conference, Austin, Texas, 2011.
58. Kima H.-J., Seoa Y.-D., You S.-K. Isogeometric analysis for trimmed CAD surfaces. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 2009, 198:2982-2995.
59. Kima H.-J., Seoa Y.-D., You S.-K. Isogeometric analysis with trimming technique for problems of arbitrary complex topology. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 2010, 199:2796-2812.
60. Scordelis A., Lo K. Computer analysis of cylindrical shells. Journal of the American Concrete Institute 1969, 61:539-561.
61. S. Kizio, K. Schweizerhof, A. Düster, E. Rank, Benchmark Computations of low and high order Shell Elements on adaptively generated FE meshes, in: Proceedings of 10. Dresdner Baustatik-Seminar, TU Dresden, Institut für Statik und Dynamik der Tragwerke, 2006.
62. S. Kollmannsberger, A. Düster, M. Ruess, E. Rank, The Finite Cell Method for eigenvalue problems, in preparation.
63. flexiCAD, Rhinoceros - NURBS modeling for Windows, 2011. http://www.de.rhino3d.com/.
64. Bindick S., Stiebler M., Krafczyk M. Fast kd-tree based hierarchical radiosity for radiative heat transport problems. Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 2011, 86(9):1082-1100.