An efficient integration technique for the voxel-based finite cell method

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering

Volumn 91, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 457-471

  Yang, Z ^a   Ruess, M ^a   Kollmannsberger, S ^a   Duster A ^b   Rank, E ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b HAMBURG UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Fictitious domain method; Finite cell method; High order FEM; Solid mechanics; Voxel models

Indexed keywords

FICTITIOUS DOMAIN METHOD; FINITE CELL METHOD; HIGH-ORDER; SOLID MECHANICS; VOXEL MODELS;

CELLS; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTICITY; MEDICAL APPLICATIONS;

CYTOLOGY;

EID: 84864023020     PISSN: 00295981     EISSN: 10970207     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nme.4269     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Frisch J, Mundani RP.Multiskalen-Strömungssimulation eines Kraftwerkskomplexes auf Höchstleistungsrechnern. Proceedings of 22. Forum Bauinformatik, Berlin, Germany, 2010.
2. Wenisch P, van Treeck C, Borrmann A, Rank E, Wenisch O.Computational steering on distributed systems: indoor comfort simulations as a case study of interactive CFD on supercomputers. International Journal of Parallel, Emergent and Distributed Systems, Taylor and Francis, 2007; 22:275-291.
3. Koketsu K, Fujiwara H, Ikegami Y.Finite-element simulation of seismic ground motion with a voxel mesh. Pure and Applied Geophysics 2004; 161:2183-2198.
4. Cai Q, Kollmannsberger S, Mundani RP, Rank E.The finite cell method for solute transport problems in porous media. 16th International Conference on Finite Elements for Flow Problems, Munich, Germany, 2011.
5. Düster A, Parvizian J, Rank E.Topology optimization based on the finite cell method. Proceedings in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics 2010; 10:151-152.
6. Parvizian J, Düster A, Rank E.Topology optimization using the finite cell method. Optimization and Engineering 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s11081-011-9159-x.
7. Adachi T, Hiromichi K, Yoshihiro T.Shape optimization based on traction method using voxel-FEM. Transactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers 2004; 70(691):426-433.
8. Torigaki T, Fujitani K.Power of a voxel approach to structural analysis and topology-shape optimization in automobile industries. Japan Journal of Industrial and Applied Mathematics 2000; 17:129-147.
9. Schillinger D, Düster A, Rank E.The hp-d adaptive finite cell method for geometrically nonlinear problems of solid mechanics. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2011. DOI: 10.1002/nme.3289.
10. Ruess M, Tal D, Trabelsi N, Yosibash Z, Rank E.The finite cell method for bone simulation: verification and validation. Biomechanics and Mechanobiology 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s10237-011-0322-2.
11. Yosibash Z, Padan R, Joscowicz L, Milgrom C.A CT-based high-order finite element analysis of the human proximal femur compared to in vitro experiments. ASME Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2007; 129:297-309.
12. Yosibash Z, Trabelsi N, Milgrom C.Reliable simulations of the human proximal femur by high-order finite element analysis validated by experimental observations. Journal of Biomechanics 2007; 40:3688-3699.
13. Perilli E, Baruffaldi F, Visentin M, Bordini B, Traina F, Cappello A, Viceconti M.MicroCT examination of human bone specimens: effects of polymethylmethacrylate embedding on structural parameters. Journal of Microscopy 2007; 225:192-200.
14. Lengsfeld M, Schmitt J, Alter P, Kaminsky J, Leppek R.Comparison of geometry-based and CT voxel-based finite element modelling and experimental validation. Medical Engineering & Physics 1998; 20(7):515-522.
15. Magne P.Efficient 3D finite element analysis of dental restorative procedures using micro-CT data. Dental Materials 2007; 23(5):539-548.
16. Gunter T, Merz B, Merieske-Stern R, Schmitt J, Leppek R, Lengesfeld M.Zahnimplantattestung am in vivo-finite-elemente-modell-testing of dental implants using an in vivo finite element model. Biomedizinische Technik/Biomedical Engineering 2000; 45(10):272-276.
17. van Rietbergen B, Weinans H, Huiskes R.Computational strategies for iterative solutions of large FEM applications employing voxel data. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1996; 39:2743-2764.
18. Margenox S, Vutov Y.Comparative analysis of PCG solvers for voxel FEM systems. Proceedings of the International Multiconference on Computer Science and Information Technology, 2007; 591-598.
19. Dick C, Georgii J, Burgkart R, Westermann R.Stress tensor field visualization for implant planning in orthopedics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 2009; 15(6):1399-1406.
20. Parvizian J, Düster A, Rank E.Finite cell method-h- and p-extension for embedded domain problems in solid mechanics. Computational Mechanics 2007; 41:121-133.
21. Düster A, Parvizian J, Yang Z, Rank E.The finite cell method for three-dimensional problems of solid mechanics. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2008; 197:3768-3782.
22. Schillinger D, Rank E.An unfitted hp-adaptive finite element method based on hierarchical b-splines for interface problems of complex geometry. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2011; 200(47-48):3358-3380.
23. Sehlhorst H-G, Düster A, Jänicke R, Diebels S, Rank E.Extraction of effective material parameters with application to sandwich structures. Proceedings in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 11: 553-554.
24. Düster A, Sehlhorst H-G, Rank E.Numerical homogenization of heterogeneous and cellular materials utilizing the finite cell method. Computational Mechanics, DOI: 10.1007/s00466-012-0681-2, 2012.
25. Yang Z, Kollmannsberger S, Düster A, Ruess M, Garcia Grande E, Burgkart R, Rank E.Non-standard bone simulation: interactive numerical analysis by computational steering. Computing and Visualization in Science, 2012; 14(5):207-216. DOI: 10.1007/s00791-012-0175-y.
26. Szabó BA, Düster A, Rank E.The p-version of the finite element method. In Encyclopedia of computational Mechanics, Vol. 1, chapter 5, Stein E, deBorst R, Hughes TJR (eds). John Wiley & Sons, 2004; 119-139.
27. Szabó BA, Babuška I.Finite Element Analysis. John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1991.
28. Vinci C.Application of Dirichlet boundary conditions in the finite cell method. Master thesis, Lehrstuhl für Computation in Engineering, Fakultät für Bauingenieur- und Vermessungswesen, Technische Universität München, 2009.
29. Szabó B, Babuška I.Finite Element Analysis. John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1991.
30. Bathe K-J.Finite Element Procedures. Prentice Hall, Inc: Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 1996.
31. Yang Z.The finite cell method for geometry-based structural simulation. Ph.D. Thesis, Lehrstuhl für Computation in Engineering, Fakultät für Bauingenieur- und Vermessungswesen, Technische Universität München, 2011.
32. 3 - User's Guide, Lehrstuhl für Bauinformatik, Technische Universität München, 2001.
33. Bauer C, Frink A, Kisil VV, Richard K, Sheplyakov A.GiNaC is Not a CAS. (Available from: ) [November 2010].
34. Baruffaldi F, Perilli E.Human bone biopsy, 3D model Bn_326_3D.stl, From: the BEL repository. (Available from: ) [May 2007].
35. SIMULIA. ABAQUS. (Available from: ) [February 2007].
36. Schöberl J.NETGEN. (Available from: ) [January 2007].
37. Chapman B, Jost G, vander Pas R.Using OpenMP. Portable shared memory parallel programming. MIT Press: MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2008.
38. Yosibash Z, Trabelsi N, Milgrom C.Reliable simulations of the human proximal femur by high-order finite element analysis validated by experimental observations. Journal of Biomechanics 2007; 40:3688-3699.
39. Keyak JH, Falkinstein Y.Comparison of in situ and in vitro CT scan-based finite element model predictions of proximal femoral fracture load. Medical Engineering and Physics 2003; 25(9):781-787.
40. Baca V, Horak Z, Mikulenka P, Dzupa V.Comparison of an inhomogeneous orthotropic and isotropic material models used for FE analyses. Medical Engineering & Physics 2008; 30:924-930.
41. Peng L, Bai J, Zeng Z, Zhou Y.Comparison of isotropic and orthotropic material property assignments on femoral finite element models under two loading conditions. Medical Engineering & Physics 2006; 28:227-233.