Corrigendum to "An accurate estimation of bone density improves the accuracy of subject-specific finite element" [J. Biomech. 41 (2008) 2483-2491] (DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.05.017);An accurate estimation of bone density improves the accuracy of subject-specific finite element models

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 41, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 2483-2491

  Schileo, Enrico ^a   Dall'Ara, Enrico ^a   Taddei, Fulvia ^a   Malandrino, Andrea ^a   Schotkamp, Tom ^a   Baleani, Massimiliano ^a   Viceconti, Marco ^a  

^a RIZZOLI ORTHOPAEDIC INSTITUTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Bone biomechanics; Bone density; Computed tomography; CT calibration; Subject specific finite element model; Validation

Indexed keywords

BONE; CALIBRATION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; TISSUE;

ACCURATE ESTIMATION; BONE BIOMECHANICS; BONE DENSITY; CORTICAL TISSUES; EXPERIMENTAL ERRORS; PREDICTION ACCURACY; SUBJECT-SPECIFIC; VALIDATION;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITOMETRY; BONE DENSITY; BONE TISSUE; CALCULATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CORTICAL BONE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMUR; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LINEAR SYSTEM; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRABECULAR BONE;

EID: 48349100917     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.09.001     Document Type: Erratum

References (38)

1. Ashman R.B., and Rho J.Y. Elastic modulus of trabecular bone material. Journal of Biomechanics 21 (1988) 177-181
2. Barker D.S., Netherway D.J., Krishnan J., and Hearn T.C. Validation of a finite element model of the human metacarpal. Medical Engineering and Physics 27 (2005) 103-113
3. Bitsakos C., Kerner J., Fisher I., and Amis A.A. The effect of muscle loading on the simulation of bone remodelling in the proximal femur. Journal of Biomechanics 38 (2005) 133-139
4. Blanton P.L., and Biggs N.L. Density of fresh and embalmed human compact and cancellous bone. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 29 (1968) 39-44
5. Carter D.R., and Hayes W.C. The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American 59 (1977) 954-962
6. Cody D.D., Gross G.J., Hou F.J., Spencer H.J., Goldstein S.A., and Fyhrie D.P. Femoral strength is better predicted by finite element models than QCT and DXA. Journal of Biomechanics 32 (1999) 1013-1020
7. Crawford R.P., Cann C.E., and Keaveny T.M. Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography. Bone 33 (2003) 744-750
8. Dalstra M., Huiskes R., and van Erning L. Development and validation of a three-dimensional finite element model of the pelvic bone. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 117 (1995) 272-278
9. Edmondston S.J., Singer K.P., Day R.E., Breidahl P.D., and Price R.I. Formalin fixation effects on vertebral bone density and failure mechanics: an in-vitro study of human and sheep vertebrae. Clinical Biomechanics 9 (1994) 175
10. Goulet R.W., Goldstein S.A., Ciarelli M.J., Kuhn J.L., Brown M.B., and Feldkamp L.A. The relationship between the structural and orthogonal compressive properties of trabecular bone. Journal of Biomechanics 27 (1994) 375-389
11. Gupta S., van der Helm F.C.T., Sterk J.C., van Keulen F., and Kaptein B.L. Development and experimental validation of a three-dimensional finite element model of the human scapula. Proceedings of the Institute of Mechanical Engineers [H] 218 (2004) 127-142
12. Gupta S., New A.M.R., and Taylor M. Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head. Clinical Biomechanics 21 (2006) 594-602
13. Helgason B., Perilli E., Schileo E., Taddei F., Brynjolfsson S., and Viceconti M. Mathematical relationships between bone density and mechanical properties: a literature review. Clinical Biomechanics 23 (2008) 135-146
14. Hernandez C.J., Beaupre G.S., Keller T.S., and Carter D.R. The influence of bone volume fraction and ash fraction on bone strength and modulus. Bone 29 (2001) 74-78
15. Kalender W.A. A phantom for standardization and quality control in spinal bone mineral measurements by QCT and DXA: design considerations and specifications. Medical Physics 19 (1992) 583-586
16. Kaneko T.S., Bell J.S., Pejcic M.R., Tehranzadeh J., and Keyak J.H. Mechanical properties, density and quantitative CT scan data of trabecular bone with and without metastases. Journal of Biomechanics 37 (2004) 523-530
17. Kaneko T.S., Pejcic M.R., Tehranzadeh J., and Keyak J.H. Relationships between material properties and CT scan data of cortical bone with and without metastatic lesions. Medical Engineering and Physics 25 (2003) 445-454
18. Keller T.S. Predicting the compressive mechanical behavior of bone. Journal of Biomechanics 27 (1994) 1159-1168
19. Keyak J.H., Fourkas M.G., Meagher J.M., and Skinner H.B. Validation of an automated method of three-dimensional finite element modelling of bone. Journal of Biomedical Engineering 15 (1993) 505-509
20. Keyak J.H., Lee I.Y., and Skinner H.B. Correlations between orthogonal mechanical properties and density of trabecular bone: use of different densitometric measures. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 28 (1994) 1329-1336
21. Keyak J.H., Rossi S.A., Jones K.A., and Skinner H.B. Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling. Journal of Biomechanics 31 (1998) 125-133
22. Keyak J.H., Kaneko T.S., Tehranzadeh J., and Skinner H.B. Predicting proximal femoral strength using structural engineering models. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (2005) 219-228
23. Morgan E.F., Bayraktar H.H., and Keaveny T.M. Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site. Journal of Biomechanics 36 (2003) 897-904
24. Ohman C., Baleani M., Perilli E., Dall'Ara E., Tassani S., Baruffaldi F., and Viceconti M. Mechanical testing of cancellous bone from the femoral head: experimental errors due to off-axis measurements. Journal of Biomechanics 40 (2007) 2426
25. Peng L., Bai J., Zeng X., and Zhou Y. Comparison of isotropic and orthotropic material property assignments on femoral finite element models under two loading conditions. Medical Engineering and Physics 28 (2006) 227-233
26. Schaffler M.B., and Burr D.B. Stiffness of compact bone: effects of porosity and density. Journal of Biomechanics 21 (1988) 13-16
27. Schileo E., Taddei F., Malandrino A., Cristofolini L., and Viceconti M. Subject-specific finite element models can accurately predict strain levels in long bones. Journal of Biomechanics 40 (2007) 2982-2989
28. Snyder S.M., and Schneider E. Estimation of mechanical properties of cortical bone by computed tomography. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 9 (1991) 422-431
29. Taddei F., Pancanti A., and Viceconti M. An improved method for the automatic mapping of computed tomography numbers onto finite element models. Medical Engineering and Physics 26 (2004) 61-69
30. Taddei F., Cristofolini L., Martelli S., Gill H.S., and Viceconti M. Subject-specific finite element models of long bones: an in vitro evaluation of the overall accuracy. Journal of Biomechanics 39 (2006) 2457-2467
31. Taddei F., Schileo E., Helgason B., Cristofolini L., and Viceconti M. The material mapping strategy influences the accuracy of CT-based finite element models of bones: an evaluation against experimental measurements. Medical Engineering and Physics 29 (2007) 973-979
32. Vazquez A.A., Lauge-Pedersen H., Lidgren L., and Taylor M. Finite element analysis of the initial stability of ankle arthrodesis with internal fixation: flat cut versus intact joint contours. Clinical Biomechanics 18 (2003) 244-253
33. Viceconti M., Olsen S., Nolte L.P., and Burton K. Extracting clinically relevant data from finite element simulations. Clinical Biomechanics 20 (2005) 451-454
34. Viceconti M., Taddei F., Montanari L., Testi D., Leardini A., Clapworthy G., and Van Sint Jan S. Multimod data manager: a tool for data fusion. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 87 (2007) 148-159
35. Wagner A., Krach W., Schicho K., Undt G., Ploder O., and Ewers R. A 3-dimensional finite-element analysis investigating the biomechanical behavior of the mandible and plate osteosynthesis in cases of fractures of the condylar process. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics 94 (2002) 678-686
36. Weinans H., Sumner D.R., Igloria R., and Natarajan R.N. Sensitivity of periprosthetic stress-shielding to load and the bone density-modulus relationship in subject-specific finite element models. Journal of Biomechanics 33 (2000) 809-817
37. Wirtz D.C., Schiffers N., Pandorf T., Radermacher K., Weichert D., and Forst R. Critical evaluation of known bone material properties to realize anisotropic FE-simulation of the proximal femur. Journal of Biomechanics 33 (2000) 1325-1330
38. Wong A.S., New A.M., Isaacs G., and Taylor M. Effect of bone material properties on the initial stability of a cementless hip stem: a finite element study. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers [H] 219 (2005) 265-275