Genome databases the CATH database

Human Genomics

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 207-212

  Knudsen, Michael ^a   Wiuf, Carsten ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

CATH; Classification; Database; Protein domains; Protein structure

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; INTERNET; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; INTERNET; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS;

EID: 85027934053     PISSN: 14739542     EISSN: 14797364     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1479-7364-4-3-207     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Berman, H.M., Westbrook, J., Feng, Z., Gilliland, G. et al. (2000), ‘The Protein Data Bank’, Nucl. Acids Res. Vol. 28, pp. 235–242.
2. Berman, H.M., Battistuz, T., Bhat, T.N., Bluhm, W.F. et al. (2002), ‘The Protein Data Bank’, Acta Cryst. Vol. D58, pp. 899–907.
3. Orengo, C.A., Michie, A.D., Jones, D.T., Swindells, M.B. et al. (1997), ‘CATH: A hierarchic classification of protein domain structures’, Structure Vol. 5, pp. 1093–1108.
4. Orengo, C.A., Martin, A.M., Hutchinson, G., Jones, S. et al. (1998), ‘Classifying a protein in the CATH database of domain structures’, Acta Cryst. Vol. D54, pp. 1155–1167.
5. Orengo, C.A., Jones, D.T., Taylor, W. and Thornton, J.M. (1994), ‘Protein superfamilies and domain superfolds’, Nature Vol. 372, pp. 631–634.
6. Cuff, A.L., Sillitoe, I., Lewis, T., Redfern, O.C. et al. (2009), ‘The CATH classification revisited — Architectures reviewed and new ways to characterize structural divergence in superfamilies’, Nucl. Acids Res. Vol. 37, pp. D310–D314.
7. Taylor, W.R. and Orengo, C.A. (1989), ‘Protein structure alignment’, J. Mol. Biol. Vol. 208, pp. 1–22.
8. Redfern, O., Grant, A., Maibaum, M. and Orengo, C. (2005), ‘Survey of current protein family databases and their applications in comparative, structural and functional genomics’, J. Chromatogr. B Vol. 815, pp. 97–107.
9. Murzin, A.G., Brenner, S.E., Hubbard, T. and Chothia, C. (1995), ‘SCOP: A structural classification of proteins database for the investi-gation of sequences and structures’, J. Mol. Biol. Vol. 247, pp. 536–540.
10. Csaba, G., Birzele, F. and Zimmer, R. (2009), ‘Systematic comparison of SCOP and CATH: A new gold standard for protein structure analysis’, BMC Struct. Biol. Vol. 9, p. 23.
11. Dietmann, S., Park, J., Notredame, C., Heger, A. et al. (2001), ‘A fully automatic evolutionary classification of protein folds: Dali Domain Directory version 3’, Nucl. Acids Res. Vol. 29, pp. 55–57.
12. Mizuguchi, K., Deane, C.M., Blundell, T.L. and Overington, J.P. (1997), ‘HOMSTRAD: A database of protein structure alignments for homolo-gous families’, Protein Science Vol. 7, pp. 2469–2471.
13. Sadreyev, R. and Grishin, N. (2003), ‘COMPASS: A tool for comparison of multiple protein alignments with assessment of statistical significance’, J. Mol. Biol. Vol. 326, pp. 317–336.
14. Sadreyev, R., Tang, M., Kim, B.-H. and Grishin, N.V. (2007), ‘COMPASS server for remote homology inference’, Nucl. Acids Res. Vol. 35, pp. W653–W658.
15. Greene, L.H., Lewis, T.E., Addou, S., Cuff, A. et al. (2007), ‘The CATH domain structure database: New protocols and classification levels give a more comprehensive resource for exploring evolution’, Nucl. Acids Res. Vol. 35, pp. D291–D297.
16. Buchan, D.W., Shepard, A.J., Lee, D., Pearl, F.M. et al. (2002), ‘Gene3D: Structural assignment for whole genes and genomes using the CATH domain structure database’, Genome Res. Vol. 12, pp. 503–514.
17. Buchan, D.W., Rison, S.C., Bray, J.E., Lee, D. et al. (2003), ‘Structural assignments for the biologist and bioinformaticist alike’, Nucl. Acids Res. Vol. 31, pp. 469–473.
18. Yeats, C., Maibaum, M., Marsden, R., Dibley, M. et al. (2006), ‘Gene3D: Modelling protein structure, function and evolution’, Nucl. Acids Res. Vol. 34, D281–D284.
19. Lees, J., Yeats, C., Redfern, O., Clegg, A. et al. (2010), ‘Gene3D: merging structure and function for a thousand genomes’, Nucl. Acids Res. Vol. 38, pp. D296–D300.
20. Røgen, P. and Fain, B. (2003), ‘Automatic classification of protein structure by using Gauss integrals’, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 100, pp. 119–124.
21. Choi, I.-G., Kwon, J. and Kim, S.-H. (2004), ‘Local feature frequency profile: A method to measure structural similarity in proteins’, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 101, pp. 3797–3802.
22. Getz, G., Vendruscolo, M., Sachs, D. and Domany, E. (2002), ‘Automated assignment of SCOP and CATH protein structure classification from FSSP scores’, Proteins Vol. 46, pp. 405–411.
23. Redfern, O.C., Harrison, A., Dallman, T., Pearl, F.M. et al. (2007), ‘CATHEDRAL: A fast and effective algorithm to predict folds and domain boundaries from multidomain protein structures’, PLoS Comp. Biol. Vol. 3, p. e232.
24. Shyu, C.-R., Chi, P.-H., Scott, G. and Xu, D. (2004), ‘ProteinDBS: A real-time retrieval system for protein structure comparison’, Nucl. Acids Res. Vol. 32, pp. W572–W575.
25. Dietmann, S. and Holm, L. (2001), ‘Identification of homology in protein structure classification’, Nature Struct. Biol. Vol. 8, pp. 953–957.
26. Cuff, A., Redfern, O.C., Greene, L., Sillitoe, I. et al. (2009), ‘The CATH hierarchy revisited – Structural divergence in domain superfami-lies and the continuity of fold space’, Structure Vol. 17, pp. 1051–1062.
27. Reeves, G.A., Dallmann, T.J., Redfern, O.C., Akpor, A. et al. (2006), ‘Structural diversity of domain superfamilies in the CATH database’, J. Mol. Biol. Vol. 360, pp. 725–741.