How do stakeholders from multiple hierarchical levels of a large provincial health system define engagement? A qualitative study

Implementation Science

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Norris, Jill M ^a   White, Deborah E ^a   Nowell, Lorelli ^a   Mrklas, Kelly ^b,c   Stelfox, Henry T ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b FOOTHILLS HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Clinical networks; Engagement; Health services; Implementation; Innovations; Involvement; Organizational change; Participation; Quality improvement

Indexed keywords

ALBERTA; EMPLOYEE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERVIEW; LEADERSHIP; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MODEL; NOMENCLATURE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SHARED DECISION MAKING; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; VOICE; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; COOPERATION; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC RELATIONS; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALBERTA; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85026553261     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13012-017-0625-5     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Clarke AL, Shearer W, McMillan AJ, Ireland PD. Investigating apparent variation in quality of care: the critical role of clinician engagement. Med J Aust. 2010;193(8 Suppl):S111-3.
2. Detwiller M, Petillion W. Change management and clinical engagement: critical elements for a successful clinical information system implementation. Comput Inform Nurs. 2014;32(6):267-73.
3. Sawka C, Ross J, Srigley J, Irish J. The crucial role of clinician engagement in system-wide quality improvement: the Cancer Care Ontario experience. Healthc Q. 2012;15:38-41.
4. How to spread good ideas: a systematic review of the literature on diffusion, dissemination and sustainability of innovations in health service delivery and organisation. Report for the National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R & D (NCCSDO) [ http://www.netscc.ac.uk/hsdr/files/project/SDO_FR_08-1201-038_V01.pdf ]. Accessed 19 July 2017.
5. Bowen S, Graham ID. Chapter 1.2: integrated knowledge translation. In: Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham ID, editors. Knowledge translation in health care. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley; 2013.
6. Dickinson H, Ham C. Engaging doctors in leadership: review of the literature. Birmingham: University of Birmingham; 2008.
7. Reinertsen J, Gosfield A, Rupp W, Whittington J. Engaging physicians in a shared quality agenda. IHI Innovation Series White Paper Cambridge: Institute for Healthcare Improvement 2007.
8. NHS staff management and health service quality: results from the NHS staff survey and related data [ https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/215455/dh_129656.pdf ]. Accessed 19 July 2017.
9. Spence Laschinger HK, Leiter MP. The impact of nursing work environments on patient safety outcomes: the mediating role of burnout/engagement. J Nurs Adm. 2006;36(5):259-67.
10. Sikorska-Simmons E. Linking resident satisfaction to staff perceptions of the work environment in assisted living: a multilevel analysis. Gerontologist. 2006;46(5):590-8.
11. Collins KS, Collins SK, McKinnies R, Jensen S. Employee satisfaction and employee retention: catalysts to patient satisfaction. Health Care Manag. 2008;27(3):245-51.
12. Ocloo J, Matthews R. From tokenism to empowerment: progressing patient and public involvement in healthcare improvement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25(8):626-32.
13. Sarrami-Foroushani P, Travaglia J, Debono D, Braithwaite J. Implementing strategies in consumer and community engagement in health care: results of a large-scale, scoping meta-review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):402.
14. Snyder H, Engstrom J. The antecedents, forms and consequences of patient involvement: a narrative review of the literature. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016;53:351-78.
15. Taitz JM, Lee TH, Sequist TD. A framework for engaging physicians in quality and safety. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(9):722-8.
16. Kaissi A. Enhancing physician engagement: an international perspective. Int J Health Serv. 2014;44(3):567-92.
17. Spurgeon P, Barwell F, Mazelan P. Developing a medical engagement scale (MES). Int J Clin Leadersh. 2008;16(4):213-23.
18. Davies H, Powell A, Rushmer R. Healthcare professionals' views on clinician engagement in quality improvement: a literature review. London: The Health Foundation; 2007.
19. Dixon-Woods M, McNicol S, Martin G. Ten challenges in improving quality in healthcare: lessons from the Health Foundation's programme evaluations and relevant literature. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012:21(10):876-84.
20. Ferlie EB, Shortell SM. Improving the quality of health care in the United Kingdom and the United States: a framework for change. Milbank Q. 2001;79(2):281-315.
21. Clark J. Medical leadership and engagement: no longer an optional extra. Journal of Health Organization and Management. 2012;26(4):437-43.
22. Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):53.
23. Bailey C, Madden A, Alfes K, Fletcher L. The meaning, antecedents and outcomes of employee engagement: a narrative synthesis. Int J Manage Rev. 2015;19:1-23.
24. Shuck B, Wollard K. Employee engagement and HRD: a seminal review of the foundations. Hum Resource Dev Rev. 2010;9(1):89-110.
25. Saks A, Gruman J. What do we really know about employee engagement? Human Resource Dev Q. 2014;25(2):155-82.
26. Macey WH, Schneider B. The meaning of employee engagement. Ind Org Psy. 2008;1:3-30.
27. Eldor L, Harpaz I. A process model of employee engagement: the learning climate and its relationship with extra-role performance behaviors. J Organ Behav. 2016;37(2):213-35.
28. Fuchs S, Edwards MR. Predicting pro-change behaviour: the role of perceived organisational justice and organisational identification. Hum Resour Manag J. 2012;22(1):39-59.
29. Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB. Utrecht work engagement scale: preliminary manual. Utrecht: Occupational Health Psychology Unit, Utrecht University; 2003.
30. White M, Wells JS, Butterworth T. The impact of a large-scale quality improvement programme on work engagement: preliminary results from a national cross-sectional-survey of the 'Productive Ward'. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014;51(12):1634-43.
31. Cornwall A. Unpacking 'Participation': models, meanings and practices. Community Dev J. 2008;43(3):269-83.
32. About us: knowledge translation [ http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/29418.html ]. Accessed 7 June 2016.
33. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50.
34. Meyers DC, Durlak JA, Wandersman A. The quality implementation framework: a synthesis of critical steps in the implementation process. Am J Community Psychol. 2012;50(3-4):462-80.
35. Saldana L, Chamberlain P, Wang W, Hendricks Brown C. Predicting program start-up using the stages of implementation measure. Admin Pol Ment Health. 2012;39(6):419-25.
36. Arnstein SR. A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Plann. 1969;35(4):216-24.
37. Connor DM. A new ladder of citizen participation. Natl Civ Rev. 1988;77(3):249-57.
38. Pretty JN. Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture. World Devel. 1995;23(8):1247-63.
39. IAP2 spectrum of public participation [ http://www.iap2.org/resource/resmgr/foundations_course/IAP2_P2_Spectrum_FINAL.pdf ]. Accessed 19 July 2017.
40. Engaging consumers in discussion about Australian health policy: key themes emerging from the AIHPS study [ http://healthissuescentre.org.au/images/uploads/resources/Engaging-consumers-in-Australian-health-care-policy-decisions.pdf ]. Accessed 19 July 2017.
41. Carman KL, Dardess P, Maurer M, Sofaer S, Adams K, Bechtel C, Sweeney J. Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(2):223-31.
42. Bowen F, Newenham-Kahindi A, Herremans I. When suits meets roots: the antecedents and consequences of community engagement strategy. J Bus Ethics. 2010;95:297-318.
43. Kovacs Burns K, Bellows M, Eigenseher C, Gallivan J. 'Practical' resources to support patient and family engagement in healthcare decisions: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):175.
44. Metro South Health Clinician Engagement Strategy 2012-2015 [ https://metrosouthhealth.citizenspace.com/community-engagement/service:planning-clinician_engagement_strategy/supporting_documents/MSH%20Clinician%20Engagement%20Plan.pdf ]. Accessed 19 July 2017.
45. Alberta Health Services. Clinical engagement discussion paper: leading practices and innovation. Edmonton: Alberta Health Services; 2012.
46. Norris JM, Hecker KG, Rabatach L, Noseworthy TW, White DE. Development and psychometric testing of the clinical networks engagement tool. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0174056.
47. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77-101.
48. Nowell L. Pragmatism and integrated knowledge translation: exploring the compatabilities and tensions. Nursing Open. 2015;2(3):141-8.
49. Lang E, Wyer P, Haynes R. Knowledge translation: closing the evidence-to-practice gap. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49(3):355-66.
50. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Knowledge to action: a knowledge translation casebook. Ottawa: Canadian Institute of Health Research; 2009.
51. King N. Using templates in the thematic analysis of text. In: Cassell C, Symon G, editors. Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research. London: Sage; 2004. p. 257-70.
52. Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldana J. Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 2014.
53. Kerr C, Nixon A, Wild D. Assessing and demonstrating data saturation in qualitative inquiry supporting patient-reported outcomes research. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010;10(3):269-81.
54. Boeije H. A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Qual Quant. 2002;36(4):391-409.
55. Lincoln Y, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage; 1985.
56. White DE, Oelke ND, Friesen S. Management of a large qualitative data set: establishing trustworthiness of the data. Int J Qual Methods. 2012;11(3):244-58.
57. van den Heuvel S, Schalk R, van Assen MA. Does a well-informed employee have a more positive attitude toward change? The mediating role of psychological contract fulfillment, trust, and perceived need for change. J Appl Behav Sci. 2015:1-22.
58. Albrecht S. Understanding employee cynicism toward change in healthcare contexts. Int J Inf Syst Chang Manag. 2010;4(3):194-209.
59. Cane J, O'Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):37.
60. Dutton JE. Energize your workplace: how to build and sustain high-quality connections at work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2003.
61. Carmeli A, Dutton JE, Hardin AE. Respect as an engine for new ideas: linking respectful engagement, relational information processing and creativity among employees and teams. Human Relations. 2015;68(6):1021-47.
62. Stephens JP, Carmeli A. Relational leadership and creativity: the effects of respectful engagement and caring on meaningfulness and creative work involvement. In: handbook of research on creativity and leadership. edn. Edited by Hemlin S, Mumford MD. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing; in press.
63. Blader SL, Tyler TR. Testing and extending the group engagement model: linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94(2):445-64.
64. Ramarajan L, Barsade SG, Burack OR. The influence of organizational respect on emotional exhaustion in the human services. J Posit Psychol. 2008;3(1):4-18.
65. Rogers KM, Ashforth BE. Respect in organizations: feeling valued as "we" and "me". J Manag. 2014;43(5):1-31.
66. Tetroe JM, Graham ID, Scott V. What does it mean to transform knowledge into action in falls prevention research? Perspectives from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. J Saf Res. 2011;42(6):423-6.
67. Graham ID, Tetroe JM. Getting evidence into policy and practice: perspective of a health research funder. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009;18(1):46-50.
68. Graham ID, Tetroe JM. Implementation of evidence. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2009;7(3):157-8.
69. Graham ID, Tetroe JM, McLean RK. Chapter 1: some basics of integrated knowledge translation research. In: Graham ID, Tetroe JM, Pearson A, editors. turning knowledge into action: practical guidance on how to do integrated knowledge translation research. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014.
70. Davison CM. Knowledge translation: implications for evaluation. N Dir Eval. 2009;2009(124):75-87.
71. Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, Straus SE, Tetroe J, Caswell W, Robinson N. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Heal Prof. 2006;26(1):13-24.
72. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Guide to knowledge translation planning at CIHR: integrated and end-of-grant approaches. Ottawa: Canadian Institutes of Health Research; 2012.
73. Saks A. Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. J Manage Psychol. 2006;21(7):600-19.
74. Carson L. The IAP2 spectrum: Larry Susskind in conversation with IAP2 members. Int J Public Particip. 2008;2(2):67-84.
75. Kirk MA, Kelley C, Yankey N, Birken SA, Abadie B, Damschroder L: A systematic review of the use of the consolidated framework for implementation research. Implement Sci 2016;11(1):1-13.
76. Ilott I, Gerrish K, Booth A, Field B. Testing the consolidated framework for implementation research on health care innovations from South Yorkshire. J Eval Clin Pract. 2013;19(5):915-24.
77. Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6(1):42.
78. May C, Finch T. Implementing, embedding, and integrating practices: an outline of normalization process theory. Sociology. 2009;43(3):535-54.
79. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1322-7.
80. Harvey G, Kitson A: PARIHS revisited: from heuristic to integrated framework for the successful implementation of knowledge into practice. Implement Sci. 2016;11(1):1-13.
81. Stetler CB, Mittman BS, Francis J. Overview of the VA Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) and QUERI theme articles: QUERI series. Implement Sci. 2008;3:8.
82. Weiner BJ. A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implement Sci. 2009;4(1):67.