Brain and Social Networks: Fundamental Building Blocks of Human Experience

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 21, Issue 9, 2017, Pages 674-690

  Falk, Emily B ^a,b,c   Bassett, Danielle S ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

communication; multiscale; networks; neuroimaging; neuroscience; social networks

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; COMMUNICATION; NETWORKS (CIRCUITS); NEUROIMAGING; NEUROLOGY; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

BIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS; BRAIN ACTIVITY; DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY; FUNDAMENTAL BUILDING BLOCKS; HUMAN BEHAVIORS; MULTI-SCALE; MULTILAYER NETWORK MODELS; NEUROSCIENCE;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

BRAIN FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MODEL; NEUROIMAGING; NEUROSCIENCE; ORGANIZATION; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL NETWORK; SOCIOLOGY; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN; COGNITION; INTERNET; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NERVE TRACT; PHYSIOLOGY; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

BRAIN; COGNITION; HUMANS; INTERNET; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NERVE NET; NEURAL PATHWAYS; NEUROSCIENCES; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

EID: 85025469893     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: 1879307X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.009     Document Type: Review

References (173)

1. Moreno, J.L., Jennings, H.H., Statistics of social configurations. Sociometry 1 (1938), 342–374.
2. Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H., Collective dynamics of 'small-world’ networks. Nature 393 (1998), 440–442.
3. Radicchi, F., Castellano, C., Fundamental difference between superblockers and superspreaders in networks. Phys. Rev. E, 95, 2017, 012318.
4. Long, J.C., et al. Structuring successful collaboration: a longitudinal social network analysis of a translational research network. Implement. Sci., 11, 2016, 19.
5. Anderson, K., et al. Can mental health interventions change social networks? A systematic review. BMC Psychiatry, 15, 2015, 297.
6. Widmer, E.D., et al. How central and connected am I in my family? Family-based social capital of individuals with intellectual disability. Res. Dev. Disabil. 29 (2008), 176–187.
7. Bae, S.-H., et al. Nursing teams: behind the charts. J. Nurs. Manag. 25 (2017), 354–365.
8. González-Bailón, S., et al. The dynamics of protest recruitment through an online network. Sci. Rep., 1, 2011, 197.
9. Bond, M., Social influences on corporate political donations in Britain. Br. J. Sociol. 55 (2004), 55–77.
10. Ward, M.D., et al. Identifying international networks: latent spaces and imputation. Breiger, R., et al. (eds.) Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis: Workshop Summary and Papers, 2003, Committee on Human Factors, Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences Education, National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council, 345–360.
11. Butts, C.T., Revisiting the foundations of network analysis. Science 325 (2009), 414–416.
12. Bassett, D.S., Sporns, O., Network neuroscience. Nat. Neurosci. 20 (2017), 353–364.
13. Servaas, M.N., et al. Associations between genetic risk, functional brain network organization and neuroticism. Brain Imaging Behav., 2016, 10.1007/s11682-016-9626-2 Published online October 14, 2017.
14. Beaty, R.E., et al. Personality and complex brain networks: the role of openness to experience in default network efficiency. Hum. Brain Mapp. 37 (2016), 773–779.
15. Marek, S., et al. The contribution of network organization and integration to the development of cognitive control. PLoS Biol., 13, 2015, e1002328.
16. Spielberg, J.M., et al. Flexible brain network reconfiguration supporting inhibitory control. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 112 (2015), 10020–10025.
17. Peeters, S., et al. Semi-metric analysis of the functional brain network: relationship with familial risk for psychotic disorder. Neuroimage Clin. 9 (2015), 607–616.
18. Chang, P., et al. The effects of an APOE promoter polymorphism on human white matter connectivity during non-demented aging. J. Alzheimers Dis. 55 (2017), 77–87.
19. Braun, U., et al. Dynamic brain network reconfiguration as a a potential schizophrenia genetic risk mechanism modulated by NMDA receptor function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 113 (2016), 12568–12573.
20. Karuza, E.A., et al. Local patterns to global architectures: influences of network topology on human learning. Trends Cogn. Sci. 20 (2016), 629–640.
21. Borchardt, V., et al. Dynamic disconnection of the supplementary motor area after processing of dismissive biographic narratives. Brain Behav., 5, 2015, e00377.
22. De Vico Fallani, F., et al. Defecting or not defecting: how to ‘read’ human behavior during cooperative games by EEG measurements. PLoS One, 5, 2010, e14187.
23. Betzel, R.F., Bassett, D.S., Multi-scale brain networks. NeuroImage, 2016, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.006 Published online November 11, 2016.
24. Bassett, D.S., Mattar, M.G., A network neuroscience of human learning: potential to inform quantitative theories of brain and behavior. Trends Cogn. Sci. 21 (2017), 250–264.
25. Schmälzle, R., et al. Brain connectivity dynamics during social interaction reflect social network structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 114 (2017), 5153–5158.
26. Hackman, D.A., et al. Socioeconomic status and the brain: mechanistic insights from human and animal research. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11 (2010), 651–659.
27. Hackman, D.A., Farah, M.J., Socioeconomic status and the developing brain. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13 (2009), 65–73.
28. O'Donnell, M.B., Falk, E.B., Big data under the microscope and brains in social context. Ann. Am. Acad. Pol. Soc. Sci. 659 (2015), 274–289.
29. O'Donnell, M.B., et al. Big data in the new media environment. Behav. Brain Sci. 37 (2014), 94–95.
30. Meshi, D., et al. The emerging neuroscience of social media. Trends Cogn. Sci. 19 (2015), 771–782.
31. Branigan, H.P., et al. Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue. Cognition 75 (2000), B13–B25.
32. Gonzales, A.L., et al. Language style matching as a predictor of social dynamics in small groups. Commun. Res. 37 (2009), 3–19.
33. Niederhoffer, K.G., Pennebaker, J.W., Linguistic style matching in social interaction. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 21 (2002), 337–360.
34. Cappella, J.N., Why biological explanations?. J. Commun. 46 (1996), 4–7.
35. Richardson, D.C., Dale, R., Looking to understand: the coupling between speakers’ and listeners' eye movements and its relationship to discourse comprehension. Cogn. Sci 29 (2005), 1045–1060.
36. Lakin, J.L., Chartrand, T.L., Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry to create affiliation and rapport. Psychol. Sci. 14 (2003), 334–339.
37. Hasson, U., et al. Brain-to-brain coupling: a mechanism for creating and sharing a social world. Trends Cogn. Sci. 16 (2012), 114–121.
38. Stephens, G.J., et al. Speaker-listener neural coupling underlies successful communication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107 (2010), 14425–14430.
39. Silbert, L.J., et al. Coupled neural systems underlie the production and comprehension of naturalistic narrative speech. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111 (2014), E4687–E4696.
40. Büchel, C., et al. Characterizing stimulus–response functions using nonlinear regressors in parametric fMRI experiments. Neuroimage 8 (1998), 140–148.
41. Khambhati, A.N., et al. Modelling and interpreting mesoscale network dynamics. NeuroImage, 2017, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.029 Published online June 20.
42. Burt, R.S., et al. Social network analysis: foundations and frontiers on advantage. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 64 (2013), 527–547.
43. Landis, B., Personality and social networks in organizations: a review and future directions. J. Organ. Behav 37 (2015), S107–S121.
44. Scholz, C., Falk, E.B., The neuroscience of viral ideas. González-Bailón, S., Foucault Welles, B., (eds.) Handbook of Communication in the Networked Age, 2017, Oxford University Press in press.
45. Goel, S., et al. The structural virality of online diffusion. Manag. Sci. 62 (2015), 180–196.
46. Mednick, S.C., et al. The spread of sleep loss influences drug use in adolescent social networks. PLoS One, 5, 2010, e9775.
47. Rosenquist, J.N., et al. The spread of alcohol consumption behavior in a large social network. Ann. Intern. Med. 152 (2010), 426–433.
48. Christakis, N.A., Fowler, J.H., The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. N. Engl. J. Med. 357 (2007), 370–379.
49. Fowler, J.H., Christakis, N.A., Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study. BMJ, 337, 2008, a2338.
50. Kim, D.A., et al. Social network targeting to maximise population behaviour change: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet 386 (2015), 145–153.
51. Strully, K.W., et al. Aspirin use and cardiovascular events in social networks. Soc. Sci. Med. 74 (2012), 1125–1129.
52. Gleeson, J.P., et al. Effects of network structure, competition and memory time on social spreading phenomena. Phys. Rev. X, 6, 2016, 021019.
53. Baumeister, R.F., Leary, M.R., The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol. Bull. 117 (1995), 497–529.
54. Lieberman, M.D., Eisenberger, N.I., Neuroscience. Pains and pleasures of social life. Science 323 (2009), 890–891.
55. Falk, E.B., Scholz, C., Persuasion, influence and value: perspectives from communication and social neuroscience. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 2017, 10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011821 in press.
56. Baek, E.C., et al. The value of sharing information: a neural account of information transmission. Psychol. Sci., 2017, 10.1177/0956797617695073 Published online May 01.
57. Falk, E.B., et al. Creating buzz: the neural correlates of effective message propagation. Psychol. Sci. 24 (2013), 1234–1242.
58. Falk, E.B., et al. Getting the word out: neural correlates of enthusiastic message propagation. Front. Hum. Neurosci, 6, 2012, 313.
59. Dietvorst, R.C., et al. A sales force-specific theory-of-mind scale: tests of its validity by classical methods and functional magnetic resonance imaging. J. Mark. Res. 46 (2009), 653–668.
60. Scholz, C., et al. A neural model of information virality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114 (2017), 2881–2886.
61. Tamir, D.I., et al. Informing others is associated with behavioral and neural signatures of value. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 144 (2015), 1114–1123.
62. Tamir, D.I., Mitchell, J.P., Disclosing information about the self is intrinsically rewarding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109 (2012), 8038–8043.
63. Zaki, J., et al. Social influence modulates the neural computation of value. Psychol. Sci. 22 (2011), 894–900.
64. Nook, E.C., Zaki, J., Social norms shift behavioral and neural responses to foods. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 27 (2015), 1412–1426.
65. Klucharev, V., et al. Reinforcement learning signal predicts social conformity. Neuron 61 (2009), 140–151.
66. Cascio, C.N., et al. Social influence and the brain: persuasion, susceptibility to influence and retransmission. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 3 (2015), 51–57.
67. Cascio, C.N., et al. Neural correlates of susceptibility to group opinions in online word-of-mouth recommendations. J. Mark. Res. 52 (2015), 559–575.
68. Bullmore, E.T., Bassett, D.S., Brain graphs: graphical models of the human brain connectome. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 7 (2011), 113–140.
69. Bullmore, E., Sporns, O., Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10 (2009), 186–198.
70. Medaglia, J.D., et al. Cognitive network neuroscience. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 27 (2015), 1471–1491.
71. Cooper, N., et al. Coherent activity between brain regions that code for value is linked to the malleability of human behavior. Sci. Rep., 7, 2017, 43250.
72. Cooper, N., et al. Coherent neural activity in the brain's value system during antismoking messages predicts reductions in smoking. Communication Research and Practice, 67th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, 2017.
73. Zhu, H., et al. Altered topological properties of brain networks in social anxiety disorder: a resting-state functional MRI study. Sci. Rep., 7, 2017, 43089.
74. Betzel, R.F., et al. Positive affect, surprise, and fatigue are correlates of network flexibility. Sci. Rep., 7, 2017, 520.
75. Che, X., et al. Synchronous activation within the default mode network correlates with perceived social support. Neuropsychologia 63 (2014), 26–33.
76. Ekman, M., et al. Predicting errors from reconfiguration patterns in human brain networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109 (2012), 16714–16719.
77. Simony, E., et al. Dynamic reconfiguration of the default mode network during narrative comprehension. Nat. Commun., 7, 2016, 12141.
78. Chai, L.R., et al. Functional network dynamics of the language system. Cereb. Cortex 26 (2016), 4148–4159.
79. Doron, K.W., et al. Dynamic network structure of interhemispheric coordination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109 (2012), 18661–18668.
80. Bassett, D.S., et al. Learning-induced autonomy of sensorimotor systems. Nat. Neurosci. 18 (2015), 744–751.
81. Bassett, D.S., et al. Cross-linked structure of network evolution. Chaos, 24, 2014, 013112.
82. Braun, U., et al. Dynamic reconfiguration of frontal brain networks during executive cognition in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 112 (2015), 11678–11683.
83. Alavash, M., et al. Persistency and flexibility of complex brain networks underlie dual-task interference. Hum. Brain Mapp. 36 (2015), 3542–3562.
84. Shine, J.M., et al. Temporal metastates are associated with differential patterns of time-resolved connectivity, network topology, and attention. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 113 (2016), 9888–9891.
85. Petersen, S.E., Sporns, O., Brain networks and cognitive architectures. Neuron 88 (2015), 207–219.
86. Bullmore, E., Sporns, O., The economy of brain network organization. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13 (2012), 336–349.
87. Bassett, D.S., et al. Emerging frontiers of neuroengineering: a network science of brain connectivity. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 19 (2017), 327–352.
88. Achard, S., et al. A resilient, low-frequency, small-world human brain functional network with highly connected association cortical hubs. J. Neurosci. 26 (2006), 63–72.
89. Mattar, M.G., et al. The network architecture of value learning. arXiv, 2016 Published online June 14 https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.04169.
90. Schilbach, L., et al. Toward a second-person neuroscience. Behav. Brain Sci. 36 (2013), 393–414.
91. Scholz, C., et al. A neural propagation system: neurocognitive and preference synchrony in information sharers and their receiver. Communication Research and Practice, 67th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, 2017.
92. Schmälzle, R., et al. Engaged listeners: shared neural processing of powerful political speeches. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 10 (2015), 1137–1143.
93. Hasson, U., Frith, C.D., Mirroring and beyond: coupled dynamics as a generalized framework for modelling social interactions. Philos. Trans R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 371, 2016, 20150366.
94. Toppi, J., et al. Graph theory in brain-to-brain connectivity: a simulation study and an application to an EEG hyperscanning experiment. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2015 (2015), 2211–2214.
95. Parkinson, C., et al. Neural homophily: similar neural responses predict friendship. bioRxiv, 2016, 10.1101/092130 Published online December 7.
96. Semin, G.R., Cacioppo, J.T., Grounding social cognition: synchronization, entrainment, and coordination. Semin, G.R., Smith, E.R., (eds.) Embodied Grounding: Social, Cognitive, Affective, and Neuroscientific Approaches, 2008, Cambridge University Press, 119–147.
97. Bassett, D.S., Gazzaniga, M.S., Understanding complexity in the human brain. Trends Cogn. Sci. 15 (2011), 200–209.
98. Templeton, A., et al. From mindless masses to small groups: conceptualizing collective behavior in crowd modeling. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 19 (2015), 215–229.
99. Falk, E.B., et al. What is a representative brain? Neuroscience meets population science. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110 (2013), 17615–17622.
100. Kivelä, M., et al. Multilayer networks. J. Complex Netw. 2 (2014), 203–271.
101. De Domenico, M., et al. MuxViz: a tool for multilayer analysis and visualization of networks. J. Complex Netw. 3 (2015), 159–176.
102. De Domenico, M., et al. The physics of spreading processes in multilayer networks. Nat. Phys. 12 (2016), 901–906.
103. Solé-Ribalta, A., et al. Congestion induced by the structure of multiplex networks. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116, 2016, 108701.
104. Yağan, O., Gligor, V., Analysis of complex contagions in random multiplex networks. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys., 86, 2012, 036103.
105. Battiston, F., et al. Efficient exploration of multiplex networks. New J. Phys., 18, 2016, 043035.
106. Nicosia, V., et al. Collective phenomena emerging from the interactions between dynamical processes in multiplex networks. Phys. Rev. Lett., 118, 2017, 138302.
107. Taylor, S.E., et al. Toward A Biology of Social Support. 2002, Oxford University Press.
108. Uchino, B.N., et al. The relationship between social support and physiological processes: a review with emphasis on underlying mechanisms and implications for health. Psychol. Bull. 119 (1996), 488–531.
109. Kiecolt-Glaser, J.K., et al. Psychoneuroimmunology: psychological influences on immune function and health. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 70 (2002), 537–547.
110. Cohen, S., Herbert, T.B., Health psychology: psychological factors and physical disease from the perspective of human psychoneuroimmunology. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 47 (1996), 113–142.
111. Markus, H.R., Kitayama, S., Cultures and selves: a cycle of mutual constitution. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 5 (2010), 420–430.
112. Stiller, J., Dunbar, R.I.M., Perspective-taking and memory capacity predict social network size. Soc. Netw. 29 (2007), 93–104.
113. Kardos, P., et al. Empathic people have more friends: empathic abilities predict social network size and position in social network predicts empathic efforts. Soc. Netw. 50 (2017), 1–5.
114. Sallet, J., et al. Social network size affects neural circuits in macaques. Science 334 (2011), 697–700.
115. Kanai, R., et al. Online social network size is reflected in human brain structure. Proc. Biol. Sci. 279 (2012), 1327–1334.
116. Von Der Heide, R., et al. The social network-network: size is predicted by brain structure and function in the amygdala and paralimbic regions. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 9 (2014), 1962–1972.
117. Powell, J., et al. Orbital prefrontal cortex volume predicts social network size: an imaging study of individual differences in humans. Proc. Biol. Sci. 279 (2012), 2157–2162.
118. Bickart, K.C., et al. Intrinsic amygdala-cortical functional connectivity predicts social network size in humans. J. Neurosci. 32 (2012), 14729–14741.
119. Molesworth, T., et al. Social network diversity and white matter microstructural integrity in humans. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 10 (2015), 1169–1176.
120. O'Donnell, M.B., et al. Neural bases of recommendations differ according to social network structure. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 12 (2017), 61–69.
121. Zerubavel, N., et al. Neural mechanisms tracking popularity in real-world social networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 112 (2015), 15072–15077.
122. Parkinson, C., et al. Spontaneous neural encoding of social network position. Nat. Hum. Behav., 1, 2017, 0072.
123. Wlodarski, R., Dunbar, R.I.M., When BOLD is thicker than water: processing social information about kin and friends at different levels of the social network. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 11 (2016), 1952–1960.
124. Dunbar, R.I.M., The Social Brain. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 23 (2014), 109–114.
125. Hampton, K.N., et al. Core networks, social isolation, and new media. Inf. Commun. Soc. 14 (2011), 130–155.
126. Ling, R., et al. Small circles: mobile telephony and the cultivation of the private sphere. Inf. Soc. 30 (2014), 282–291.
127. Sutcliffe, A., et al. Relationships and the social brain: integrating psychological and evolutionary perspectives. Br. J. Psychol. 103 (2012), 149–168.
128. Roberts, S.G.B., et al. Individual differences and personal social network size and structure. Pers. Individ. Differ. 44 (2008), 954–964.
129. Roberts, S.G.B., Dunbar, R.I.M., Communication in social networks: effects of kinship, network size, and emotional closeness. Pers. Relatsh. 18 (2010), 439–452.
130. Granovetter, M.S., The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 78 (1973), 1360–1380.
131. Vanhalst, J., Leary, M.R., Sociotropic differentiation: differential anticipatory reactions to rejection by close versus distal others predict well-being. Pers. Individ. Differ. 68 (2014), 176–182.
132. Wright, K.B., Miller, C.H., A measure of weak-tie/strong-tie support network preference. Commun. Monogr. 77 (2010), 500–517.
133. Burt, R.S., Network-related personality and the agency question: multirole evidence from a virtual world. Am. J. Sociol. 118 (2012), 543–591.
134. Dunbar, R.I.M., et al. The structure of online social networks mirrors those in the offline world. Soc. Netw. 43 (2015), 39–47.
135. Cohen, S., et al. Social ties and susceptibility to the common cold. JAMA 277 (1997), 1940–1944.
136. Eisenberger, N.I., et al. Neural pathways link social support to attenuated neuroendocrine stress responses. Neuroimage 35 (2007), 1601–1612.
137. Feld, S.L., et al. Describing changes in personal networks over time. Field Methods 19 (2007), 218–236.
138. Montague, P.R., et al. Hyperscanning: simultaneous fMRI during linked social interactions. Neuroimage 16 (2002), 1159–1164.
139. Babiloni, F., Astolfi, L., Social neuroscience and hyperscanning techniques: past, present and future. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 44 (2014), 76–93.
140. Hasson, U., et al. Intersubject synchronization of cortical activity during natural vision. Science 303 (2004), 1634–1640.
141. Tadić, B., et al. Algebraic topology of multi-brain connectivity networks reveals dissimilarity in functional patterns during spoken communications. PLoS One, 11, 2016, e0166787.
142. Sporns, O., et al. The human connectome: a structural description of the human brain. PLoS Comput. Biol., 1, 2005, e42.
143. Hagmann, P., et al. Mapping the structural core of human cerebral cortex. PLoS Biol., 6, 2008, e159.
144. Bassett, D.S., et al. Conserved and variable architecture of human white matter connectivity. Neuroimage 54 (2011), 1262–1279.
145. Baum, G.L., et al. Modular segregation of structural brain networks supports the development of executive function in youth. Curr. Biol. 27 (2017), 1561–1572.
146. Betzel, R.F., et al. Changes in structural and functional connectivity among resting-state networks across the human lifespan. Neuroimage 102 (2014), 345–357.
147. Hermundstad, A.M., et al. Structurally-constrained relationships between cognitive states in the human brain. PLoS Comput. Biol., 10, 2014, e1003591.
148. Hermundstad, A.M., et al. Structural foundations of resting-state and task-based functional connectivity in the human brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110 (2013), 6169–6174.
149. Goñi, J., et al. Resting-brain functional connectivity predicted by analytic measures of network communication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111 (2014), 833–838.
150. Honey, C.J., et al. Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106 (2009), 2035–2040.
151. Arnaboldi, V., et al. Online Social Networks: Human Cognitive Constraints in Facebook and Twitter Personal Graphs. 2015, Elsevier.
152. Wellman, B., Computer networks as social networks. Science 293 (2001), 2031–2034.
153. Saramäki, J., et al. Persistence of social signatures in human communication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111 (2014), 942–947.
154. Eckmann, J.-P., et al. Entropy of dialogues creates coherent structures in e-mail traffic. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101 (2004), 14333–14337.
155. Onnela, J.-P., et al. Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104 (2007), 7332–7336.
156. Wrzus, C., et al. Social network changes and life events across the life span: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 139 (2013), 53–80.
157. Small, M.L., et al. How stable is the core discussion network?. Soc. Netw. 40 (2015), 90–102.
158. Schultz, W., Behavioral theories and the neurophysiology of reward. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 57 (2006), 87–115.
159. Dayan, P., Models of value and choice. Dolan, R., Sharot, T., (eds.) Neuroscience of Preference and Choice, 2012, Academic Press, 33–52.
160. Von Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O., Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. 1944, Princeton University Press.
161. Savage Leonard, J., The Foundations of Statistics. 1954, John Wiley.
162. Samuelson, P.A., A note on measurement of utility. Rev. Econ. Stud., 4, 1937, 155.
163. Camerer, C., et al. Neuroeconomics: how neuroscience can inform economics. J. Econ. Lit. 43 (2005), 9–64.
164. Schultz, W., Behavioral theories and the neurophysiology of reward. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 57 (2006), 87–115.
165. Bandura, A., Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 52 (2001), 1–26.
166. Iacoboni, M., Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 60 (2009), 653–670.
167. Dufour, N., et al. Similar brain activation during false belief tasks in a large sample of adults with and without autism. PLoS One, 8, 2013, e75468.
168. Frith, C.D., Frith, U., The neural basis of mentalizing. Neuron 50 (2006), 531–534.
169. Centola, D., The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science 329 (2010), 1194–1197.
170. Judd, S., et al. Behavioral dynamics and influence in networked coloring and consensus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107 (2010), 14978–14982.
171. Zaki, J., et al. Social cognition as reinforcement learning: feedback modulates emotion inference. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 28 (2016), 1270–1282.
172. Kearns, M., et al. An experimental study of the coloring problem on human subject networks. Science 313 (2006), 824–827.
173. Carlson, J.M., et al. Measuring and modeling behavioral decision dynamics in collective evacuation. PLoS One, 9, 2014, e87380.