Mirroring and beyond: Coupled dynamics as a generalized framework for modelling social interactions

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 371, Issue 1693, 2016, Pages

  Hasson, Uri ^a   Frith, Chris D ^b,c  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Alignment; Coupling; Inter subject correlation; Mirroring; Synchronization

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; DETECTION METHOD; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; LABOR DIVISION; LEADERSHIP; MANAGED REALIGNMENT; PARADIGM SHIFT; SYNCHRONY;

BRAIN; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; PHYSIOLOGY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; THEORETICAL MODEL;

BRAIN; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 84963620211     PISSN: 09628436     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0366     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Rizzolatti G, Fadiga L, Gallese V, Fogassi L. 1996 Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 3, 131–141. (doi:10.1016/0926-6410(95)00038-0)
2. Rizzolatti G, Fogassi L, Gallese V. 2001 Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 661–670. (doi:10.1038/35090060)
3. Fogassi L, Ferrari PF, Gesierich B, Rozzi S, Chersi F, Rizzolatti G. 2005 Parietal lobe: from action organization to intention understanding. Science 308, 662–667. (doi:10.1126/science.1106138)
4. Gallese V, Goldman A. 1998 Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2, 493–501. (doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01262-5)
5. Gallese V. 2001 The ‘shared manifold’ hypothesis. From mirror neurons to empathy. J. Consciousness Stud. 8, 33–50.
6. Rizzolatti G, Arbib MA. 1998 Language within our grasp. Trends Neurosci. 21, 188–194. (doi:10.1016/S0166-2236(98)01260-0)
7. Jacob P, Jeannerod M. 2005 The motor theory of social cognition: a critique. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9, 21–25. (doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.11.003)
8. Hickok G. 2009 Eight problems for the mirror neuron theory of action understanding in monkeys and humans. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 21, 1229–1243. (doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21189)
9. Rizzolatti G, Sinigaglia C. 2010 The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11, 264–274. (doi:10.1038/nrn2805)
10. Rizzolatti G, Fogassi L. 2014 The mirror mechanism: recent findings and perspectives. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 369, 20130420. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0420)
11. Ballerini M et al. 2008 Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: evidence from a field study. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 1232–1237. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0711437105)
12. Tomasello M. 2009 The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Chartrand TL, Bargh JA. 1999 The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 76, 893–910. (doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.893)
14. Lakin JL, Chartrand TL. 2003 Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry to create affiliation and rapport. Psychol. Sci. 14, 334–339. (doi:10.1111/1467-9280.14481)
15. van Baaren RB, Holland RW, Kawakami K, van Knippenberg A. 2004 Mimicry and prosocial behavior. Psychol. Sci. 15, 71–74. (doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01501012.x)
16. Over H, Carpenter M. 2009 Priming third-party ostracism increases affiliative imitation in children. Dev. Sci. 12, F1–F8. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00820.x)
17. Lakin JL, Chartrand TL, Arkin RM. 2008 I am too just like you—nonconscious mimicry as an automatic behavioral response to social exclusion. Psychol. Sci. 19, 816–822. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02162.x)
18. Garrod S, Pickering MJ. 2009 Joint action, interactive alignment, and dialog. Top. Cogn. Sci. 1, 292–304. (doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01020.x)
19. Adank P, Hagoort P, Bekkering H. 2010 Imitation improves language comprehension. Psychol. Sci. 21, 1903–1909. (doi:10.1177/0956797610389192)
20. Vanderschraaf P. 1995 Convention as correlated equilibrium. Erkenntnis 42, 65–87. (doi:10.1007/BF01666812)
21. Hutchins E. 1995 Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Schilbach L, Timmermans B, Reddy V, Costall A, Bente G, Schlicht T, Vogeley K. 2013 Toward a second-person neuroscience. Behav. Brain Sci. 36, 393–414. (doi:10.1017/S0140525X12000660)
23. Hasson U, Honey CJ. 2012 Future trends in neuroimaging: neural processes as expressed within real-life contexts. NeuroImage 62, 1272–1278. (doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.004)
24. Hasson U, Nir Y, Levy I, Fuhrmann G, Malach R. 2004 Intersubject synchronization of cortical activity during natural vision. Science 303, 1634–1640. (doi:10.1126/science.1089506)
25. Mukamel R, Gelbard H, Arieli A, Hasson U, Fried I, Malach R. 2005 Coupling between neuronal firing, field potentials, and fMRI in human auditory cortex. Science 309, 951–954. (doi:10.1126/science.1110913)
26. Honey CJ et al. 2012 Slow cortical dynamics and the accumulation of information over long timescales. Neuron 76, 423–434. (doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.011)
27. Honey CJ, Thompson CR, Lerner Y, Hasson U. 2012 Not lost in translation: neural responses shared across languages. J. Neurosci. 32, 15 277–15 283. (doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1800-12.2012)
28. Ames DL, Honey CJ, Chow MA, Todorov A, Hasson U. 2014 Contextual alignment of cognitive and neural dynamics. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 27, 655–664. (doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00728)
29. Stephens GJ, Silbert LJ, Hasson U. 2010 Speakerlistener neural coupling underlies successful communication. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 14 425–14 430. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1008662107)
30. Silbert LJ, Honey CJ, Simony E, Poeppel D, Hasson U. 2014 Coupled neural systems underlie the production and comprehension of naturalistic narrative speech. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E4687–E4696. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1323812111)
31. Dikker S, Silbert LJ, Hasson U, Zevin JD. 2014 On the same wavelength: predictable language enhances speaker-listener brain-to-brain synchrony in posterior superior temporal gyrus. J. Neurosci. 34, 6267–6272. (doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3796-13.2014)
32. Clark HH, Brennan SE. 1991 Grounding in communication. Perspect. Socially Shared Cogn. 13, 127–149. (doi:10.1037/10096-006)
33. Fuchs A, Jirsa VK. 2008 Coordination: neural, behavioral and social dynamics. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
34. Konvalinka I, Vuust P, Roepstorff A, Frith CD. 2010 Follow you, follow me: continuous mutual prediction and adaptation in joint tapping. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. (Colchester) 63, 2220–2230. (doi:10.1080/17470218.2010.497843)
35. Wing AM, Endo S, Bradbury A, Vorberg D. 2014 Optimal feedback correction in string quartet synchronization. J. R. Soc. Interface 11, 20131125 (doi:10.1098/rsif.2013.1125)
36. Couzin ID. 2009 Collective cognition in animal groups. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13, 36–43. (doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.10.002)
37. Grunbaum D. 1998 Schooling as a strategy for taxis in a noisy environment. Evol. Ecol. 12, 503–522. (doi:10.1023/a:1006574607845)
38. Torney C, Neufeld Z, Couzin ID. 2009 Contextdependent interaction leads to emergent search behavior in social aggregates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 22 055–22 060. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0907929106)
39. Biro D, Sumpter DJT, Meade J, Guilford T. 2006 From compromise to leadership in pigeon homing. Curr. Biol. 16, 2123–2128. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.08.087)
40. Belz M, Pyritz LW, Boos M. 2013 Spontaneous flocking in human groups. Behav. Process. 92, 6–14. (doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2012.09.004)
41. Faria JJ, Krause S, Krause J. 2010 Collective behavior in road crossing pedestrians: the role of social information. Behav. Ecol. 21, 1236–1242. (doi:10.1093/beheco/arq141)
42. Pickering MJ, Garrod S. 2004 Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behav. Brain Sci. 27, 169–190; discussion 190–226.
43. Fusaroli R, Bahrami B, Olsen K, Roepstorff A, Rees G, Frith C, Tylen K. 2012 Coming to terms: quantifying the benefits of linguistic coordination. Psychol. Sci. 23, 931–939. (doi:10.1177/0956797612436816)
44. Gallotti M, Frith CD. 2013 Social cognition in the we-mode. Trends Cogn. Sci. 17, 160–165. (doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.02.002)
45. Cardellicchio P, Sinigaglia C, Costantini M. 2013 Grasping affordances with the other’s hand: a TMS study. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 8, 455–459. (doi:10.1093/scan/nss017)
46. Sebanz N, Knoblich G, Prinz W. 2005 How two share a task: corepresenting stimulus-response mappings. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 31, 1234–1246. (doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1234)
47. Samson D, Apperly IA, Braithwaite JJ, Andrews BJ, Bodley Scott SE. 2010 Seeing it their way: evidence for rapid and involuntary computation of what other people see. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 36, 1255–1266. (doi:10.1037/a0018729)
48. Qureshi AW, Apperly IA, Samson D. 2010 Executive function is necessary for perspective selection, not level-1 visual perspective calculation: evidence from a dual-task study of adults. Cognition 117, 230–236. (doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.003)
49. Raafat RM, Chater N, Frith C. 2009 Herding in humans. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13, 420–428. (doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.08.002)
50. Cook R, Bird G, Lunser G, Huck S, Heyes C. 2012 Automatic imitation in a strategic context: players of rock-paper-scissors imitate opponents’ gestures. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 780–786. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.1024)
51. Belot M, Crawford VP, Heyes C. 2013 Players of matching pennies automatically imitate opponents’ gestures against strong incentives. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 2763–2768. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1209981110).
52. Lang M, Shaw DJ, Reddish P, Wallot S, Mitkidis P, Xygalatas D. In press. Lost in the rhythm: effects of rhythm on subsequent interpersonal coordination. Cogn. Sci. (doi:10.1111/cogs.12302)
53. Fusaroli R, Tylén K. 2016 Investigating conversational dynamics: interactive alignment, interpersonal synergy, and collective task performance. Cogn. Sci. 40, 145–171. (doi:10.1111/cogs.12251)
54. Fairhurst MT, Janata P, Keller PE. 2013 Leading the follower: an fMRI investigation of dynamic cooperativity and leader-follower strategies in synchronization with an adaptive virtual partner. NeuroImage 84, 688–697. (doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.027)
55. Vesper C, van der Wel RP, Knoblich G, Sebanz N. 2012 Are you ready to jump? Predictive mechanisms in interpersonal coordination. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 39, 48–61. (doi:10.1037/a0028066)
56. Skewes JC, Skewes L, Michael J, Konvalinka I. 2015 Synchronised and complementary coordination mechanisms in an asymmetric joint aiming task. Exp. Brain Res. 233, 551–565. (doi:10.1007/s00221-014-4135-2)
57. Konvalinka I, Bauer M, Stahlhut C, Hansen LK, Roepstorff A, Frith CD. 2014 Frontal alpha oscillations distinguish leaders from followers: multivariate decoding of mutually interacting brains. NeuroImage 94, 79–88. (doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.003)
58. Flack A, Pettit B, Freeman R, Guilford T, Biro D. 2012 What are leaders made of? The role of individual experience in determining leader-follower relations in homing pigeons. Anim. Behav. 83, 703–709. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.12.018).
59. Braun DA, Ortega PA, Wolpert DM. 2011 Motor coordination: when two have to act as one. Exp. Brain Res. 211, 631–641. (doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2642-y)
60. Kostrubiec V, Kelso JAS. 2014 Incorporating coordination dynamics into an evolutionarily grounded science of intentional change. Behav. Brain Sci. 37, 428–429. (doi:10.1017/s0140525X13003191)
61. Jantzen KJ, Kelso JS. 2007 Neural coordination dynamics of human sensorimotor behavior: a review. In Handbook of brain connectivity (eds VK Jirsa, AR McIntosh), pp. 421–461. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
62. Dumas G, de Guzman GC, Tognoli E, Kelso JAS. 2014 The human dynamic clamp as a paradigm for social interaction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E3726–E3734. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1407486111)
63. Haken H. 1983 Advanced synergetics. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
64. Hasson U, Yang E, Vallines I, Heeger DJ, Rubin N. 2008 A hierarchy of temporal receptive windows in human cortex. J. Neurosci. 28, 2539–2550. (doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5487-07.2008).
65. Hasson U, Chen J, Honey CJ. 2015 Hierarchical process memory: memory as an integral component of information processing. Trends Cogn. Sci. 19, 304–313. (doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.04.006)
66. Shi L, Griffiths TL. 2009 Neural implementation of hierarchical Bayesian inference by importance sampling. In Advances in neural information processing systems 22 (eds Y Bengio, D Schuurmans, J Lafferty, C Williams, A Culotta), pp. 1669–1677. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
67. Diaconescu AO, Mathys C, Weber LAE, Daunizeau J, Kasper L, Lomakina EI, Fehr E, Stephan KE. 2014 Inferring on the intentions of others by hierarchical Bayesian learning. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003810. (doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003810)
68. Friston KJ, Frith CD. 2015 Active inference, communication and hermeneutics. Cortex 68, 129–143. (doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.025)
69. Davidson D. 1973 Radical interpretation. Dialectica 27, 313–328. (doi:10.1111/j.1746-8361.1973.tb00623.x)