Precision of guided scanning procedures for full-arch digital impressions in vivo;Präzision von Guided-Scanning-Verfahren bei digitalen Gesamtkieferabformungen in vivo

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 78, Issue 6, 2017, Pages 466-471

  Zimmermann, Moritz ^a   Koller, Christina ^b   Rumetsch, Moritz ^b   Ender, Andreas ^a   Mehl, Albert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b Private practice for orthodontics   (Germany)

Author keywords

CAD CAM; Conventional impression; Digital impression; Intraoral scanning; Orthodontics

Indexed keywords

ALGINIC ACID;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DEVICES; HUMAN; ORTHODONTICS; PROCEDURES; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

ALGINATES; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL;

EID: 85025427192     PISSN: 14345293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00056-017-0103-3     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D (2008) Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 204:505–511. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.350
2. Christensen GJ (2008) Will digital impressions eliminate the current problems with conventional impressions? J Am Dent Assoc 139:761–763
3. Dalstra M, Melsen B (2009) From alginate impressions to digital virtual models: accuracy and reproducibility. J Orthod 36:36–41. doi:10.1179/14653120722905 (discussion 14)
4. Ender A, Attin T, Mehl A (2016) In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods of obtaining complete-arch dental impressions. J Prosthet Dent 115:313–320. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.09.011
5. Ender A, Mehl A (2011) Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions–an in vitro study. Int J Comput Dent 14:11–21
6. Ender A, Mehl A (2013) Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent 109:121–128. doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60028-1
7. Ender A, Mehl A (2013) Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems. Int J Comput Dent 16:11–21
8. Ender A, Mehl A (2014) Accuracy in dental medicine, a new way to measure trueness and precision. J Vis Exp. doi:10.3791/51374
9. Ender A, Zimmermann M, Attin T, Mehl A (2015) In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods for obtaining quadrant dental impressions. Clin Oral Investig. doi:10.1007/s00784-015-1641-y
10. Erbe C, Ruf S, Wostmann B, Balkenhol M (2012) Dimensional stability of contemporary irreversible hydrocolloids: humidor versus wet tissue storage. J Prosthet Dent 108:114–122. doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60117-6
11. Faria AC, Rodrigues RC, Macedo AP, Mattos Mda G, Ribeiro RF (2008) Accuracy of stone casts obtained by different impression materials. Braz Oral Res 22:293–298
12. Kravitz ND, Groth C, Jones PE, Graham JW, Redmond WR (2014) Intraoral digital scanners. J Clin Orthod 48:337–347
13. Luthardt RG, Loos R, Quaas S (2005) Accuracy of intraoral data acquisition in comparison to the conventional impression. Int J Comput Dent 8:283–294
14. Mehl A, Koch R, Zaruba M, Ender A (2013) 3D monitoring and quality control using intraoral optical camera systems. Int J Comput Dent 16:23–36
15. Patzelt SB, Emmanouilidi A, Stampf S, Strub JR, Att W (2014) Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners. Clin Oral Investig 18:1687–1694. doi:10.1007/s00784-013-1132-y
16. Patzelt SB, Lamprinos C, Stampf S, Att W (2014) The time efficiency of intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparative study. J Am Dent Assoc 145:542–551. doi:10.14219/jada.2014.23
17. Zimmermann M, Mehl A, Mormann WH, Reich S (2015) Intraoral scanning systems—a current overview. Int J Comput Dent 18:101–129