Accuracy in dental medicine, a new way to measure trueness and precision

Journal of Visualized Experiments

Volumn , Issue 86, 2014, Pages

  Ender, Andreas ^a   Mehl, Albert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Abrasion; Accuracy; Calibration; Dental; Dental impression; Full arch scan; Issue 86; Laboratories; Medicine; Precision; Technology; Trueness

Indexed keywords

EID: 84940231231     PISSN: 1940087X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3791/51374     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Wettstein, F., Sailer, I., Roos M, Hämmerle, CH. Clinical study of the internal gaps of zirconia and metal frameworks for fixed partial dentures. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 116 (3), 272-279 (2008).
2. Persson, A.S., Oden, A., Andersson, M., Sandborgh-Englund, G. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness. Dent. Mater.25 (7), 929-936 (2009).
3. Del'Acqua, M.A., Arioli-Filho, J.N., Compagnoni, M.A., Mollo Jr., F. de A Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 23 (2), 226-236 (2008).
4. Schneider, D., Grunder, U., Ender, A., Hämmerle, C.H.F., Jung, R.E. Volume gain and stability of peri-implant tissue following bone and soft tissue augmentation: 1-year results from a prospective cohort study. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 22 (1), 28-37 (2011).
5. Windisch, S.I., Jung, R.E., Sailer, I., Studer, S.P., Ender, A., Hämmerle, C.H.F. A new optical method to evaluate three-dimensional volume changes of alveolar contours: a methodological in vitro study. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 18 (5), 545-551 (2007).
6. Caputi, S., Varvara, G. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study. J. Prosthet. Dent. 99 (4), 274-281 (2008).
7. Hoyos, A., Soderholm, K.J. Influence of tray rigidity and impression technique on accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions. Int. J. Prosthodont. 24 (1), 49-54, (2011).
8. Luthardt, R.G., Kuhmstedt, P., Walter, M.H. A new method for the computer-aided evaluation of three-dimensional changes in gypsum materials. Dent. Mater. 19 (1), 19-24 (2003).
9. Mehl, A., Ender, A., Mörmann, W., Attin, T. Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera. International Journal of Computerized Dentistry. 12 (1), 11-28 (2009).
10. Fickl, S., et al. Dimensional changes of the ridge contour after socket preservation and buccal overbuilding: an animal study. J. Clin. Periodontol. 36 (5), 442-448 (2009).
11. Vlaar, S.T., van der Zel, J.M. Accuracy of dental digitizers. Int. Dent. J. 56 (5), 301-309 (2006).
12. Ender, A., Mehl, A. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. J. Prosthet. Dent. 109 (2), 121-128 (2013).
13. Ender, A., Mehl, A. Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems. Int. J. Comput. Dent. 16 (1), 11-21 (2013).
14. Ender, A., Mehl, A. Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions--an in-vitro study. Int. J. Comput. Dent. 14 (1), 11-21 (2011).
15. Meer, W.J., Andriessen, F.S., Wismeijer, D., Ren, Y. Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology. PLoS One. 7(8), e43312 (2012).