Agreed definitions and a shared vision for new standards in stroke recovery research: The Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable taskforce

International Journal of Stroke

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 444-450

  Bernhardt, Julie ^a,b   Hayward, Kathryn S ^a,b,c   Kwakkel, Gert ^d,e   Ward, Nick S ^f,g   Wolf, Steven L ^h,i   Borschmann, Karen ^a,b   Krakauer, John W ^j   Boyd, Lara A ^c,k   Carmichael, S Thomas ^l   Corbett, Dale ^m,n   Cramer, Steven C ^o  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b NATIONAL HEALTH AND MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^d VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^e NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^g NATIONAL HOSPITAL FOR NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY   (United Kingdom)

^h EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

ⁱ VA Center of Excellence and Neurocognitive Rehabilitation   (United States)

^j JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^l UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^m UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

ⁿ Centre for Stroke Recovery   (Canada)

^o UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

definitions; rehabilitation; research standards; Stroke; stroke recovery; translation

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER;

ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CHRONICITY; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONSENSUS; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; CONVALESCENCE; EDUCATION; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; KINEMATICS; LEARNING; MEASUREMENT; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR SYSTEM; NERVE REGENERATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; REHABILITATION RESEARCH; STANDARD; STROKE REHABILITATION; ANIMAL; CAPACITY BUILDING; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NOMENCLATURE; PERSONNEL; STANDARDS;

ANIMALS; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CAPACITY BUILDING; HUMANS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; STROKE; STROKE REHABILITATION; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC;

EID: 85023749838     PISSN: 17474930     EISSN: 17474949     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1747493017711816     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Bernhardt J, Borschmann K, Boyd L. Moving rehabilitation research forward: developing consensus statements for rehabilitation and recovery research. Int J Stroke 2016; 11: 454–458.
2. Corbett D, Carmichael ST, Murphy ST, et al. Enhancing the alignment of the preclinical and clinical stroke recovery research pipeline: consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable (SRRR) translational working group. Int J Stroke 2017. DOI: 10.1177/1747493017711814
3. Boyd LA, Hayward KS, Ward NS, et al. Biomarkers of stroke recovery: consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable (SRRR). Int J Stroke (under review)
4. Kwakkel G, Lannin N, Borschmann K, et al. Standardised measurement of sensorimotor recovery in stroke trials: consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable (SRRR). Int J Stroke 2017. DOI: 10.1177/1747493017711813
5. Walker MF, Hoffmann TC, Brady MC, et al. Improving the development, monitoring and reporting of stroke rehabilitation research: consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable (SRRR). Int J Stroke 2017. DOI: 10.1177/1747493017711815
6. Krakauer JW, Carmichael ST, Corbett D, Wittenberg GF. Getting neurorehabilitation right: what can be learned from animal models? Neurorehab Neural Repair 2012; 26: 923–931.
7. Kwakkel G, Veerbeek JM, van Wegen EE, Wolf SL. Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke. Lancet Neurol 2015; 14: 224–234.
8. British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine. Rehabilitation following acquired brain injury: National Clinical Guidelines, London, UK: Physicians RCo, 2003.
9. World Health Organisation. International classification of functioning, disability and health, Geneva: World Health Organisation, 2001.
10. Levin MF, Kleim JA, Wolf SL. What do motor ‘recovery' and ‘compensation' mean in patients following stroke? Neurorehab Neural Repair 2009; 23: 313–319.
11. Zeiler SR, Krakauer JW. The interaction between training and plasticity in the post-stroke brain. Curr Opin Neurol 2013; 26: 609–616.
12. Duff M, Chen Y, Cheng L. Adaptive mixed reality rehabilitation improves quality of reaching movements more than traditional reaching therapy following stroke. Neurorehab Neural Repair 2013; 27: 3016–315.
13. Hope TM, Seghier ML, Leff AP, Price CJ. Predicting outcome and recovery after stroke with lesions extracted from MRI images. Neuroimage Clin 2013; 2: 424–433.
14. Carmichael ST. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of neural repair after stroke: making waves. Ann Neurol 2006; 59: 735–742.
15. Cramer SC, Koroshetz WJ, Finklestein SP. The case for modality-specific outcome measures in clinical trials of stroke recovery-promoting agents. Stroke 2007; 38: 1393–1395.
16. Nakayama H, Jorgensen H, Raaschou H, Olsen T. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 394–398.
17. Byblow WD, Stinear CM, Barber PA, Petoe MA, Ackerley SJ. Proportional recovery after stroke depends on corticomotor integrity. Ann Neurol 2015; 78: 848–859.
18. Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Matchar D, Divine GW, Feussner J. Measurement of motor recovery after stroke:outcome assessment and sample size requirements. Stroke 1992; 23: 1084–1089.
19. Prabhakaran S, Zarahn E, Riley C. Inter-individual variability in the capacity for motor recovery after ischemic stroke. Neurorehab Neural Repair 2008; 22: 64–71.
20. Winters C, van Wegen EE, Daffertshofer A, Kwakkel G. Generalizability of the proportional recovery model for the upper extremity after an ischemic stroke. Neurorehab Neural Repair 2015; 29: 614–622.
21. Winters C, van Wegen E, Daffershofer A, Kwakkel G. Generalizability of the maximum proportional recovery rule to visuospatial neglect early poststroke. Neurorehab Neural Repair 2017; 31: 334–342.
22. Lendrem W, Lincoln NB. Spontaneous recovery of language in patients with aphasia between 4 and 34 weeks after stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 1985; 48: 743–748.
23. Pedersen PM, Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Aphasia in acute stroke: incidence, determinants, and recovery. Ann Neurol 1995; 38: 659–666.
24. Twitchell TE. The restoration of motor function following hemiplegia in man. Brain 1951; 74: 443–480.
25. Lazar RM, Minzer B, Antoniello D, Festa JR, Krakauer JW, Marshall RS. Improvement in aphasia scores after stroke is well predicted by initial severity. Stroke 2010; 41: 1485–1488.
26. Burke E, Cramer SC. Biomarkers and predictors of restorative therapy effects after stroke. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2013; 13: 329.
27. Buma F, Kwakkel G, Ramsey N. Understanding upper limb recovery after stroke. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2013; 31: 707–722.
28. Dobkin BH, Carmichael ST. The specific requirements of neural repair trials for stroke. Neurorehab Neural Repair 2016; 30: 470–478.
29. Bernhardt J, English C, Johnson L, Cumming TB. Early mobilization after stroke: early adoption but limited evidence. Stroke 2015; 46: 1141–1146.
30. Biernaskie J, Chernenko G, Corbett D. Efficacy of rehabilitative experience declines with time after focal ischemic brain injury. J Neurosci 2004; 24: 1245–1254.
31. Caliaperumal J, Colbourne F. Rehabilitation improves behavioral recovery and lessens cell death without affecting iron, ferritin, transferrin, or inflammation after intracerebral hemorrhage in rats. Neurorehab Neural Repair 2014; 28: 395–404.
32. Clarkson A, Overman J, Zhong S, Mueller R, Lynch G, Carmichael S. AMPA receptor-induced local brain-derived neurotrophic factor signaling mediates motor recovery after stroke. J Neurosci 2011; 31: 3766–3775.
33. Carmichael ST. The 3 Rs of stroke biology: radial, relayed, and regenerative. Neurotherapeutics 2016; 13: 348–359.
34. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Lindeman E. Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2004; 22: 281–299.
35. Hankey GJ. Stroke. Lancet 2016; 389: 641–654
36. Xi G, Keep RF, Hoff JT. Mechanisms of brain injury after intracerebral haemorrhage. Lancet Neurol 2006; 5: 53–63.
37. Bernhardt J, Godecke E, Johnson L, Langhorne P. Early rehabilitation after stroke. Curr Opin Neurol 2017; 30: 48–54.
38. Stinear C, Ackerley S, Byblow W. Rehabilitation is initiated early after stroke, but most motor rehabilitation trials are not: a systematic review. Stroke 2013; 44: 2039–2045.
39. Birkenmeier RL, Prager EM, Lang CE. Translating animal doses of task-specific training to people with chronic stroke in 1-hour therapy sessions: a proof-of-concept study. Neurorehab Neural Repair 2010; 24: 620–635.
40. Dromerick AW, Lang CE, Birkenmeier RL. Very early constraint-induced movement during stroke rehabilitation (VECTORS): a single-center RCT. Neurology 2009; 73: 195–201.
41. Kwakkel G, Winters C, van Wegen EE. Effects of unilateral upper limb training in two distinct prognostic groups early after stroke: the EXPLICIT-stroke randomized clinical trial. Neurorehab Neural Repair 2016; 30: 804–816.
42. Winters C, Heymans MW, van Wegen EE, Kwakkel G. How to design clinical rehabilitation trials for the upper paretic limb early post stroke? Trials 2016; 17: 468.
43. Stinear CM, Barber PA, Petoe M, Anwar S, Byblow WD. The PREP algorithm predicts potential for upper limb recovery after stroke. Brain 2012; 135: 2527–2535.
44. Cortes JC, Goldsmith J, Harran MD, et al. A short and distinct time window for recovery of arm motor control early after stroke revealed with a global measure of trajectory kinematics. Neurorehab Neural Repair. Published online March 16, 2017: 1545968317697034
45. Ward NS. Restoring brain function after stroke – bridging the gap between animals and humans. Nat Rev Neurol 2017; 13: 244–255.
46. Cramer SC, Wolf SL, Adams HP, Jr. Stroke recovery and rehabilitation research: issues, opportunities, and the national institutes of health StrokeNet. Stroke 2017; 48: 813–819.
47. Schmidt RA, Lee TM. Motor control and learning: a behavioural emphasis, 4th ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2005.
48. Haith AM, Krakauer JW, Theoretical models of motor control and motor learning. In: Gollhofer I, Taube W, Nielsen JB, (eds). Handbook of motor control and motor learning, Abingdon, Oxon, UK: Routledge, 2012, pp. 7–28.
49. Shmuelof L, Krakauer JW, Mazzoni PJ. How is a motor skill learned? Change and invariance at the levels of task success and trajectory control. J Neurophysiol 2012; 108: 578–594.
50. Hubbard IJ, Parsons MW, Neilson C, Carey LM. Task-specific training: evidence for and translation into clinical practice. OccupTher Int 2009; 16: 175–189.
51. French B, Thomas LH, Leathley MJ. Repetitive task training for improving functional ability after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 4: CD006073.
52. Carr J, Shepherd R. Movement science: foundations for physical therapy in rehabilitation, Maryland, USA: Aspen Publishers, 2000.
53. Bayona NA, Bitensky J, Salter K, Teasell RW. The role of task-specific training in rehabilitation therapies. Topics Stroke Rehab 2005; 12: 58–65.
54. Fasotti L, van Kessel M. Novel insights in the rehabilitation of neglect. Front Hum Neurosci 2013; 7: 780.
55. Richards L, Hanson C, Wellborn M, Sethi A. Driving motor recovery after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2008; 15: 397–411.
56. Dobkin BH, Dorsch A. New evidence for therapies in stroke rehabilitation. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2013; 15: 331.