Generalizability of the Maximum Proportional Recovery Rule to Visuospatial Neglect Early Poststroke

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 334-342

  Winters, Caroline ^a,b   Van Wegen, Erwin E H ^a,b   Daffertshofer, Andreas ^b   Kwakkel, Gert ^a,b,c,d  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Institute   (Netherlands)

^d NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

prognosis; stroke; upper extremity; visuospatial neglect

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; CANCELLATION TEST; CONVALESCENCE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISEASE COURSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PARESIS; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROPORTIONAL RECOVERY RULE; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SCORING SYSTEM; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; UPPER LIMB; VISUAL DEPRIVATION; VISUOSPATIAL NEGLECT; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLINICAL TRIAL; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPLICATION; DISABILITY; FOLLOW UP; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROGNOSIS; STROKE; STROKE REHABILITATION;

BRAIN ISCHEMIA; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; PROGNOSIS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; STROKE; STROKE REHABILITATION; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 85018278650     PISSN: 15459683     EISSN: 15526844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1545968316680492     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Twisk J., Impact of time on improvement of outcome after stroke. Stroke. 2006; 37: 2348-2353.
2. Prabhakaran S, Zarahn E, Riley C, et al. Inter-individual variability in the capacity for motor recovery after ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008; 22: 64-71.
3. Winters C, Van Wegen EE, Daffertshofer A, Kwakkel G., Generalizability of the proportional recovery model for the upper extremity after an ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015; 29: 614-622.
4. Byblow WD, Stinear CM, Barber PA, Petoe MA, Ackerley SJ., Proportional recovery after stroke depends on corticomotor integrity. Ann Neurol. 2015; 78: 848-859.
5. Feng W, Wang J, Chhatbar PY, et al. Corticospinal tract lesion load: a potential imaging biomarker for stroke motor outcomes. Ann Neurol. 2015; 78: 860-870.
6. Krakauer JW, Marshall RS., The proportional recovery rule for stroke revisited. Ann Neurol. 2015; 78: 845-847.
7. Bigourdan A, Munsch F, Coupe P, et al. Early fiber number ratio is a surrogate of corticospinal tract integrity and predicts motor recovery after stroke. Stroke. 2016; 47: 1053-1059.
8. Krakauer JW, Carmichael ST, Corbett D, Wittenberg GF., Getting neurorehabilitation right: what can be learned from animal models? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012; 26: 923-931.
9. Kwakkel G, Winters C, Van Wegen EE, et al. Effects of unilateral upper limb training in two distinct prognostic groups early after stroke: The EXPLICIT-Stroke randomized clinical trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016; 30: 804-816.
10. Veerbeek JM, Van Wegen E, Van Peppen R, et al. What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014; 9: e87987.
11. Zarahn E, Alon L, Ryan SL, et al. Prediction of motor recovery using initial impairment and fMRI 48 h poststroke. Cereb Cortex. 2011; 21: 2712-2721.
12. Lazar RM, Minzer B, Antoniello D, Festa JR, Krakauer JW, Marshall RS., Improvement in aphasia scores after stroke is well predicted by initial severity. Stroke. 2010; 41: 1485-1488.
13. Bamford J, Sandercock P, Dennis M, Burn J, Warlow C., Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction. Lancet. 1991; 337: 1521-1526.
14. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC., Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet. 1999; 354: 191-196.
15. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, Prevo AJ., Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke. 2003; 34: 2181-2186.
16. Kwakkel G, Meskers CG, Van Wegen EE, et al. Impact of early applied upper limb stimulation: the EXPLICIT-stroke programme design. BMC Neurol. 2008; 8: 49.
17. Nijland R, Van Wegen E, Van der Krogt H, et al. Characterizing the protocol for early modified constraint-induced movement therapy in the EXPLICIT-stroke trial. Physiother Res Int. 2013; 18: 1-15.
18. Ferber S, Karnath HO., How to assess spatial neglect-line bisection or cancellation tasks? J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2001; 23: 599-607.
19. Bailey MJ, Riddoch MJ, Crome P., Evaluation of a test battery for hemineglect in elderly stroke patients for use by therapists in clinical practice. NeuroRehabilitation. 2000; 14: 139-150.
20. Nijboer TC, Kollen BJ, Kwakkel G., Time course of visuospatial neglect early after stroke: a longitudinal cohort study. Cortex. 2013; 49: 2021-2027.
21. Brott T, Adams HP Jr, Olinger CP, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989; 20: 864-870.
22. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S., The post-stroke hemiplegic patient: 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975; 7: 13-31.
23. Collin C, Wade D., Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1990; 53: 576-579.
24. Twisk JW., Longitudinal data analysis: a comparison between generalized estimating equations and random coefficient analysis. Eur J Epidemiol. 2004; 19: 769-776.
25. Ward JH., Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc. 1963; 58: 236-244.
26. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ., The comparison of dendrograms by objective methods. Taxon. 1962; 11: 33-40.
27. Levine DN, Warach JD, Benowitz L, Calvanio R., Left spatial neglect: effects of lesion size and premorbid brain atrophy on severity and recovery following right cerebral infarction. Neurology. 1986; 36: 362-366.
28. Gottesman RF, Kleinman JT, Davis C, et al. Unilateral neglect is more severe and common in older patients with right hemispheric stroke. Neurology. 2008; 71: 1439-1444.
29. Von Monakow C., Diaschisis. Harris G, trans. Baltimore, MD: Penguin; 1969: 27-36.
30. Feeney DM, Baron JC., Diaschisis. Stroke. 1986; 17: 817-830.
31. Andrews RJ., Transhemispheric diaschisis: a review and comment. Stroke. 1991; 22: 943-949.
32. Nijboer TC, Kollen BJ, Kwakkel G., The impact of recovery of visuo-spatial neglect on motor recovery of the upper paretic limb after stroke. PLoS One. 2014; 9: e100584.
33. Corbetta M, Kincade MJ, Lewis C, Snyder AZ, Sapir A., Neural basis and recovery of spatial attention deficits in spatial neglect. Nat Neurosci. 2005; 8: 1603-1610.
34. Lazar RM, Speizer AE, Festa JR, Krakauer JW, Marshall RS., Variability in language recovery after first-time stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008; 79: 530-534.
35. Rorden C, Karnath HO., A simple measure of neglect severity. Neuropsychologia. 2010; 48: 2758-2763.
36. Kim B, Winstein C., Can Neurological Biomarkers of Brain Impairment Be Used to Predict Poststroke Motor Recovery? A Systematic Review. [Epub ahead of print]. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016. doi: 10.1177/1545968316662708.
37. Winters C, Heymans MW, Van Wegen EE, Kwakkel G., How to design clinical rehabilitation trials for the upper paretic limb early post-stroke? Trials. 2016; 17: 468.