The PREP algorithm predicts potential for upper limb recovery after stroke

Brain

Volumn 135, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 2527-2535

  Stinear, Cathy M ^a   Barber, P Alan ^a,b   Petoe, Matthew ^a   Anwar, Samir ^a,c   Byblow, Winston D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b AUCKLAND CITY HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

^c Auckland District Health Board   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

motor; MRI; prognosis; rehabilitation; stroke; TMS

Indexed keywords

ABDUCTION; ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; FEMALE; FINGER; HUMAN; MALE; MUSCLE STRENGTH; PREDICTING RECOVERY POTENTIAL ALGORITHM; PREDICTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHOULDER; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

EID: 84864680994     PISSN: 00068950     EISSN: 14602156     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/brain/aws146     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Cruz Martinez A, Tejada J, Diez Tejedor E. Motor hand recovery after stroke. Prognostic yield of early transcranial magnetic stimulation. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1999; 39: 405-10.
2. DeVetten G, Coutts SB, Hill MD, Goyal M, Eesa M, O'Brien B, et al. Acute corticospinal tract Wallerian degeneration is associated with stroke outcome. Stroke 2010; 41: 751-6.
3. Escudero JV, Sancho J, Bautista D, Escudero M, Lopez-Trigo J. Prognostic value of motor evoked potential obtained by transcranial magnetic brain stimulation in motor function recovery in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 1998; 29: 1854-9.
4. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient I. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975; 7: 13-31.
5. Graziano M. The organization of behavioral repertoire in motor cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci 2006; 29: 105-34.
6. Hachinski V, Donnan GA, Gorelick PB, Hacke W, Cramer SC, Kaste M, et al. Stroke: working towards a prioritized world agenda. Stroke 2010; 41: 1084-99.
7. Heald A, Bates D, Cartlidge NE, French JM, Miller S. Longitudinal study of central motor conduction time following stroke. 2. Central motor conduction measured within 72 h after stroke as a predictor of functional outcome at 12 months. Brain 1993; 116 (Pt 6): 1371-85.
8. Jang SH, Ahn SH, Sakong J, Byun WM, Choi BY, Chang CH, et al. Comparison of TMS and DTT for predicting motor outcome in intracerebral hemorrhage. J Neurol Sci 2010; 290: 107-11.
9. Kasner SE. Clinical interpretation and use of stroke scales. Lancet Neurol 2006; 5: 603-12.
10. Katrak P, Bowring G, Conroy P, Chilvers M, Poulos R, McNeil D. Predicting upper limb recovery after stroke: the place of early shoulder and hand movement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 758-61.
11. Kwon YH, Son SM, Lee J, Bai DS, Jang SH. Combined study of transcranial magnetic stimulation and diffusion tensor tractography for prediction of motor outcome in patients with corona radiata infarct. J Rehabil Med 2011; 43: 430-4.
12. Lang CE, Edwards DF, Birkenmeier RL, Dromerick AW. Estimating minimal clinically important differences of upper-extremity measures early after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89: 1693-700.
13. Nijland RH, van Wegen EE, Harmeling-van der Wel BC, Kwakkel G. Presence of finger extension and shoulder abduction within 72 hours after stroke predicts functional recovery: early prediction of functional outcome after stroke: the EPOS cohort study. Stroke 2010; 41: 745-50.
14. Puig J, Pedraza S, Blasco G, Daunis IEJ, Prados F, Remollo S, et al. Acute damage to the posterior limb of the internal capsule on diffusion tensor tractography as an early imaging predictor of motor outcome after stroke. AJNR 2011; 32: 857-63.
15. Radlinska B, Ghinani S, Leppert IR, Minuk J, Pike GB, Thiel A. Diffusion tensor imaging, permanent pyramidal tract damage, and outcome in subcortical stroke. Neurology 2010; 75: 1048-54.
16. Rapisarda G, Bastings E, de Noordhout AM, Pennisi G, Delwaide PJ
17. Schiemanck SK, Kwakkel G, Post MW, Kappelle LJ, Prevo AJ. Impact of internal capsule lesions on outcome of motor hand function at one year post-stroke. J Rehabil Med 2008; 40: 96-101.
18. Shelton FN, Reding MJ. Effect of lesion location on upper limb motor recovery after stroke. Stroke 2001; 32: 107-12.
19. Smania N, Paolucci S, Tinazzi M, Borghero A, Manganotti P, Fiaschi A, et al. Active finger extension: a simple movement predicting recovery of arm function in patients with acute stroke. Stroke 2007; 38: 1088-90.
20. Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, Beckmann CF, Behrens TE, Johansen-Berg H, et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 2004; 23 (Suppl 1): S208-19.
21. Sotak CH. The role of diffusion tensor imaging in the evaluation of ischemic brain injury-a review. NMR Biomed 2002; 15: 561-9.
22. Stinear C. Prediction of recovery of motor function after stroke. Lancet Neurol 2010; 9: 1228-32.
23. Stinear CM, Barber PA, Smale PR, Coxon JP, Fleming MK, Byblow WD. Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity. Brain 2007; 130: 170-80.
24. Van der Lee JH, De Groot V, Beckerman H, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM. The intra-and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 14-9.
25. Veerbeek JM, Kwakkel G, van Wegen EE, Ket JC, Heymans MW. Early prediction of outcome of activities of daily living after stroke: a systematic review. Stroke 2011; 42: 1482-8.
26. Ward N. Assessment of cortical reorganisation for hand function after stroke. J Physiol 2011; 589: 5625-32.
27. WHO. The global burden of disease: 2004 update. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004.