Performance and implementation of low impact development – A review

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 607-608, Issue , 2017, Pages 413-432

  Eckart, Kyle ^a   McPhee, Zach ^a   Bolisetti, Tirupati ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR   (Canada)

Author keywords

Green infrastructure; LID; LID implementation; LIUDD; Low impact development; Stormwater management; SuDS; Sustainability; WSUD

Indexed keywords

CATCHMENTS; ENGINEERING GEOLOGY; INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; STORM SEWERS; STORMS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE; LID IMPLEMENTATION; LIUDD; LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT; STORM-WATER MANAGEMENTS; SUDS; WSUD;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

GROUND WATER; RAIN; STORM WATER;

CLIMATE CHANGE; GREENSPACE; IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS; INFRASTRUCTURE; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; STORMWATER; SUSTAINABILITY; URBAN PLANNING; URBANIZATION; WATER MANAGEMENT;

CLIMATE CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; FLOODING; GENETIC ALGORITHM; HYDROLOGY; LAND USE; LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; URBAN AREA; URBANIZATION; WASTE COMPONENT REMOVAL; WATER FLOW; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER POLLUTION; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHED; WETLAND;

EID: 85021954653     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: 18791026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.254     Document Type: Review

References (186)

1. AAstebøl, S.O., Hvitved-Jacobsen, T., Simonsen, Ø., Sustainable stormwater management at Fornebu—from an airport to an industrial and residential area of the City of Oslo, Norway. Sci. Total Environ. 334 (2004), 239–249.
2. Ahiablame, L.M., Engel, B.A., Chaubey, I., Effectiveness of low impact development practices: literature review and suggestions for future research. Water Air Soil Pollut. 223:7 (2012), 4253–4273, 10.1007/s11270-012-1189-2.
3. Ahiablame, L.M., Engel, B.A., Chaubey, I., Effectiveness of low impact development practices in two urbanized watersheds: retrofitting with rain Barrel/cistern and porous pavement. J. Environ. Manag. 119 (2013), 151–161 (April). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.01.019.
4. Ahmed, K., Chung, E.-S., Song, J.-Y., Shahid, S., Ices in two urbanized watersheds: retrofitting with rain barrel/cistern and porous pavement. ial Area of the City of Oslo, Norwaase of Malaysia. Water, 9(3), 2017, 173, 10.3390/w9030173.
5. Akhter, M., Hewa, G., Shahid, S., Effective design and planning specification of low impact development practices using water management analysis module (WMAM): case of Malaysia. Water, 8(11), 2016, 511, 10.3390/w8110511.
6. Ashley, R.M., Digman, C., Stovin, V.R., Balmforth, D., Glerum, J., Shaffer, P., Retrofitting surface water management measures: delivering multiple value. In 12th Int. Conf on Urban Drainage, 2011 http://web.sbe.hw.ac.uk/staffprofiles/bdgsa/temp/12th%20ICUD/PDF/PAP005188.pdf.
7. Ashley, R.M., Nowell, R., Gersonius, B., Walker, L., “A Review of Current Knowledge: Surface Water Management and Urban Green Infrastructure.” FR/R0014. 2011, Foundation for Water Research http://www.fwr.org/greeninf.pdf.
8. Baek, S., Choi, D., Jung, J., Lee, H.J., Lee, H., Yoon, K., Cho, K.H., Optimizing low impact development (LID) for stormwater runoff treatment in urban area, Korea: experimental and modeling approach. Water Res. 86:December (2015), 122–131, 10.1016/j.watres.2015.08.038.
9. Banting, D., Doshi, H., Li, J., Missios, P., Au, A., Currie, B., Michael, V., Report on the environmental benefits and costs of green roof technology for the City of Toronto. 2005, Ryerson University http://www.toronto.ca/greenroofs/pdf/fullreport103105.pdf.
10. Barkdoll, B.D., Kantor, C.M., Wesseldyke, E.S., Ghimire, S.R., Stormwater low-impact development: a call to arms for hydraulic engineers. J. Hydraul. Eng., 142(8), 2016, 2516002 ( http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001152).
11. Bean, E.Z., Hunt, W.F., Bidelspach, D.A., Field survey of permeable pavement surface infiltration rates. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 133:3 (2007), 249–255 (doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2007)133:3(249) C).
12. Bergman, M., Hedegaard, M.R., Peterson, M.F., Binning, P., Ole, M., Mikkelsen, P.S., Evaluation of two stormwater infiltration trenches in central copenhagen after 15 years of operation. Novatech 2010, 2010, IWA Publishing, Lyon, France.
13. Binstock, M., Greening stormwater management in Ontario: an analysis of challenges and opportunities. 2011, Canadian Institute for Environmental Law and Policy.
14. Bloom, M.F., Greening stormwater management in Ontario: an analysis of challenges and opearation. Water Wastewater Int., 21(4), 2006.
15. Booth, D.B., Jackson, C.R., Urbanization of aquatic systems: degradation thresholds, stormwater detection, and the limits of mitigation. Wiley Online Library http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1997.tb04126.x/abstract, 1997.
16. Borenstein, S., Experts: CO2 record illustrates “scary” trend. News Daily, 2013 Retrieved from http://www.newsdaily.com/article/06b04c0b26ff402cffacd3d8053776f1/experts-co2-record-illustrates-scary-trend.
17. Bosley, E.K., Hydrologic evaluation of low impact development using a continuous, spatially-distributed model. Master of Science in Civil Engineering, 2008, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia.
18. Brander, K.E., Owen, K.E., Potter, K.W., Modeled impacts of development type on runoff volume and infiltration performance. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 40:4 (2004), 961–969.
19. Brattebo, B.O., Booth, D.B., Long-term stormwater quantity and quality performance of permeable pavement systems. Water Res. 37:18 (2003), 4369–4376, 10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00410-X.
20. Brown, H.L., Bos, D.G., Walsh, C.J., Fletcher, T.D., Ross-Rakesh, S., More than money: how multiple factors influence householder participation in at-source stormwater management. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 59:1 (2016), 79–97 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2014.984017.
21. Brown, R.A., Line, D.E., Hunt, W.F., LID treatment train: pervious concrete with subsurface storage in series with bioretention and care with seasonal high water tables. J. Environ. Eng. 138:6 (2012), 689–697, 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000506.
22. Brown, R.R., Impediments to integrated urban stormwater management: the need for institutional reform. Environ. Manag. 36:3 (2005), 455–468.
23. Burns, M., Fletcher, T.D., Hatt, B.E., Ladson, A., Walsh, C.J., Hydrologic shortcomings of conventional urban stormwater management and opportunities for reform. Landsc. Urban Plan. 105 (2012), 230–240.
24. Cano, O.M., Barkdoll, B.D., Multiobjective, socioeconomic, boundary-emanating, nearest distance algorithm for stormwater low-impact BMP selection and placement. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag., 143(1), 2017, 5016013, 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000726.
25. Carbone, M., Mancuso, A., Piro, P., Porous pavement quality modelling. Proc. Eng. 89 (2014), 758–766, 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.504.
26. Center for Neighborhood Technology (CNT), The Value of Green Infrastructure: A Guide to Recognizing Its Economic, Environmental and Social Benefits. http://www.cnt.org/repository/gi-values-guide.pdf, 2010.
27. Center for Watershed Protection (CWP), Better Site Design: A Handbook for Changing Development Rules in Your Community. http://chesapeakestormwater.net/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2012/03/Better-Site-Design-Handbook.pdf, 1998.
28. Charlesworth, S.M., A Review of the adaptation and mitigation of global climate change using sustainable drainage in cities. J. Water Clim. Change, 1(3), 2010, 165, 10.2166/wcc.2010.035.
29. Charlesworth, S., Warwick, F., Lashford, C., Decision-making and sustainable drainage: design and scale. Sustainability, 8(782), 2016, 10.3390/su8080782.
30. Chief Building Official and Exectuve Director, Toronto Building, Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. Staff Report. By-law to Require and Govern the Construction of Green Roofs in Toronto, 2009 March 27. http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-20562.pdf.
31. Chen, C.F., Lin, J.Y., Application of the SUSTAIN model to a watershed-scale case for water quality management. International Low Impact Development Conference 2015: LID: It Works in All Climates and Soils, 2015, ASCE, 11–20 Retrieved from http://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1061/9780784479025#page=20.
32. Chen, Y., Samuelson, H.W., Tong, Z., Integrated design workflow and a new tool for urban rainwater management. J. Environ. Manag. 180 (2016), 45–51 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.04.059.
33. Cheng, M.S., Zhen, J.X., Shoemaker, L., BMP decision support system for evaluating stormwater management alternatives. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. China 3:4 (2009), 453–463, 10.1007/s11783-009-0153-x.
34. Chui, T.F.M., Liu, X., Zhan, W., Assessing cost-effectiveness of specific LID practice designs in response to large storm events. J. Hydrol. 533 (2016), 353–364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.12.011.
35. CHI Water, PCSWMM 2011: Spatial Decision Support for Urban Drainage and Watershed Modeling. http://www.chiwater.com/Files/PCSWMMBrochure.pdf, 2011.
36. City of Portland Bureau of Environmental Services, and Entrix Inc, Portland's Green Infrastructure: Quantifying the Health, Energy, and Community LIvability Benefits. 2010 (City of Portland).
37. Clary, J., Quigley, M., Poresky, A., Earles, A., Strecker, E., Leisenring, M., Jones, J., Integration of low-impact development into the international stormwater BMP database. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 137:3 (2010), 190–198.
38. Claytor, R.A., Schueler, T.R., Design of stormwater filtering systems. Chesapeake Research Consortium, 1996.
39. Cobbina, A.S., The Impact of Climate Change on Toronto Precipitation Patterns and Stormwater Infrastructure. 2007.
40. Coffman, L.S., Low-Impact Development Design: A new Paradigm for Stormwater Management Mimicking and Restoring the Natural Hydrologic Regime; an Alternative Stormwater Management Technology. 1997, Prince George's County Department of Environmental Resources, Maryland County, USA.
41. Coffman, L.S., Low-Impact Development Design: A New Paradigm For Stormwater Management Mimicking and Restoring The Natural Hydrologic Regime; An Alternative Stormwater Management Technology. 2000, Prince George's County Department of Environmental Resources and US EPA, Maryland County, USA (Report EPA 841-B-00-003).
42. Cote, S.A., Wolfe, S.E., Assessing the social and economic barriers to permeable surface utilization for residential driveways in Kitchener, Canada. Environ. Pract. 16:1 (2014), 6–18, 10.1017/S1466046613000641.
43. Credit Valley Conservation (CVC), and Toronto and Region Conservation (TRC), Low Impact Development stormwater Management Planning and Design Guide. Vol. 1.0, 2010 http://www.creditvalleyca.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/LID-SWM-Guide-v1.0_2010_1_no-appendices.pdf.
44. Damodaram, C., Giacomoni, M.H., Prakash Khedun, C., Holmes, H., Ryan, A., Saour, W., Zechman, E.M., Simulation of combined best management practices and low impact development for sustainable stormwater management1. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 46:5 (2010), 907–918.
45. Damodaram, C., Zechman, E.M., Simulation-optimization approach to design low impact development for managing peak flow alterations in urbanizing watersheds. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 139:3 (2013), 290–298, 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000251.
46. Davis, A.P., Green engineering principles promote low-impact development. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39:16 (2005), 338A–344A, 10.1021/es053327e.
47. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T., A fast and elitis multi-objective Genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. KanGAL Report 200001, 2000, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India.
48. Debusk, K.M., Hunt, W.F., Bioretention outflow: does it mimic rural water interflow?. Presented at the World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, Palm Springs, California, United States, 2011, 375–386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/41173(414)41.
49. Denault, C., Millar, R.G., Lence, B.J., Assessment of posible impacts of climate change in an urban catchment. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 42:3 (2006), 685–697.
50. De Toffol, S., Laghari, A.N., Rauch, W., Are extreme rainfall intensities more frequent? Analysis of trends in rainfall patterns relevant to urban drainage systems. Water Sci. Technol., 59(9), 2009, 1769 http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wst.2009.182.
51. DHI, Mike urban. Product Information, 2014, MIKE by DHI http://www.mikebydhi.com/products/mike-urban.
52. Dietz, M.E., Low impact development practices: a review of current research and recommendations for future directions. Water Air Soil Pollut. 186:1–4 (2007), 351–363, 10.1007/s11270-007-9484-z.
53. Dietz, M.E., Clausen, J.C., Stormwater runoff and export changes with development in a traditional and low impact subdivision. J. Environ. Manag. 87:4 (2008), 560–566.
54. Drake, J., Bradford, A., Van Seters, T., Hydrologic performance of three partial-infiltration permeable pavements in a cold climate over low permeability soil. J. Hydrol. Eng., 19(9), 2013, 4014016.
55. Duan, H.F., Li, F., Yan, H., Multi-objective optimal design of detention tanks in the urban stormwater drainage system: LID implementation and analysis. Water Resour. Manag. 30:13 (2016), 4635–4648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1444-1.
56. Eckart, K., L {"custom":[]} CSL_BIzation of Low Impact Development Stormwater Controls Under Climate Change Conditions. 2015, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada.
57. Eckart, K., McPhee, Z., Bolisetti, T., Multiobjective Optimization of LID Controls. 2017 (Review for publication submission).
58. Elliott, A.H., Trowsdale, S.A., A review of models for low impact urban stormwater drainage. Environmental Modelling & Software, Special section: Advanced Technology for Environmental Modelling, 22 (3), 2007, 394–405, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.12.005.
59. Ellis, B.J., Viavattene, C., Sustainable urban drainage system modeling for managing urban surface water flood risk: SUDS modeling for urban runoff management. Clean: Soil, Air, Water 42:2 (2014), 153–159, 10.1002/clen.201300225.
60. Engel, B., Storm, D., White, M., Arnold, J., Arabi, M., A hydrologic/water quality model applicati1. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 43:5 (2007), 1223–1236, 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00105.x.
61. eWater, Music overview. Product Information, 2014 www.ewater.com.au http://www.ewater.com.au/products/music/music-overview/.
62. Ewing, S.A., Grayson, R.B., Science, citizens, and catchments: decision support for catchment planning in Australia. Soc. Nat. Resour. 13:5 (2000), 443–459, 10.1080/089419200403857.
63. Fach, S., Engelhard, C., Wittke, N., Rauch, W., Performance of infiltration swales with regard to operation in winter times in an alpine region. Water Sci. Technol., 63(11), 2011.
64. Fassman, E.A., Blackbourn, S., Urban runoff mitigation by a permeable pavement system over impermeable soils. J. Hydrol. Eng. 15:6 (2010), 475–485, 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000238.
65. Fletcher, T.D., Andrieu, H., Hamel, P., Understanding, management and modelling of urban hydrology and its consequences for receiving waters: a state of the art. Adv. Water Resour. 51:January (2013), 261–279, 10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.09.001.
66. Fletcher, T.D., Mitchell, G., Deletic, A., Ladson, A., Séven, A., Is stormwater harvesting beneficial to urban waterway environmental flows?. Water Sci. Technol. 55:2 (2007), 65–72.
67. Fletcher, T.D., Shuster, W., Hunt, W.F., Ashley, R., Butler, D., Arthur, S., Trowsdale, S., Barraud, S., Semadeni-Davies, A., Bertrand-Krajewski, J.L., Mikkelsen, P.S., Rivard, G., Uhl, M., Dagenais, D., Viklander, M., SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and More – the evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage. Urban Water J., 2014, 1–18 July. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2014.916314.
68. Frame, B., Vale, R., Increasing uptake of low impact urban design and development: the role of sustainability assessment systems. Local Environ. 11:3 (2006), 287–306.
69. Franczyk, J., Chang, H., The effects of climate change and urbanization on the runoff of the Rock Creek basin in the Portland metropolitan area, Oregon, USA. Hydrol. Process. 23:6 (2009), 805–815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7176.
70. Freni, G., Mannina, G., Viviani, G., Urban storm-water quality management: centralized versus source control. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 136:2 (2010), 268–278.
71. Gallo, C., Moore, A., Wywrot, J., Comparing the adaptability of infiltration based BMPs to various U.S. regions. Landsc. Urban Plan. 106:4 (2012), 326–335, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.04.004.
72. General Manager, Toronto Water, Implementing a Mandatory Downspout Disconnection Program. October 17 http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2007/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-7842.pdf, 2007.
73. Giacomoni, M.H., Zechman, E.M., Brumbelow, K., Hydrologic footprint residence: environmentally friendly criteria for best management practices. J. Hydrol. Eng. 17:1 (2012), 99–108, 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000407.
74. Gilroy, K.L., McCuen, R.H., Spatio-temporal effects of low impact development practices. J. Hydrol. 367:3 (2009), 228–236.
75. Goonrey, C.M., Perera, B.J.C., Lechte, P., Maheepala, S., Mitchell, V.G., A technical decision-making framework: Stormwater as an alternative supply source. Urban Water J. 6:6 (2009), 417–429.
76. Green, C., Towards sustainable flood risk management. Int. J. Disaster Risk Sci. 1:1 (2010), 33–43.
77. Guo, J.C.Y., Urbonas, B., MacKenzie, K., Water quality capture volume for storm water BMP and LID designs. J. Hydrol. Eng. 19:4 (2014), 682–686, 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000847.
78. Hakimdavar, R., Culligan, P.J., Guido, A., McGillis, W.R., The soil water apportioning method (SWAM): an approach for long-term, low-cost monitoring of green roof hydrologic performance. Ecol. Eng. 93 (2016), 207–220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.05.023.
79. Hamel, P., Daly, E., Fletcher, T.D., Source-control stormwater management for mitigating the impacts of urbanisation on baseflow: a review. J. Hydrol. 485 (2013), 201–211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.01.001.
80. Hathaway, J.M., Hunt, W.F., Jadlocki, S., Indicator bacteria removal in storm-water best management practices in Charlotte, North Carolina. J. Environ. Eng. 135:12 (2009), 1275–1285.
81. Houdeshel, C.D., Pomeroy, C.A., Hair, L., Moeller, J., Cost-estimating tools for low-impact development best management practices: challenges, limitations, and implications. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 137:3 (2011), 183–189, 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000179.
82. Hunt, W.F., Smith, J.T., Jadlocki, S.J., Hathaway, J.M., Eubanks, P.R., Pollutant removal and peak flow mititgation by a bioretention cell in urban Charlotte, N.C. J. Environ. Eng. 134:5 (2008), 403–408, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2008)134:5(403).
83. Huntington, T.G., Evidence for intensification of the global water cycle: review and synthesis. J. Hydrol. 319:1–4 (2006), 83–95 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.003.
84. Imteaz, M.A., Ahsan, A., Rahman, A., Mekanik, F., Modelling Stormwater treatment systems using MUSIC: accuracy. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 71:February (2013), 15–21, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.11.007.
85. Innoyze, Sustainable Urban Stormwater Best Managment Practices with InfoSWMM Sustain. http://www.innovyze.com/news/showcases/InfoSWMM_Sustain_InfoSWMM_2D_and_SWMMLive.pdf, 2015.
86. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Fourth Assessment Report (Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report No. Contributions of Working Groups I, II, and II). 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom; New York, U.S.A.; Geneva, Switzerland.
87. Jackisch, N., Weiler, M., The hydrologic outcome of a low impact development (LID) site including superposition with streamflow peaks. Urban Water J., 2015, 1–17 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2015.1080735.
88. Jacobson, C.R., Identification and quantification of the hydrological impacts of imperviousness in urban catchments: a review. J. Environ. Manag. 92:6 (2011), 1438–1448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.01.018.
89. Jennings, A.A., Adeel, A.A., Hopkins, A., Litofsky, A.L., Wellstead, S.W., Rain barrel-urban Garden Stormwater Management Performance. Http://Dx. doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000663, October http://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000663, 2012.
90. Jia, H., Lu, Y., Yu, S.L., Chen, Y., Planning of LID–BMPs for urban runoff control: the case of Beijing Olympic Village. Sep. Purif. Technol. 84:January (2012), 112–119, 10.1016/j.seppur.2011.04.026.
91. Jia, H., Yao, H., Tang, Y., Yu, S.L., Zhen, J.X., Lu, Y., Development of a multi-criteria index ranking system for urban runoff best management practices (BMPs) selection. Environ. Monit. Assess. 185:9 (2013), 7915–7933, 10.1007/s10661-013-3144-0.
92. Jia, H., Wang, X., Ti, C., Zhai, Y., Field, R., Tafuri, A.N., Cai, H., Yu, S.L., Field monitoring of a LID-BMP treatment train system in China. Environ. Monit. Assess., 187(6), 2015, 10.1007/s10661-015-4595-2.
93. Johnson, R.D., Sample, D.J., A semi-distributed model for locating stormwater best management practices in coastal environments. Environ. Model. Softw. 91:May (2017), 70–86, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.01.015.
94. Joyce, J., Chang, N.B., Harji, R., Ruppert, T., Imen, S., Developing a multi-scale modeling system for resilience assessment of green-grey drainage infrastructures under climate change and sea level rise impact. Environ. Model. Softw. 90:April (2017), 1–26, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.11.026.
95. Jung, Y., Han, S., Jo, D., Optimal design of permeable pavement using harmony search algorithm with SWMM. Kim, J.H., Geem, Z.W., (eds.) Harmony Search Algorithm, Vol. 382, 2016, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 385–394 Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-662-47926-1_37.
96. Kaini, P., Artita, K.S., Nicklow, J.W., Designing BMPs at a watershed scale using SWAT and a genetic algorithm. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, 2008 http://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/40976(316)125.
97. Karamouz, M., Nazif, S., Reliability-based flood management in urban watersheds considering climate change impacts. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 139:5 (2013), 520–533, 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000345.
98. Katzenmoyer, C., Marengo, B.G., Potts, A., Finneran, C., Going green to save green. Water Environment & Technology, 2013 April.
99. Khin, M.M.L., Shaker, A., Joksimovic, D., Yan, W.Y., The use of WorldView-2 satellite imagery to model urban drainage system with low impact development (LID) techniques. Geocarto Int. 31:1 (2016), 92–108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2015.1041561.
100. Kirby, J.T., Durrans, S.R., Pitt, R., Johnson, P.D., Hydraulic resistance in grass swales designed for small flow conveyance. J. Hydraul. Eng. 131:1 (2005), 65–68, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2005)131:1(65).
101. Konrad, C.P., Booth, D.B., Hydrologic changes in urban streams and their ecological significance. American Fisheries Society Symposium, Vol. 47, 2005, 157–177 Retrieved from http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/urban/pdf/157-178_Konrad.pdf.
102. Lai, F., Dai, T., Zhen, J., Riverson, J., Alvi, K., Shoemaker, L., SUSTAIN-an EPA BMP process and placement tool for urban watersheds. Proc. Water Environ. Fed. 2007:5 (2007), 946–968.
103. Lee, J.G., Selvakumar, A., Alvi, K., Riverson, J., Zhen, J.X., Shoemaker, L., Lai, F., A watershed-scale design optimization model for stormwater best management practices. Environ. Model. Softw. 37:November (2012), 6–18, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.04.011.
104. Lenhart, H.A., Hunt, W.F. III, Evaluating four storm-water peformance metrics with a north carolina pain storm-water wetland. J. Environ. Eng., 2011, 155–162 February. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000307.
105. Limbrunner, J.F., Vogel, R.M., Chapra, S.C., Kirshen, P.H., Classic optimization techniques applied to Stormwater and nonpoint source pollution management at the watershed scale. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 139:5 (2013), 486–491, 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000361.
106. Line, D.E., Brown, R.A., Hunt, W.F., Lord, W.G., Effectiveness of LID for commercial development in North Carolina. J. Environ. Eng. 138:6 (2012), 680–688, 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000515.
107. Liu, Y., Ahiablame, L., Bralts, V., Engel, B., Enhancing a rainfall-runoff model to assess the impacts of BMPs and LID practices on storm runoff. J. Environ. Manage. 147 (2015), 12–23.
108. Liu, Y., Theller, L.O., Pijanowski, B.C., Engel, B.A., Optimal selection and placement of green infrastructure to reduce impacts of land use change and climate change on hydrology and water quality: an application to the trail creek watershed, Indiana. Sci. Total Environ. 553:May (2016), 149–163, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.116.
109. Lloyd, S.D., Wong, T.H.F., Chesterfield, C.J., Water Sensitive Urban Design: A Stormwater Management Perspective. http://www.catchment.crc.org.au/pdfs/industry200210.pdf, 2002.
110. Maharjan, M., Pathirana, A., Gersonius, B., Vairavamoorthy, K., Staged cost optimization of urban storm drainage systems based on hydraulic performance in a changing environment. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 13:4 (2009), 481–489.
111. Maniquiz-Redillas, M.C., Kim, L.-H., Evaluation of the capability of low-impact development practices for the removal of heavy metal from urban stormwater runoff. Environ. Technol. 37:18 (2016), 2265–2272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2016.1147610.
112. Martin-Mikle, C.J., de Beurs, K.M., Julian, J.P., Mayer, P.M., Identifying priority sites for low impact development (LID) in a mixed-use watershed. Landsc. Urban Plan. 140:August (2015), 29–41, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.04.002.
113. Mayer, A.L., Shuster, W.D., Beaulieu, J.J., Hopton, M.E., Rhea, L.K., Roy, A.H., Thurston, H.W., Building green infrastructure via citizen participation: a six-year study in the Shepherd Creek (Ohio). Environ. Pract. 14:1 (2012), 57–67 doi: 10.10170S1466046611000494.
114. McGarity, A.E., Watershed-based optimal stormwater management: part 1—application of StormWISE to little Crum Creek in suburban Philadelphia. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, 2010, 2010, 2502–2512.
115. McGarity, A.E., Storm-water investment strategy evaluation model for impaired urban watersheds. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 138:2 (2011), 111–124.
116. Mitchell, V.G., Applying integrated urban water management concepts: a review of Australian experience. Environ. Manag. 37:5 (2006), 589–605.
117. Montalto, F.A., Bartrand, T.A., Waldman, A.M., Travaline, K.A., Loomis, C.H., McAfee, C., Geldi, J.M., Riggall, G.J., Boles, L.M., Decentralised green infrastructure: the importance of stakeholder behaviour in determining spatial and temporal outcomes. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 9:12 (2013), 1187–1205, 10.1080/15732479.2012.671834.
118. Moore, T.L., Assessment of Ecosystem Service Provision by Stormwater Control Measures. Ph.D. 2011, North Carolina State University, United States – North Carolina http://search.proquest.com/pqdtft/docview/921851506/abstract/13CF93AC5A0639396E0/14?accountid=14789.
119. Morley, S.A., Karr, J.R., Assessing and restoring the health of urban streams in the puget sound basin. Conserv. Biol. 16:6 (2002), 1498–1509.
120. Neitsch, S.L., Arnold, J.G., Kiniry, J.R., Williams, J.R., Agricultural Research Service, Texas AgriLife Research, Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation version 2009. Technical Report 406. Texas Water Resources Institute, 2011, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas http://twri.tamu.edu/reports/2011/tr406.pdf.
121. Obropta, C.C., Kardos, J.S., Review of urban stormwater quality models: deterministic, stochastic, and hybrid approaches1: review of urban stormwater quality models: deterministic, stochastic, and hybrid approaches. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 43:6 (2007), 1508–1523, 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00124.x.
122. Palanisamy, B., Chui, T.F.M., Rehabilitation of concrete canals in urban catchments using low impact development techniques. J. Hydrol. 523:April (2015), 309–319, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.01.034.
123. Palla, A., Gnecco, I., Hydrologic modeling of low impact development systems at the urban catchment scale. J. Hydrol. 528:September (2015), 361–368, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.050.
124. Park, Y.S., Lim, K.J., Theller, L., Engel, B.A., L-THIA GIS Manual. 2013, Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering: Purdue University.
125. Passeport, E., Vidon, P., Forshay, K.J., Harris, L., Kaushal, S.S., Kellogg, D.Q., Lazar, J., Mayer, P., Stander, E.K., Ecological engineering practices for the reduction of excess nitrogen in human-influenced landscapes: a guide for watershed managers. Environ. Manag. 51:2 (2013), 392–413, 10.1007/s00267-012-9970-y.
126. Paule-Mercado, M.A., Lee, B.Y., Memon, S.A., Umer, S.R., Salim, I., Lee, C.-H., Influence of land development on stormwater runoff from a mixed land use and land cover catchment. Sci. Total Environ. 599–600:December (2017), 2142–2155, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.081.
127. Pitt, R., Clark, S., Field, R., Groundwater contamination potential from stormwater infiltration practices. Urban Water J., 1999, 217–236, 10.1016/S1462-0758(99)00014-X.
128. Prince George's County, Low-impact Development Design Strategies: An Integrated Design Approach. 1999, MD Department of Environmental Resources, Prince George's County.
129. Pyke, C., Warren, M.P., Johnson, T., LaGro, J., Scharfenberg, J., Groth, P., Freed, R., Schroeer, W., Main, E., Assessment of low impact development for managing stormwater with changing precipitation due to climate change. Landsc. Urban Plan. 103:2 (2011), 166–173, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.07.006.
130. Qin, H., Li, Z., Fu, G., The effects of low impact development on urban flooding under different rainfall characteristics. J. Environ. Manag. 129:November (2013), 577–585 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.026.
131. Reichold, L., Zechman, E.M., Brill, E.D., Holmes, H., Simulation-optimization framework to support sustainable watershed development by mimicking the predevelopment flow regime. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 136:3 (2009), 366–375.
132. Rosa, D.J., Clausen, J.C., Dietz, M.E., Calibration and verification of SWMM for low impact development. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 51:3 (2015), 746–757, 10.1111/jawr.12272.
133. Rossman, L.A., Storm Water Management Model User's Manual, Version 5.0. 2010, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency ftp://152.66.121.2/Oktatas/Epito2000/KozmuhalozatokTervezese-SP2/swmm/epaswmm5_manual.Pdf.
134. Rowe, D.B., Green roofs as a means of pollution abatement. Environ. Pollut. 159:8–9 (2011), 2100–2110, 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.10.029.
135. Roy, A.H., Wenger, S.J., Fletcher, T.D., Walsh, C.J., Ladson, A.R., Shuster, W.D., Thurston, H.W., Brown, R.R., Impediments and solutions to sustainable, watershed-scale urban stormwater management: lessons from Australia and the United States. Environ. Manag. 42:2 (2008), 344–359.
136. Sample, D.J., Heaney, J.P., Wright, L.T., Fan, C.-Y., Lai, F.-H., Field, R., Costs of best management practices and associated land for urban stormwater control. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 129:1 (2003), 59–68.
137. Scharffenberg, W.A., HEC-HMS User's Manual 4.0. Vol. CPD-74A. 2013, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC.
138. Semadeni-Davies, A., Hernebring, C., Svensson, G., Gustafsson, L.-G., The impacts of climate change and urbanisation on drainage in Helsingborg, Sweden: combined sewer system. J. Hydrol. 350:1–2 (2008), 100–113, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.05.028.
139. Seo, M., Jaber, F., Srinivasan, R., Jeong, J., Evaluating the impact of low impact development (LID) practices on water quantity and quality under different development designs using SWAT. Water, 9(193), 2017, 10.3390/w9030193.
140. Shafique, M., Kim, R., Low impact development practices: a review of current research and recommendations for future directions. Ecol. Chem. Eng. S, 22(4), 2015, 10.1515/eces-2015-0032.
141. Sharma, A.K., Gray, S., Diaper, C., Liston, P., Howe, C., Assessing integrated water management options for urban developments–Canberra case study. Urban Water J. 5:2 (2008), 147–159.
142. Shuster, W.D., Morrison, M.A., Thurston, H.W., Impacts Saisonniers et Situationnels D'un Programme de Gestion Décentralisée Des Eaux Pluviales Sur La Réduction Du Volume Des Ruissellements (Cincinatti, Ohio, USA). 2010, 2010, NOVATECH http://documents.irevues.inist.fr/handle/2042/35775.
143. Shuster, W.D., Morrison, M.A., Webb, R., Front-loading urban stormwater management for success–a perspective incorporating current studies on the implementation of retrofit low-impact development. CATE, 1(2), 2008, 8.
144. Shuster, W.D., Rhea, L., Catchment-scale hydrologic implications of parcel-level stormwater management (Ohio USA). J. Hydrol. 485:April (2013), 177–187, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.10.043.
145. Smullen, J.T., Myers, R.D., Reynolds, S.K., A green approach to combined sewer overflow control: source control implementation on a watershed scale. Proc. Water Environ. Fed. 2008:6 (2008), 714–725.
146. Stovin, V.R., Moore, S.L., Wall, M., Ashley, R.M., The potential to retrofit sustainable drainage systems to address combined sewer overflow discharges in the Thames tideway catchment. Water Environ. J., 2012 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1747-6593.2012.00353.x/full.
147. Swan, A.D., Stovin, V.R., Retrofit SuDS—cost estimates and decision-support tools. Proc. ICE - Water Manage. 160:4 (2007), 207–214, 10.1680/wama.2007.160.4.207.
148. Toronto and Region Conservation, Performance evaluation of permeable pavement and a bioretention swale. Seneca College, King City, Ontario. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, Interim Report #2, 2006.
149. Trinh, D.H., Chui, T.F.M., Assessing the hydrologic restoration of an urbanized area via integrated distributed hydrological model. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 10:4 (2013), 4099–4132, 10.5194/hessd-10-4099-2013.
150. Trinkaus, S.D., LID demonstration project for Seaside Village in Bridgeport, Connecticut. Improving Water Quality and the Environment, 2012, Bari, Italy, 477–485.
151. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, L-THIA LID Tutorials. 2014, Purdue University https://engineering.purdue.edu/mapserve/LTHIA7/lthianew/lidIntro.htm.
152. U.S Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Stormwater Technology Fact Sheet. Bioretention. 1999, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
153. U.S Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Low Impact Development (LID) A Literature Review. 2000, U.S Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
154. U.S Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Reducing stormwater costs through low impact development (LID) strategies and practices. EPA 841-F-07-006, 2007, Branch, USEPA Nonpoint Source Control.
155. U.S Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), EPA-F-10-004, (eds.) Green infrastructure case studies: municipal policies for managing stormwater with green infrastructure, 2010, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds.
156. U.S Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Memorandum: Achieving Water Quality Through Integrated Municipal Stormwater and Wastewater Plans. 2011 October 27.
157. U.S Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Case studies analyzing the economic benefits of low impact development and green infrastructure programs. EPA 841-R-13-004, 2013, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, Washington, DC.
158. van Roon, M.R., Water sensitive residential developments: application of LIUDD principles and methods in the Netherlands, Australia and New Zealand. Urban Water J. 8:6 (2011), 325–335.
159. van Roon, M., Emerging approaches to urban ecosystem management: the potential of low impact urban design and development principles. JEAPM 7:1 (2005), 125–148.
160. van Roon, M., Water localisation and reclamation: steps towards low impact urban design and development. J. Environ. Manag. 83:4 (2007), 437–447.
161. van Roon, M., van Roon, H., Low impact urban design and development: the big picture, an introduction to the liudd principles and methods framework. Landcare Research Science Series No. 37, 2009, The University of Auckland, Lincoln, New Zealand http://www.mwpress.co.nz/store/downloads/Science_Rep_LIUDD_optimised.pdf.
162. van Roon, M., Knight-Lenihan, S., Ecological Context of Development: New Zealand Perspectives. 2004, Oxford University Press, South Melbourne, Vic.; Auckland, N.Z.
163. Viavattene, C., Ellis, J.B., Revitt, D.M., Sieker, H., Peters, C., The Application of a GIS-based BMP Selection Tool for the Evaluation of Hydrologic Performance and Storm Flow Reduction. 2010 Retrieved from http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/6502/.
164. Viavattene, C., Scholes, L., Revitt, D.M., Ellis, J.B., A GIS based decision support system for the implementation of stormwater best management practices. In 11th International Conference on Urban Drainage, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, 2008 Retrieved from http://web.sbe.hw.ac.uk/staffprofiles/bdgsa/11th_International_Conference_on_Urban_Drainage_CD/ICUD08/pdfs/62.pdf.
165. Visitacion, B.J., Booth, D.B., Steinemann, A.C., Costs and benefits of storm-water management: case study of the Puget sound region. J. Urban Plann. Dev. 135:4 (2009), 150–158.
166. Vogel, J.R., Moore, T.L., Coffman, R.R., Rodie, S.N., Hutchinson, S.L., McDonough, K.R., McLemore, A.J., McMaine, J.T., Critical review of technical questions facing low impact development and green infrastructure: a perspective from the Great Plains. Water Environ. Res. 87:9 (2015), 849–862 http://dx.doi.org/10.2175/106143015X14362865226392.
167. Walsh, C.J., Fletcher, T.D., Water sensitive urban design: can it really protect the environmental quality of receiving waters. Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Sustainable Water in the Urban Environment, 2006, Australian Water Association, Stormwater Industry Association and Urban Development Institute of Australia, Sippy Downs, Queensland.
168. Wang, M., Zhang, D., Adhityan, A., Ng, W.J., Dong, J., Tan, S.K., The urban environment. Australianate change and urbanization for future scenarios. J. Hydrol., 543, 2016 December: 423A).
169. Water Environment Federation (WEF)., Green infrastructure implementation. WEF Special Publication, 2014, Water Environment Federation, Alexandria, VA.
170. Water Environment Federation (WEF), Environmental and Water Resources Institute (U.S.), Design of Urban stormwater controls. WEF Manual of Practice, No. 23, 2nd ed., 2012, McGraw-Hill Professional; McGraw-Hill [distributor], New York: London.
171. Williams, E.S., Wise, W.R., Hydrologic impacts of alternative approaches to storm water management and land development. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 42:2 (2006), 443–455.
172. Williams, E.S., Wise, W.R., Economic impacts of alternative approaches to storm-water management and land development. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 135:6 (2009), 537–546.
173. Wilson, C.E., Hunt, W.F., Winston, R.J., Smith, P., Comparison of runoff quality and quantity from a commercial low-impact and conventional development in Raleigh, North Carolina. J. Environ. Eng., 141(2), 2015, 5014005, 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000842.
174. Wise, S., Braden, J., Ghalayini, D., Grant, J., Kloss, C., MacMullan, E., Morse, S., Montalto, F., Nees, D., Nowak, D., Integrating Valuation Methods to Recognize Green Infrastructure's Multiple Benefits. 2010, Center for Neighborhood Technology April. http://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/41099(367)98.
175. Wong, T.H.F., Eadie, M.L., Water sensitive urban design—a paradigm shift in urban design. Proceedings of the Xth World Water Congress, [in CD-ROM], 12:16, 2000 http://gabeira.locaweb.com.br/cidadesustentavel/biblioteca/%7B30788FE6-98A8-44E5-861E-996D286A78B3%7D_Wong1.pdf.
176. Wong, T.H.F., Fletcher, T.D., Duncan, H.P., Coleman, J.R., Jenkins, G.A., A model for urban stormwater improvement conceptualisation. Strecker, E.W., Huber, W.C., (eds.) Global solutions for urban drainage (CD Rom) Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Urban Drainag, held in Portland, Oregon, September 8–13, 2002, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia, USA.
177. Wright, T.J., Liu, Y., Carroll, N.J., Ahiablame, L.M., Engel, B.A., Retrofitting LID practices into existing neighborhoods: is it worth it?. Environ. Manag. 57:4 (2016), 856–867, 10.1007/s00267-015-0651-5.
178. Wright Water Engineers Inc, Geosyntec Consultants, International Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMP) Database: User's Guide for BMP Data Entry Spreadsheets. Release Version 3.2. bmpdatabase.org, 2010.
179. Xiao, Q., McPherson, E.G., Simpson, J.R., Ustin, S.L., Hydrologic processes at the urban residential scale. Hydrol. Process. 21:16 (2007), 2174–2188.
180. Xu, T., Jia, H., Wang, Z., Mao, X., Xu, C., SWMM-based methodology for block-scale LID-BMPs planning based on site-scale multi-objective optimization: a case study in Tianjin. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 11(4), 2017, 10.1007/s11783-017-0934-6.
181. Yazdi, J., Salehi Neyshabouri, S.A.A., Identifying low impact development strategies for flood mitigation using a fuzzy-probabilistic approach. Environ. Model. Softw. 60:October (2014), 31–44, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.06.004.
182. Zahmatkesh, Z., Burian, S.J., Karamouz, M., Tavakol-Davani, H., Goharian, E., Low-impact development practices to mitigate climate change effects on urban stormwater runoff: case study of new York City. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 141(1), 2015, 4014043, 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000770.
183. Zhang, G., Development of a Multi-Objective Optimization Framework for Implementing Low Impact Development Scenarios in an Urbanizing Watershed. 2009, The Pennsylvania State University https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/paper/10187/5619.
184. Zhang, X., Guo, X., Hu, M., Hydrological effect of typical low impact development approaches in a residential district. Nat. Hazards 80:1 (2016), 389–400, 10.1007/s11069-015-1974-5.
185. Zhen, J.X., Yu, S.L., Lin, J.-Y., Optimal location and sizing of stormwater basins at waterhsed scale. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 130:4 (2004), 339–347, 10.1061/~ASCE!0733-9496.
186. Zhou, Q., A review of sustainable urban drainage systems considering the climate change and urbanization impacts. Water 6:4 (2014), 976–992, 10.3390/w6040976.