Comparing the adaptability of infiltration based BMPs to various U.S. regions

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 106, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 326-335

  Gallo, Cory ^a   Moore, Austin ^b   Wywrot, Joe ^c  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Waggoner Engineering   (United States)

^c Smith Group JJR   (United States)

Author keywords

Best management practice; Portland; Simplified Sizing Approach; Sizing factor; Stormwater management

Indexed keywords

ENGINEERING GEOLOGY; RAIN; STORMS;

BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES; PORTLAND; SIMPLIFIED SIZING APPROACH; SIZING FACTOR; STORM-WATER MANAGEMENTS;

STORM SEWERS;

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; INFILTRATION; MODEL VALIDATION; STORMWATER; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

OREGON; PACIFIC NORTHWEST; PORTLAND [OREGON]; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84861572626     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.04.004     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Akan A.O. Sizing stormwater infiltration structures. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 2002, 128(5):534-537.
2. Bannerman R., Owens D., Dodds R., Hornewer N. Sources of pollutants in Wisconsin stormwater. Water Science and Technology 1993, 28(3):241-259.
3. Barbosa A.E., Hvitved-Jacobsen T. Infiltration pond design for highway runoff treatment in semiarid climates. Journal of Environmental Engineering 2001, 127:1014.
4. Boller M. Towards sustainable urban stormwater management. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply 2004, 4(1):55-65.
5. Booth D.B. Urbanization and the natural drainage system: Impacts, solutions, and prognoses 1991, vol. 7:1. The Institute for Environmental Studies.
6. Braga A., Horst M., Traver R.G. Temperature effects on the infiltration rate through an infiltration basin BMP. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 2007, 133:593.
7. Stormwater management manual-Revision 4 2008, City of Portland - Bureau of Environmental Science (BES).
8. Davis A.P., Hunt W.F., Traver R.G., Clar M. Bioretention technology: Overview of current practice and future needs. Journal of Environmental Engineering 2009, 135:109.
9. Debo T.N., Reese A.J. Municipal stormwater management 2003, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton.
10. Dietz M.E. Low impact development practices: A review of current research and recommendations for future directions. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 2007, 186(1):351-363.
11. Echols S. Artful rainwater design in the urban landscape. Journal of Green Building 2007, 2(4):103-122.
12. Echols S., Pennypacker E. Art for rain's sake: Designers make rainwater a central part of two projects. Landscape Architecture 2006, 24.
13. Echols S., Pennypacker E. From stormwater management to artful rainwater design. Landscape Journal 2008, 27(2):268-290.
14. Ferguson B.K., Debo T.N. On-site stormwater management: Applications for landscape and engineering 1990, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
15. Field R., Sullivan D. Wet-weather flow in the urban watershed: Technology and management 2003, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton.
16. Gilroy K.L., McCuen R.H. Spatio-temporal effects of low impact development practices. Journal of Hydrology 2009, 367(3-4):228-236.
17. Grewe T., Anderson S., Butman L. Portland, Oregon: A case study in sustainability. Government Finance Review 2002, 8-13. Government Finance Officers Association.
18. Hirschman D., Collins K., Schueler T. The runoff reduction method 2009, Center for Watershed Protection.
19. Holman-Dodds J.K. Towards greener stormwater management. Journal of Green Building 2007, 2(1):68-96.
20. Hottenroth D., Harper C., Turner J. Effectiveness of integrated stormwater management in a Portland, Oregon watershed. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 1999, 35(3):633-641.
21. Liptan T., Murase R.K. Watergardens as stormwater infrastructure in Portland, Oregon. Water sensitive ecological planning and design symposium 2000.
22. Madden S.S.A., Layzer J.A. Choosing green over gray: Philadelphia's innovative stormwater infrastructure plan 2010, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
23. Mikkelsen P., Jacobsen P., Fujita S. Infiltration practice for control of urban stormwater. Journal of Hydraulic Research 1996, 34(6):827-840.
24. Pennypacker E., Echols S. Learning from artful rainwafer design. Landscape Architecture 2008, 28-36.
25. Roy A.H., Wenger S.J., Fletcher T.D., Walsh C.J., Ladson A.R., Shuster W.D., Thurston H.W., Brown R.R. Impediments and solutions to sustainable, watershed-scale urban stormwater management: Lessons from Australia and the United States. Environmental Management 2008, 42(2):344-359.
26. Sample D.J., Heaney J.P., Wright L.T., Fan C.-Y., Lai F.-H., Field R. Costs of best management practices and associated land for urban stormwater control. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 2003, 129:59.
27. Stubchaer J.M. The Santa Barbara urban hydrograph method. National symposium on urban hydrology and sediment control 1975, 131-141.
28. Thompson J.W. The poetics of stormwater. Landscape Architecture 1999, 58-88.
29. Thompson J.W. Remembered rain. Portland, a stormwater garden celebrates rain falling on an urban setting 2004, Landscape Architecture, DC, p. 60.
30. Tsihrintzis V.A., Sidan C.B. Modeling urban stormwater runoff processes using the Santa Barbara method. Water Resources Management 1998, 12(2):139-166.
31. Tunney K.W. Innovative stormwater design: The role of the landscape architect. Stormwater Magazine 2000, pp. 30-34, 36, 40.
32. United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Rescources Conservation Service (NRCS). (1986). Urban hydrology for small watersheds, Technical Release 55.
33. Low-impact development (LID): A literature review 2000, United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).
34. Case studies: Portland, OR 2008, Water Environment Research Foundation (WERF).