Bioretention outflow: Does it mimic rural water interflow?

World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2011: Bearing Knowledge for Sustainability - Proceedings of the 2011 World Environmental and Water Resources Congress

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 375-386

  Debusk, Kathy M ^a   Hunt, William F ^a  

^a North Carolina State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Biological processes; Rural areas; Water flow; Water quality; Water treatment

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL PROCESS; BIORETENTION; BIORETENTION CELL; DATA SETS; FLOW VOLUMES; INTERFLOW; LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT; NORTH CAROLINA; OUTFLOW RATE; RESEARCH QUESTIONS; SHALLOW GROUNDWATER; SMALL STREAMS; STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES; STORM EVENTS; STREAMS DRAINING; WATER FLOW;

BEARINGS (STRUCTURAL); FLOW RATE; LANDFORMS; MIRRORS; RIVERS; RURAL AREAS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; WATER QUALITY; WATER RESOURCES; WATER SUPPLY; WATER TREATMENT; WATERSHEDS;

RECHARGING (UNDERGROUND WATERS);

EID: 79960384045     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1061/41173(414)41     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Biggs, T. W., T. Dunne, and L. A. Martinelli. 2004. Natural controls and human impacts on stream nutrient concentrations in a deforested region of the Brazilian Amazon basin. Biogeochemistry. 68:227-257.
2. Davis, A. P. 2008. Field performance of bioretention: Hydrology impacts. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering. 13(2):90-95.
3. Davis, A. P. 2005. Green engineering principles promote low-impact development. Environmental Science and Technology. 39(16):338A-344A.
4. Davison, A. C. and D. V. Hinkley. 1997. Bootstrap Methods and Their Application. Cambridge University Press.
5. Dietz, M. E. 2007. Low impact development practices: A review of current research and recommendations for future directions. Water Air and Soil Pollution. 186(1-4):351-363.
6. Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group (FISRWG). 1998. Stream Corridor Restoration: Principles, Processes, and Practices. GPO Item No. 0120-A; SuDocs No. A 57.6/2:EN 3/PT.653.
7. nd ed. West Chester, England: John Wiley and Sons.
8. Hunt, W. F., J. T. Smith, S. J. Jadlocki, J. M. Hathaway, P. R. Eubanks. 2008. Pollutant Removal and Peak Flow Mitigation by a Bioretention Cell in Urban Charlotte, NC. ASCE Journal of Environmental Engineering, 134(5):403-408.
9. Hunt, W. F., A. R. Jarrett, J. T. Smith, and L. J. Sharkey. 2006. Evaluating bioretention hydrology and nutrient removal at three field sites in North Carolina. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. 132(6):600-608.
10. Hunt, W. F. and B. A. Doll. 2000. Designing stormwater wetlands for small watersheds: North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service (E00-38813).
11. Meyer, S. C. 2005. Analysis of base flow trends in urban streams, northeastern Illinois, USA. Hydrogeology Journal. 13:871-885.
12. Nelson, R. A., J. A. Smith, and A. J. Miller. 2006. Evolution of channel morphology and hydrologic response in an urbanizing drainage basin. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. 31:1063-1079.
13. North Carolina State Climate Office (NCSCO). 2008. "Climate normals." Dec. 15, 2008.
14. Passeport, E., W. F. Hunt, D. E. Line, R. A. Smith, and R. A. Brown. 2009. Field Study of the Ability of Two Grassed Bioretention Cells to Reduce Stormwater Runoff Pollution. ASCE Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 135(4):505-510.
15. Phillips, P. J., and R. W. Bode. 2004. Pesticides in surface water runoff in southeastern New York State, USA: Seasonal and stormflow effects on concentrations. Pest Management Science. 60:531-543.
16. Rose, S., and N. E. Peters. 2001. Effects of urbanization on streamflow in the Atlanta area (Georgia, USA): A comparative hydrological approach. Hydrological Processes. 15:1441-1457.
17. Sala, M., and M. Inbar. 1992. Some hydrologic effects of urbanization in Catalan Rivers. Catena. 19:363-378.
18. Sharkey, L. J. 2006. The Performance of Bioretention Areas in North Carolina: A Study of Water Quality, Water Quantity, and Soil Media. MS thesis. Raleigh, N. C.: North Carolina State Univeristy, Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering.
19. Vicars-Groening, J., and H. F. L. Williams. 2007. Impact of urbanization on storm response of White Rock Creek, Dallas, TX. Environmental Geology. 51:1263-1269.
20. Wheeler, A. P., P. L. Angermeier, and A. E. Rosenberger. 2005. Impacts of new highways and subsequent landscape urbanization on stream habitat and biota. Reviews in Fisheries Science. 13:141-164.
21. Widianarko, B., R. A. Verwejj, C. A. M. Van Gestel, and N. M. Van Straalen. 2000. Spatial distribution of trace metals in sediments from urban streams of Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 46:95-100.
22. USEPA. 2003. Protecting water quality from urban runoff. Washington D. C.: (EPA-841-F-03-003).
23. USEPA. 2000. Low impact development (LID): A literature review. Washington D. C.: (EPA-841-B-00-005).