The use of PCSWMM for assessing the impacts of land use changes on hydrological responses and performance of WSUD in managing the impacts at myponga catchment, South Australia

Water (Switzerland)

Volumn 8, Issue 11, 2016, Pages

  Akhter, Muhammad Saleem ^a   Hewa, Guna Alankarage ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Bio retention cells; Catchment; Floods; Land use changes; Myponga; PCSWMM; WSUD

Indexed keywords

FLOODS; LAND USE; PERSONAL COMPUTERS; RUNOFF;

HYDROLOGICAL RESPONSE; LAND-USE CHANGE; MYPONGA; PCSWMM; RECURRENCE INTERVALS; STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MODELS; WATER SENSITIVE URBAN DESIGN (WSUD); WSUD;

CATCHMENTS;

CATCHMENT; DISCHARGE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; FLOOD CONTROL; FLOOD FREQUENCY; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; HYDROLOGICAL RESPONSE; LAND USE CHANGE; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PLANNING METHOD; RECURRENCE INTERVAL; URBAN DESIGN; URBANIZATION; WATER RETENTION;

AUSTRALIA; MYPONGA RIVER; SOUTH AUSTRALIA;

EID: 85005982480     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20734441     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/w8110511     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Elga, S.; Jan, B.; Okke, B. Hydrological modelling of urbanized catchments: A review and future directions. J. Hydrol. 2015, 529, 62-81.
2. Du, J.; Qian, L.; Rui, H.; Zuo, T.; Zheng, D.; Xu, Y.; Xu, C.Y. Assessing the effects of urbanization on annual runoff and flood events using an integrated hydrological modeling system for Qinhuai River Basin, China. J. Hydrol. 2012, 464-465, 127-139.
3. Lee, A. Methodologies to Maintain Pre-Urbanization Low Flow Characteristics in an Urbanized Cathment Using Water Sensitive Urban Design Measures; The University of South Australia: Adelaide, Australia, 2008.
4. White, M.D.; Greer, K.A. The effects of watershed urbanization on the stream hydrology and riparian vegetation of Los Peñasquitos Creek, California. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2006, 74, 125-138.
5. Lee, S.; Yoon, C.; Jung, K.; Hwang, H. Comparative evaluation of runoff and water quality using HSPF and SWMM. Water Sci. Technol. 2010, 62, 1401-1409.
6. Mao, D.; Cherkauer, K.A. Impacts of land-use change on hydrologic responses in the Great Lakes region. J. Hydrol. 2009, 374, 71-82.
7. DEWNR. Water Connect. Available online: https://www.waterconnect.sa.gov.au/Water-Resources/Surface-Water/SitePages/Home.aspx (accessed on 15 August 2015).
8. Wella-Hewage, S. Methodologies to Assess the Performance of Water Sensitive Urban Design Systems in Greenfield Catchment Development; Univeristy of South Australia: Adelaide, Australia, 2013.
9. James, W.; Rossman, L.A.; James, W.R.C. User's Guide to Swmm 5, 13th ed.; Computational Hydraulics International (CHI): Guelph, ON, Canada, 2010.
10. Rossman, L.A. Storm Water Management Model User's Manual; Version 5.0; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Cincinnati, OH, USA, 2010.
11. Sun, N.; Hall, M.; Hong, B.; Zhang, L. Impact of swmm catchment discretization: Case study in Syracuse, New York. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2014, 19, 223-234.
12. Abdul-Aziz, O.I.; Al-Amin, S. Climate, land use and hydrologic sensitivities of stormwater quantity and quality in a complex coastal-urban watershed. Urban Water J. 2015, 13, 1-19.
13. Yu, H.; Huang, G.; Wu, C. Application of the stormwater management model to a piedmont city: A case study of Jinan city, China. Water Sci. Technol. 2014, 70, 858-864.
14. CHI. Pcswmm. Available online: http://www.chiwater.com/Software/PCSWMM/index.asp (accessed on 9 September 2015).
15. Environment Protection Authority (EPA). Myponga Watercourse Restoration Project Final Report 2000-2007; EPA: Adelaide, Australia, 2008.
16. Barnett, S.R.; Rix, R. Southern Fleurieu Groundwater Assessment; Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation: Adelaide, Australia, 2006.
17. Ratnayake, D.C.; Hewa, G.A.; Frizenschaf, J. Assess flooding potential in the vicinity of the Myponga Reservoir area (Tiers ungauged catchment). In Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium (HWRS); New Zealand Hydrological Society, Engineers Australia & IPENZ Rivers Group: Queenstown, New Zealand, 2016.
18. BOM. Climate Data Online. Available online: http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/data/ (accessed on 26 August 2015).
19. Choi, K.-S.; Ball, J.E. Parameter estimation for urban runoff modelling. Urban Water 2002, 4, 31-41.
20. James, W. Rules for Responsible Modeling; Computational Hydraulics International (CHI): Guelph, ON, Canada, 2005.
21. CHI. Calibrating a SWMM5 Model Using the SRTC Tool. Available online: http://support.chiwater.com/support/solutions/articles/29894-calibrating-a-swmm5-model-using-t (accessed on 4 October 2015).
22. Silva, L.; Ragab, R.; Duarte, I.; Lourenço, E.; Simöes, N.; Chaves, M. Calibration and validation of saltmed model under dry and wet year conditions using chickpea field data from Southern Portugal. Irrig. Sci. 2013, 31, 651-659.
23. Wilby, R.L. Uncertainty in water resource model parameters used for climate change impact assessment. Hydrol. Process. 2005, 19, 3201-3219.
24. Davis, A.P. Field performance of bioretention: Hydrology impacts. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2008, 13, 90-95.
25. Ashbolt, S.; Aryal, S.; Petrone, K.; McIntosh, B.; Maheepala, S.; Chowdhury, R.; Gardner, T. Can stormwater harvesting restore pre-development flows in urban catchments in south east Queensland. Water Sci. Technol. 2012, 67, 446-451.
26. Davis, A.P.; Traver, R.G.; Hunt, W.F.; Lee, R.; Brown, R.A.; Olszewski, J.M. Hydrologic performance of bioretention storm-water control measures. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2011, 17, 604-614.
27. Thompson, A.M.; Paul, A.C.; Balster, N.J. Physical and hydraulic properties of engineered soil media for bioretention basins. Trans. ASABE 2008, 51, 499-514.
28. Bledsoe, B.P.; Watson, C.C. Effects of urbanization on channel instability. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2001, 37, 255-270.
29. Pilgrim, D.; Doran, D. Australian Rainfall and Runoff: Volume One: A Guide to Flood Estimation; Book IV; Institution of Engineers, Australia: Territory, Australia, 1997; Volume 1.
30. Yang, H.; Florence, D.; McCoy, E.; Dick, W.; Grewal, P. Design and hydraulic characteristics of a field-scale bi-phasic bioretention rain garden system for storm water management. Water Sci. Technol. 2009, 59, 1863-1872.
31. Trowsdale, S.A.; Simcock, R. Urban stormwater treatment using bioretention. J. Hydrol. 2011, 397, 167-174.
32. Ermilio, J.; Traver, R. Hydrologic and Pollutant Removal Performance of a Bio-Infiltration Bmp. In Proceedings of the EWRI Water Congress, Omaha, NE, USA, 21-25 May 2006.
33. Li, M.-H.; Dvorak, B.; Sung, C.Y. Bioretention, low impact development, and stormwater management. Urban Ecosyst. Ecol. 2010, 413-430.
34. Hatt, B.E.; Fletcher, T.D.; Deletic, A. Hydrologic and pollutant removal performance of stormwater biofiltration systems at the field scale. J. Hydrol. 2009, 365, 310-321.
35. Argue, J.R. Water Sensitive Urban Design, Basic Procedures for 'Source Control' of Stormwater: A Handbook for Australian Practice; Urban Water Resource Centre, University of South Australia: Adelaide, Australia, 2009.