The hydrologic outcome of a Low Impact Development (LID) site including superposition with streamflow peaks

Urban Water Journal

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 143-159

  Jackisch, Nicole ^a   Weiler, Markus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

design; environmental impact; rainfall runoff analysis; source control; Stormwater runoff; urban hydrology

Indexed keywords

HYDROLOGICAL REGIME; HYDROLOGICAL RESPONSE; PEAK DISCHARGE; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING; STORMWATER; STREAMFLOW; URBAN AREA;

EID: 84945208979     PISSN: 1573062X     EISSN: 17449006     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1573062X.2015.1080735     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Ahiablame, L.M., Engel, B.A., and Chaubey, I., 2012. Effectiveness of low impact development practices:literature review and suggestions for future research. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 223 (7), 4253–4273. doi:10.1007/s11270-012-1189-2
2. ATV-DVWK–Deutsche Vereinigung für Wasserwirtschaft, Abwasser und Abfall e.V., Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Abwassertechnik e.V. (GFA) (Eds)., 2002. Verdunstung in Bezug zu Landnutzung, Bewuchs und Boden, Merkblatt M 504 (German technical guidance document). Hennef, Germany:Fraunhofer IRB Verlag.
3. Barron, O.V., Barr, A.D., and Donn, M.J., 2013. Effect of urbanisation on the water balance of a catchment with shallow groundwater. Journal of Hydrology, 485, 162–176. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.04.027
4. Bastien, N., et al., 2010. The best management of SuDS treatment trains:A holistic approach. Water Science & Technology, 61 (1), 263–271. doi:10.2166/wst.2010.806
5. BEC - Barr Engineering Company, 2006. Burnsville Stormwater Retrofit Study. Burnsville:City of Burnsville, Final report. Retrieved from http://www.co.dakota.mn.us/EnvironmentRoads/EnvirProtect/Stormwater/LID.htm [Accessed 11 July 2013].
6. BC - Beller Consult GmbH, 1996. Entwässerungstechnische Erschließung des ehemaligen Kasernengeländes Vauban - Entwurfs- und Genehmigungsplanung, Teil 2:Oberflächenentwässerung. Freiburg, no. 71-2-330 (planning document), November 1996, Freiburg, precipitation station Freiburg (WA) no. 7035 (269 m asl, May to September 1951–1980).
7. Booth, D.B., and Rhett Jackson, C.R., 1997. Urbanization of aquatic systems:Degradation thresholds, stormwater detection, and the limits of mitigation. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 33 (5), 1077–1090. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1997.tb04126.x
8. Burns, M.J., et al., 2012. Hydrologic shortcomings of conventional urban stormwater management and opportunities for reform. Landscape and Urban Planning, 105 (3), 230–240. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.012
9. BWK - Bund der Ingenieure für Wasserwirtschaft, Abfallwirtschaft und Kulturbau e.V. (Ed.), 2007. Ableitung von immissionsorientierten Anforderungen an Misch- und Niederschlagswassereinleitungen unter Berücksichtigung örtlicher Verhältnisse, Merkblatt M 3 (German technical guidance document). (4th ed.). Stuttgart:Fraunhofer IRB Verlag.
10. Cheng, M.-S., Coffman, L.S., and Clar, M.L., 2003a. Low-Impact development hydrologic analysis. In R., Field, & D., Sullivan (Eds.), Wet-Weather Flow in the Urban Watershed, Technology and Management (pp. 295–314). Boca Raton, FL:CRC Press.
11. Cheng, M.S, et al., 2003b. Comparison of Hydrological Responses from Low Impact Development with Conventional Development. In Proceedings of World Water & Environmental Resources Congress 2003. June 23-26, 2003. Philadelphia:Environmental and Water Resources Institute (EWRI), American Society of Civil Engineers.
12. Clausen, J.C., 2007. Jordan Cove Watershed Project. Storrs:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, Final Report (section 319). Retrieved from http://www.cag.uconn.edu/nrme/jordancove/jordan_cove/publications/final_report.pdf [Accessed 11 July 2013].
13. Coffman, L.S., 2001. Low impact development creating a storm of controversy. Water Resource Impact, 3 (6), 7–9.
14. Davis, A.P., et al., 2009. Bioretention technology:Overview of current practice and future needs. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 135 (3), 109–117. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2009)135:3(109)
15. Dechesne, M., Barraud, S., and Bardin, J.-P., 2004. Indicators for hydraulic and pollution retention assessment of stormwater infiltration basins. Journal of Environmental Management, 71 (4), 371–380. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.04.005
16. DWA - Deutsche Vereinigung für Wasserwirtschaft, Abwasser und Abfall e.V. (Ed.), 2005. Planung, Bau und Betrieb von Anlagen zur Versickerung von Niederschlagswasser, Arbeitsblatt A 138 (German technical guidance document). Hennef, Germany:DWA.
17. DWA - Deutsche Vereinigung für Wasserwirtschaft, Abwasser und Abfall e.V. (Ed.), 2006. Leitlinien der integralen Siedlungsentwässerung (ISiE), Arbeitsblatt A 100 (German technical guidance document). Hennef, Germany:DWA.
18. DWA - Deutsche Vereinigung für Wasserwirtschaft, Abwasser und Abfall e.V. (Ed.), 2007. Handlungsempfehlungen zum Umgang mit Regenwasser, Merkblatt M 153 (German technical guidance document). Hennef, Germany:DWA.
19. EU WFD - European Water Framework Directive, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the Community action in the field of water policy, OJ L 327, 22 December 2000. Strasbourg:European Parliament and Council.
20. Fletcher, T.D., Andrieu, H., and Hamel, P., 2013. Understanding, management and modelling of urban hydrology and its consequences for receiving waters:A state of the art. Advances in Water Resources, 51, 261–279. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.09.001
21. Fletcher, T.D., et al., 2014. SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and more–The evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage. Urban Water Journal, 1–18, doi:10.1080/1573062X.2014.916314
22. Førland, E.J., et al., 1996. Manual for operational correction of Nordic precipitation data. Report Nr. 24/96 Blindern, Oslo, Norway:DNMI.
23. GC & WWE - Geosyntec Consultants and Wright Water Engineers, 2009. Urban Stormwater BMP Performance Monitoring. Under support from US Environmental Protection Agency, Water Environment Research Foundation, Federal Highway Administration, Environmental and Water Resources Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineers. Retrieved from http://water.epa.gov/scitech/wastetech/guide/stormwater/upload/2009-Stormwater-BMP-Monitoring-Manual.pdf [Accessed 18 June 2012].
24. GC & WWE - Geosyntec Consultants and Wright Water Engineers, 2011. International Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMP) Database–Technical Summary:Volume Reduction. Under support from Water Environment Research Foundation, Federal Highway Administration, Environmental and Water Resources Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineers. Retrieved from http://www.bmpdatabase.org/Docs/Volume%20Reduction%20Technical%20Summary%20Jan%202011.pdf [Accessed 23 June 2012].
25. Göbel, P., and Coldewey, W.G., 2010. Concept for near-natural storm water control in urban areas. Environmental Earth Sciences, 70 (5), 1945–1950. doi:10.1007/s12665-010-0852-4
26. Guo, J.C.Y., and Urbonas, B., 1996. Maximized Detention Volume Determined by Runoff Capture Ratio. Journal of Water Resource Planning and Management, 122 (1), 33–39. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1996)122:1(33)
27. Haase, D., 2009. Effects of urbanisation on the water balance–A long-term trajectory. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 29 (4), 211–219. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2009.01.002
28. HEC-RAS 4.1, 2010. HEC-RAS River Analysis System User’s Manual Version 4.1. US Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center. Retrieved from http://www.hec.usace.army.mil/software/hec-ras/documentation/HEC-RAS_4.1_Users_Manual.pdf [Accessed 2 March 2012].
29. Holman-Dodds, J.K., Bradley, A.A., and Potter, K.W., 2003. Evaluation of hydrologic benefits of infiltration based urban storm water management1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 39 (1), 205–215.
30. Hood, M.J., Clausen, J.C., and Warner, G.S., 2007. Comparison of Stormwater Lag Times for Low Impact and Traditional Residential Development. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 43 (4), 1036–1046.
31. Jackisch, N., and Weiler, M., 2013. Simulation FReWaB [online]. As of 19 August 2013. Freiburg:University of Freiburg, Chair of Hydrology. Retrieved from http://www.naturnahe-regenwasserbewirtschaftung.info/index.php?page=simulation [Accessed 25 April 2014].
32. Keßler, S., et al., 2012. Influence of Near-to-Nature Stormwater Management on the Local Water Balance Using the Example of an Urban Development Area. Water Environmental Research, 84 (5), 441–451. doi:10.2175/106143012X13347678384729
33. Kern, F.-J., 2007. Flächenversiegelung (Atlastafel 6.2) - Wasser- und Bodenatlas Baden-Württemberg (Soil sealing map, Water and Soil Atlas for Baden-Württemberg), vol. 3. Lieferung 2007. Stuttgart:Umweltministerium Baden-Württemberg.
34. KLIWA, 2012. Climate Change in Southern Germany/Extent - Impact–Adaptation. KLIWA (Climate Change and its impact on water resources management cooperative project) brochure. Baden-Württemberg State Institute for the Environment, Measurement and Nature Conservation, Bavarian State Agency for the Environment, Rhineland-Palatinate State Department of the Environment, Water Management and Trade Supervision, German Weather Service. Retrieved from http://www.kliwa.de/download/Climate_Change_in_Southern_Germany_2012.pdf [Accessed 10 February 2014].
35. Fowler, L.A., et al., 2008. Runoff Limits - An ecologically based stormwater management program. Stormwater, 9 (2), 46–58. Retrieved from http://www.stormh2o.com/SW/Articles/Runoff_Limits_101.aspx [Accessed 11 November 2013].
36. LUBW–Landesanstalt für Umwelt, Messungen und Naturschutz Baden-Württemberg, 2007. Abfluss-Kennwerte in Baden-Württemberg–Hochwasserabfluss [online]. Retrieved from http://www.bw-abfluss.de [Accessed 22 May 2013].
37. LUBW - Landesanstalt für Umwelt, Messungen und Naturschutz Baden-Württemberg, 2009. Precipitation data station Freiburg-Mitte no. 61596, Niederschlagsmessnetz, 7:30 daily values, 1961-1990 [data]. Database:LfU-BW, Oracle/MEROS-DB, 28 August 2009. Karlsruhe:LUBW.
38. LfU - Landesanstalt für Umweltschutz Baden-Württemberg, 2006. Arbeitshilfen für den Umgang mit Regenwasser:Regenrückhaltung. Karlsuhe:Landesanstalt für Umwelt, Messungen und Naturschutz Baden-Württemberg, Arbeitshilfen (guidance document), June 2006. Retrieved from https://www.lubw.baden-wuerttemberg.de/servlet/is/13995/arbeitshilfen_regenwasser_regenrueckhaltung_2006.pdf?command=downloadContent&filename=arbeitshilfen_regenwasser_regenrueckhaltung_2006.pdf [Accessed 19 April 2010].
39. Ludwig, C., 2012. Entwicklung einer web-basierten Informationsplattform für die Bestimmung von Regenwasserabfluss in urbanen Gebieten (Bachelor thesis). Chair of Hydrology:University of Freiburg.
40. Michelson, D.B., 2004. Systematic correction of precipitation gauge observations using analyzed meteorological variables. Journal of Hydrology, 290, 161–177. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.10.005
41. Mikkelsen, P.S., et al., 1997. Pollution of soil and groundwater from infiltration of highly contaminated stormwater–A case study. Water Science & Technology, 36 (8–9), 325–330.
42. Moura, P., et al., 2011. Multicriteria decision-aid method to evaluate the performance of stormwater infiltration systems over the time. Water Science and Technology, 64 (10), 1993–2000. doi:10.2166/wst.2011.154
43. Muthukrishnan, S., Madge, B., and Selvakumar, A., 2006. The Use of Best Management Practices (BMPs) in Urban Watersheds–Executive Summary. In R., Field, A.N. Taruri, S., Muthukrishnan, B.A., Madge, and A., Selvakumar (Eds.) The Use of Best Management Practices (BMPs) in Urban Watersheds. Lancester:DEStech, 1–11.
44. Park, D., Song, Y.-I., and Roesner, L.A., 2013. Effect of the Seasonal Rainfall Distribution on Storm-Water Quality Capture Volume Estimation. Journal of Water Resource Planning and Management, 139 (1), 45–52. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000204
45. PGC - Prince George’s County, Maryland, 1999. Low-Impact Development Hydrologic Analysis. Prince George’s County, MA:Department of Environmental Resources, Programs and Planning Division. Retrieved from http://water.epa.gov/polwaste/green/upload/lid_hydr.pdf [Accessed 10 March 2012].
46. Petrucci, G., et al., 2013. Do stormwater source control policies deliver the right hydrologic outcomes? Journal of Hydrology, 485, 188–200. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.06.018
47. Pitt, R., Clark, S., and Field, R., 1999. Groundwater contamination potential from stormwater infiltration practices. Urban Water, 1 (3), 217–236.
48. Reese, A.J., Jawdy, C.M., and Parker, J.M., 2010. Green Infrastructure and Storm Depth Retention Criteria. Stormwater, 11 (5), 10–27.
49. Roseen, R., et al., 2009. Seasonal Performance Variations for Storm-Water Management Systems in Cold Climate Conditions. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 135 (3), 128–137. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2009)135:3(128)
50. Sartor, J., 2002. Ist die Regenwasserversickerung von bebauten Flächen wirklich naturnah? Wasser Abfall, 07–08, 24–28.
51. Selbig, W.R., and Bannerman, R.T., 2008. A comparison of runoff quantity and quality from two small basins undergoing implementation of conventional- and low-impact-development (LID) strategies. Cross Plains, Wisconsin, water years 1999–2005, Scientific Investigations Report 2008–5008. Reston, VA:U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). Retrieved from http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2008/5008/ [Accessed 11 July 2013].
52. Shuster, W.D., et al., 2005. Impacts of impervious surface on watershed hydrology:A review. Urban Water Journal, 2 (4), 263–275. doi:10.1080/15730620500386529
53. Sieker, F., et al., 2009. Konzept für bundeseinheitliche Anforderungen an die Regenwasserbewirtschaftung (Concept for standardized requirements for Stormwater Management). Dessau-Roßlau:Umweltbundesamt, Texte 19/2009, UBA-FB 001284. Dessau-Roßlau:Umweltbundesamt. Available Retrieved from:http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/publikation/long/3815.pdf [Accessed 11 March 2011].
54. Sieker, F., Schlottmann, P., and Zweynert, U., 2007. Ökologische und ökonomische Vergleichsbetrachtung zwischen dem Konzept der konventionellen Regenwasserentsorgung und dem Konzept der dezentralen Regenwasserbewirtschaftung. Texte 19/2007, UBA-FB 001001. Dessau-Roßlau:Umweltbundesamt. Retrieved from http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/publikation/long/3246.pdf [Accessed 11 March 2011].
55. Stahre, P., 2008. Blue-green fingerprints in the city of Malmö, Sweden. Malmö:VA SYD.
56. Stephenson, D., 1994. Comparison of the water balance for an undeveloped and a suburban catchment. Hydrological Science Journal, 39 (4), 295–307. doi:10.1080/02626669409492751
57. Stovin, V., 2010. The potential of green roofs to manage Urban Stormwater. Water and Environment Journal, 24 (3), 192–199. doi:10.1111/j.1747-6593.2009.00174.x
58. Urbonas, B., and Roesner, L.A., 1993. Hydrologic design for urban drainage and flood control. In D.R., Maidment (Ed.). Handbook of Hydrology (pp. 28.1–28.6). New York:McGraw Hill.
59. Urbonas, B., 2000. Assessment of stormwater best management practice effectiveness. In J.P., Heaney, R., Pitt, & R., Field (Eds.). Innovative Urban Wet-Weather Flow Management Systems (pp. 255–300). Cincinnati:Technomic publishing.
60. Urbonas, B., Guo, J., and MacKenzie, K., 2011. The Case for a Water Quality Capture Volume for Stormwater BMPs. Stormwater, 12 (7), 16–23.
61. US EPA - U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2000. Low Impact Development (LID) - A Literature Review, EPA-841-B-00-005. Washington, DC:US EPA. Retrieved from http://water.epa.gov/polwaste/green/upload/lid.pdf [Accessed 4 November 2011].
62. Zimmer, C.A., et al., 2007. Low-Impact-Development Practices for Stormwater:Implications for Urban Hydrology. Canadian Water Resource Journal, 32 (3), 193–212.