The Different Learning Outcomes of High School and College Students on a 3D-Printing STEAM Engineering Design Curriculum

International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2018, Pages 1047-1064

  Chien, Yu Hung ^a   Chu, Po Ying ^b  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b TATUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

3D printing; Curriculum; Engineering; Industrial design; STEAM; STEM

Indexed keywords

EID: 85021885496     PISSN: 15710068     EISSN: 15731774     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10763-017-9832-4     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Ahmed, S., Wallace, K. M., & Blessing, L. T. (2003). Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks. Research in Engineering Design, 14(1), 1–11
2. Atman, C. J., Adams, R. S., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., & Saleem, J. (2007). Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(4), 359–379
3. Atman, C. J., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., & Adams, R. (2005). Comparing freshman and senior engineering design processes: An in-depth follow-up study. Design Studies, 26(4), 325–357
4. Başar, A. G. Ç., & Ülkebaş, D. (2011). Diversity of industrial design education in Turkey and future prospects. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 981–987
5. Besemer, S. P., & Treffinger, D. J. (1981). Analysis of creative products: Review and synthesis. Journal of Creative Behavior, 15, 158–178
6. Blikstein, P., Kabayadondo, Z., Martin, A., & Fields, D. (2017). An assessment instrument of technological literacies in makerspaces and fablabs. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(1), 149–175
7. Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in P-12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 369–387
8. Bybee, R. W. (2010). What is STEM education? Science, 329, 996
9. Chang, Y. S. (2002). A study on creativity of virtual teams (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan
10. Corum, K., & Garofalo, J. (2015). Using digital fabrication to support student learning. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing, 1, 50–55
11. Domermuth, D. (2009). The pedagogy of form versus function for industrial design. Paper presented at the ASEE Southeast Section Conference, The Citadel, Charleston, SC
12. Eisenberg, M. (2013). 3D printing for children: What to build next? International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 1(1), 7–13
13. F1 in Schools (2017). All about the challenge. Retrieved from http://www.f1inschools.com/all-about-the-challenge/
14. Fan, S. C., & Yu, K. C. (2017). How an integrative STEM curriculum can benefit students in engineering design practices. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(1), 107–129
15. Hubel, V., & Lussow, D. B. (1984). Focus on designing. New York: McGraw-Hill
16. Kendall, M. G., & Smith, B. B. (1939). The problem of m rankings. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 10(3), 275–287
17. Kim, D., & Bolger, M. (2017). Analysis of Korean elementary pre-service teachers’ changing attitudes about integrated STEAM pedagogy through developing lesson plans. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(4), 587–605
18. Kwon, H. (2016). Effect of middle school students’ motivation to learn technology on their attitudes toward engineering. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(9), 2281–2294
19. Land, M. H. (2013). Full STEAM ahead: The benefits of integrating the arts into STEM. Procedia Computer Science, 20, 547–552
20. Lipson, H., & Kurman, M. (2013). Fabricated: The new world of 3D printing. New York: Wiley
21. Madsen, D. A., & Madsen, D. P. (2017). Engineering drawing and design (6th ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning
22. Mentzer, N., Huffman, T., & Thayer, H. (2014). High school student modeling in the engineering design process. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(3), 293–316
23. Milkova, L., Crossman, C., Wiles, S., & Allen, T. (2012). Engagement and skill development in biology students through analysis of art. CBE Life Sciences Education, 12(4), 687–700
24. Mote, C., Strelecki, K., & Johnson, K. (2014). Cultivating high-level organizational engagement to promote novel learning experiences in STEAM. The STEAM Journal, 1(2), 18
25. Newstetter, W. C., & McCracken, W. M. (2001). Novice conceptions of design: implications for the design of learning environments. Design Knowing and Learning: Cognition in Design Education, 1, 63–77
26. NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press
27. Norman, D. (2010). Why design education must change. Core, 77. Retrieved from http://www.core77.com/posts/17993/why-design-education-must-change-17993
28. 2-powered cars in middle school science. Learning & Leading with Technology, 31(5), 22–34
29. Park, D. Y., Park, M. H., & Bates, A. B. (2016a). Exploring young children’s understanding about the concept of volume through engineering design in a STEM activity: A case study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10763-016-9776-0
30. Park, H., Byun, S. Y., Sim, J., Han, H., & Baek, Y. S. (2016b). Teachers’ perceptions and practices of STEAM education in South Korea. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(7), 1739–1753
31. Quigley, C. F., & Herro, D. (2016). Finding the joy in the unknown: Implementation of STEAM teaching practices in middle school science and math classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 410–426
32. Roozenburg, N., van Breemen, E., & Mooy, S. (2008). A competency-directed curriculum for industrial design engineering. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, Barcelona, Spain
33. Snyder, T. J., Andrews, M., Weislogel, M., Moeck, P., Stone-Sundberg, J., Birkes, D.,.. Graft, J. (2014). 3D systems’ technology overview and new applications in manufacturing, engineering, science, and education. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing, 2, 169–176
34. Spanos, P. D., Castillo, D. H., Kougioumtzoglou, I. A., & Tapia, R. A. (2012). A nonlinear model for top fuel dragster dynamic performance assessment. Vehicle System Dynamics, 50(2), 281–297
35. Ulrich, K. T., & Eppinger, S. D. (2011). Product design and development (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education
36. Verner, I., & Merksamer, A. (2015). Digital design and 3D printing in technology teacher education. Procedia CIRP, 36, 182–186
37. Wells, J., Lammi, M., Gero, J., Grubbs, M. E., Paretti, M., & Williams, C. (2016). Characterizing design cognition of high school students: Initial analyses comparing those with and without pre-engineering experiences. Journal of Technology Education, 27(2), 78–91
38. Wicklein, R. C. (2006). Five good reasons for engineering as the focus for technology education. The Technology Teacher, 65(7), 25–29
39. Winston, A. (2014). Design education is “tragic” say Jonathan Ive. Dezeen Magazine. Retrieved from https://www.dezeen.com/2014/11/13/design-education-tragic-says-jonathan-ive-apple
40. Wordley, S., & Saunders, J. (2006). Aerodynamics for formula SAE: A numerical, wind tunnel and on-track study (Technical Paper No. 2006-01-0808). Monash Wind Tunnel, Mechanical Engineering Monash University, Australia: SAE International
41. Zande, R. V. (2017). Design education: Creating thinkers to improve the world. Lahham: Rowman & Littlefield