3D systems' technology overview and new applications in manufacturing, engineering, science, and education

3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 169-176

  Snyder, Trevor J ^a   Andrews, Mike ^a   Weislogel, Mark ^b   Moeck, Peter ^b   Stone Sundberg, Jennifer ^b   Birkes, Derek ^b   Hoffert, Madeline Paige ^b   Lindeman, Adam ^b   Morrill, Jeff ^b   Fercak, Ondrej ^b   Friedman, Sasha ^b   Gunderson, Jeff ^b   Ha, Anh ^b   Mccollister, Jack ^b   Chen, Yongkang ^b   Geile, John ^b   Wollman, Andrew ^b   Attari, Babak ^b   Botnen, Nathan ^b   Vuppuluri, Vasant ^b   Shim, Jennifer ^c   Kaminsky, Werner ^d   Adams, Dustin ^e   Graft, John ^f   more..

^a 3D Systems   (United States)

^b PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^e XEROX CORPORATION   (United States)

^f NASA JOHNSON SPACE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

3D PRINTERS; LAYERED MANUFACTURING;

3-D PRINTING; 3D SYSTEMS; CUSTOMER NEED; EVOLUTIONARY PROCESS; NEW APPLICATIONS;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 84991833448     PISSN: 23297662     EISSN: 23297670     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/3dp.2014.1502     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. 3D Systems Corp. www.3dsystems . com (last accessed August 25, 2014
2. Birkes D, Hoffert M, Lindeman A, Morrill J. 3D Systems Addimata, ME493 Final Report. Portland State University, Portland, OR, 2014
3. Fercak O, Friedman S, Gunderson J, et al. 3D Printed Mechanical Clock Design, ME493 Final Report. Portland State University, Portland, OR, 2014
4. Dori YJ, Barak MJ. Virtual and Physical Molecular Modeling: Fostering Model Perception and Spatial Understanding. Educ Technol Soc 2001; 4: 61-74
5. Wai J, Lubinski D, Benbow CP. Spatial ability for STEM domains: aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. J Educ Psychol 2009; 101: 817-835
6. Preece D, Williams SB, Lam R, Weller R. Let s get physical: advantages of a physical model over 3D computer models and textbooks in learning imaging anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 2013; 6: 216-224
7. Sorby S, Baartmans B. The development and assessment of a course for enhancing the 3-D spatial visualization skills of first year engineering students. J Eng Educ 2000; 89: 301-307
8. Hall SR, McMahon B (eds.). International Tables for Crystallography, Vol. G: Definition and Exchange of Crystallographic Data. www .iucr.org/resources/cif (last accessed August 25, 2014
9. Moeck P, Kaminsky W, Snyder T. Presentation and Answers to a Few Questions about 3D Printing of Crystallographic Models. Newsl Int Union Crystallogr 2014; 22: 7-. www.iucr.org/news/newsletter/volume-22/number-1/3d-printing (last accessed August 25, 2014
10. Kaminsky W. Werner Kaminsky s Homepage. http://cad4.cpac.washington.edu (last accessed August 25, 2014
11. Portland State University. Open Access Crystallography. http://nanocrystallography.research.pdx.edu (last accessed August 25, 2014
12. 3D Systems Corporation. Quickparts. www.3dsystems.com/quickparts (last accessed August 25, 2014
13. Wollman A, Weislogel M. New investigations in capillary fluidics using a drop tower. Exp Fluids 2013; 54: 1499
14. Wollman A, Snyder T, Pettit D, Weislogel M. Spontaneous capillarity -driven droplet eject i on. arXiv: 1209.3999v1 [physics.flu-dyn]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1209.3999 (last accessed August 25, 2014
15. Attari B, Botnen N, Chen Y, et al. Final Reports, Capillary Flow ME510. Portland State University, Portland, OR, 2014