A population level atlas of Mus musculus craniofacial skeleton and automated image-based shape analysis

Journal of Anatomy

Volumn 231, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 433-443

  Maga, A Murat ^a,b   Tustison, Nicholas J ^c   Avants, Brian B ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b SEATTLE CHILDREN S RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^d BIOGEN   (United States)

Author keywords

geometrics morphometrics; image processing; image based shape analysis; landmarking; microCT; segmentation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANATOMIC LANDMARK; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CRANIOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; FIRST CERVICAL VERTEBRA; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; INBRED MOUSE STRAIN; MANDIBLE; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MOUSE; MUS MUSCULUS; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SKULL; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; ANIMAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EVALUATION STUDY;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MICE; SKULL; X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 85021418671     PISSN: 00218782     EISSN: 14697580     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/joa.12645     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Adams DC, Otarola-Castillo E (2013) geomorph: an R package for the collection and analysis of geometric morphometric shape data. Methods Ecol Evol 4, 393–399.
2. Avants BB, Tustison NJ, Stauffer M, et al. (2014) The insight toolkit image registration framework. Front Neuroinform 8,44. Available at: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fninf.2014.00044/abstract [accessed 28 December 2016].
3. Bookstein FL (1989) Principal warps: thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 11(6), 567–585.
4. Bromiley PA, Schunke AC, Ragheb H, et al. (2014) Semi-automatic landmark point annotation for geometric morphometrics. Front Zool 11(1), 61.
5. Burgio G, Baylac M, Heyer E, et al. (2009) Genetic analysis of skull shape variation and morphological integration in the mouse using interspecific recombinant congenic strains between C57Bl/6 and mice of the Mus spretus species. Evolution 63(10), 2668–2686.
6. Cheverud JM, Hager R, Roseman C, et al. (2008) Genomic imprinting effects on adult body composition in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105(11), 4253–4258.
7. Desikan RS, Ségonne F, Fischl B, et al. (2006) An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. NeuroImage 31(3), 968–980.
8. Dryden IL, Mardia KM (2008) Statistical Shape Analysis. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
9. Evans AC, Janke AL, Collins DL, et al. (2012) Brain templates and atlases. NeuroImage 62(2), 911–922.
10. Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, et al. (2012) 3D slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network. Magn Reson Imaging 30(9), 1323–1341.
11. Gonzalez PN, Pavlicev M, Mitteroecker P, et al. (2016) Genetic structure of phenotypic robustness in the collaborative cross mouse diallel panel. J Evol Biol 29(9), 1737–1751.
12. Goodall C (1991) Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. J R Stat Soc. Series B (Methodol) 53(2), 285–339.
13. Hawrylycz MJ, Lein ES, Guillozet-Bongaarts AL, et al. (2012) An anatomically comprehensive atlas of the adult human brain transcriptome. Nature 489(7416), 391–399.
14. Johnson GA, Badea A, Brandenburg J, et al. (2010) Waxholm space: an image-based reference for coordinating mouse brain research. NeuroImage 53(2), 365–372.
15. Kirby A, Kang HM, Wade CM, et al. (2010) Fine mapping in 94 inbred mouse strains using a high-density haplotype resource. Genetics 185(3), 1081–1095.
16. Klein A, Andersson J, Ardekani BA, et al. (2009) Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration. NeuroImage 46(3), 786–802.
17. Klingenberg CP (2008) Morphological integration and developmental modularity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39(1), 115–132.
18. Klingenberg CP, Leamy LJ, Routman EJ, et al. (2001) Genetic architecture of mandible shape in mice: effects of quantitative trait loci analyzed by geometric morphometrics. Genetics 157(2), 785–802.
19. Klingenberg CP, Leamy LJ, Cheverud JM (2004) Integration and modularity of quantitative trait locus effects on geometric shape in the mouse mandible. Genetics 166(4), 1909–1921.
20. Kuan L, Li Y, Lau C, et al. (2015) Neuroinformatics of the Allen Mouse Brain Connectivity Atlas. Methods 73, 4–17.
21. Leamy LJ, Klingenberg CP, Sherratt E, et al. (2008) A search for quantitative trait loci exhibiting imprinting effects on mouse mandible size and shape. Heredity 101(6), 518–526.
22. Lorenz S, Weiner KS, Caspers J et al. (2017) Two New Cytoarchitectonic Areas on the Human Mid-Fusiform Gyrus. Cereb Cortex N Y N 1991 27, 373–385. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhv225.
23. Maga AM (2016) Post-natal growth of the craniofacial skeleton in male C57BL/6J mice. J Am Assoc Lab 55, 1–6.
24. Maga AM, Navarro N, Cunningham ML, et al. (2015) Quantitative trait loci affecting the 3D skull shape and size in mouse and prioritization of candidate genes in-silico. Front Physiol 6, 92.
25. Mandal PK, Mahajan R, Dinov ID (2012) Structural brain atlases: design, rationale, and applications in normal and pathological cohorts. J Alzheimers Dis, 31(3), S169–S188.
26. Mangin J-F, Lebenberg J, Lefranc S, et al. (2016) Spatial normalization of brain images and beyond. Med Image Anal 33, 127–133.
27. Márquez EJ, Cabeen R, Woods RP, et al. (2012) The measurement of local variation in shape. Evol Biol 39(3), 419–439.
28. Martinsson P-G, Rokhlin V, Tygert M (2011) A randomized algorithm for the decomposition of matrices. Appl Comput Harmon Anal 30(1), 47–68.
29. Mazziotta J, Toga A, Evans A, et al. (2001) A probabilistic atlas and reference system for the human brain: International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM). Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 356(1412), 1293–1322.
30. Mazziotta J, Toga A, Evans A, et al. (2011) Evaluation of registration methods on thoracic CT: the EMPIRE10 challenge. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 30(11), 1901–1920.
31. Navarro N, Maga AM (2016) Does 3D phenotyping yield substantial insights in the genetics of the mouse mandible shape? G3 Genes Genomes Genet, 6, 1153–1163. doi: 10.1534/g3.115.024372.
32. Pallares LF, Harr B, Turner LM, et al. (2014) Use of a natural hybrid zone for genomewide association mapping of craniofacial traits in the house mouse. Mol Ecol 23(23), 5756–5770.
33. Pallares LF, Carbonetto P, Gopalakrishnan S, et al. (2015) Mapping of craniofacial traits in outbred mice identifies major developmental genes involved in shape determination. PLoS Genet 11(11), e1005607.
34. Pallares LF, Turner LM, Tautz D (2016) Craniofacial shape transition across the house mouse hybrid zone: implications for the genetic architecture and evolution of between-species differences. Dev Genes Evol 226(3), 173–186.
35. Percival CJ, Huang Y, Jabs EW, et al. (2014) Embryonic craniofacial bone volume and bone mineral density in Fgfr2+/P253R and nonmutant mice. Dev Dyn 243(4), 541–551.
36. Percival CJ, Liberton DK, Pardo-Manuel de Villena F, et al. (2016) Genetics of murine craniofacial morphology: diallel analysis of the eight founders of the Collaborative Cross. J Anat 228(1), 96–112.
37. R Core Team (2014) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: http://www.R-project.org/.
38. Rohlf FJ, Slice D (1990) Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst Zool 39(1), 40–59.
39. Schunke AC, Bromiley PA, Tautz D, et al. (2012) TINA manual landmarking tool: software for the precise digitization of 3D landmarks. Front Zool 9, 6.
40. Siegel AF, Benson RH (1982) A robust comparison of biological shapes. Biometrics 38(2), 341–350.
41. Song G, Avants BB, Gee JC (2007) Multi-start Method with Prior Learning for Image Registration. In 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision. 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 1–8.
42. Tustison NJ, Cook PA, Klein A, et al. (2014) Large-scale evaluation of ANTs and FreeSurfer cortical thickness measurements. NeuroImage 99, 166–179.
43. Wolf JB, Cheverud JM, Roseman C, et al. (2008) Genome-wide analysis reveals a complex pattern of genomic imprinting in mice. PLoS Genet 4(6). Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2390766/ [accessed 8 March 2014].
44. Yoo TS, Ackerman MJ, Lorensen WE, et al. (2002) Engineering and algorithm design for an image processing Api: a technical report on ITK–the Insight Toolkit. Stud Health Technol Inform 85, 586–592.
45. Young R, Maga AM (2015) Performance of single and multi-atlas based automated landmarking methods compared to expert annotations in volumetric microCT datasets of mouse mandibles. Front Zool 12(1), 33.