Prevalence and determinants of preterm birth in Tehran, Iran: A comparison between logistic regression and decision tree methods

Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 195-200

  Amini, Payam ^a   Maroufizadeh, Saman ^a   Samani, Reza Omani ^a   Hamidi, Omid ^b   Sepidarkish, Mahdi ^a  

^a ROYAN INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE   (Iran)

^b HAMEDAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Decision tree; Infant; Logistic regression; Preterm birth; Risk factor

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DECISION TREE; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; INFERTILITY THERAPY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERVIEW; IRAN; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL RECORD; MULTIPLE PREGNANCY; PREECLAMPSIA; PREGNANT WOMAN; PREMATURE LABOR; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK FACTOR; RISK REDUCTION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH;

EID: 85021342247     PISSN: 22109099     EISSN: 22336052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.24171/j.phrp.2017.8.3.06     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. WHO: recommended definitions, terminology and format for statistical tables related to the perinatal period and use of a new certificate for cause of perinatal deaths. Modifications recommended by FIGO as amended October 14, 1976. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1977;56:247-53
2. Liu L, Oza S, Hogan D, et al. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality in 2000-13, with projections to inform post-2015 priorities: an updated systematic analysis. Lancet 2015;385:430-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61698-6
3. Mwaniki MK, Atieno M, Lawn JE, et al. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes after intrauterine and neonatal insults: a systematic review. Lancet 2012;379:445-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61577-8
4. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard MZ, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Lancet 2012;379:2162-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60820-4
5. Zeitlin J, Szamotulska K, Drewniak N, et al. Preterm birth time trends in Europe: a study of 19 countries. BJOG 2013;120:1356-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12281
6. Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, et al. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet 2008;371:75-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60074-4
7. Muglia LJ, Katz M. The enigma of spontaneous preterm birth. N Engl J Med 2010;362:529-35. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra0904308
8. Klebanoff MA, Keim SA. Epidemiology: the changing face of preterm birth. Clin Perinatol 2011;38:339-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2011.06.006
9. Kate RJ, Perez RM, Mazumdar D, et al. Prediction and detection models for acute kidney injury in hospitalized older adults. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2016;16:39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-016-0277-4
10. Kotsiantis SB. Supervised machine learning: a review of classification techniques. Informatica 2007;31:249-268
11. Rencher AC. Methods of multivariate analysis. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2003
12. Dietterich T. Ensemble methods in machine learning. In: Kittler J, Roli F, editors. Proceeding of 1st International Workshop on Multiple Classifier Systems. London: Springer-Verlag; 2000
13. Rokach L, Maimon O. Data mining with decision trees: theory and applications. Series in Machine Perception and Artificial Intelligence: Volume 69. New Jersey: World Scientific; 2014
14. Jenhani I, Amor NB, Elouedi Z. Decision trees as possibilistic classifiers. Int J Approx Reason 2008;48:784-807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2007.12.002
15. Detsky AS, Naglie G, Krahn MD, et al. Primer on medical decision analysis: part 2-building a tree. Med Decis Making 1997;17:126-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X9701700202
16. Mercer BM, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, et al. The preterm prediction study: prediction of preterm premature rupture of membranes through clinical findings and ancillary testing. The national institute of child health and human development maternal-fetal medicine units network. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:738-45. https://doi. org/10.1067/mob.2000.106766
17. Derakhshi B, Esmailnasab N, Ghaderi E, et al. Risk factor of preterm labor in the west of iran: a case-control study. Iran J Public Health 2014;43:499-506
18. Wang YA, Sullivan EA, Black D, et al. Preterm birth and low birth weight after assisted reproductive technology-related pregnancy in Australia between 1996 and 2000. Fertil Steril 2005;83:1650-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.12.033
19. Dunietz GL, Holzman C, McKane P, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of preterm birth among primiparas. Fertil Steril 2015;103:974-9.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015. 01.015
20. Morgen CS, Bjørk C, Andersen PK, et al. Socioeconomic position and the risk of preterm birth-a study within the Danish National Birth Cohort. Int J Epidemiol 2008;37:1109-20. https://doi. org/10.1093/ije/dyn112
21. Brett KM, Strogatz DS, Savitz DA. Employment, job strain, and preterm delivery among women in North Carolina. Am J Public Health 1997;87:199-204
22. Torloni MR, Betrán AP, Daher S, et al. Maternal BMI and preterm birth: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2009;22:957-70. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767050903042561
23. Nair SR, Tan LK, Mohd Ramli N, et al. A decision tree for differentiating multiple system atrophy from Parkinson's disease using 3-T MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2013;23:1459-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2759-9
24. Valero S, Daigre C, Rodríguez-Cintas L, et al. Neuroticism and impulsivity: their hierarchical organization in the personality characterization of drug-dependent patients from a decision tree learning perspective. Compr Psychiatry 2014;55:1227-33. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.03.021
25. Li XB. A scalable decision tree system and its application in pattern recognition and intrusion detection. Decis Support Syst 2005;41:112-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2004.06.016
26. Zhu M, Philpotts D, Sparks R, et al. A hybrid approach to combining CART and logistic regression for stock ranking. J Portf Manag 2011;38:100-9. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2011.38.1.100
27. Das U, Maiti T, Pradhan V. Bias correction in logistic regression with missing categorical covariates. J Stat Plan Inference 2010;140:2478-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2010.02.018
28. Long WJ, Griffith JL, Selker HP, et al. A comparison of logistic regression to decision-tree induction in a medical domain. Comput Biomed Res 1993;26:74-97
29. Chen MY. Predicting corporate financial distress based on integration of decision tree classification and logistic regression. Expert Syst Appl 2011;38:11261-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.173
30. Khemphila A, Boonjing V. Comparing performances of logistic regression, decision trees, and neural networks for classifying heart disease patients. Paper presented at: 2010 International Conference on Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications (CISIM); 2010 Oct 8-10; Krakow, Poland. IEEE, 2010. pp. 193-8. https://doi.org/10.1109/CISIM.2010.5643666
31. Li CP, Zhi XY, Ma J, et al. Performance comparison between logistic regression, decision trees, and multilayer perceptron in predicting peripheral neuropathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Chin Med J (Engl) 2012;125:851-7
32. Samanta B, Bird GL, Kuijpers M, et al. Prediction of periventricular leukomalacia. Part I: Selection of hemodynamic features using logistic regression and decision tree algorithms. Artif Intell Med 2009;46:201-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2008.12.005
33. Safiarian R, Amini P, Moez EK, et al. Risk group classification for bleeding after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a comparison of the logistic regression with decision tree models. Türk Gögüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi 2013;21:574-80. https://doi.org/10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2013.7680
34. Sledjeski EM, Dierker LC, Brigham R, et al. The use of risk assessment to predict recurrent maltreatment: A classification and regression tree analysis (CART). Prev Sci 2008;9:28-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-007-0079-0