Social class and prosocial behavior: current evidence, caveats, and questions

Current Opinion in Psychology

Volumn 18, Issue , 2017, Pages 6-10

  Piff, Paul K ^a   Robinson, Angela R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; MOTIVATION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL CLASS;

HUMANS; MOTIVATION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL CLASS; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION;

EID: 85021159390     PISSN: 2352250X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.06.003     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. Evans-Pritchard, E.E., The Nuer. 1940, Oxford University Press.
2. Piketty, T., Saez, E., Income inequality in the United States, 1913–1998. Q. J. Econ. 118 (2003), 1–39.
3. Parker, K., Yes, the Rich are Different. 2012, Pew Research Center.
4. Murray, C., Coming Apart: The State of White America, 1960–2010. 2012, Crown Forum.
5. Keltner, D., Kogan, A., Piff, P.K., Saturn, S.R., The sociocultural appraisals, values, and emotions (SAVE) framework of prosociality: core processes from gene to meme. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 65 (2014), 425–460.
6. Kraus, M.W., Piff, P.K., Keltner, D., Social class, sense of control, and social explanation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 97 (2009), 992–1004.
7. Johnson, W., Krueger, R.F., How money buys happiness: genetic and environmental processes linking finances and life satisfaction. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 90 (2006), 680–691.
8. Johnson, W., Krueger, R.F., Genetic effects on physical health: lower at higher income levels. Behav. Genet. 35 (2005), 579–590.
9. Snibbe, A.C., Markus, H.R., You can't always get what you want: educational attainment, agency, and choice. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 88 (2005), 703–720.
10. Stephens, N.M., Fryberg, S.A., Markus, H.R., When choice does not equal freedom: a sociocultural analysis of agency in working-class American contexts. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 2 (2011), 33–41.
11. Stephens, N.M., Markus, H.R., Townsend, S.S.M., Choice as an act of meaning: the case of social class. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 93 (2007), 814–830.
12. 12•• Kraus, M.W., Piff, P.K., Mendoza-Denton, R., Rheinschmidt, M.L., Keltner, D., Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: how the rich are different from the poor. Psychol. Rev. 119 (2012), 546–572 Reviews how and why social class influences social-cognitive tendencies and behavior, including prosocial tendencies.
13. Evans, G.W., Gonnella, C., Marcynyszyn, L.A., Gentile, L., Salpekar, N., The role of chaos in poverty and children's socioemotional adjustment. Psychol. Sci. 16 (2005), 560–565.
14. Mittal, C., Griskevicius, V., Sense of control under uncertainty depends on people's childhood environment: a life history theory approach. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 107 (2014), 621–637.
15. Lachman, M.E., Weaver, S.L., The sense of control as a moderator of social class differences in health and well-being. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 74 (1998), 763–773.
16. Kraus, M.W., Rheinschmidt, M.L., Piff, P.K., The intersection of resources and rank: signaling social class in face-to-face encounters. Fiske, S.T., Markus, H.R., (eds.) Facing Social Class: How Societal Rank Influences Interaction, 2012, Russell Sage, 152–172.
17. Stephens, N.M., Fryberg, S.A., Markus, H.R., Johnson, C., Covarrubias, R., Unseen disadvantage: how American universities’ focus on independence undermines the academic performance of first-generation college students. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 102 (2012), 1178–1197.
18. Bianchi, E.C., American individualism rises and falls with the economy: cross-temporal evidence that individualism declines when the economy falters. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 111 (2016), 567–584.
19. Greenfield, P.M., Keller, H., Fuligni, A., Maynard, A., Cultural pathways through universal development. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 54 (2003), 461–490.
20. 20• Lammers, J., Galinsky, A.D., Dubois, D., Rucker, D.D., Power and morality. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 6 (2015), 15–19 Reviews how aspects of power (including social class) influence morality, including self-interest.
21. Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D.H., Anderson, C., Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychol. Rev. 110 (2003), 265–284.
22. 22• Dietze, P., Knowles, E.D., Social class and the motivational relevance of other human beings: evidence from visual attention. Psychol. Sci. 27 (2016), 1517–1527 Provides evidence for social class differences in attention to others.
23. Kraus, M.W., Keltner, D., Signs of socioeconomic status: a thin-slicing approach. Psychol. Sci. 20 (2009), 99–106.
24. Na, J., Grossmann, I., Varnum, M.E.W., Kitayama, S., Gonzalez, R., Nisbett, R.E., Cultural differences are not always reducible to individual differences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107 (2010), 6192–6197.
25. 25•• Piff, P.K., Moskowitz, J., The class-compassion gap: how socioeconomic factors influence compassion. Seppala, E., Doty, J., Worline, M., Cameron, D., Brown, S., Simon-Thomas, E., (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Compassion Science, 2017, Oxford University Press, 317–330 Reviews theory and evidence linking social class to compassion and other-regarding behavior.
26. Kraus, M.W., Côté, S., Keltner, D., Social class, contextualism, and empathic accuracy. Psychol. Sci. 21 (2010), 1716–1723.
27. Frith, C.D., Frith, U., The neural basis of mentalizing. Neuron 50 (2006), 531–534.
28. Zaki, J., Weber, J., Bolger, N., Ochsner, K., The neural bases of empathic accuracy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106 (2009), 11382–11387.
29. Lieberman, M.D., Social cognitive neuroscience. Fiske, S.T., Gilbert, D.T., Lindzey, G., (eds.) Handbook of Social Psychology, 2010, McGraw-Hill, 143–193.
30. Mitchell, J.P., Inferences about mental states. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 364 (2009), 1309–1316.
31. Muscatell, K.A., Morelli, S.A., Falk, E.B., Way, B.M., Pfeifer, J.H., Galinsky, A.D., Lieberman, M.D., Dapretto, M., Eisenberger, N.I., Social status modulates neural activity in the mentalizing network. Neuroimage 60 (2012), 1771–1777.
32. Varnum, M.E.W., Blais, C., Hampton, R.S., Brewer, G.A., Social class affects neural empathic responses. Cult. Brain 3 (2015), 122–130.
33. Stellar, J.E., Manzo, V.M., Kraus, M.W., Keltner, D., Class and compassion: socioeconomic factors predict responses to suffering. Emotion 12 (2012), 449–459.
34. Campbell, W.K., Bonacci, A.M., Shelton, J., Exline, J.J., Bushman, B.J., Psychological entitlement: interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure. J. Pers. Assess. 83 (2004), 29–45.
35. Piff, P.K., Wealth and the inflated self: class, entitlement, and narcissism. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 40 (2014), 34–43.
36. Cai, H., Kwan, V.S.Y., Sedikides, C., A sociocultural approach to narcissism: the case of modern China. Eur. J. Pers. 26 (2012), 529–535.
37. Foster, J.D., Campbell, W.K., Twenge, J.M., Individual differences in narcissism: inflated self-views across the lifespan and around the world. J. Res. Pers. 37 (2003), 469–486.
38. Chapman, B.P., Fiscella, K., Kawachi, I., Duberstein, P.R., Personality, socioeconomic status, and all-cause mortality in the United States. Am. J. Epidemiol. 171 (2010), 83–92.
39. Batson, C.D., Shaw, L.L., Encouraging words concerning the evidence for altruism. Psychol. Inq. 2 (1991), 159–168.
40. 40•• Piff, P.K., Kraus, M.W., Côté, S., Cheng, B.H., Keltner, D., Having less, giving more: the influence of social class on prosocial behavior. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 99 (2010), 771–784 Exemplar of research linking higher social class to decreased prosocial behavior.
41. Miller, J., Kahle, S., Hastings, P., Roots and benefits of costly giving: young children's altruism is related to having less family wealth and more autonomic flexibility. Psychol. Sci. 26 (2015), 1038–1045.
42. Chen, Y., Zhu, L., Chen, Z., Family income affects children's altruistic behavior in the dictator game. PLoS One, 8, 2013, e80419, 10.1371/journal.pone.0080419.
43. Wang, L., Murnighan, J.K., Money, emotions, and ethics across individuals and countries. J. Bus. Ethics 125 (2014), 163–176.
44. Piff, P.K., Stancato, D.M., Côté, S., Mendoza-Denton, R., Keltner, D., Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109 (2012), 4086–4091.
45. 45• Dubois, D., Rucker, D.D., Galinsky, A.D., Social class, power, and selfishness: when and why upper and lower class individuals behave unethically. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 108 (2015), 436–449 Exemplar of social class differences in selfishness.
46. Piff, P.K., Stancato, D.M., Martinez, A.G., Kraus, M.W., Keltner, D., Class, chaos, and the construction of community. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 103 (2012), 949–962.
47. Taylor, S.E., Tend and befriend: biobehavioral bases of affiliation under stress. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 15 (2006), 273–277.
48. Hogg, M.A., Sherman, D.K., Dierselhuis, J., Maitner, A.T., Moffitt, G., Uncertainty, entitativity, and group identification. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 43 (2007), 135–142.
49. Shuper, P.A., Sorrentino, R.M., Otsubo, Y., Hodson, G., Walker, A.M., A theory of uncertainty orientation: implications for the study of individual differences within and across cultures. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 35 (2004), 460–480.
50. Independent Sector, Giving and Volunteering in the United States. 2001, Independent Sector.
51. James, R.N. III, Sharpe, D.L., The nature and causes of the U-shaped charitable giving profile. Nonprofit Volunt. Sect. Q. 36 (2007), 218–238.
52. Bureau of Labor and Statistics, Consumer Expenditures Survey. 2013, Bureau of Labor and Statistics.
53. 53• Korndörfer, M., Egloff, B., Schmukle, S.C., A large scale test of the effect of social class on prosocial behavior. PLoS One, 10, 2015, e0133193, 10.1371/journal.pone.0133193 Finds a positive relationship between social class and prosociality, and highlights the role of measurement, motivation, and context in shaping class differences in prosocial tendencies.
54. Hardy, C.L., Van Vugt, M., Nice guys finish first: the competitive altruism hypothesis. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 32 (2006), 1402–1413.
55. 55•• Kraus, M.W., Callaghan, B., Social class and prosocial behavior: the moderating role of public versus private contexts. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 7 (2016), 769–777 Documents how the social context (i.e., anonymity) can moderate class differences in prosociality.
56. Whillans, A.V., Caruso, E.M., Dunn, E.W., Both selfishness and selflessness start with the self: how wealth shapes responses to charitable appeals. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 70 (2017), 242–250.
57. Côté, S., Piff, P.K., Willer, R., For whom do the ends justify the means? Social class and utilitarian moral judgment. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 104 (2013), 490–503.
58. De Dreu, C.K.W., Balliet, D., Halevy, N., Parochial cooperation in humans: forms and functions of self-sacrifice in intergroup conflict. Adv. Motiv. Sci. 1 (2014), 1–47.
59. Van Doesum, N.J., Tybur, J.M., Van Lange, P.A.M., Class impressions: higher social class elicits lower prosociality. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 68 (2017), 11–20.
60. Adler, N.E., Epel, E.S., Castellazzo, G., Ickovics, J.R., Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychol. 19 (2000), 586–592.
61. 61•• Côté, S., House, J., Willer, R., High economic inequality leads higher-income individuals to be less generous. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 112 (2015), 15838–15843 Shows how inequality can moderate social class differences in prosocial behavior.