Genotypic complexity of fisher’s geometric model

Genetics

Volumn 206, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 1049-1079

  Hwang, Sungmin ^a   Park, Su Chan ^b   Krug, Joachim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^b The Catholic University of Korea   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Epistasis; Fitness landscape; Fitness peaks; Genotype phenotype map

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EPISTASIS; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; FISHER GEOMETRIC MODEL; GENE LOCUS; GENE MAPPING; GENOTYPE; GENOTYPE PHENOTYPE CORRELATION; GEOMETRY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MUTANT; MUTATION; PHASE TRANSITION; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TOPOGRAPHY; ADAPTATION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; GENETIC FITNESS; GENOTYPE; MODELS, GENETIC; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 85020673975     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: 19432631     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.116.199497     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Bank, C., R. T. Hietpas, A. Wong, D. N. Bolon, and J. D. Jensen, 2014 A bayesian MCMC approach to assess the complete distribution of fitness effects of new mutations: uncovering the potential for adaptive walks in challenging environments. Genetics 196: 841-852.
2. Bank, C., S. Matuszewski, R. T. Hietpas, and J. D. Jensen, 2016 On the (un)predictability of a large intragenic fitness landscape. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113: 14085-14090.
3. Blanquart, F., and T. Bataillon, 2016 Epistasis and the structure of fitness landscapes: are experimental fitness landscapes compatible with Fisher’s model? Genetics203: 847-862.
4. Blanquart, F., G. Achaz, T. Bataillon, and O. Tenaillon, 2014 Properties of selected mutations and genotypic landscapes under Fisher’s geometric model. Evolution 68: 3537-3554.
5. Bray, A. J., and M. A. Moore, 1980 Metastable states in spin glasses. J. Phys. C Solid State Phys. 13: L469-L476.
6. Chevin, L.-M., G. Martin, and T. Lenormand, 2010 Fisher’s model and the genomics of adaptation: Restricted pleiotropy, heterogeneous mutation, and parallel evolution. Evolution 64: 3213-3231.
7. Crona, K., D. Greene, and M. Barlow, 2013 The peaks and geometry of fitness landscapes. J. Theor. Biol. 317: 1-10.
8. de Visser, J. A. G. M., and J. Krug, 2014 Empirical fitness landscapes and the predictability of evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15: 480-490.
9. de Visser, J. A. G.M., S.-C. Park, and J. Krug, 2009 Exploring the effect of sex on empirical fitness landscapes. Am. Nat. 174: S15-S30.
10. Durrett, R., and V. Limic, 2003 Rigorous results for the NK model. Ann. Probab. 31: 1713-1753.
11. Evans, S. N., and D. Steinsaltz, 2002 Estimating some features of NK fitness landscapes. Ann. Appl. Probab. 12: 1299-1321.
12. Fisher, R. A., 1930 The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
13. Fraïsse, C., P. A. Gunnarsson, D. Roze, N. Bierne, and J. J. Welch, 2016 The genetics of speciation: insights from Fisher’s geometric model. Evolution 70: 1450-1464.
14. Franke, J., A. Klözer, J. A. G. M. de Visser, and J. Krug, 2011 Evolutionary accessibility of mutational pathways. PLoS Comp. Biol. 7: e1002134.
15. Gillespie, J. H., 1983 A simple stochastic gene substitution model. Theor. Popul. Biol. 23: 202-215.
16. Gillespie, J. H., 1984 Molecular evolution over the mutational landscape. Evolution 38: 1116-1129.
17. Gros, P.-A., H. Le Nagard, and O. Tenaillon, 2009 The evolution of epistasis and its links with genetic robustness, complexity and drift in a phenotypic model of adaptation. Genetics 182: 277-293.
18. Hayashi, Y., T. Aita, H. Toyota, Y. Husimi, I. Urabe et al., 2006 Experimental rugged fitness landscape in protein sequence space. PLoS One 1: e96.
19. Hermisson, J., and A. P. McGregor, 2008 Pleiotropic scaling and QTL data. Nature 456: E3.
20. Kauffman, S., and S. Levin, 1987 Towards a general theory of adaptive walks on rugged landscapes. J. Theor. Biol. 128: 11-45.
21. Kimura, M., 1983 The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
22. Lande, R., 1980 The genetic covariance between characters maintained by pleiotropic mutations. Genetics 94: 203-215.
23. Limic, V., and R. Pemantle, 2004 More rigorous results on the Kauffman-Levin model of evolution. Ann. Probab. 32: 2149-2178.
24. Martin, G., 2014 Fisher’s geometric model emerges as a property of complex integrated phenotypic networks. Genetics 197: 237-255.
25. Martin, G., S. F. Elena, and T. Lenormand, 2007 Distributions of epistasis in microbes fit predictions from a fitness landscape model. Nat. Genet. 39: 555-560.
26. Moura de Sousa, J. A., J. Alpendrinha, P. R. A. Campos, and I. Gordo, 2016 Competition and fixation of cohorts of adaptive mutations under Fisher geometrical model. PeerJ 4: e2256.
27. Neidhart, J., I. G. Szendro, and J. Krug, 2014 Adaptation in tunably rugged fitness landscapes: The rough mount fuji model. Genetics 198: 699-721.
28. Orr, H. A., 1998 The population genetics of adaptation: The distribution of factors fixed during adaptive evolution. Evolution 52: 935-949.
29. Orr, H. A., 2000 Adaptation and the cost of complexity. Evolution 54: 13-20.
30. Orr, H. A., 2002 The population genetics of adaptation: The adaptation of DNA sequences. Evolution 56: 1317-1330.
31. Orr, H. A., 2003 A minimum on the mean number of steps taken in adaptive walks. J. Theor. Biol. 220: 241-247.
32. Orr, H. A., 2005 The genetic theory of adaptation: a brief history. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6: 119-127.
33. Park, S.-C., and J. Krug, 2008 Evolution in random fitness landscapes: The infinite sites model. J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 2008: P04014.
34. Park, S.-C., and J. Krug, 2016 d-exceedance records and random adaptive walks. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 49: 315601.
35. Park, S.-C., I. G. Szendro, J. Neidhart, and J. Krug, 2015 Phase transition in random adaptive walks on correlated fitness landscapes. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 91: 042707.
36. Park, S.-C., J. Neidhart, and J. Krug, 2016 Greedy adaptive walks on a correlated fitness landscape. J. Theor. Biol. 397: 89-102.
37. Perfeito, L., A. Sousa, T. Bataillon, and I. Gordo, 2014 Rates of fitness decline and rebound suggest pervasive epistasis. Evolution 68: 150-162.
38. Poelwijk, F. J., D. J. Kiviet, D. M. Weinreich, and S. J. Tans, 2007 Empirical fitness landscapes reveal accessible evolutionary paths. Nature 445: 383-386.
39. Poelwijk, F. J., S. Tănase-Nicola, D. J. Kiviet, and S. J. Tans, 2011 Reciprocal sign epistasis is a necessary condition for multipeaked fitness landscapes. J. Theor. Biol. 272: 141-144.
40. Ram, Y., and L. Hadany, 2015 The probability of improvement in Fisher’s geometric model: a probabilistic approach. Theor. Popul. Biol. 99: 1-6.
41. Rokyta, D., P. Joyce, S. Caudle, C. Mille, C. Beisel et al., 2011 Epistasis between beneficial mutations and the phenotype - to-fitness map for a ssDNA virus. PLoS Genet. 7 e1002075.
42. Rozen, D. E., M. G. J. L. Habets, A. Handel, and J. A. G. M. de Visser, 2008 Heterogeneous adaptive trajectories of small populations on complex fitness landscapes. PLoS One 3 e1715.
43. Schenk, M. F., I.G. Szendro,M. L. Salverda, J. Krug, and J. A. G. M. de Visser, 2013 Patterns of epistasis between beneficial mutations in an antibiotic resistance gene. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30: 1779-1787.
44. Schmitt, A. O., and H. Herzel, 1997 Estimating the entropy of DNA sequences. J. Theor. Biol. 188: 369-377.
45. Schoustra, S., S. Hwang, J. Krug, and J. A. G. M. de Visser, 2016 Diminishing-returns epistasis among random beneficial mutations in a multicellular fungus. Proc. Biol. Sci. 283: 20161376.
46. Servedio, M. R., Y. Brandvain, S. Dhole, C. L. Fitzpatrick, E. E. Goldberg et al., 2014 Not just a theory-the utility of mathematical models in evolutionary biology. PLoS Biol. 12 e1002017.
47. Szendro, I. G., M. F. Schenk, J. Franke, J. Krug, and J. A. G. M. de Visser, 2013 Quantitative analyses of empirical fitness landscapes. J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 2013: P01005.
48. Tanaka, F., and S. F. Edwards, 1980 Analytic theory of the ground state properties of a spin glass. I. Ising spin glass. J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. 10 2769.
49. Tenaillon, O., 2014 The utility of Fisher’s geometric model in evolutionary genetics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 45 179-201.
50. Velenich, A., and J. Gore, 2013 The strength of genetic interactions scales weakly with mutational effects. Genome Biol. 14 R76.
51. Wagner, G. P., J. P. Kenney-Hunt, M. Pavlicev, J. R. Peck, D. Waxman et al., 2008 Pleiotropic scaling of gene effects and the ‘cost of complexity’. Nature 452: 470-472.
52. Waxman, D., and J. J. Welch, 2005 Fisher’s microscope and Haldane’s ellipse. Am. Nat. 166: 447-457.
53. Weinberger, E. D., 1991 Local properties of Kauffman’s N-k model: a tunably rugged energy landscape. Phys. Rev. A 44 6399-6413.
54. Weinreich, D. M., and J. L. Knies, 2013 Fisher’s geometric model of adaptation meets the functional synthesis: data on pairwise epistasis for fitness yields insights into the shape and size of phenotype space. Evolution 67 2957-2972.
55. Weinreich, D. M., R. A. Watson, and L. Chao, 2005 Sign epistasis and genetic constraint on evolutionary trajectories. Evolution 59 1165-1174.
56. Weinreich, D. M., Y. Lan, C. S. Wylie, and R. B. Heckendorn, 2013 Should evolutionary geneticists worry about higher-order epistasis? Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 23 700-707.
57. Zagorski, M., Z. Burda, and B. Waclaw, 2016 Beyond the hypercube: evolutionary accessibility of fitness landscapes with realistic mutational networks. PLoS Comp. Biol. 12 e1005218.