The peaks and geometry of fitness landscapes

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 317, Issue , 2013, Pages 1-10

  Crona, Kristina ^a   Greene, Devin ^a   Barlow, Miriam ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Directed acyclic graph (DAG); Epistasis; Fitness landscape; Geometric classification; Polytope

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; EPISTASIS; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; EVOLUTIONARY THEORY; FITNESS; GENOTYPE;

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; EPISTASIS; FITNESS LANDSCAPES; GENE INTERACTION; GENE MUTATION; GENOTYPE; GEOMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ALLELES; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; GENETIC FITNESS; GENETIC LOCI; GENOTYPE; HIV; MODELS, GENETIC;

EID: 84867425613     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: 10958541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.09.028     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Aita T., Iwakura M., Husimi Y. A cross-section of the fitness landscape of dihydrofolate reductase. Protein Eng. 2001, 14(Sep (9)):633-638.
2. Beerenwinkel N., Eriksson N., Sturmfels B. Conjunctive Bayesian networks. Bernoulli 2007, 13:893-909.
3. Beerenwinkel N., Pachter L., Sturmfels B. Epistasis and shapes of fitness landscapes. Statistica Sinica 2007, 17:1317-1342.
4. Beerenwinkel N., Pachter L., Sturmfels B., Elena S.F., Lenski R.E. Analysis of epistatic interactions and fitness landscapes using a new geometric approach. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2007, 7:60.
5. Bonhoeffer S., Chappey C., Parkin N.T., Whitcomb J.M., Petropoulos C.J. Evidence for positive epistasis in HIV-1. Science 2004, 306:1547-15501.
6. Carnerio M., Hartl D.L. Colloquium papers. adaptive landscapes and protein evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107(suppl 1):1747-1751.
7. Crona, K., Patterson, D., Stack, K., Greene, D., Goulart, C., Mahmudi, M., Jacobs, S.D., Kallmann, M., Barlow, M., 2012. Antibiotic resistance landscapes: a quantification of deviation of fitness data from classical models of fitness landscapes (manuscript).
8. De Loera J.A., Rambau J., Santos F. Triangulations. Applications, Structures and Algorithms. Number 25 in Algorithms and Computation in Mathematics 2010, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.
9. Desper R., Jiang F., Kallioniemi O.P., Moch H., Papadimitriou C.H., Schäffer A.A. Inferring tree models for oncogenesis from comparative genome hybridization data. Comput. Biol. 1999, 6:37-51.
10. Flyvbjerg H., Lautrup B. Evolution in a rugged fitness landscape. Phys. Rev. A 1992, 46:6714-6723.
11. Gillespie J.H. A simple stochastic gene substitution model. Theor. Pop. Biol. 1983, 23:202-215.
12. Gillespie J.H. The molecular clock may be an episodic clock. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1984, 81:8009-8013.
13. Goulart, C., Mahmudi, M., Crona, K., Jacobs, S.D., Kallmann, M., Greene, D., Barlow, M., 2012. Adaptive landscapes: a second chance for antibiotics (manuscript).
14. Kauffman S.A., Levin S. Towards a general theory of adaptive walks on rugged landscapes. J. Theor. Biol. 1987, 128:11-45.
15. Kauffman S.A., Weinberger E.D. The NK model of rugged fitness landscape and its application to maturation of the immune response. J. Theor. Biol. 1989, 141:211-245.
16. Kingman J.F.C. A simple model for the balance between selection and mutation. J. Appl. Prob. 1978, 15:1-12.
17. Kryazhimskiy S., Draghi J.A., Plotkin J.B. In evolution, the sum is less than its part. Science 2011, 332:1160-1161.
18. Kryazhimskiy S., Tkacik G., Plotkin J.B. The dynamics of adaptation on correlated fitness landscapes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106:18638-18643.
19. Macken C.A., Perelson A.S. Protein evolution on partially correlated landscapes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92:9657-9661.
20. Mani R., St.Onge R.P., Hartman J.L., Giaever G., Roth F.P. Defining Genetic Interaction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105:3461-3466.
21. Maynard Smith J. Natural selection and the concept of protein space. Nature 1970, 225:563-564.
22. Orr H.A. The population genetics of adaptation. the adaptation of DNA sequences. Evolution 2002, 56:1317-1330.
23. Orr H.A. The population genetics of adaptation on correlated fitness landscapes. the block model. Evolution 2006, 60:1113-1124.
24. Otto S.P., Lenormand T. Resolving the paradox of sex and recombination. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2002, 3:252-261.
25. Park S.C., Krug J. Evolution in random fitness landscapes. the infinite sites model. J. Stat. Mech. 2008, P04014.
26. Poelwijk F.J., Kiviet D.J., Weinreich D.M., Tans S.J. Empirical fitness landscapes reveal accessible evolutionary paths. Nature 2007, 445:383-386.
27. Poelwijk F.J., Sorin T.-N., Kiviet D.J., Tans S.J. Reciprocal sign epistasis is a necessary condition for multi-peaked fitness landscapes. J. Theor. Biol. 2011, 272(Mar 7 (1)):141-144.
28. Rokyta D.R., Beisel C.J., Joyce P. Properties of adaptive walks on uncorrelated landscapes under strong selection and weak mutation. J. Theor. Biol. 2006, 243:114.
29. Reidys M.C., Stadler F.P. Combinatorial landscapes. SIAM Rev. 2002, 44:3-54.
30. Segal M.R., Barbour J.D., Grant R.M. Relating HIV-1 sequence variation to replication capacity via trees and forests. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2004, 3:2.
31. Shpak M., Stadler P., Wagner G.P. Variables and system decomposition. applications to fitness landscape analysis. Theory in biosciences Theorie in den Biowissenschaften 2004, 123(1):33-68.
32. Weinreich D.M., Watson R.A., Chao L. Sign epistasis and genetic constraint on evolutionary trajectories. Evolution 2005, 59:1165-1174.
33. Wright S. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 1931, 16:97-159.
34. Ziegler G. Lectures on Polytopes. Graduate Texts in Mathematics 1995, vol. 152. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, New York.