ROTS: An R package for reproducibility-optimized statistical testing

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2017, Pages

  Suomi, Tomi ^a   Seyednasrollah, Fatemeh ^a   Jaakkola, Maria K ^a   Faux, Thomas ^a   Elo, Laura L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MASS SPECTROMETRY; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; PROTEINS; STATISTICAL TESTS; STATISTICS;

BIOCONDUCTORS; BIOLOGICAL DATA; EXPRESSION ANALYSIS; PROPERTY; PROTEOMICS; REPRODUCIBILITIES; STATISTICAL TESTING; STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE; T-STATISTICS; TEST STATISTICS;

RNA;

CASE REPORT; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE EXPRESSION; HUMAN; PROTEOMICS; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL; TRANSCRIPTOMICS; BIOLOGY; CELL CULTURE; CHEMISTRY; INTERNET; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PROCEDURES; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SOFTWARE;

PROTEIN;

CELLS, CULTURED; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; HUMANS; INTERNET; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, RNA; SOFTWARE;

EID: 85020112152     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005562     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Mukherjee S, Roberts SJ. A theoretical analysis of gene selection. Proceedings / IEEE Computational Systems Bioinformatics Conference, CSB IEEE Computational Systems Bioinformatics Conference. 2004; p. 131–41.
2. Qin LX, Kerr KF, Contributing Members of the Toxicogenomics Research ConsortiumEmpirical evaluation of data transformations and ranking statistics for microarray analysis. Nucleic acids research. 2004;32(18):5471–9. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh866 15479783
3. Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G, Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2001;98(9):5116–21. doi: 10.1073/pnas.091062498 11309499
4. Breitling R, Armengaud P, Amtmann A, Herzyk P, Rank products: a simple, yet powerful, new method to detect differentially regulated genes in replicated microarray experiments. FEBS letters. 2004;573(1–3):83–92. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.07.055 15327980
5. Smyth GK, Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology. 2005;3(1):1–25. doi: 10.2202/1544-6115.1027
6. Soneson C, Delorenzi M, A comparison of methods for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-91 23497356
7. Rapaport F, Khanin R, Liang Y, Pirun M, Krek A, Zumbo P, Mason CE, Socci ND, Betel D, Comprehensive evaluation of differential gene expression analysis methods for RNA-seq data. Genome Biology. 2013;14(9). doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-9-r95 24020486
8. Seyednasrollah F, Laiho A, Elo LL, Comparison of software packages for detecting differential expression in RNA-seq studies. Briefings in Bioinformatics. 2015;16(1):59–70. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbt086 24300110
9. Jaakkola MK, Seyednasrollah F, Mehmood A, Elo LL, Comparison of methods to detect differentially expressed genes between single-cell populations. Briefings in Bioinformatics. 2016;(February):bbw057. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbw057
10. Elo LL, Filén S, Lahesmaa R, Aittokallio T, Reproducibility-optimized test statistic for ranking genes in microarray studies. IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics / IEEE, ACM. 2008;5(3):423–31. doi: 10.1109/tcbb.2007.1078
11. Pursiheimo A, Vehmas AP, Afzal S, Suomi T, Chand T, Strauss L, et al. Optimization of Statistical Methods Impact on Quantitative Proteomics Data. Journal of Proteome Research. 2015;14(10):4118–4126. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00183 26321463
12. Seyednasrollah F, Rantanen K, Jaakkola P, Elo LL, ROTS: reproducible RNA-seq biomarker detector-prognostic markers for clear cell renal cell cancer. Nucleic acids research. 2016;44(1):e1. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv806 26264667
13. Bruderer R, Bernhardt OM, Gandhi T, Miladinović SM, Cheng LY, Messner S, et al. Extending the Limits of Quantitative Proteome Profiling with Data-Independent Acquisition and Application to Acetaminophen-Treated Three-Dimensional Liver Microtissues. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2015;14:1400–1410. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M114.044305 25724911
14. Tabb DL, Vega-Montoto L, Rudnick Pa, Variyath AM, Ham AJL, Bunk DM, et al. Repeatability and reproducibility in proteomic identifications by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of proteome research. 2010;9(2):761–76. doi: 10.1021/pr9006365 19921851
15. Rudnick PA, Clauser KR, Kilpatrick LE, Tchekhovskoi DV, Neta P, Blonder N, et al. Performance Metrics for Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Systems in Proteomics Analyses. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. 2010;9(2):225–241. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M900223-MCP200
16. Paulovich AG, Billheimer D, Ham AJL, Vega-Montoto L, Rudnick PA, Tabb DL, et al. Interlaboratory study characterizing a yeast performance standard for benchmarking LC-MS platform performance. Molecular & cellular proteomics: MCP. 2010;9(2):242–54. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M900222-MCP200
17. SEQC/MAQC-III ConsortiumA comprehensive assessment of RNA-seq accuracy, reproducibility and information content by the Sequencing Quality Control Consortium. Nature biotechnology. 2014;32(9):903–14. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2957 25150838
18. Jiang L, Schlesinger F, Davis CA, Zhang Y, Li R, Salit M, et al. Synthetic spike-in standards for RNA-seq experiments. Genome research. 2011;21(9):1543–51. doi: 10.1101/gr.121095.111 21816910
19. Law CW, Chen Y, Shi W, Smyth GK, voom: Precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts. Genome biology. 2014;15(2):R29. doi: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-2-r29 24485249
20. Robinson MD, Oshlack A, A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. Genome biology. 2010;11(3):R25. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-3-r25 20196867
21. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK, edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 2010;26(1):139–40. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616
22. McCarthy DJ, Chen Y, Smyth GK, Differential expression analysis of multifactor RNA-Seq experiments with respect to biological variation. Nucleic acids research. 2012;40(10):4288–97. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks042 22287627
23. Anders S, Huber W, Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome biology. 2010;11(10):R106. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r106 20979621
24. Björklund ÅK, Forkel M, Picelli S, Konya V, Theorell J, Friberg D, et al. The heterogeneity of human CD127+ innate lymphoid cells revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing. Nature immunology. 2016;17(4):451–460. doi: 10.1038/ni.3368 26878113
25. Kharchenko PV, Silberstein L, Scadden DT, Bayesian approach to single-cell differential expression analysis. Nature methods. 2014;11(7):740–2. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2967 24836921
26. Finak G, McDavid A, Yajima M, Deng J, Gersuk V, Shalek AK, et al. MAST: a flexible statistical framework for assessing transcriptional changes and characterizing heterogeneity in single-cell RNA sequencing data. Genome biology. 2015;16(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0844-5 26653891