Post-transcriptional regulation across human tissues

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2017, Pages

  Franks, Alexander ^a,f   Airoldi, Edoardo ^b,c   Slavov, Nikolai ^d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c BROAD INSTITUTE OF MIT AND HARVARD   (United States)

^d Northeastern University   (United States)

^e NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HISTOLOGY; TISSUE;

CELL TYPES; HUMAN TISSUES; MEASUREMENT NOISE; MRNA LEVELS; POST-TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATIONS; PROTEIN LEVEL; RELATIVE CONTRIBUTION; SOURCES OF VARIABILITY; TISSUE TYPES; TRANSCRIPT LEVEL;

PROTEINS;

MESSENGER RNA; PROTEOME;

ADRENAL GLAND TISSUE; ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ESOPHAGUS TISSUE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HEART TISSUE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; KIDNEY TISSUE; LUNG PARENCHYMA; OVARY TISSUE; PANCREAS TISSUE; PROSTATE TISSUE; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BLOOD LEVEL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, FUNCTION AND VARIABILITY; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS REGULATION; SALIVARY GLAND; SPLEEN TISSUE; STOMACH TISSUE; TESTIS TISSUE; THYROID GLAND TISSUE; UTERUS TISSUE; ANTIBODY SPECIFICITY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; PROTEIN DATABASE;

DATABASES, PROTEIN; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HUMANS; ORGAN SPECIFICITY; PROTEOME; RNA, MESSENGER; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

EID: 85020108418     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005535     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Sørlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, Aas T, Geisler S, Johnsen H, et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2001;98(19):10869–10874. doi: 10.1073/pnas.191367098
2. Slavov N, Dawson KA, Correlation signature of the macroscopic states of the gene regulatory network in cancer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009;106(11):4079–4084. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0810803106
3. Spellman PT, Sherlock G, Zhang MQ, Iyer VR, Anders K, Eisen MB, et al. Comprehensive identification of cell cycle–regulated genes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by microarray hybridization. Molecular biology of the cell. 1998;9(12):3273–3297. doi: 10.1091/mbc.9.12.3273 9843569
4. Slavov N, Macinskas J, Caudy A, Botstein D, Metabolic cycling without cell division cycling in respiring yeast. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United Statesof America. 2011;108(47):19090–19095. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1116998108
5. Slavov N, Airoldi EM, van Oudenaarden A, Botstein D, A conserved cell growth cycle can account for the environmental stress responses of divergent eukaryotes. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 2012;23(10):1986–1997. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E11-11-0961 22456505
6. Djebali S, Davis CA, Merkel A, Dobin A, Lassmann T, Mortazavi A, et al. Landscape of transcription in human cells. Nature. 2012;489(7414):101–108. doi: 10.1038/nature11233 22955620
7. Alberts B, Johnson A, Morgan JLD, Raff M, Roberts K, Walter P, Molecular Biology of the Cell.6th ed. Garland; 2014.
8. Kuersten S, Goodwin EB, The power of the 3′ UTR: translational control and development. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2003;4(8):626–637. doi: 10.1038/nrg1125 12897774
9. Hengst L, Reed SI, Translational control of p27Kip1 accumulation during the cell cycle. Science. 1996;271(5257):1861–1864. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5257.1861 8596954
10. Polymenis M, Schmidt EV, Coupling of cell division to cell growth by translational control of the G1 cyclin CLN3 in yeast. Genes & development. 1997;11(19):2522. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.19.2522
11. Daran-Lapujade P, Rossell S, van Gulik WM, Luttik MA, de Groot MJ, Slijper M, et al. The fluxes through glycolytic enzymes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are predominantly regulated at posttranscriptional levels. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2007;104(40):15753–15758. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707476104
12. Slavov N, Budnik B, Schwab D, Airoldi E, van Oudenaarden A, Constant Growth Rate Can Be Supported by Decreasing Energy Flux and Increasing Aerobic Glycolysis. Cell Reports. 2014;7:705–714. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.03.057 24767987
13. Gygi SP, Rochon Y, Franza BR, Aebersold R, Correlation between protein and mRNA abundance in yeast. Molecular and cellular biology. 1999;19(3):1720–1730. doi: 10.1128/MCB.19.3.1720 10022859
14. Smits AH, Lindeboom RG, Perino M, van Heeringen SJ, Veenstra GJC, Vermeulen M, Global absolute quantification reveals tight regulation of protein expression in single Xenopus eggs. Nucleic acids research. 2014;42(15):9880–9891. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku661 25056316
15. Schwanhäusser B, Busse D, Li N, Dittmar G, Schuchhardt J, Wolf J, et al. Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control. Nature. 2011;473(7347):337–342. doi: 10.1038/nature10098 21593866
16. Li JJ, Bickel PJ, Biggin MD, System wide analyses have underestimated protein abundances and the importance of transcription in mammals. PeerJ. 2014;2:e270. doi: 10.7717/peerj.270 24688849
17. Csárdi G, Franks A, Choi DS, Airoldi EM, Drummond DA, Accounting for experimental noise reveals that mRNA levels, amplified by post-transcriptional processes, largely determine steady-state protein levels in yeast. PLoS Genetics. 2015;11(5):e1005206. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005206 25950722
18. Jovanovic M, Rooney MS, Mertins P, Przybylski D, Chevrier N, Satija R, et al. Dynamic profiling of the protein life cycle in response to pathogens. Science. 2015;347(6226):1259038. doi: 10.1126/science.1259038 25745177
19. Cheng Z, Teo G, Krueger S, Rock TM, Koh HW, Choi H, et al. Differential dynamics of the mammalian mRNA and protein expression response to misfolding stress. Molecular systems biology. 2016;12(1):855. doi: 10.15252/msb.20156423 26792871
20. Wilhelm M, Schlegl J, Hahne H, Gholami A, Lieberenz M, et al. Mass-spectrometry-based draft of the human proteome. Nature. 2014;509:582–587. doi: 10.1038/nature13319 24870543
21. Kim MS, Pinto SM, Getnet D, Nirujogi RS, Manda SS, Chaerkady R, et al. A draft map of the human proteome. Nature. 2014;509(7502):575–581. doi: 10.1038/nature13302 24870542
22. Edfors F, Danielsson F, Hallström BM, Käll L, Lundberg E, Pontén F, et al. Gene specific correlation of RNA and protein levels in human cells and tissues. Molecular Systems Biology. 2016;12(10):883
23. Blyth CR, On Simpson’s paradox and the sure-thing principle. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1972;67(338):364–366. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1972.10482387
24. Marioni JC, Mason CE, Mane SM, Stephens M, Gilad Y, RNA-seq: an assessment of technical reproducibility and comparison with gene expression arrays. Genome research. 2008;18(9):1509–1517. doi: 10.1101/gr.079558.108 18550803
25. Consortium SI, et al. A comprehensive assessment of RNA-seq accuracy, reproducibility and information content by the Sequencing Quality Control Consortium. Nature Biotechnology. 2014;32(9):903–914. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2957
26. Peng M, Taouatas N, Cappadona S, van Breukelen B, Mohammed S, Scholten A, et al. Protease bias in absolute protein quantitation. Nature methods. 2012;9(6):524–525. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2031 22669647
27. Ong SE, Blagoev B, Kratchmarova I, Kristensen DB, Steen H, Pandey A, et al. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Molecular & cellular proteomics. 2002;1(5):376–386. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M200025-MCP200
28. Blagoev B, Ong SE, Kratchmarova I, Mann M, Temporal analysis of phosphotyrosine-dependent signaling networks by quantitative proteomics. Nature biotechnology. 2004;22(9):1139–1145. doi: 10.1038/nbt1005 15314609
29. Djebali S, Davis CA, Merkel A, Dobin A, Lassmann T, Mortazavi A, et al. Landscape of transcription in human cells. Nature. 2012;489(7414):101–108. doi: 10.1038/nature11233 22955620
30. Fagerberg L, Hallström BM, Oksvold P, Kampf C, Djureinovic D, Odeberg J, et al. Analysis of the human tissue-specific expression by genome-wide integration of transcriptomics and antibody-based proteomics. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. 2014;13(2):397–406. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M113.035600
31. Consortium GO, et al. The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource. Nucleic acids research. 2004;32(suppl 1):D258–D261. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh036
32. Hall JE, Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology: Enhanced E-book.Elsevier Health Sciences; 2010.
33. Budnik B, Levy E, Slavov N, Mass-spectrometry of single mammalian cells quantifies proteome heterogeneity during cell differentiation. bioRxiv. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1101/102681
34. McIsaac RS, Silverman SJ, McClean MN, Gibney PA, Macinskas J, Hickman MJ, et al. Fast-acting and nearly gratuitous induction of gene expression and protein depletion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Molecular biology of the cell. 2011;22(22):4447–4459. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E11-05-0466 21965290
35. Mauro VP, Edelman GM, The ribosome filter hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2002;99(19):12031–12036. doi: 10.1073/pnas.192442499
36. Mauro VP, Matsuda D, Translation regulation by ribosomes: Increased complexity and expanded scope. RNA biology. 2016;13(9):748–755. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2015.1107701 26513496
37. Slavov N, Semrau S, Airoldi E, Budnik B, van Oudenaarden A, Differential stoichiometry among core ribosomal proteins. Cell Reports. 2015;13:865–873. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.09.056 26565899
38. Preiss T, All Ribosomes Are Created Equal. Really?Trends in biochemical sciences. 2016;41(2):121–123. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2015.11.009 26682497
39. Gebauer F, Hentze MW, Molecular mechanisms of translational control. Nature reviews Molecular cell biology. 2004;5(10):827–835. doi: 10.1038/nrm1488 15459663
40. Rojas-Duran MF, Gilbert WV, Alternative transcription start site selection leads to large differences in translation activity in yeast. RNA. 2012;18(12):2299–2305. doi: 10.1261/rna.035865.112 23105001
41. Castello A, Fischer B, Eichelbaum K, Horos R, Beckmann BM, Strein C, et al. Insights into RNA biology from an atlas of mammalian mRNA–binding proteins. Cell. 2012;149(6):1393–1406. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.031 22658674
42. Arribere JA, Gilbert WV, Roles for transcript leaders in translation and mRNA decay revealed by transcript leader sequencing. Genome research. 2013;23(6):977–987. doi: 10.1101/gr.150342.112 23580730
43. Katz Y, Li F, Lambert NJ, Sokol ES, Tam WL, Cheng AW, et al. Musashi proteins are post-transcriptional regulators of the epithelial-luminal cell state. eLife. 2014;3:e03915. doi: 10.7554/eLife.03915 25380226
44. Cox J, Mann M, MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized ppb-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nature biotechnology. 2008;26(12):1367–1372. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1511 19029910
45. Franks AM, Csárdi G, Drummond DA, Airoldi EM, Estimating a structured covariance matrix from multi-lab measurements in high-throughput biology. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 2015;110(509):27–44. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2014.964404 25954056
46. Spearman C, The proof and measurement of association between two things. Am J Psychol. 1904;15:72–101. doi: 10.2307/1412159
47. Zimmerman D, Williams R, Properties of the spearman correction for attenuation for normal and realistic non-normal distributions. Applied Psychological Measurement. 1997;21(3):253270. doi: 10.1177/01466216970213005
48. Slavov N, Botstein D, Coupling among growth rate response, metabolic cycle, and cell division cycle in yeast. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 2011;22(12):1997–2009. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E11-02-0132 21525243
49. Storey JD, The positive false discovery rate: A Bayesian interpretation and the q-value. Annals of statistics. 2003; p. 2013–2035. doi: 10.1214/aos/1074290335
50. Benjamini Y, Yekutieli D, The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Annals of statistics. 2001; p. 1165–1188.