Targeted recombination between homologous chromosomes for precise breeding in tomato

Nature Communications

Volumn 8, Issue , 2017, Pages

  Hayut, Shdema Filler ^a   Bessudo, Cathy Melamed ^a   Levy, Avraham A ^a  

^a WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; BIOASSAY; BREEDING; CHROMOSOME; DNA; EDIBLE SPECIES; FRUIT; GENE EXPRESSION; IMMUNE RESPONSE; MUTATION;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRISPR CAS SYSTEM; DNA END JOINING REPAIR; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; GENE; GENE INDUCTION; GENE MUTATION; HETEROZYGOTE; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; MUTANT; NONHUMAN; PLANT BREEDING; PSY1 GENE; TOMATO; WILD TYPE; GENE TARGETING; GENETICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; MUTATION; PLANT GENOME; PROCEDURES; RECOMBINATION REPAIR; TRANSGENIC PLANT; WHOLE GENOME SEQUENCING;

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; LYCOPERSICON PIMPINELLIFOLIUM;

PLANT PROTEIN;

CRISPR-CAS SYSTEMS; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; GENE TARGETING; GENOME, PLANT; HETEROZYGOTE; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; MUTATION; PLANT BREEDING; PLANT PROTEINS; PLANTS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; RECOMBINATIONAL DNA REPAIR; WHOLE GENOME SEQUENCING;

EID: 85019997306     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15605     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Baudat, F., Imai, Y., & de Massy, B. Meiotic recombination in mammals: localization and regulation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 794-806 (2013).
2. Li, J., Hsia, A.-P., & Schnable, P. S. Recent advances in plant recombination. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 10, 131-135 (2007).
3. Lieberman-Lazarovich, M., & Levy, A. A. Homologous recombination in plants: an antireview. Methods Mol. Biol. 701, 51-65 (2011).
4. Mehta, A., & Haber, J. E. Sources of DNA double-strand breaks and models of recombinational DNA repair. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 6, a016428 (2014).
5. Puchta, H., & Fauser, F. in Advances in New Technology for Targeted Modification of Plant Genomes. 1-20 (Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2015).
6. Amiard, S., Gallego, M. E., & White, C. I. Signaling of double strand breaks and deprotected telomeres in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 4, 405 (2013).
7. Bleuyard, J.-Y., Gallego, M. E., & White, C. I. Recent advances in understanding of the DNA double-strand break repair machinery of plants. DNA Repair 5, 1-12 (2006).
8. Decottignies, A. Alternative end-joining mechanisms: a historical perspective. Front. Genet. 4, 48 (2013).
9. Gorbunova, V., & Levy, A. How plants make ends meet: DNA double-strand break repair. Trends Plant Sci. 4, 263-269 (1999).
10. Puchta, H. The repair of double-strand breaks in plants: mechanisms and consequences for genome evolution. J. Exp. Bot. 56, 1-14 (2005).
11. Edlinger, B., & Schlögelhofer, P. Have a break: determinants of meiotic DNA double strand break (DSB) formation and processing in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 1545-1563 (2011).
12. Mercier, R., Mézard, C., Jenczewski, E., Macaisne, N., & Grelon, M. The molecular biology of meiosis in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 66, 297-327 (2015).
13. Puchta, H., Dujon, B., & Hohn, B. Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 5055-5060 (1996).
14. Shalev, G., & Levy, A. A. The maize transposable element Ac induces recombination between the donor site and an homologous ectopic sequence. Genetics 146, 1143-1151 (1997).
15. Marton, I., et al. Nontransgenic genome modification in plant cells. Plant Physiol. 154, 1079-1087 (2010).
16. Cermak, T., et al. Efficient design and assembly of custom TALEN and other TAL effector-based constructs for DNA targeting. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, e82 (2011).
17. Shan, Q., Wang, Y., Li, J., & Gao, C. Genome editing in rice and wheat using the CRISPR/Cas system. Nat. Protoc. 9, 2395-2410 (2014).
18. Fauser, F., Schiml, S., & Puchta, H. Both CRISPR/Cas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genome engineering in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 79, 348-359 (2014).
19. Schiml, S., Fauser, F., & Puchta, H. The CRISPR/Cas system can be used as nuclease for in planta gene targeting and as paired nickases for directed mutagenesis in Arabidopsis resulting in heritable progeny. Plant J. 80, 1139-1150 (2014).
20. Butler, N. M., Baltes, N. J., Voytas, D. F., & Douches, D. S. Geminivirusmediated genome editing in potato (Solanum tuberosum L) using sequencespecific nucleases. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 1045 (2016).
21. Gorbunova, V., & Levy, A. A. Non-homologous DNA end joining in plant cells is associated with deletions and filler DNA insertions. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 4650-4657 (1997).
22. Lloyd, A. H., et al. Single molecule PCR reveals similar patterns of nonhomologous DSB repair in tobacco and arabidopsis. PLoS ONE 7, e32255 (2012).
23. Charbonnel, C., Allain, E., Gallego, M. E., & White, C. I. Kinetic analysis of DNA double-strand break repair pathways in Arabidopsis. DNA Repair 10, 611-619 (2011).
24. Ma, X., Zhu, Q., Chen, Y., & Liu, Y.-G. CRISPR/Cas9 platforms for genome editing in plants: developments and applications. Mol. Plant 9, 961-974 (2016).
25. Brooks, C., Nekrasov, V., Lippman, Z. B., & Van Eck, J. Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-Associated9 system. Plant Physiol. 166, 1292-1297 (2014).
26. Cermák, T., et al. High-frequency, precise modification of the tomato genome. Genome Biol. 16, 232 (2015).
27. Puchta, H., Swoboda, P., & Hohn, B. Induction of intrachromosomal homologous recombination in whole plants. Plant J. 7, 203-210 (1995).
28. Orel, N., Kyryk, A., & Puchta, H. Different pathways of homologous recombination are used for the repair of double-strand breaks within tandemly arranged sequences in the plant genome. Plant J. 35, 604-612 (2003).
29. Molinier, J., Ries, G., Bonhoeffer, S., & Hohn, B. Interchromatid and interhomolog recombination in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 16, 342-352 (2004).
30. Rubin, E., & Levy, A. A. Abortive gap repair: underlying mechanism for Ds element formation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 6294-6302 (1997).
31. Puchta, H., et al. Double-strand break-induced recombination between ectopic homologous sequences in somatic plant cells. Genetics 152, 1173-1181 (1999).
32. Athma, P., & Peterson, T. Ac induces homologous recombination at the maize P locus. Genetics 128, 163-173 (1991).
33. Lowe, B., Mathern, J., & Hake, S. Active mutator elements suppress the knotted phenotype and increase recombination at the Kn1-O tandem duplication. Genetics 132, 813-822 (1992).
34. Dooner, H. K., & Mart?nez-Férez, I. M. Recombination occurs uniformly within the bronze gene, a meiotic recombination hotspot in the maize genome. Plant Cell 9, 1633-1646 (1997).
35. Rosu, S., et al. Robust crossover assurance and regulated interhomolog access maintain meiotic crossover number. Science 334, 1286-1289 (2011).
36. Preston, C. R., & Engels, W. R. P-element-induced male recombination and gene conversion in Drosophila. Genetics 144, 1611-1622 (1996).
37. Bétermier, M., et al. Is Non-homologous end-joining really an inherently errorprone process? PLoS Genet. 10, e1004086 (2014).
38. Vu, G. T. H., et al. Repair of site-specific dna double-strand breaks in barley occurs via diverse pathways primarily involving the sister chromatid. Plant Cell 26, 2156-2167 (2014).
39. Kachanovsky, D. E., Filler, S., Isaacson, T., & Hirschberg, J. Epistasis in tomato color mutations involves regulation of phytoene synthase 1 expression by ciscarotenoids. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 19021-19026 (2012).
40. Gisler, B., Salomon, S., & Puchta, H. The role of double-strand break-induced allelic homologous recombination in somatic plant cells. Plant J. 32, 277-284 (2002).
41. Dulieu, H. L. Somatic variations on a yellow mutant in Nicotiana tabacum L. (a1+/a1a2+/a2) I. Non-reciprocal genetic events occurring in leaf cells. Mutat. Res. Mol. Mech. Mutagen. 25, 289-304 (1974).
42. Carlson, P. S. Mitotic crossing-over in a higher plant. Genet. Res. 24, 109-112 (2016).
43. Mercier, R., et al. Two meiotic crossover classes cohabit in arabidopsis: one is dependent on MER3, whereas the other one is not. Curr. Biol. 15, 692-701 (2005).
44. Drouaud, J., et al. Contrasted patterns of crossover and non-crossover at Arabidopsis thaliana meiotic recombination hotspots. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003922 (2013).
45. Sweetser, D. B., Hough, H., Whelden, J. F., Arbuckle, M., & Nickoloff, J. A. Fineresolution mapping of spontaneous and double-strand break-induced gene conversion tracts in saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals reversible mitotic conversion polarity. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 3863-3875 (1994).
46. Tsaponina, O., & Haber, J. E. Frequent Interchromosomal template switches during gene conversion in S. cerevisiae. Mol. Cell 55, 615-625 (2014).
47. Gorbunova, V., et al. A new hyperrecombinogenic mutant of Nicotiana tabacum. Plant J. 24, 601-611 (2000).
48. Johnson, R. A., Gurevich, V., Filler, S., Samach, A., & Levy, A. A. Comparative assessments of CRISPR-Cas nucleases? cleavage efficiency in planta. Plant Mol. Biol. 87, 143-156 (2015).
49. Waibel, F., & Filipowicz, W. U6 snRNA genes of arabidopsis are transcribed by RNA polymerase III but contain the same two upstream promoter elements as RNA polymerase ll-Transcribed U-snRNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 3451-3458 (1990).
50. Li, X., Jiang, D., Yong, K., & Zhang, D. Varied Transcriptional Efficiencies of Multiple Arabidopsis U6 Small Nuclear RNA Genes. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 49, 222-229 (2007).
51. McCormick, S Plant Tissue Culture Manual 311-319 (Springer, 1991).
52. Sarrion-Perdigones, A., et al. Goldenbraid: an iterative cloning system for standardized assembly of reusable genetic modules. PLoS ONE 6, e21622 (2011).
53. Blecher-Gonen, R., et al. High-Throughput chromatin immunoprecipitation for genome-wide mapping of in vivo protein-DNA interactions and epigenomic states. Nat. Protoc. 8, 539-554 (2013).