Noninvasive Deep Brain Stimulation via Temporally Interfering Electric Fields

Cell

Volumn 169, Issue 6, 2017, Pages 1029-1041.e16

  Grossman, Nir ^a,b,c,d   Bono, David ^e   Dedic, Nina ^a   Kodandaramaiah, Suhasa B ^a,f   Rudenko, Andrii ^a,g   Suk, Ho Jun ^a,b   Cassara, Antonino M ^h   Neufeld, Esra ^h   Kuster, Niels ^h,i   Tsai, Li Huei ^a,j   Pascual Leone, Alvaro ^c   Boyden, Edward S ^a,b,e,j  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^e Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

^f University of Minnesota   (United States)

^g CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^h FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES IN SOCIETY IT IS   (Switzerland)

ⁱ ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^j BROAD INSTITUTE OF MIT AND HARVARD   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

brain; cortex; deep brain stimulation; electromagnetic; hippocampus; neuromodulation; noninvasive; optogenetics; transcranial direct current stimulation; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Indexed keywords

CASPASE 3; HISTONE H2AX;

AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; ASTROCYTE; AUTOMATED PATCH CLAMP; BRAIN CELL; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; BRAIN REGION; BRAIN TEMPERATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRIC CURRENT; ELECTRIC FIELD; ELECTRODE IMPLANT; ELECTROMAGNETISM; FIRING RATE; HIPPOCAMPUS; MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; MICROGLIA; MOTOR CORTEX; MOUSE; NERVE CELL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEIZURE; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ANIMAL; C57BL MOUSE; DEVICES; ELECTRODE; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION;

ANIMALS; DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION; ELECTRODES; HIPPOCAMPUS; MALE; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; NEURONS; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION;

EID: 85019971518     PISSN: 00928674     EISSN: 10974172     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.024     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Chaieb, L., Antal, A., Paulus, W., Transcranial alternating current stimulation in the low kHz range increases motor cortex excitability. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 29 (2011), 167–175.
2. Chen, R., Romero, G., Christiansen, M.G., Mohr, A., Anikeeva, P., Wireless magnetothermal deep brain stimulation. Science 347 (2015), 1477–1480.
3. Cruz, J.C., Tseng, H.C., Goldman, J.A., Shih, H., Tsai, L.H., Aberrant Cdk5 activation by p25 triggers pathological events leading to neurodegeneration and neurofibrillary tangles. Neuron 40 (2003), 471–483.
4. Cuellar, J.M., Alataris, K., Walker, A., Yeomans, D.C., Antognini, J.F., Effect of high-frequency alternating current on spinal afferent nociceptive transmission. Neuromodulation 16 (2013), 318–327 discussion 327.
5. D'Amelio, M., Sheng, M., Cecconi, F., Caspase-3 in the central nervous system: beyond apoptosis. Trends Neurosci. 35 (2012), 700–709.
6. Dell, R.B., Holleran, S., Ramakrishnan, R., Sample size determination. ILAR J. 43 (2002), 207–213.
7. Dobbin, M.M., Madabhushi, R., Pan, L., Chen, Y., Kim, D., Gao, J., Ahanonu, B., Pao, P.C., Qiu, Y., Zhao, Y., Tsai, L.H., SIRT1 collaborates with ATM and HDAC1 to maintain genomic stability in neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 16 (2013), 1008–1015.
8. Dragunow, M., Robertson, H.A., Kindling stimulation induces c-fos protein(s) in granule cells of the rat dentate gyrus. Nature 329 (1987), 441–442.
9. Eng, L.F., Ghirnikar, R.S., Lee, Y.L., Glial fibrillary acidic protein: GFAP-thirty-one years (1969-2000). Neurochem. Res. 25 (2000), 1439–1451.
10. Gradinaru, V., Mogri, M., Thompson, K.R., Henderson, J.M., Deisseroth, K., Optical deconstruction of parkinsonian neural circuitry. Science 324 (2009), 354–359.
11. Greenberg, B.D., Gabriels, L.A., Malone, D.A. Jr., Rezai, A.R., Friehs, G.M., Okun, M.S., Shapira, N.A., Foote, K.D., Cosyns, P.R., Kubu, C.S., et al. Deep brain stimulation of the ventral internal capsule/ventral striatum for obsessive-compulsive disorder: worldwide experience. Mol. Psychiatry 15 (2010), 64–79.
12. Hasgall, P.A., Di Gennaro, F., Baumgartner, C., Neufeld, E., Gosselin, M.C., Payne, D., Klingenböck, A., and Kuster, N. (2015). IT'IS database for thermal and electromagnetic parameters of biological tissues, version 3.0. doi: 10.13099/VIP21000-03-0, https://www.itis.ethz.ch/virtual-population/tissue-properties/overview/.
13. Histed, M.H., Bonin, V., Reid, R.C., Direct activation of sparse, distributed populations of cortical neurons by electrical microstimulation. Neuron 63 (2009), 508–522.
14. Hutcheon, B., Yarom, Y., Resonance, oscillation and the intrinsic frequency preferences of neurons. Trends Neurosci. 23 (2000), 216–222.
15. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric and magnetic fields (1 Hz to 100 kHz). Health Phys. 99 (2010), 818–836.
16. Ito, D., Imai, Y., Ohsawa, K., Nakajima, K., Fukuuchi, Y., Kohsaka, S., Microglia-specific localisation of a novel calcium binding protein, Iba1. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 57 (1998), 1–9.
17. Kainz, W., Nikoloski, N., Oesch, W., Berdiñas-Torres, V., Fröhlich, J., Neubauer, G., Kuster, N., Development of novel whole-body exposure setups for rats providing high efficiency, National Toxicology Program (NTP) compatibility and well-characterized exposure. Phys. Med. Biol. 51 (2006), 5211–5229.
18. Kalia, S.K., Sankar, T., Lozano, A.M., Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease and other movement disorders. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 26 (2013), 374–380.
19. Kilgore, K.L., Bhadra, N., Reversible nerve conduction block using kilohertz frequency alternating current. Neuromodulation 17 (2014), 242–254 discussion 254–255.
20. Kim, D., Frank, C.L., Dobbin, M.M., Tsunemoto, R.K., Tu, W., Peng, P.L., Guan, J.S., Lee, B.H., Moy, L.Y., Giusti, P., et al. Deregulation of HDAC1 by p25/Cdk5 in neurotoxicity. Neuron 60 (2008), 803–817.
21. Kodandaramaiah, S.B., Franzesi, G.T., Chow, B.Y., Boyden, E.S., Forest, C.R., Automated whole-cell patch-clamp electrophysiology of neurons in vivo. Nat. Methods 9 (2012), 585–587.
22. Kringelbach, M.L., Jenkinson, N., Owen, S.L., Aziz, T.Z., Translational principles of deep brain stimulation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8 (2007), 623–635.
23. Kunz, P., Antal, A., Hewitt, M., Neef, A., Opitz, A., Paulus, W., 5 kHz transcranial alternating current stimulation: lack of cortical excitability changes when grouped in a theta burst pattern. Front. Hum. Neurosci., 10, 2017.
24. Legon, W., Sato, T.F., Opitz, A., Mueller, J., Barbour, A., Williams, A., Tyler, W.J., Transcranial focused ultrasound modulates the activity of primary somatosensory cortex in humans. Nat. Neurosci. 17 (2014), 322–329.
25. Mah, L.J., El-Osta, A., Karagiannis, T.C., gammaH2AX: a sensitive molecular marker of DNA damage and repair. Leukemia 24 (2010), 679–686.
26. Merrill, D.R., Bikson, M., Jefferys, J.G.R., Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols. J. Neurosci. Methods 141 (2005), 171–198.
27. Miranda, P.C., Mekonnen, A., Salvador, R., Ruffini, G., The electric field in the cortex during transcranial current stimulation. Neuroimage 70 (2013), 48–58.
28. Peratta, C., Peratta, A., Modelling the human body exposure to elf electric fields. 2010, WIT Press.
29. Plaksin, M., Shoham, S., Kimmel, E., Intramembrane cavitation as a predictive bio-piezoelectric mechanism for ultrasonic brain stimulation. Phys. Rev. X, 4, 2014.
30. Reijmers, L.G., Perkins, B.L., Matsuo, N., Mayford, M., Localization of a stable neural correlate of associative memory. Science 317 (2007), 1230–1233.
31. Stavroulakis, P., (eds.) Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields Mechanisms, Modeling, Biological Effects, Therapeutic Effects, International Standards, Exposure Criteria, 2014, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
32. Tarsa, L., Goda, Y., Synaptophysin regulates activity-dependent synapse formation in cultured hippocampal neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 (2002), 1012–1016.
33. Tennant, K.A., Adkins, D.L., Donlan, N.A., Asay, A.L., Thomas, N., Kleim, J.A., Jones, T.A., The organization of the forelimb representation of the C57BL/6 mouse motor cortex as defined by intracortical microstimulation and cytoarchitecture. Cereb. Cortex 21 (2011), 865–876.
34. Wolf, H.K., Buslei, R., Schmidt-Kastner, R., Schmidt-Kastner, P.K., Pietsch, T., Wiestler, O.D., Blümcke, I., NeuN: a useful neuronal marker for diagnostic histopathology. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 44 (1996), 1167–1171.