Super-resolution microscopy with DNA-PAINT

Nature Protocols

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2017, Pages 1198-1228

  Schnitzbauer, Joerg ^a,b   Strauss, Maximilian T ^a,b   Schlichthaerle, Thomas ^a,b   Schueder, Florian ^a,b   Jungmann, Ralf ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF BIOCHEMISTRY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NANOMATERIAL; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE; DNA; MACROMOLECULE;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPUTER MODEL; DNA POINTS ACCUMULATION FOR IMAGING IN NANOSCALE TOPOGRAPHY; DNA PROBE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; METHODOLOGY; MICROSCOPY; MOLECULAR DOCKING; NANOIMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DESIGN; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SOFTWARE; TOPOGRAPHY; ANALYSIS; CYTOLOGY; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; GENETICS; MACROMOLECULE; METABOLISM; PROCEDURES; STAINING;

CYTOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; DNA; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MACROMOLECULAR SUBSTANCES; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; STAINING AND LABELING;

EID: 85019658425     PISSN: 17542189     EISSN: 17502799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2017.024     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Gustafsson, M.G.L. Nonlinear structured-illumination microscopy: wide-field fluorescence imaging with theoretically unlimited resolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 13081-13086 (2005).
2. Hell, S.W. & Wichmann, J. Breaking the diffraction resolution limit by stimulated emission: stimulated-emission-depletion fluorescence microscopy. Opt. Lett. 19, 780-782 (1994).
3. Betzig, E. et al. Imaging intracellular fluorescent proteins at nanometer resolution. Science 313, 1642-1645 (2006).
4. Hess, S.T., Girirajan, T.P.K. & Mason, M.D. Ultra-high resolution imaging by fluorescence photoactivation localization microscopy. Biophys. J. 91, 4258-4272 (2006).
5. Rust, M.J., Bates, M. & Zhuang, X. Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM). Nat. Methods 3, 793-795 (2006).
6. Heilemann, M. et al. Subdiffraction-resolution fluorescence imaging with conventional fluorescent probes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 47, 6172-6176 (2008).
7. Hell, S.W. Far-field optical nanoscopy. Science 316, 1153-1158 (2007).
8. Sengupta, P. et al. Probing protein heterogeneity in the plasma membrane using PALM and pair correlation analysis. Nat. Methods 8, 969-975 (2011).
9. Xu, K., Zhong, G. & Zhuang, X. Actin, spectrin, and associated proteins form a periodic cytoskeletal structure in axons. Science 339, 452-456 (2012).
10. Honigmann, A. et al. Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate clusters act as molecular beacons for vesicle recruitment. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 679-686 (2013).
11. Li, D. et al. ADVANCED IMAGING. Extended-resolution structured illumination imaging of endocytic and cytoskeletal dynamics. Science 349, aab3500 (2015).
12. Galiani, S. et al. Super-resolution microscopy reveals compartmentalization of peroxisomal membrane proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 16948-16962 (2016).
13. Hell, S.W. et al. The 2015 super-resolution microscopy roadmap. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 48, 443001 (2015).
14. Huang, B., Bates, M. & Zhuang, X. Super-resolution fluorescence microscopy. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 78, 993-1016 (2009).
15. Lippincott-Schwartz, J., Jennifer, L.-S. & Patterson, G.H. Photoactivatable fluorescent proteins for diffraction-limited and super-resolution imaging. Trends Cell Biol. 19, 555-565 (2009).
16. Nieuwenhuizen, R.P.J. et al. Measuring image resolution in optical nanoscopy. Nat. Methods 10, 557-562 (2013).
17. Sharonov, A. & Hochstrasser, R.M. Wide-field subdiffraction imaging by accumulated binding of diffusing probes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 18911-18916 (2006).
18. Giannone, G. et al. Dynamic superresolution imaging of endogenous proteins on living cells at ultra-high density. Biophys. J. 99, 1303-1310 (2010).
19. Jungmann, R. et al. Single-molecule kinetics and super-resolution microscopy by fluorescence imaging of transient binding on DNA origami. Nano Lett. 10, 4756-4761 (2010).
20. Jungmann, R. et al. Multiplexed 3D cellular super-resolution imaging with DNA-PAINT and Exchange-PAINT. Nat. Methods 11, 313-318 (2014).
21. Iinuma, R. et al. Polyhedra self-assembled from DNA tripods and characterized with 3D DNA-PAINT. Science 344, 65-69 (2014).
22. Jungmann, R. et al. Quantitative super-resolution imaging with qPAINT. Nat. Methods 13, 439-442 (2016).
23. Dai, M., Jungmann, R. & Yin, P. Optical imaging of individual biomolecules in densely packed clusters. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 798-807 (2016).
24. Schlichthaerle, T., Strauss, M.T., Schueder, F., Woehrstein, J.B. & Jungmann, R. DNA nanotechnology and fluorescence applications. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 39, 41-47 (2016).
25. Agasti, S. et al. DNA-barcoded labeling probes for highly multiplexed Exchange-PAINT imaging. Chem. Sci. (2017) http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c6sc05420j.
26. Rasnik, I., McKinney, S.A. & Ha, T. Nonblinking and long-lasting single-molecule fluorescence imaging. Nat. Methods 3, 891-893 (2006).
27. Aitken, C.E., Marshall, R.A. & Puglisi, J.D. An oxygen scavenging system for improvement of dye stability in single-molecule fluorescence experiments. Biophys. J. 94, 1826-1835 (2008).
28. Ha, T. & Tinnefeld, P. Photophysics of fluorescent probes for single-molecule biophysics and super-resolution imaging. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 63, 595-617 (2012).
29. Ries, J., Kaplan, C., Platonova, E., Eghlidi, H. & Ewers, H. A simple, versatile method for GFP-based super-resolution microscopy via nanobodies. Nat. Methods 9, 582-584 (2012).
30. Opazo, F. et al. Aptamers as potential tools for super-resolution microscopy. Nat. Methods 9, 938-939 (2012).
31. Tokunaga, M., Imamoto, N. & Sakata-Sogawa, K. Highly inclined thin illumination enables clear single-molecule imaging in cells. Nat. Methods 5, 159-161 (2008).
32. Legant, W.R. et al. High-density three-dimensional localization microscopy across large volumes. Nat. Methods 13, 359-365 (2016).
33. Rothemund, P.W.K. Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns. Nature 440, 297-302 (2006).
34. Seeman, N.C. Nucleic acid junctions and lattices. J. Theor. Biol. 99, 237-247 (1982).
35. Seeman, N.C. An overview of structural DNA nanotechnology. Mol. Biotechnol. 37, 246-257 (2007).
36. Douglas, S.M. et al. Rapid prototyping of 3D DNA-origami shapes with caDNAno. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 5001-5006 (2009).
37. Benson, E. et al. DNA rendering of polyhedral meshes at the nanoscale. Nature 523, 441-444 (2015).
38. Kim, D.-N., Kilchherr, F., Dietz, H. & Bathe, M. Quantitative prediction of 3D solution shape and flexibility of nucleic acid nanostructures. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 2862-2868 (2012).
39. Douglas, S.M. et al. Self-assembly of DNA into nanoscale three-dimensional shapes. Nature 459, 414-418 (2009).
40. Martin, T.G. & Dietz, H. Magnesium-free self-assembly of multi-layer DNA objects. Nat. Commun. 3, 1103 (2012).
41. Sobczak, J.-P.J., Martin, T.G., Gerling, T. & Dietz, H. Rapid folding of DNA into nanoscale shapes at constant temperature. Science 338, 1458-1461 (2012).
42. Bellot, G., Gaëtan, B., McClintock, M.A., Chenxiang, L. & Shih, W.M. Recovery of intact DNA nanostructures after agarose gel-based separation. Nat. Methods 8, 192-194 (2011).
43. Lin, C., Perrault, S.D., Kwak, M., Graf, F. & Shih, W.M. Purification of DNA-origami nanostructures by rate-zonal centrifugation. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e40 (2013).
44. Stahl, E., Martin, T.G., Praetorius, F. & Dietz, H. Facile and scalable preparation of pure and dense DNA origami solutions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 53, 12735-12740 (2014).
45. Steinhauer, C., Jungmann, R., Sobey, T.L., Simmel, F.C. & Tinnefeld, P. DNA origami as a nanoscopic ruler for super-resolution microscopy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 48, 8870-8873 (2009).
46. Schmied, J.J. et al. DNA origami-based standards for quantitative fluorescence microscopy. Nat. Protoc. 9, 1367-1391 (2014).
47. Dean, K.M. & Palmer, A.E. Advances in fluorescence labeling strategies for dynamic cellular imaging. Nat. Chem. Biol. 10, 512-523 (2014).
48. Dempsey, G.T., Vaughan, J.C., Chen, K.H., Bates, M. & Zhuang, X. Evaluation of fluorophores for optimal performance in localization-based super-resolution imaging. Nat. Methods 8, 1027-1036 (2011).
49. Mikhaylova, M. et al. Resolving bundled microtubules using anti-tubulin nanobodies. Nat. Commun. 6, 7933 (2015).
50. Los, G.V. et al. HaloTag: a novel protein labeling technology for cell imaging and protein analysis. ACS Chem. Biol. 3, 373-382 (2008).
51. Keppler, A., Pick, H., Arrivoli, C., Vogel, H. & Johnsson, K. Labeling of fusion proteins with synthetic fluorophores in live cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 9955-9959 (2004).
52. Wang, L., Xie, J. & Schultz, P.G. Expanding the genetic code. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 35, 225-249 (2006).
53. Schweller, R.M. et al. Multiplexed in situ immunofluorescence using dynamic DNA complexes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 51, 9292-9296 (2012).
54. Ullal, A.V. et al. Cancer cell profiling by barcoding allows multiplexed protein analysis in fine-needle aspirates. Sci. Transl. Med. 6, 219ra9 (2014).
55. Gong, H. et al. Simple method to prepare oligonucleotide-conjugated antibodies and its application in multiplex protein detection in single cells. Bioconjug. Chem. 27, 217-225 (2016).
56. Xu, K., Babcock, H.P. & Zhuang, X. Dual-objective STORM reveals three-dimensional filament organization in the actin cytoskeleton. Nat. Methods 9, 185-188 (2012).
57. Whelan, D.R. & Bell, T.D.M. Image artifacts in single molecule localization microscopy: why optimization of sample preparation protocols matters. Sci. Rep. 5, 7924 (2015).
58. Edelstein, A.D. et al. J. Biol. Methods 1, 10 (2014).
59. Beier, H.T. & Ibey, B.L. Experimental comparison of the high-speed imaging performance of an EM-CCD and sCMOS camera in a dynamic live-cell imaging test case. PLoS One 9, e84614 (2014).
60. Huang, F. et al. Video-rate nanoscopy using sCMOS camera-specific single-molecule localization algorithms. Nat. Methods 10, 653-658 (2013).
61. Shroff, H., Galbraith, C.G., Galbraith, J.A. & Betzig, E. Live-cell photoactivated localization microscopy of nanoscale adhesion dynamics. Nat. Methods 5, 417-423 (2008).
62. Venkataramani, V., Herrmannsdörfer, F., Heilemann, M. & Kuner, T. SuReSim: simulating localization microscopy experiments from ground truth models. Nat. Methods 13, 319-321 (2016).
63. Sage, D. et al. Quantitative evaluation of software packages for single-molecule localization microscopy. Nat. Methods 12, 717-724 (2015).
64. Smith, C.S., Joseph, N., Rieger, B. & Lidke, K.A. Fast, single-molecule localization that achieves theoretically minimum uncertainty. Nat. Methods 7, 373-375 (2010).
65. Egner, A. et al. Fluorescence nanoscopy in whole cells by asynchronous localization of photoswitching emitters. Biophys. J. 93, 3285-3290 (2007).
66. Wang, Y. et al. Localization events-based sample drift correction for localization microscopy with redundant cross-correlation algorithm. Opt. Express 22, 15982-15991 (2014).
67. Endesfelder, U., Malkusch, S., Fricke, F. & Heilemann, M. A simple method to estimate the average localization precision of a single-molecule localization microscopy experiment. Histochem. Cell Biol. 141, 629-638 (2014).
68. Lin, C. et al. Submicrometre geometrically encoded fluorescent barcodes self-assembled from DNA. Nat. Chem. 4, 832-839 (2012).
69. Bates, M., Huang, B., Dempsey, G.T. & Zhuang, X. Multicolor super-resolution imaging with photo-switchable fluorescent probes. Science 317, 1749-1753 (2007).
70. Huang, B., Jones, S.A., Brandenburg, B. & Zhuang, X. Whole-cell 3D STORM reveals interactions between cellular structures with nanometer-scale resolution. Nat. Methods 5, 1047-1052 (2008).
71. Shin, J.Y. et al. Visualization and functional dissection of coaxial paired SpoIIIE channels across the sporulation septum. Elife 4 (2015).
72. Puchner, E.M., Walter, J.M., Kasper, R., Huang, B. & Lim, W.A. Counting molecules in single organelles with superresolution microscopy allows tracking of the endosome maturation trajectory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 16015-16020 (2013).
73. Lee, S.-H., Shin, J.Y., Lee, A. & Bustamante, C. Counting single photoactivatable fluorescent molecules by photoactivated localization microscopy (PALM). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 17436-17441 (2012).
74. Rollins, G.C., Shin, J.Y., Bustamante, C. & Pressé, S. Stochastic approach to the molecular counting problem in superresolution microscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, E110-8 (2015).
75. Nieuwenhuizen, R.P.J. et al. Quantitative localization microscopy: effects of photophysics and labeling stoichiometry. PLoS One 10, e0127989 (2015).
76. Sengupta, P., Jovanovic-Talisman, T. & Lippincott-Schwartz, J. Quantifying spatial organization in point-localization superresolution images using pair correlation analysis. Nat. Protoc. 8, 345-354 (2013).
77. Juette, M.F. et al. Three-dimensional sub-100 nm resolution fluorescence microscopy of thick samples. Nat. Methods 5, 527-529 (2008).
78. Broeken, J. et al. Resolution improvement by 3D particle averaging in localization microscopy. Methods Appl. Fluoresc. 3, 014003 (2015).
79. Cheng, Y., Yifan, C., Nikolaus, G., Penczek, P.A. & Thomas, W. A primer to single-particle cryo-electron microscopy. Cell 161, 438-449 (2015).
80. Szymborska, A. et al. Nuclear pore scaffold structure analyzed by super-resolution microscopy and particle averaging. Science 341, 655-658 (2013).
81. Loschberger, A. et al. Super-resolution imaging visualizes the eightfold symmetry of gp210 proteins around the nuclear pore complex and resolves the central channel with nanometer resolution. J. Cell Sci. 125, 570-575 (2012).
82. Penczek, P., Radermacher, M. & Frank, J. Three-dimensional reconstruction of single particles embedded in ice. Ultramicroscopy 40, 33-53 (1992).
83. Perrault, S.D. & Chan, W.C.W. Synthesis and surface modification of highly monodispersed, spherical gold nanoparticles of 50-200 nm. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 17042-17043 (2009).