Reformulating Minas Frescal cheese using consumers' perceptions: Insights from intensity scales and check-all-that-apply questionnaires

Journal of Dairy Science

Volumn 100, Issue 8, 2017, Pages 6111-6124

  Oliveira, E W ^a,c   Esmerino, E A ^a,c   Carr, B Thomas ^d   Pinto, L P F ^a   Silva, H L A ^a   Pimentel, T C ^e   Bolini, H M A ^b   Cruz, A G ^f   Freitas, M Q ^a  

^a FLUMINENSE FEDERAL UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

^b Faculdade de Engenharia de Alimentos ^*

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^d Carr Consulting   (United States)

^e INSTITUTO FEDERAL DO PARANÁ   (Brazil)

^f INSTITUTO FEDERAL DE EDUCAÇÃO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

check all that apply (CATA) questions; intensity scales; Minas Frescal cheese; product reformulation

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; CHEESE; FOOD PREFERENCE; PERCEPTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; TASTE;

ANIMALS; CHEESE; FOOD PREFERENCES; PERCEPTION; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TASTE;

EID: 85019624162     PISSN: 00220302     EISSN: 15253198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2016-12335     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Adams, J., Williams, A., Lancaster, B., Foley, M., Advantages and uses of check-all-that-apply response compared to traditional scaling of attributes for salty snacks. 7th Pangborn Sensory Science Symposium, Minneapolis, MN, 2007, Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
2. Afonso, F.M., Gurgel, M.V., Mendes, C.T.D., Gregório, S.R., Lanzilotti, M.S., Avaliação das características sensoriais em queijos Minas Frescal pasteurizado tipo tradicional e light. Hig. Aliment. 16 (2002), 42–47 [In Portuguese].
3. Albert, A., Varela, P., Salvador, A., Hough, G., Fiszman, S., Overcoming the issues in the sensory description of hot served food with a complex texture. Application of QDA, flash profiling and projective mapping using panels with different degrees of training. Food Qual. Prefer. 22 (2011), 463–473.
4. Antunes, L., Vidal, L., Saldamando, L., Giménez, A., Ares, G., Comparison of consumer-based methodologies for sensory characterization: Case study with four sample sets of powdered drinks. Food Qual. Prefer. 56 (2017), 149–163.
5. Ares, G., Andrade, J.C., Antúnez, L., Alcaire, F., Swaney-Stueve, M., Gordon, S., Jaeger, S.R., Hedonic product optimisation: CATA questions as alternatives to JAR scales. Food Qual. Prefer. 55 (2017), 67–78.
6. Ares, G., Bruzzone, F., Giménez, A., Is a consumer panel able to reliably evaluate the texture of dairy desserts using unstructured intensity scales? Evaluation of global and individual performance. J. Sens. Stud. 26 (2011), 363–370.
7. Ares, G., Dauber, C., Fernández, E., Giménez, A., Varela, P., Penalty analysis based on CATA questions to identify drivers of liking and directions for product reformulation. Food Qual. Prefer. 32 (2014), 65–76.
8. Ares, G., de Saldamando, L., Vidal, L., Antúnez, L., Giménez, A., Varela, P., Polarized projective mapping: Comparison with polarized sensory positioning approaches. Food Qual. Prefer. 28 (2013), 510–518.
9. Ares, G., Deliza, R., Barreiro, C., Giménez, A., Gámbarro, A., Comparison of two sensory profiling techniques based on consumer perception. Food Qual. Prefer. 21 (2010), 417–426.
10. Ares, G., Varela, P., Rado, G., Gimenez, A., Identifying ideal products using three different consumer profiling methodologies. Comparison with external preference mapping. Food Qual. Prefer. 22 (2011), 581–591.
11. Bruzzone, F., Ares, G., Giménez, A., Consumers' texture perception of milk desserts. II—Comparison with trained assessors' data. J. Texture Stud. 43 (2012), 214–226.
12. Bruzzone, F., Vidal, L., Antúnez, L., Giménez, A., Deliza, R., Ares, G., Comparison of intensity scales and CATA questions in new product development: Sensory characterization and directions for product reformulation of milk desserts. Food Qual. Prefer. 44 (2015), 183–193.
13. Cowden, J., Moore, K., Vanleur, K., Application of check-all-that-apply response to identify and optimize attributes important to consumer's Ideal product. Eighth Rose-Marie Pangborn Sensory Science Symposium, Florence, Italy, 2009, Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
14. Cruz, A.G., Cadena, R.S., Castro, W.F., Esmerino, E.A., Rodrigues, J.B., Gaze, L., Faria, J.A.F., Freitas, M.Q., Deliza, R., Bolini, H.M.A., Consumer perception of probiotic yogurt: Performance of check all that apply (CATA), projective mapping, sorting and intensity scale. Food Res. Int. 54 (2013), 601–610.
15. Dantas, A.B., Jesus, V.F., Silva, R., Almada, C.N., Esmerino, E.A., Cappato, L.P., Silva, M.C., Raices, R.S.L., Cavalcanti, R.N., Carvalho, C.C., A.S. Sant'Ana, Bolini, H.M.A., Freitas, M.Q., Cruz, A.G., Manufacture of probiotic Minas Frescal cheese with Lactobacillus casei Zhang. J. Dairy Sci. 99 (2016), 18–30 26519974.
16. Dooley, L., Lee, Y.-S., Meullenet, J.-F., The application of check-all-that-apply (CATA) consumer profiling to preference mapping of vanilla ice cream and its comparison to classical external preference mapping. Food Qual. Prefer. 21 (2010), 394–401.
17. Esmerino, E.A., Paixão, J.A., Cruz, A.G., Garitta, L., Hough, G., Bolini, H.M.A., Survival analysis: A consumer-friendly method to estimate the optimum sucrose level in probiotic petit Suisse. J. Dairy Sci. 98 (2015), 7544–7551 26387013.
18. Husson, F., Le Dien, S., Pagès, J., Which value can be granted to sensory profiles given by consumers? Methodology and results. Food Qual. Prefer. 12 (2001), 291–296.
19. Jaeger, S., Giacalone, D., Roigard, C.M., Pineau, B., Vidal, L., Giménez, A., Frost, M.B., Ares, G., Investigation of bias of hedonic scores when co-eliciting product attribute information using CATA questions. Food Qual. Prefer. 30 (2013), 242–249.
20. Jaeger, S.R., Ares, G., Lack of evidence that concurrent sensory product characterization using CATA questions bias hedonic scores. Food Qual. Prefer. 35 (2014), 1–5.
21. Jaeger, S.R., Beresford, M.K., Paisley, A.G., Antúnez, L., Vidal, L., Cadena, R.S., Gimenez, A., Ares, G., Check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions for sensory product characterization by consumers: Investigations into the number of terms used in CATA questions. Food Qual. Prefer. 42 (2015), 154–164.
22. Kwak, H.S., Lee, S.-Y., Presentation methods for unidirectional scales to measure consumers' liking and disliking percepts. Food Qual. Prefer. 51 (2016), 20–26.
23. MacFie, H.J., Bratchell, N., Greenhoff, K., Vallis, L.V., Designs to balance the effect of order of presentation and first-order carry-over effects in hall tests. J. Sens. Stud. 4 (1989), 129–148.
24. Marchi, R., Montes-Villanueva, N.D., McDaniel, M.R., Bolini, H.M.A., Sensory profile and stability of a new ready-to-drink passion fruit juice beverage with different sweetener systems. CENTRUM Catolicas Working Paper Series, n.2012–09–0016. http://vcentrum.pucp.edu.pe/investigacion/wps/CECYM_WP2012-09-0016.html, 2012.
25. Meyners, M., Castura, J.C., Carr, B.T., Existing and new approaches for the analysis of CATA data. Food Qual. Prefer. 30 (2013), 309–319.
26. Moskowitz, H.R., Product Testing and Sensory Evaluation of Foods, 1983, Food and Nutrition Press, Westport, CT.
27. Moskowitz, H.R., Experts versus consumers: A comparison. J. Sens. Stud. 11 (1996), 19–37.
28. Moskowitz, H.R., Sensory directionals for pizza: A deeper analysis. J. Sens. Stud. 16 (2001), 583–600.
29. Moskowitz, H.R., Hartmann, J., Consumer research: Creating a solid base for innovative strategies. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 19 (2008), 581–589.
30. Plaehn, D., CATA penalty/reward. Food Qual. Prefer. 24 (2012), 141–152.
31. Popper, R., Rosentock, W., Schraidt, M., Kroll, B.J., The effect of attribute questions on overall liking ratings. Food Qual. Prefer. 15 (2004), 853–858.
32. Robert, P., Escoufier, Y., A unifying tool for linear multivariate statistical methods: The RV coefficient. Appl. Stat. 25 (1976), 257–265.
33. Santos, B.A., Campagnol, P.C.B., Cruz, A.G., Galvão, M.T.E.L., Monteiro, R.A., Wagner, R., Pollonio, M.A.R., Check all that apply and free listing to describe the sensory characteristics of low sodium dry fermented sausages: Comparison with trained panel. Food Res. Int. 76 (2015), 725–734.
34. Tarrega, A., Marcano, J., Fiszman, S., Yogurt viscosity and fruit pieces affect satiating capacity expectations. Food Res. Int. 89 (2016), 574–581.
35. Van Kleef, F., Van Trup, H.C.M., Luning, P., Internal versus external preference analysis: An exploratory study on end-user evaluation. Food Qual. Prefer. 17 (2006), 387–399.
36. Worch, T., Dooley, L., Meullenet, J.F., Punter, P., Comparison of PLS dummy variables and fishbone method to determine optimal product characteristics from ideal profiles. Food Qual. Prefer. 21 (2010), 1077–1087.
37. Worch, T., Lê, S., Punter, P., Pages, J., Extension of the consistency of the data obtained with the Ideal Profile Method: Would the ideal products be more liked than the tested products?. Food Qual. Prefer. 26 (2012), 74–80.
38. Worch, T., Lê, S., Punter, P., Pagès, J., Ideal Profile Method (IPM): The ins and outs. Food Qual. Prefer. 28 (2013), 45–59.
39. Worch, T., Punter, P., 14—Ideal profiling as a sensory profiling technique. Rapid Sensory Profiling Techniques and Related Methods, 2015, Woodhead Publishing Series, Cambridge, UK, 307–332.
40. Xiong, R., Meullenet, J.F., A PLS dummy variable approach to assess the impact of JAR attributes on liking. Food Qual. Prefer. 17 (2006), 188–198.