Contact-analog information representation in an automotive head-up display

Eye Tracking Research and Applications Symposium (ETRA)

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 119-122

  Poitschke, T ^a   Ablassmeier, M ^a   Rigoll, G ^a   Bardins, S ^b   Kohlbecher, S ^b   Schneider, E ^b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Automotive; Calibration; Contact analog; Eye tracking; Head Up Display; HUD

Indexed keywords

CONTACT-ANALOG; EYE TRACKING SYSTEMS; EYE-TRACKING; HEAD UP DISPLAYS; INFORMATION REPRESENTATION; TEST RESULTS; USABILITY STUDIES; VIRTUAL IMAGES;

CALIBRATION; OPTICAL SYSTEMS;

IMAGE SENSORS;

EID: 77950323579     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1344471.1344502     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. GISH, K., AND STAPLIN, L. 1995. Human factors aspects of using head up displays in automobiles: A review of the literature. Tech. Rep. Report No. DOT HS 808 320, Washington: U.S. Department of Transportation.
2. HARTLEY, R., AND ZISSERMAN, A. 2004. Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision, second ed. Cambridge University Press.
3. KIEFER, R. 1998. Defining the "HUD Benefit Time Window". Amsterdam: Elsevier, ch. Vision in Vehicles - VI, 133-142.
4. KIEFER, R. 2000. Older Drivers' Pedestrian Detection Times Surrounding Head-Up Versus Head-Down Speedometer Glances. Amsterdam: Elsevier, ch. Vision in Vehicles - VII, 111-118.
5. TUCERYAN, M., GENC, Y., AND NAVAB, N. 2002. Single point active alignment method (spaam) for optical see-through hmd calibration for augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 11 (June), 259-276.
6. ZHANG, Z. 2000. A flexible new technique for camera calibration. In IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 22(11):13301334.